Re: Array Constructors
- From: nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Richard Maine)
- Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 13:21:25 -0800
Jan Vorbrüggen <jvorbrueggen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Do note that both I/O and DATA statement implied do loops go "way back".
So the difference isn't something new.
Hmmm...has that difference been pointed out, with all its consequences, in
the Fortran standard prior to F90?
What do you mean by "pointed out, with all its consequences". The
standard is not and has never been a tutorial document. The facts on
this are there, pretty explicitly and clearly (as much as standard-speak
ever is), in at least f77, and probably f66, though I don't care to
research that. It is not the job of the standard to lecture on
consequences.
--
Richard Maine | Good judgement comes from experience;
email: last name at domain . net | experience comes from bad judgement.
domain: summertriangle | -- Mark Twain
.
- References:
- Array Constructors
- From: cjk32
- Re: Array Constructors
- From: Michael Metcalf
- Re: Array Constructors
- From: cjk32
- Re: Array Constructors
- From: *** Hendrickson
- Re: Array Constructors
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: Array Constructors
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: Array Constructors
- From: Jan Vorbrüggen
- Re: Array Constructors
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: Array Constructors
- From: Jan Vorbrüggen
- Array Constructors
- Prev by Date: Re: optional argument versus subroutine overloading
- Next by Date: Re: Array Constructors
- Previous by thread: Re: Array Constructors
- Next by thread: Re: Array Constructors
- Index(es):