comp.lang.fortran

• Date Index

---

• Importing from Microsoft Access in Fortran, iman
  • Re: Importing from Microsoft Access in Fortran, klaus . knebel
  • Re: Importing from Microsoft Access in Fortran, Gary Scott
• reading back a partially-written record on direct access, Thomas König
  • Re: reading back a partially-written record on direct access, glen herrmannsfeldt
    • Re: reading back a partially-written record on direct access, Richard Maine
      • Re: reading back a partially-written record on direct access, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: reading back a partially-written record on direct access, Richard Maine
• variable content lost, listad
  • Re: variable content lost, Beliavsky
    • Re: variable content lost, Listad
      • Re: variable content lost, Beliavsky
      • Re: variable content lost, Richard Maine
      • Re: variable content lost, Beliavsky
      • Re: variable content lost, Richard Maine
  • Re: variable content lost, Steven G. Kargl
    • Re: variable content lost, Listad
      • Re: variable content lost, Louis Krupp
• array operations on non-conforming arrays -- do compilers catch them?, Beliavsky
  • Re: array operations on non-conforming arrays -- do compilers catch them?, Bart Vandewoestyne
  • Re: array operations on non-conforming arrays -- do compilers catch them?, Lane Straatman
    • Re: array operations on non-conforming arrays -- do compilers catch them?, Beliavsky
• Re: Sample polling program code?, dpb
  • Re: Sample polling program code?, glen herrmannsfeldt
    • Message not available
      • Re: Sample polling program code?, glen herrmannsfeldt
  • Message not available
    • Re: Sample polling program code?, dpb
• undefined variable problem, Bart Vandewoestyne
  • Re: undefined variable problem, Arjen Markus
    • Re: undefined variable problem, Bart Vandewoestyne
  • Re: undefined variable problem, Catherine Rees Lay
  • Re: undefined variable problem, Reinhold Bader
  • Re: undefined variable problem, Bart Vandewoestyne
    • Re: undefined variable problem, John Appleyard
      • Re: undefined variable problem, Bart Vandewoestyne
      • Re: undefined variable problem, Gordon Sande
      • Re: undefined variable problem, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: undefined variable problem, Bart Vandewoestyne
• LQ Decomposition and Null Space, michael
  • Re: LQ Decomposition and Null Space, Pierre Asselin
• Converting a string to reals, psycho_dad
  • RE: Converting a string to reals, meek
    • Re: Converting a string to reals, psycho_dad
      • Re: Converting a string to reals, psycho_dad
      • Re: Converting a string to reals, Craig Powers
  • Re: Converting a string to reals, e p chandler
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Re: Converting a string to reals, psycho_dad
• writing fortran variable to file in gdb, jadoo.dost@xxxxxxxxx
• copy and move files, Fluid
  • Re: copy and move files, Arjen Markus
    • Re: copy and move files, Beliavsky
      • Re: copy and move files, Arjen Markus
  • Re: copy and move files, Gib Bogle
    • Re: copy and move files, Fluid
      • Re: copy and move files, dpb
      • Re: copy and move files, Fluid
      • Re: copy and move files, dpb
  • Re: copy and move files, Walter Spector
  • Re: copy and move files, Charles Russell
    • Re: copy and move files, Charles Russell
• funny variable names in gdb, jadoo.dost@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: funny variable names in gdb, robert . corbett
• BOZ literal constants, a puzzle for us Standard-loving types., Toon Moene
  • Re: BOZ literal constants, a puzzle for us Standard-loving types., Steven G. Kargl
    • Re: BOZ literal constants, a puzzle for us Standard-loving types., Toon Moene
    • Re: BOZ literal constants, a puzzle for us Standard-loving types., glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: BOZ literal constants, a puzzle for us Standard-loving types., Steven G. Kargl
      • Re: BOZ literal constants, a puzzle for us Standard-loving types., glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: BOZ literal constants, a puzzle for us Standard-loving types., Steven G. Kargl
      • Re: BOZ literal constants, a puzzle for us Standard-loving types., glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: BOZ literal constants, a puzzle for us Standard-loving types., Brooks Moses
      • Re: BOZ literal constants, a puzzle for us Standard-loving types., glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: BOZ literal constants, a puzzle for us Standard-loving types., Steven G. Kargl
      • Re: BOZ literal constants, a puzzle for us Standard-loving types., glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: BOZ literal constants, a puzzle for us Standard-loving types., Brooks Moses
      • Re: BOZ literal constants, a puzzle for us Standard-loving types., glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: BOZ literal constants, a puzzle for us Standard-loving types., Gary Scott
      • Re: BOZ literal constants, a puzzle for us Standard-loving types., glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: BOZ literal constants, a puzzle for us Standard-loving types., Brooks Moses
  • Re: BOZ literal constants, a puzzle for us Standard-loving types., glen herrmannsfeldt
  • Re: BOZ literal constants, a puzzle for us Standard-loving types., Brooks Moses
    • Re: BOZ literal constants, a puzzle for us Standard-loving types., glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: BOZ literal constants, a puzzle for us Standard-loving types., Brooks Moses
• unable to view symbols in gdb, jadoo.dost@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: unable to view symbols in gdb, jadoo.dost@xxxxxxxxx
• How to read .csv file in fortran77?, Nye
  • Re: How to read .csv file in fortran77?, Herman D . Knoble
    • Re: How to read .csv file in fortran77?, Beliavsky
      • Re: How to read .csv file in fortran77?, Herman D . Knoble
    • Re: How to read .csv file in fortran77?, Nye
• ifort 9.1 on 64-bit openSuSE 10.2 (?), Matthew Halfant
• Re: Is C faster than fortran?, Lane Straatman
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Is C faster than fortran?, FX
• calculation accuracy, Ben
  • Re: calculation accuracy, glen herrmannsfeldt
    • Re: calculation accuracy, Richard Maine
      • Re: calculation accuracy, Thomas Koenig
      • Re: calculation accuracy, Beliavsky
      • RE: calculation accuracy, meek
      • Re: calculation accuracy, Lane Straatman
      • Re: calculation accuracy, Ben Hetland
      • Re: calculation accuracy, Beliavsky
      • Re: calculation accuracy, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: calculation accuracy, Terence
      • Re: calculation accuracy, FX
      • Re: calculation accuracy, subspace
      • Re: calculation accuracy, Lane Straatman
      • Re: calculation accuracy, Richard Maine
      • Re: calculation accuracy, Lane Straatman
      • Re: calculation accuracy, Richard Maine
      • Re: calculation accuracy, Tim Prince
      • Re: calculation accuracy, glen herrmannsfeldt
  • Re: calculation accuracy, Lane Straatman
    • Re: calculation accuracy, Ben Hetland
  • Re: calculation accuracy, John Harper
    • Re: calculation accuracy, e p chandler
