IBM XL Fortran

From: Gib Bogle <g.bogle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2007 10:39:27 +1300

Since I didn't get a reply to my post about a bug in IBM XL Fortran, I'd like to ask some more general questions. Is anyone here using XL Fortran? If so, do you have any problems with it? What is the general opinion about this compiler? Is it well supported?

Thanks
Gib
.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: IBM XL Fortran
  - From: Richard Maine

Prev by Date: Re: End of record marker - 32 vs. 64 bit
Next by Date: Re: End of record marker - 32 vs. 64 bit
Previous by thread: End of record marker - 32 vs. 64 bit
Next by thread: Re: IBM XL Fortran
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: IBM XL Fortran
... like to ask some more general questions. ... Fortran? ... I used XLF for several years on an R6000 workstation running AIX. ... I have always considered XLF to be the "gold-standard" against ...
(comp.lang.fortran)
Re: character*80 versus character*1 (80)
... I was using Fortran II on an IBM 1620 in 1963 and it didn't allow ... SUBROUTINE or FUNCTION statements. ... However there were Fortran dialects available then that did. ... McCracken "Guide to FORTRAN Programming" lists IBM 7070, ...
(comp.lang.fortran)
IVF 10 Bug: Wrong branch returned by SQRT for COMPLEX*16 argument
... I've been corresponding with a support person for Intel Visual Fortran ... for about 3 weeks regarding a bug in IVF 10 that did not occur for me ... obtained without using it indicates a serious compiler bug that should ...
(comp.lang.fortran)
Re: IBM XL Fortran
... Is anyone here using XL Fortran? ... 3rd-hand data, is that it was/is a solid, well-maintained compiler. ... We do, however, have a cadre of IBM folks and contractors that are involved in that sort of thing. ... loop: 4 0 ...
(comp.lang.fortran)
Re: IBM XL Fortran
... Is anyone here using XL Fortran? ... It has been a long time since I had an oportunity to work with IBM XL ... 3rd-hand data, is that it was/is a solid, well-maintained compiler. ... loop: 4 0 ...
(comp.lang.fortran)