Re: optional argument versus subroutine overloading
- From: "Michael Metcalf" <michaelmetcalf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 16:41:34 GMT
"Steve Lionel" <steve.lionel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1172679546.993183.171590@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
reubendb wrote:Steve,
Is function/subroutine overloading actually resolved
during compilation, or during run time, as in the case of presence
test ?
Overloading is typically resolved at compile time. I'd be astonished
if any implementation did it differently.
Surely the optional argument case too?
Regards,
Mike Metcalf
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: optional argument versus subroutine overloading
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: optional argument versus subroutine overloading
- References:
- optional argument versus subroutine overloading
- From: reubendb
- Re: optional argument versus subroutine overloading
- From: Steve Lionel
- optional argument versus subroutine overloading
- Prev by Date: Re: character string assumed length
- Next by Date: Re: Array Constructors
- Previous by thread: Re: optional argument versus subroutine overloading
- Next by thread: Re: optional argument versus subroutine overloading
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|