      • Re: calculation accuracy, Richard Maine
      • Re: calculation accuracy, Lane Straatman
      • Re: calculation accuracy, John Harper
      • Re: calculation accuracy, e p chandler
      • Re: calculation accuracy, robert . corbett
      • Re: calculation accuracy, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: calculation accuracy, robert . corbett
      • Re: calculation accuracy, robert . corbett
  • Re: calculation accuracy, Rodrigo López Negrete
    • Re: calculation accuracy, Rodrigo López Negrete
  • Re: calculation accuracy, John Campbell
• Fortran, jfrench690
• How to inspect an array value in gdb?, www
  • Re: How to inspect an array value in gdb?, FX
    • Re: How to inspect an array value in gdb?, www
      • Re: How to inspect an array value in gdb?, FX
• howto find where a variable is initialized, mintoo
  • Re: howto find where a variable is initialized, mecej4
  • Re: howto find where a variable is initialized, mintoo
    • Re: howto find where a variable is initialized, Richard Maine
  • Re: howto find where a variable is initialized, Herman D . Knoble
  • Re: howto find where a variable is initialized, FX
    • Re: howto find where a variable is initialized, Richard Maine
      • Re: howto find where a variable is initialized, Beliavsky
    • Re: howto find where a variable is initialized, glen herrmannsfeldt
  • Re: howto find where a variable is initialized, Craig Powers
  • Re: howto find where a variable is initialized, David Flower
• FYI: Canaimasoft Web Site Back Up, gary . l . scott
  • Re: FYI: Canaimasoft Web Site Back Up, William Asher
• Read a .BMP into Fortran?, David . Paterson
  • Re: Read a .BMP into Fortran?, gary . l . scott
    • Re: Read a .BMP into Fortran?, e p chandler
    • Re: Read a .BMP into Fortran?, David . Paterson
      • Re: Read a .BMP into Fortran?, Gary Scott
  • Re: Read a .BMP into Fortran?, Edward N Bromhead
• how to call a file.out in a fortran file?, Élodie
  • Re: how to call a file.out in a fortran file?, jadoo.dost@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: how to call a file.out in a fortran file?, Élodie
  • Re: how to call a file.out in a fortran file?, e p chandler
  • Re: how to call a file.out in a fortran file?, Élodie
• How do I make a library file with XLF?, Shawn
  • Re: How do I make a library file with XLF?, Paul van Delst
    • Re: How do I make a library file with XLF?, Shawn
• Fortran90/95 Call tree, jadoo.dost@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Fortran90/95 Call tree, glen herrmannsfeldt
    • Re: Fortran90/95 Call tree, jadoo.dost@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Fortran90/95 Call tree, glen herrmannsfeldt
  • Re: Fortran90/95 Call tree, Bil Kleb
• Starting to doubt fortran, Nomad.C@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Starting to doubt fortran, Beliavsky
    • Re: Starting to doubt fortran, Nomad.C@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Starting to doubt fortran, highegg
      • Re: Starting to doubt fortran, Gary Scott
  • Re: Starting to doubt fortran, Gary Scott
    • Re: Starting to doubt fortran, Tim Prince
  • Re: Starting to doubt fortran, e p chandler
    • Re: Starting to doubt fortran, Lane Straatman
      • Re: Starting to doubt fortran, e p chandler
  • OT usage nitpick (was Re: Starting to doubt fortran), blmblm
    • Re: OT usage nitpick (was Re: Starting to doubt fortran), Louis Krupp
      • Re: OT usage nitpick (was Re: Starting to doubt fortran), blmblm
      • Re: OT usage nitpick (was Re: Starting to doubt fortran), Terence
      • Re: OT usage nitpick (was Re: Starting to doubt fortran), Louis Krupp
      • Re: OT usage nitpick (was Re: Starting to doubt fortran), blmblm
      • Re: OT usage nitpick (was Re: Starting to doubt fortran), Nomad.C@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: OT usage nitpick (was Re: Starting to doubt fortran), Gary Scott
      • Re: OT usage nitpick (was Re: Starting to doubt fortran), blmblm
      • Re: OT usage nitpick (was Re: Starting to doubt fortran), e p chandler
    • Re: OT usage nitpick (was Re: Starting to doubt fortran), John Harper
      • Re: OT usage nitpick (was Re: Starting to doubt fortran), blmblm
  • Message not available
    • Re: Starting to doubt fortran, Beliavsky
      • Re: Starting to doubt fortran, Charles Russell
      • Re: Starting to doubt fortran, Ron Shepard
      • Re: Starting to doubt fortran, Beliavsky
      • Re: Starting to doubt fortran, Tim Prince
      • Re: Starting to doubt fortran, blmblm
  • Message not available
    • Re: Starting to doubt fortran, Ben Hetland
      • Re: Starting to doubt fortran, highegg
      • Re: Starting to doubt fortran, Ben Hetland
      • Re: Starting to doubt fortran, Gordon Sande
      • Re: Starting to doubt fortran, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: Starting to doubt fortran, Gordon Sande
      • Re: Starting to doubt fortran, Ben Hetland
      • Re: Starting to doubt fortran, Charles Russell
      • Re: Starting to doubt fortran, Charles Russell
      • Re: Starting to doubt fortran, Richard Maine
      • Re: Starting to doubt fortran, Gordon Sande
      • Re: Starting to doubt fortran, Ben Hetland
      • Re: Starting to doubt fortran, Charles Russell
      • Re: Starting to doubt fortran, Beliavsky
      • Re: Starting to doubt fortran, Gordon Sande
      • Re: Starting to doubt fortran, Ben Hetland
      • Re: Starting to doubt fortran, Pierre Asselin
      • Re: Starting to doubt fortran, Dan Nagle
      • Re: Starting to doubt fortran, Pierre Asselin
      • Re: Starting to doubt fortran, Dan Nagle
      • Re: Starting to doubt fortran, Gary Scott
      • Re: Starting to doubt fortran, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: Starting to doubt fortran, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: Starting to doubt fortran, Gordon Sande
      • Re: Starting to doubt fortran, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: Starting to doubt fortran, Gordon Sande
      • Re: Starting to doubt fortran, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: Starting to doubt fortran, Charles Russell
      • Re: Starting to doubt fortran, Richard Maine
      • Re: Starting to doubt fortran, Jan Vorbrüggen
      • Re: Starting to doubt fortran, Ben Hetland
      • Re: Starting to doubt fortran, Richard Maine
      • Re: Starting to doubt fortran, robert . corbett
      • Re: Starting to doubt fortran, Richard Maine
      • Re: Starting to doubt fortran, Lane Straatman
      • Re: Starting to doubt fortran, Pierre Asselin
      • Re: Starting to doubt fortran, Richard Maine
      • Re: Starting to doubt fortran, blmblm
      • Re: Starting to doubt fortran, Craig Powers
• Intel Fortran 9.1, michael
  • Re: Intel Fortran 9.1, gsal
    • Re: Intel Fortran 9.1, Tim Prince
  • Re: Intel Fortran 9.1, Steve Lionel
  • Re: Intel Fortran 9.1, Tom Micevski
• Different results with same executable using openmp clause, anshu . bhola
  • Re: Different results with same executable using openmp clause, FX
• declaring variables in the code, Lynn
  • Re: declaring variables in the code, Brooks Moses
    • Re: declaring variables in the code, Gary Scott
