Re: Array Constructors
- From: Jan Vorbrüggen <jvorbrueggen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 18:52:03 +0100
As for the I/O ones. Hmm. I was thinking I recalled some reason, but it
escapes me at the moment.
That would have been my point: Why are the I/O implied-dos "normal" loops instead like the others?
Do note that both I/O and DATA statement implied do loops go "way back".
So the difference isn't something new. People wouldn't yet have had a
chance to get annoyed enough at me to want to give me the chance to make
a fool of myself. Well, my parents were probably pretty frustrated, but
that's another matter. :-)
Hmmm...has that difference been pointed out, with all its consequences, in
the Fortran standard prior to F90?
Jan
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Array Constructors
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: Array Constructors
- From: Steve Lionel
- Re: Array Constructors
- References:
- Array Constructors
- From: cjk32
- Re: Array Constructors
- From: Michael Metcalf
- Re: Array Constructors
- From: cjk32
- Re: Array Constructors
- From: *** Hendrickson
- Re: Array Constructors
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: Array Constructors
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: Array Constructors
- From: Jan Vorbrüggen
- Re: Array Constructors
- From: Richard Maine
- Array Constructors
- Prev by Date: End of record marker - 32 vs. 64 bit
- Next by Date: Re: Intel Support
- Previous by thread: Re: Array Constructors
- Next by thread: Re: Array Constructors
- Index(es):