Re: character string assumed length
- From: nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Richard Maine)
- Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 16:08:13 -0800
string <strung@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
What (will) happen is the onslaught of the evangelists crawling all over
you for politically incorrect syntax and sprinkles of endless/useless
babble.
Hmm. I've only seen one evangelical post so far in this thread. :-(
I happen to use the same syntax as Lynn does, modulo a difference too
small to be worth commenting on, so I won't. Mike and Steve already gave
the answer, as well as the reasoning behind it, so I won't repeat that.
--
Richard Maine | Good judgement comes from experience;
email: last name at domain . net | experience comes from bad judgement.
domain: summertriangle | -- Mark Twain
.
- References:
- character string assumed length
- From: Lynn McGuire
- Re: character string assumed length
- From: string
- character string assumed length
- Prev by Date: array-valued function as dummy argument
- Next by Date: Re: array-valued function as dummy argument
- Previous by thread: Re: character string assumed length
- Next by thread: suggestion for new intrinsic function: CONFORM
- Index(es):