  • Re: declaring variables in the code, Colin Watters
    • Re: declaring variables in the code, Lynn
  • Re: declaring variables in the code, Beliavsky
    • Re: declaring variables in the code, Lynn
  • Re: declaring variables in the code, Gordon Sande
    • Re: declaring variables in the code, Louis Krupp
      • Re: declaring variables in the code, Gary Scott
      • Re: declaring variables in the code, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: declaring variables in the code, Beliavsky
      • Re: declaring variables in the code, John Harper
      • Re: declaring variables in the code, Richard Maine
      • Re: declaring variables in the code, Louis Krupp
      • Re: declaring variables in the code, Dick Hendrickson
• how to get the gradient of a function?, zhngbn
  • Re: how to get the gradient of a function?, e p chandler
  • Re: how to get the gradient of a function?, Arjen Markus
    • Re: how to get the gradient of a function?, Terence
• .mul ? what does it mean ?, coolchick
  • Re: .mul ? what does it mean ?, mecej4
    • Re: .mul ? what does it mean ?, glen herrmannsfeldt
    • Re: .mul ? what does it mean ?, Leif Harcke
• Fortran with a GUI??, Nomad.C@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Fortran with a GUI??, Gary Scott
  • Re: Fortran with a GUI??, Arjen Markus
  • Re: Fortran with a GUI??, Hani Ibrahim
  • Re: Fortran with a GUI??, widmar
    • Re: Fortran with a GUI??, Gary Scott
    • Re: Fortran with a GUI??, Ben Hetland
  • Re: Fortran with a GUI??, Bil Kleb
  • Re: Fortran with a GUI??, baf
• Newbie Question!, Nomad.C@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Newbie Question!, Tim Prince
  • Re: Newbie Question!, mecej4
    • Re: Newbie Question!, Beliavsky
      • Re: Newbie Question!, Lane Straatman
  • Re: Newbie Question!, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi
• ffnet 0.6 - neural networks and fortran, Marek Wojciechowski
• Why float is called as 'float', not 'real'?, DirtyHarry
  • Re: Why float is called as 'float', not 'real'?, ttw
  • Re: Why float is called as 'float', not 'real'?, Gib Bogle
    • Re: Why float is called as 'float', not 'real'?, Lane Straatman
      • Re: Why float is called as 'float', not 'real'?, Richard Maine
      • Re: Why float is called as 'float', not 'real'?, Lane Straatman
      • Re: Why float is called as 'float', not 'real'?, Richard Maine
      • Re: Why float is called as 'float', not 'real'?, Gordon Sande
      • Re: Why float is called as 'float', not 'real'?, Lane Straatman
      • Re: Why float is called as 'float', not 'real'?, Louis Krupp
      • Re: Why float is called as 'float', not 'real'?, Lane Straatman
      • Re: Why float is called as 'float', not 'real'?, John Harper
      • Re: Why float is called as 'float', not 'real'?, sureal
      • Re: Why float is called as 'float', not 'real'?, Dan Nagle
      • Re: Why float is called as 'float', not 'real'?, sureal
      • Re: Why float is called as 'float', not 'real'?, Gary Scott
      • Re: Why float is called as 'float', not 'real'?, Gordon Sande
      • Re: Why float is called as 'float', not 'real'?, Lane Straatman
      • Re: Why float is called as 'float', not 'real'?, Gordon Sande
      • Re: Why float is called as 'float', not 'real'?, Lane Straatman
      • Re: Why float is called as 'float', not 'real'?, blmblm
      • Re: Why float is called as 'float', not 'real'?, Gordon Sande
      • Re: Why float is called as 'float', not 'real'?, Ron Shepard
      • Re: Why float is called as 'float', not 'real'?, blmblm
      • Re: Why float is called as 'float', not 'real'?, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: Why float is called as 'float', not 'real'?, Brooks Moses
      • Re: Why float is called as 'float', not 'real'?, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: Why float is called as 'float', not 'real'?, Janne Blomqvist
      • Re: Why float is called as 'float', not 'real'?, Lane Straatman
      • Re: Why float is called as 'float', not 'real'?, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: Why float is called as 'float', not 'real'?, Lane Straatman
      • Re: Why float is called as 'float', not 'real'?, blmblm
      • Re: Why float is called as 'float', not 'real'?, ttw
      • Re: Why float is called as 'float', not 'real'?, Dave Seaman
      • Re: Why float is called as 'float', not 'real'?, ttw
      • Re: Why float is called as 'float', not 'real'?, Lane Straatman
      • Re: Why float is called as 'float', not 'real'?, blmblm
      • Re: Why float is called as 'float', not 'real'?, Lane Straatman
      • Re: Why float is called as 'float', not 'real'?, blmblm
      • Re: Why float is called as 'float', not 'real'?, Gordon Sande
      • Re: Why float is called as 'float', not 'real'?, Lane Straatman
      • Re: Why float is called as 'float', not 'real'?, Richard Maine
      • Re: Why float is called as 'float', not 'real'?, blmblm
      • Re: Why float is called as 'float', not 'real'?, Gary Scott
      • Re: Why float is called as 'float', not 'real'?, blmblm
      • Re: Why float is called as 'float', not 'real'?, Dan Nagle
      • Re: Why float is called as 'float', not 'real'?, gary . l . scott
      • Re: Why float is called as 'float', not 'real'?, Gordon Sande
      • Re: Why float is called as 'float', not 'real'?, blmblm
      • Re: Why float is called as 'float', not 'real'?, Gordon Sande
      • Re: Why float is called as 'float', not 'real'?, Pierre Asselin
      • Re: Why float is called as 'float', not 'real'?, Gordon Sande
      • Re: Why float is called as 'float', not 'real'?, Toon Moene
      • Re: Why float is called as 'float', not 'real'?, blmblm
      • Re: Why float is called as 'float', not 'real'?, Richard Maine
      • Re: Why float is called as 'float', not 'real'?, highegg
      • Re: Why float is called as 'float', not 'real'?, Richard Maine
      • Re: Why float is called as 'float', not 'real'?, Kevin G. Rhoads
  • Re: Why float is called as 'float', not 'real'?, glen herrmannsfeldt
  • Re: Why float is called as 'float', not 'real'?, Louis Krupp
    • Re: Why float is called as 'float', not 'real'?, Gary Scott
      • Re: Why float is called as 'float', not 'real'?, Richard Maine
      • Re: Why float is called as 'float', not 'real'?, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: Why float is called as 'float', not 'real'?, ttw
      • Re: Why float is called as 'float', not 'real'?, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: Why float is called as 'float', not 'real'?, ttw
• Libraries on Linux, Hĺkan Lane
  • Re: Libraries on Linux, Tim Prince
  • Re: Libraries on Linux, Lane Straatman
• how to display the source file in ddd?, zhngbn
  • Re: how to display the source file in ddd?, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi
    • Re: how to display the source file in ddd?, Tim Prince
• CVF Version 6.1.A Bug, michael
  • Re: CVF Version 6.1.A Bug, Richard Maine
    • Re: CVF Version 6.1.A Bug, John Harper
  • Re: CVF Version 6.1.A Bug, Steve Lionel
• Profiling Fortran 77 using gprof on linux, coolchick
  • Re: Profiling Fortran 77 using gprof on linux, Tim Prince
    • Re: Profiling Fortran 77 using gprof on linux, coolchick
    • Re: Profiling Fortran 77 using gprof on linux, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi
      • Re: Profiling Fortran 77 using gprof on linux, Tim Prince
      • Re: Profiling Fortran 77 using gprof on linux, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi
      • Re: Profiling Fortran 77 using gprof on linux, Tim Prince
• alpha stage OpenMP compilers for Fortran 95 and C, Beliavsky
  • Re: alpha stage OpenMP compilers for Fortran 95 and C, FX
    • Re: alpha stage OpenMP compilers for Fortran 95 and C, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: alpha stage OpenMP compilers for Fortran 95 and C, Michael Metcalf
      • Re: alpha stage OpenMP compilers for Fortran 95 and C, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: alpha stage OpenMP compilers for Fortran 95 and C, Michael Metcalf
• Visual Fortran add-in program - VFTool 2.20, kangzhao
• The Elements of Fortran Style, Michael Metcalf
  • Re: The Elements of Fortran Style, Dan Nagle
    • Re: The Elements of Fortran Style, Gordon Sande
  • Re: The Elements of Fortran Style, Gary Scott
    • Re: The Elements of Fortran Style, Richard Maine
  • Re: The Elements of Fortran Style, Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
    • Re: The Elements of Fortran Style, Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
    • Re: The Elements of Fortran Style, Gary Scott
      • Re: The Elements of Fortran Style, Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
• g77 efficiency, Gene Wagenbreth
  • Re: g77 efficiency, Beliavsky
    • Re: g77 efficiency, Tobias Burnus
• Redefining intrinsic operators, FX
  • Re: Redefining intrinsic operators, Michael Metcalf
  • Re: Redefining intrinsic operators, Dick Hendrickson
  • Re: Redefining intrinsic operators, Richard Maine
• make, tuli
  • Re: make, Tim Prince
    • Re: make, glen herrmannsfeldt
  • Re: make, Beliavsky
    • Re: make, gsal
  • Re: make, Hani Ibrahim
• about IMSL library and global variable, cswbww@xxxxxxxxx
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • About IMSL library and global variable, Way
    • Re: About IMSL library and global variable, Beliavsky
      • Re: About IMSL library and global variable, highegg
    • Re: About IMSL library and global variable, Steve Lionel
      • Re: About IMSL library and global variable, Beliavsky
• Array of procedure pointers in F2003?, Arjen Markus
  • Re: Array of procedure pointers in F2003?, highegg
• John Backus 1924-2007, Beliavsky
  • Re: John Backus 1924-2007, aeroguy
  • Re: John Backus 1924-2007, rusi_pathan
    • Re: John Backus 1924-2007, Eugene Miya
      • Re: John Backus 1924-2007, Lane Straatman
      • Re: John Backus 1924-2007, Eugene Miya
      • Re: John Backus 1924-2007, Lane Straatman
      • Re: John Backus 1924-2007, Eugene Miya
      • Re: John Backus 1924-2007, Terence
  • Re: John Backus 1924-2007, rms
  • Re: John Backus 1924-2007, Charles Russell
  • Re: John Backus 1924-2007, John Harper
    • Re: John Backus 1924-2007, Eugene Miya
  • Re: John Backus 1924-2007, subspace
  • Re: John Backus 1924-2007, Jim Backus
    • Re: John Backus 1924-2007, subspace
      • Re: John Backus 1924-2007, Jim Backus
      • Re: John Backus 1924-2007, Edward N Bromhead
      • Re: John Backus 1924-2007, Gary Scott
• RE: Reading in a file as raw hex bytes?, meek
  • Re: Reading in a file as raw hex bytes?, Terence
• iso_c_binding: use of c_int in an initialization expression, nobat
  • Re: iso_c_binding: use of c_int in an initialization expression, Steve Lionel
    • Re: iso_c_binding: use of c_int in an initialization expression, Dan Nagle
      • Re: iso_c_binding: use of c_int in an initialization expression, Steve Lionel
      • Re: iso_c_binding: use of c_int in an initialization expression, Dan Nagle
      • Re: iso_c_binding: use of c_int in an initialization expression, Brooks Moses
      • Re: iso_c_binding: use of c_int in an initialization expression, Richard Maine
      • Re: iso_c_binding: use of c_int in an initialization expression, Lane Straatman
      • Re: iso_c_binding: use of c_int in an initialization expression, Richard Maine
      • Re: iso_c_binding: use of c_int in an initialization expression, Lane Straatman
      • Re: iso_c_binding: use of c_int in an initialization expression, Richard Maine
      • Re: iso_c_binding: use of c_int in an initialization expression, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: iso_c_binding: use of c_int in an initialization expression, John Harper
    • Re: iso_c_binding: use of c_int in an initialization expression, FX
      • Re: iso_c_binding: use of c_int in an initialization expression, Brooks Moses
      • Re: iso_c_binding: use of c_int in an initialization expression, Dan Nagle
      • Re: iso_c_binding: use of c_int in an initialization expression, gary . l . scott
  • Re: iso_c_binding: use of c_int in an initialization expression, Tobias Burnus
• complex number & sort, nakisa
  • Re: complex number & sort, Michael Metcalf
  • RE: complex number & sort, meek
  • Re: complex number & sort, highegg
    • Re: complex number & sort, nakisa
      • Re: complex number & sort, highegg
    • Re: complex number & sort, highegg
      • Re: complex number & sort, nakisa
      • Re: complex number & sort, highegg
      • Re: complex number & sort, nakisa
      • Re: complex number & sort, highegg
  • Re: complex number & sort, Kevin G. Rhoads
    • Re: complex number & sort, nakisa
• integer factorization subroutine, Bart Vandewoestyne
  • Re: integer factorization subroutine, Arjen Markus
  • Re: integer factorization subroutine, Gordon Sande
    • Re: integer factorization subroutine, ttw
  • Re: integer factorization subroutine, Paul van Delst
    • Re: integer factorization subroutine, Terence
      • Re: integer factorization subroutine, Terence
      • Re: integer factorization subroutine, Lane Straatman
      • Re: integer factorization subroutine, Gordon Sande
    • Re: integer factorization subroutine, Dick Hendrickson
      • Re: integer factorization subroutine, Paul van Delst
      • Re: integer factorization subroutine, Lane Straatman
      • Re: integer factorization subroutine, Dick Hendrickson
      • Re: integer factorization subroutine, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: integer factorization subroutine, Terence
• Print statement within If-Then block changes output!!!????, watsteel
  • Re: Print statement within If-Then block changes output!!!????, Dan Nagle
    • Re: Print statement within If-Then block changes output!!!????, Beliavsky
      • Re: Print statement within If-Then block changes output!!!????, Gib Bogle
      • Re: Print statement within If-Then block changes output!!!????, Gib Bogle
    • Re: Print statement within If-Then block changes output!!!????, Steven G. Kargl
    • Re: Print statement within If-Then block changes output!!!????, Colin Watters
      • Re: Print statement within If-Then block changes output!!!????, Colin Watters
      • Re: Print statement within If-Then block changes output!!!????, Dan Nagle
  • Re: Print statement within If-Then block changes output!!!????, Ron Shepard
  • Re: Print statement within If-Then block changes output!!!????, Brooks Moses
    • Re: Print statement within If-Then block changes output!!!????, watsteel
      • Re: Print statement within If-Then block changes output!!!????, watsteel
      • Re: Print statement within If-Then block changes output!!!????, Beliavsky
      • Re: Print statement within If-Then block changes output!!!????, watsteel
      • Re: Print statement within If-Then block changes output!!!????, Beliavsky
      • Re: Print statement within If-Then block changes output!!!????, Jugoslav Dujic
      • Re: Print statement within If-Then block changes output!!!????, FX
      • Re: Print statement within If-Then block changes output!!!????, Dan Nagle
      • Re: Print statement within If-Then block changes output!!!????, Richard Maine
      • Re: Print statement within If-Then block changes output!!!????, e p chandler
      • Re: Print statement within If-Then block changes output!!!????, Gordon Sande
      • Re: Print statement within If-Then block changes output!!!????, Dick Hendrickson
      • Re: Print statement within If-Then block changes output!!!????, Lane Straatman
      • Re: Print statement within If-Then block changes output!!!????, e p chandler
      • Re: Print statement within If-Then block changes output!!!????, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: Print statement within If-Then block changes output!!!????, Lane Straatman
      • Re: Print statement within If-Then block changes output!!!????, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: Print statement within If-Then block changes output!!!????, e p chandler
      • Re: Print statement within If-Then block changes output!!!????, Richard Maine
      • Re: Print statement within If-Then block changes output!!!????, Gary Scott
      • Re: Print statement within If-Then block changes output!!!????, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: Print statement within If-Then block changes output!!!????, Richard Maine
      • Re: Print statement within If-Then block changes output!!!????, Kevin G. Rhoads
      • Re: Print statement within If-Then block changes output!!!????, Richard Maine
    • Re: Print statement within If-Then block changes output!!!????, e p chandler
      • Re: Print statement within If-Then block changes output!!!????, watsteel
      • Re: Print statement within If-Then block changes output!!!????, watsteel
      • Re: Print statement within If-Then block changes output!!!????, Paul van Delst
      • Re: Print statement within If-Then block changes output!!!????, e p chandler
• NAGWare Fortran 95 Syntax Checker Available online, Beliavsky
  • Re: NAGWare Fortran 95 Syntax Checker Available online, Arjen Markus
• Fortran language course, maan . alasfoor
• Equivalence of derived types with default initializers?, Brooks Moses
  • Re: Equivalence of derived types with default initializers?, Dick Hendrickson
    • Re: Equivalence of derived types with default initializers?, Richard Maine
      • Re: Equivalence of derived types with default initializers?, Brooks Moses
      • Re: Equivalence of derived types with default initializers?, Richard Maine
      • Re: Equivalence of derived types with default initializers?, Dan Nagle
      • Re: Equivalence of derived types with default initializers?, Brooks Moses
  • Re: Equivalence of derived types with default initializers?, robert . corbett
    • Re: Equivalence of derived types with default initializers?, Brooks Moses
      • Re: Equivalence of derived types with default initializers?, robert . corbett
• F2k8 BITS, gary . l . scott
  • Re: F2k8 BITS, Brooks Moses
    • Re: F2k8 BITS, Gary Scott
    • Re: F2k8 BITS, Richard Maine
• http or tcp/ip, allelopath
  • Re: http or tcp/ip, e p chandler
  • Re: http or tcp/ip, gary . l . scott
    • Re: http or tcp/ip, David Frank
      • Re: http or tcp/ip, Beliavsky
      • Re: http or tcp/ip, Steve Lionel
      • Re: http or tcp/ip, Gary Scott
      • Re: http or tcp/ip, Gary Scott
      • Re: http or tcp/ip, Steve Lionel
      • Re: http or tcp/ip, Gary Scott
      • Re: http or tcp/ip, Gary Scott
      • Re: http or tcp/ip, Gary Scott
      • Re: http or tcp/ip, Brooks Moses
      • Re: http or tcp/ip, PJH
      • Re: http or tcp/ip, Steve Lionel
      • Re: http or tcp/ip, Richard Maine
      • Re: http or tcp/ip, Jan Vorbrüggen
      • Re: http or tcp/ip, Dan Nagle
      • Re: http or tcp/ip, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: http or tcp/ip, Pierre Asselin
      • Re: http or tcp/ip, gary . l . scott
      • Re: http or tcp/ip, Pierre Asselin
      • Re: http or tcp/ip, Jan Vorbrüggen
      • Re: http or tcp/ip, Brooks Moses
      • Re: http or tcp/ip, Toon Moene
      • Re: http or tcp/ip, Brooks Moses
      • Re: http or tcp/ip, Jan Vorbrüggen
      • Re: http or tcp/ip, Brooks Moses
      • Re: http or tcp/ip, Gary Scott
      • Re: http or tcp/ip, Jan Vorbrüggen
      • Re: http or tcp/ip, Gary Scott
      • Re: http or tcp/ip, Jan Vorbrüggen
      • Re: http or tcp/ip, Steve Lionel
      • Re: http or tcp/ip, Jan Vorbrüggen
      • Re: http or tcp/ip, Dick Hendrickson
      • Re: http or tcp/ip, gary . l . scott
      • Re: http or tcp/ip, Dick Hendrickson
      • Re: http or tcp/ip, gary . l . scott
      • Re: http or tcp/ip, Richard Maine
      • Re: http or tcp/ip, gary . l . scott
      • Re: http or tcp/ip, Richard Maine
      • Re: http or tcp/ip, Gary Scott
      • Re: http or tcp/ip, Jan Vorbrüggen
      • Re: http or tcp/ip, Lane Straatman
      • Re: http or tcp/ip, Jan Vorbrüggen
      • Re: http or tcp/ip, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: http or tcp/ip, Gary Scott
      • Re: http or tcp/ip, Gary Scott
      • Re: http or tcp/ip, David Frank
      • Re: http or tcp/ip, Jan Vorbrüggen
      • Re: http or tcp/ip, Gary Scott
• Function kind attribute: valid fortran?, Bil Kleb
  • Re: Function kind attribute: valid fortran?, Michael Metcalf
  • Re: Function kind attribute: valid fortran?, Richard Maine
  • Re: Function kind attribute: valid fortran?, Paul van Delst
  • Re: Function kind attribute: valid fortran?, James Giles
• Re: Efficient arrays for artificial neural networks?, Beliavsky
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Efficient arrays for artificial neural networks?, Jan Vorbrüggen
• Guess what's sitting on my desk?, Catherine Rees Lay
  • Wrong recipient (obviously!) Sorry, folks., Catherine Rees Lay
    • Re: Wrong recipient (obviously!) Sorry, folks., Kevin G. Rhoads
      • Re: Wrong recipient (obviously!) Sorry, folks., Lynn McGuire
    • Re: Wrong recipient (obviously!) Sorry, folks., Dick Hendrickson
  • Re: Guess what's sitting on my desk?, J. F. Cornwall
• Polyhedron 2005 benchmark results, FX
  • Re: Polyhedron 2005 benchmark results, Steve Lionel
    • Re: Polyhedron 2005 benchmark results, FX
      • Re: Polyhedron 2005 benchmark results, Steve Lionel
    • Re: Polyhedron 2005 benchmark results, Brooks Moses
      • Re: Polyhedron 2005 benchmark results, FX
      • Re: Polyhedron 2005 benchmark results, Steven G. Kargl
      • Re: Polyhedron 2005 benchmark results, Brooks Moses
      • Re: Polyhedron 2005 benchmark results, Steven G. Kargl
  • Re: Polyhedron 2005 benchmark results, Jan Vorbrüggen
    • Re: Polyhedron 2005 benchmark results, FX
    • Re: Polyhedron 2005 benchmark results, robert . corbett
      • Re: Polyhedron 2005 benchmark results, Jan Vorbrüggen
      • Re: Polyhedron 2005 benchmark results, robert . corbett
• Need help with fortran file output, zcai886
  • Re: Need help with fortran file output, Terence
  • Re: Need help with fortran file output, Beliavsky
  • Re: Need help with fortran file output, Michael Prager
    • Re: Need help with fortran file output, Michael Prager
  • Re: Need help with fortran file output, Charles Russell
    • Re: Need help with fortran file output, Beliavsky
      • Re: Need help with fortran file output, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: Need help with fortran file output, Richard Maine
• Gfortran 2 years behind G95 and still not ready for prime time, awgreynolds
  • Re: Gfortran 2 years behind G95 and still not ready for prime time, Thomas Koenig
    • Re: Gfortran 2 years behind G95 and still not ready for prime time, Brooks Moses
      • Re: Gfortran 2 years behind G95 and still not ready for prime time, awgreynolds
      • Re: Gfortran 2 years behind G95 and still not ready for prime time, Brooks Moses
      • Re: Gfortran 2 years behind G95 and still not ready for prime time, awgreynolds
      • Re: Gfortran 2 years behind G95 and still not ready for prime time, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: Gfortran 2 years behind G95 and still not ready for prime time, awgreynolds
      • Re: Gfortran 2 years behind G95 and still not ready for prime time, FX
      • Re: Gfortran 2 years behind G95 and still not ready for prime time, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: Gfortran 2 years behind G95 and still not ready for prime time, awgreynolds
      • Re: Gfortran 2 years behind G95 and still not ready for prime time, paul . richard . thomas
      • Re: Gfortran 2 years behind G95 and still not ready for prime time, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: Gfortran 2 years behind G95 and still not ready for prime time, Brooks Moses
    • Re: Gfortran 2 years behind G95 and still not ready for prime time, Richard Maine
      • Re: Gfortran 2 years behind G95 and still not ready for prime time, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: Gfortran 2 years behind G95 and still not ready for prime time, Steve Lionel
      • Re: Gfortran 2 years behind G95 and still not ready for prime time, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: Gfortran 2 years behind G95 and still not ready for prime time, Richard Maine
  • Re: Gfortran 2 years behind G95 and still not ready for prime time, Steven G. Kargl
    • Re: Gfortran 2 years behind G95 and still not ready for prime time, Joost
      • Re: Gfortran 2 years behind G95 and still not ready for prime time, FX
      • Re: Gfortran 2 years behind G95 and still not ready for prime time, Joost
      • Re: Gfortran 2 years behind G95 and still not ready for prime time, Richard Maine
      • Re: Gfortran 2 years behind G95 and still not ready for prime time, Brooks Moses
    • Re: Gfortran 2 years behind G95 and still not ready for prime time, awgreynolds
      • Re: Gfortran 2 years behind G95 and still not ready for prime time, Brooks Moses
      • Re: Gfortran 2 years behind G95 and still not ready for prime time, FX
      • Re: Gfortran 2 years behind G95 and still not ready for prime time, awgreynolds
      • Re: Gfortran 2 years behind G95 and still not ready for prime time, Thomas Koenig
      • Re: Gfortran 2 years behind G95 and still not ready for prime time, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi
      • Re: Gfortran 2 years behind G95 and still not ready for prime time, Brooks Moses
    • Re: Gfortran 2 years behind G95 and still not ready for prime time, Dick Hendrickson
      • Re: Gfortran 2 years behind G95 and still not ready for prime time, Charles Russell
      • Re: Gfortran 2 years behind G95 and still not ready for prime time, Beliavsky
      • Re: Gfortran 2 years behind G95 and still not ready for prime time, Brooks Moses
      • Re: Gfortran 2 years behind G95 and still not ready for prime time, FX
      • Re: Gfortran 2 years behind G95 and still not ready for prime time, Dick Hendrickson
      • Re: Gfortran 2 years behind G95 and still not ready for prime time, Beliavsky
      • Re: Gfortran 2 years behind G95 and still not ready for prime time, Beliavsky
      • Re: Gfortran 2 years behind G95 and still not ready for prime time, Joost
• Netcat and Fortran, feenberg
  • Re: Netcat and Fortran, glen herrmannsfeldt
• variable names for different fortrans, allelopath
  • Re: variable names for different fortrans, Beliavsky
    • Re: variable names for different fortrans, Lane Straatman
      • Re: variable names for different fortrans, Richard Maine
      • Re: variable names for different fortrans, Thomas Koenig
      • Re: variable names for different fortrans, Brooks Moses
      • Re: variable names for different fortrans, Gordon Sande
      • Re: variable names for different fortrans, Richard Maine
      • Re: variable names for different fortrans, Lane Straatman
      • Re: variable names for different fortrans, Terence
      • Re: variable names for different fortrans, Ben Hetland
      • Re: variable names for different fortrans, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: variable names for different fortrans, Ben Hetland
      • Re: variable names for different fortrans, Craig Powers
  • Re: variable names for different fortrans, Ancient_Hacker
    • Re: variable names for different fortrans, Rich Townsend
    • Re: variable names for different fortrans, Ben Hetland
      • Re: variable names for different fortrans, James Parsly
      • Re: variable names for different fortrans, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: variable names for different fortrans, allelopath
      • Re: variable names for different fortrans, gary . l . scott
      • Re: variable names for different fortrans, Ron Shepard
      • Re: variable names for different fortrans, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: variable names for different fortrans, Ben Hetland
      • Re: variable names for different fortrans, glen herrmannsfeldt
  • Re: variable names for different fortrans, Richard Maine
    • Re: variable names for different fortrans, Richard Maine
      • Re: variable names for different fortrans, Ancient_Hacker
      • Re: variable names for different fortrans, glen herrmannsfeldt
  • Re: variable names for different fortrans, David Flower
    • Re: variable names for different fortrans, Beliavsky
      • Re: variable names for different fortrans, Michael Metcalf
  • Re: variable names for different fortrans, Richard Harter
    • Re: variable names for different fortrans, PJH
      • Re: variable names for different fortrans, Beliavsky
      • Re: variable names for different fortrans, Dan Nagle
      • Re: variable names for different fortrans, Brooks Moses
      • Re: variable names for different fortrans, PJH
      • Re: variable names for different fortrans, Ben Hetland
      • Re: variable names for different fortrans, Beliavsky
      • Re: variable names for different fortrans, Ben Hetland
      • Re: variable names for different fortrans, Beliavsky
      • Re: variable names for different fortrans, Richard Maine
  • Re: variable names for different fortrans, pantarei
  • Re: variable names for different fortrans, David Frank
• Inverse of a square matrix, michael
  • Re: Inverse of a square matrix, Beliavsky
  • Re: Inverse of a square matrix, Greg Lindahl
• design question, Bart Vandewoestyne
  • Re: design question, Rich Townsend
  • Re: design question, Michael Metcalf
  • Re: design question, Douglas Wells
  • Re: design question, Beliavsky
• Windows gfortran binaries, FX
  • Re: Windows gfortran binaries, Beliavsky
    • Re: Windows gfortran binaries, FX
    • Re: Windows gfortran binaries, Ken Fairfield
      • Re: Windows gfortran binaries, Beliavsky
      • Re: Windows gfortran binaries, Richard Maine
      • Re: Windows gfortran binaries, Brooks Moses
      • Re: Windows gfortran binaries, Ken Fairfield
    • Re: Windows gfortran binaries, FX
  • Re: Windows gfortran binaries, Ian Gay
• Debug Symbols missing in Intel Visual Fortran, R. MacDonald
  • Re: Debug Symbols missing in Intel Visual Fortran, Beliavsky
• presentations at "Fifty Years of Fortran", Beliavsky
  • Re: presentations at "Fifty Years of Fortran", Gary Scott
    • Re: presentations at "Fifty Years of Fortran", Lane Straatman
• Merits of Fortran - followup summary, Richard Harter
  • Re: Merits of Fortran - followup summary, Beliavsky
    • Re: Merits of Fortran - followup summary, Arjen Markus
    • Re: Merits of Fortran - followup summary, Richard Harter
      • Re: Merits of Fortran - followup summary, Lane Straatman
      • Re: Merits of Fortran - followup summary, Richard Harter
• Append to screen IO, John Deas
  • Re: Append to screen IO, Ugo
    • Re: Append to screen IO, Beliavsky
      • Re: Append to screen IO, Ben Hetland
      • Re: Append to screen IO, Dick Hendrickson
      • Re: Append to screen IO, John Deas
      • Re: Append to screen IO, Ben Hetland
      • Re: Append to screen IO, Dick Hendrickson
      • Re: Append to screen IO, Ben Hetland
      • Re: Append to screen IO, Richard Maine
      • Re: Append to screen IO, Ben Hetland
      • Re: Append to screen IO, John Harper
      • Re: Append to screen IO, Richard Maine
      • Re: Append to screen IO, Dick Hendrickson
      • Re: Append to screen IO, Richard Maine
    • Re: Append to screen IO, gsal
      • Re: Append to screen IO, Beliavsky
      • Re: Append to screen IO, Dick Hendrickson
• compilers: Compaq, Lahey, Intel, allelopath
  • Re: compilers: Compaq, Lahey, Intel, Dan Nagle
  • Re: compilers: Compaq, Lahey, Intel, Gary Scott
  • Re: compilers: Compaq, Lahey, Intel, Paul van Delst
    • Re: compilers: Compaq, Lahey, Intel, John Harper
    • Re: compilers: Compaq, Lahey, Intel, Bil Kleb
      • Re: compilers: Compaq, Lahey, Intel, Paul van Delst
  • Re: compilers: Compaq, Lahey, Intel, Beliavsky
  • Re: compilers: Compaq, Lahey, Intel, Catherine Rees Lay
  • Re: compilers: Compaq, Lahey, Intel, Pierre Asselin
• Code Too Large for MS FORTRAN, monir
  • Re: Code Too Large for MS FORTRAN, Michael Prager
    • Re: Code Too Large for MS FORTRAN, FX
      • Re: Code Too Large for MS FORTRAN, e p chandler
      • Re: Code Too Large for MS FORTRAN, FX
      • Re: Code Too Large for MS FORTRAN, monir
      • Re: Code Too Large for MS FORTRAN, Terence
      • Re: Code Too Large for MS FORTRAN, FX
      • Re: Code Too Large for MS FORTRAN, Terence
      • Re: Code Too Large for MS FORTRAN, e p chandler
      • Re: Code Too Large for MS FORTRAN, Beliavsky
      • Re: Code Too Large for MS FORTRAN, Brooks Moses
      • Re: Code Too Large for MS FORTRAN, Pierre Asselin
      • Re: Code Too Large for MS FORTRAN, Thomas Koenig
      • Re: Code Too Large for MS FORTRAN, Toon Moene
      • Re: Code Too Large for MS FORTRAN, Kevin G. Rhoads
      • Re: Code Too Large for MS FORTRAN, Kevin G. Rhoads
  • Re: Code Too Large for MS FORTRAN, bandito
  • Re: Code Too Large for MS FORTRAN, Kevin G. Rhoads
    • Re: Code Too Large for MS FORTRAN, e p chandler
      • Re: Code Too Large for MS FORTRAN, Kevin G. Rhoads
  • Re: Code Too Large for MS FORTRAN, max
• DDD and modules, John Deas
  • Re: DDD and modules, Les
  • Re: DDD and modules, John Deas
    • Re: DDD and modules, Herman D . Knoble
  • Re: DDD and modules, Joost
    • Re: DDD and modules, gsal
      • Re: DDD and modules, Gary Scott
      • Re: DDD and modules, John Deas
• using somebody else's function, Lane Straatman
  • Re: using somebody else's function, Dick Hendrickson
    • Re: using somebody else's function, Lane Straatman
      • Re: using somebody else's function, Richard Maine
      • Re: using somebody else's function, Lane Straatman
      • Re: using somebody else's function, Richard Maine
      • Re: using somebody else's function, Lane Straatman
      • Re: using somebody else's function, Ken Fairfield
    • Re: using somebody else's function, Lane Straatman
      • Re: using somebody else's function, Richard Maine
      • Re: using somebody else's function, Lane Straatman
      • Re: using somebody else's function, Jan Vorbrüggen
  • Re: using somebody else's function, glen herrmannsfeldt
  • Re: using somebody else's function, Michael Metcalf
    • Re: using somebody else's function, Lane Straatman
      • Re: using somebody else's function, Jugoslav Dujic
• AMD Opteron + intel fortran (linux), jmj75
  • Re: AMD Opteron + intel fortran (linux), Steven G. Kargl
  • Re: AMD Opteron + intel fortran (linux), Steve Lionel
  • Re: AMD Opteron + intel fortran (linux), Sebastian Hanigk
    • Re: AMD Opteron + intel fortran (linux), Greg Lindahl
    • Re: AMD Opteron + intel fortran (linux), joehill
      • Re: AMD Opteron + intel fortran (linux), Sebastian Hanigk
      • Re: AMD Opteron + intel fortran (linux), Keith Refson
      • Re: AMD Opteron + intel fortran (linux), Sebastian Hanigk
      • Re: AMD Opteron + intel fortran (linux), Pierre Asselin
      • Re: AMD Opteron + intel fortran (linux), Helge Avlesen
    • Re: AMD Opteron + intel fortran (linux), Kevin G. Rhoads
    • Re: AMD Opteron + intel fortran (linux), Keith Refson
      • Re: AMD Opteron + intel fortran (linux), Sebastian Hanigk
  • Re: AMD Opteron + intel fortran (linux), Jan Vorbrüggen
    • Re: AMD Opteron + intel fortran (linux), jmj75
      • Re: AMD Opteron + intel fortran (linux), Jan Vorbrüggen
  • Re: AMD Opteron + intel fortran (linux), Keith Refson
    • Re: AMD Opteron + intel fortran (linux), Tim Prince
      • Re: AMD Opteron + intel fortran (linux), jmj75
      • Re: AMD Opteron + intel fortran (linux), Tim Prince
    • Re: AMD Opteron + intel fortran (linux), Mark Mackey
      • Re: AMD Opteron + intel fortran (linux), Tim Prince
      • Re: AMD Opteron + intel fortran (linux), Mark Mackey
      • Re: AMD Opteron + intel fortran (linux), pantarei
      • Re: AMD Opteron + intel fortran (linux), Paul van Delst
      • Re: AMD Opteron + intel fortran (linux), Beliavsky
      • Re: AMD Opteron + intel fortran (linux), Rich Townsend
      • Re: AMD Opteron + intel fortran (linux), Peter
      • Re: AMD Opteron + intel fortran (linux), Tom Micevski
      • Re: AMD Opteron + intel fortran (linux), Mark Mackey
      • Re: AMD Opteron + intel fortran (linux), Peter
• Question to IBM xlf users, Patrick Begou
  • Re: Question to IBM xlf users, Patrick Begou
    • Re: Question to IBM xlf users, insun.song@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Question to IBM xlf users, Ian Bush
    • Re: Question to IBM xlf users, Patrick Begou
      • Re: Question to IBM xlf users, Richard Maine
• Benchmarking "transfer", nobat
  • Re: Benchmarking "transfer", Arjen Markus
    • Re: Benchmarking "transfer", Dick Hendrickson
      • TRANSFER on the derived types with allocatable components ( Was Benchmarking "transfer"), nobat
      • Re: TRANSFER on the derived types with allocatable components ( Was Benchmarking "transfer"), Richard Maine
      • Re: Benchmarking "transfer", Arjen Markus
      • Re: Benchmarking "transfer", Dick Hendrickson
• Using unused variables, Daniel Franke
  • Re: Using unused variables, highegg
    • Re: Using unused variables, Daniel Franke
      • Re: Using unused variables, Gordon Sande
  • Re: Using unused variables, Tom Micevski
  • Re: Using unused variables, Michael Metcalf
    • Re: Using unused variables, Daniel Franke
      • Re: Using unused variables, Richard Maine
      • Re: Using unused variables, Ron Shepard
      • Re: Using unused variables, glen herrmannsfeldt
  • Re: Using unused variables, Beliavsky
    • Re: Using unused variables, Gary Scott
      • Re: Using unused variables, Walter Spector
      • Re: Using unused variables, Gary Scott
      • Re: Using unused variables, Walter Spector
      • Re: Using unused variables, Gordon Sande
      • Re: Using unused variables, Pierre Asselin
      • Re: Using unused variables, Gordon Sande
      • Re: Using unused variables, Dick Hendrickson
      • Re: Using unused variables, Gordon Sande
      • Re: Using unused variables, Ron Shepard
• multiple precision arithmetic, Bart Vandewoestyne
  • Re: multiple precision arithmetic, Herman D . Knoble
  • Re: multiple precision arithmetic, Herman D . Knoble
  • Re: multiple precision arithmetic, highegg
  • Re: multiple precision arithmetic, Beliavsky
• using blank common as malloc on Cray Fortran, Dan
  • Re: using blank common as malloc on Cray Fortran, Walter Spector
    • Re: using blank common as malloc on Cray Fortran, Dan
      • Re: using blank common as malloc on Cray Fortran, Jan Vorbrüggen
      • Re: using blank common as malloc on Cray Fortran, Walter Spector
• MR&C 7.9, Lane Straatman
  • Re: MR&C 7.9, Michael Metcalf
    • Re: MR&C 7.9, Lane Straatman
      • Re: MR&C 7.9, Rich Townsend
      • Re: MR&C 7.9, Kevin G. Rhoads
      • Re: MR&C 7.9, Michael Metcalf
      • Re: MR&C 7.9, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: MR&C 7.9, Rich Townsend
      • Re: MR&C 7.9, Kevin G. Rhoads
      • Re: MR&C 7.9, Rich Townsend
      • Re: MR&C 7.9, Gary Scott
      • Re: MR&C 7.9, Lane Straatman
      • Re: MR&C 7.9, Rich Townsend
      • Re: MR&C 7.9, Lane Straatman
      • Re: MR&C 7.9, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: MR&C 7.9, Lane Straatman
      • Re: MR&C 7.9, Ken Fairfield
      • Re: MR&C 7.9, Jan Vorbrüggen
      • Re: MR&C 7.9, Ken Fairfield
      • Re: MR&C 7.9, Lane Straatman
      • Re: MR&C 7.9, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: MR&C 7.9, Dick Hendrickson
      • Re: MR&C 7.9, Lane Straatman
      • Re: MR&C 7.9, Richard Maine
      • Re: MR&C 7.9, Lane Straatman
      • Re: MR&C 7.9, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: MR&C 7.9, Richard Maine
      • Re: MR&C 7.9, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: MR&C 7.9, Lane Straatman
      • Re: MR&C 7.9, Michael Metcalf
      • Re: MR&C 7.9, Lane Straatman
      • Re: MR&C 7.9, Richard Maine
      • Re: MR&C 7.9, Brooks Moses
      • Re: MR&C 7.9, Lane Straatman
      • Re: MR&C 7.9, Richard Maine
      • Re: MR&C 7.9, Lane Straatman
      • Re: MR&C 7.9, Brooks Moses
      • Re: MR&C 7.9, Dan Nagle
      • Re: MR&C 7.9, Brooks Moses
      • Re: MR&C 7.9, Lane Straatman
      • Re: MR&C 7.9, Richard Maine
      • Re: MR&C 7.9, Lane Straatman
      • Re: MR&C 7.9, Richard Maine
      • Re: MR&C 7.9, Brooks Moses
      • Re: MR&C 7.9, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: MR&C 7.9, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: MR&C 7.9, Lane Straatman
      • Re: MR&C 7.9, Richard Maine
• F2k3 Translation - UML 2 Test Profile Example, Gary Scott
• Any free Fortran 90-95 compilers for Cray Y-MP ?, Ancient_Hacker
  • Re: Any free Fortran 90-95 compilers for Cray Y-MP ?, Dan
    • Re: Any free Fortran 90-95 compilers for Cray Y-MP ?, Janne Blomqvist
  • Re: Any free Fortran 90-95 compilers for Cray Y-MP ?, Toon Moene
• increasing width, Lane Straatman
  • Re: increasing width, gsal
  • Re: increasing width, Steve Lionel
    • Re: increasing width, Lane Straatman
      • Re: increasing width, Steve Lionel
      • Re: increasing width, Lane Straatman
      • Re: increasing width, Brooks Moses
      • Re: increasing width, Dick Hendrickson
      • Re: increasing width, Gordon Sande
      • Re: increasing width, robin
      • Re: increasing width, robin
  • Re: increasing width, Dick Hendrickson
    • Re: increasing width, Lane Straatman
  • Re: increasing width, Michael Metcalf
    • Re: increasing width, Lane Straatman
      • Re: increasing width, Tom Micevski
      • Re: increasing width, Lane Straatman
      • Re: increasing width, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: increasing width, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: increasing width, Lane Straatman
      • Re: increasing width, Gordon Sande
      • Re: increasing width, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: increasing width, Lane Straatman
      • Re: increasing width, Ken Fairfield
      • Re: increasing width, Paul van Delst
      • Re: increasing width, Ian Bush
      • Re: increasing width, Ron Shepard
      • Re: increasing width, Ken Fairfield
      • Re: increasing width, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: increasing width, Lane Straatman
      • Re: increasing width, robin
      • Re: increasing width, Lane Straatman
      • Re: increasing width, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: increasing width, FX
  • Re: increasing width, Pierre Asselin
    • Re: increasing width, Dick Hendrickson
• reset the video buffer, heavytull
  • Re: reset the video buffer, Richard Maine
    • Re: reset the video buffer, heavytull
      • Re: reset the video buffer, Gordon Sande
      • Re: reset the video buffer, Terence
      • Re: reset the video buffer, Lane Straatman
      • Re: reset the video buffer, Richard Maine
      • Re: reset the video buffer, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: reset the video buffer, Richard Maine
• Merits of fortran, Richard Harter
  • Re: Merits of fortran, max
    • Re: Merits of fortran, Gib Bogle
    • Re: Merits of fortran, Craig Powers
      • Re: Merits of fortran, Gary Scott
      • Re: Merits of fortran, ejkost
      • Re: Merits of fortran, Gary Scott
      • Re: Merits of fortran, Dan Nagle
      • Re: Merits of fortran, Sebastian Hanigk
      • Re: Merits of fortran, Craig Powers
  • Re: Merits of fortran, Beliavsky
    • Re: Merits of fortran, Richard Harter
      • Re: Merits of fortran, Sebastian Hanigk
      • Re: Merits of fortran, Brooks Moses
      • Re: Merits of fortran, James Giles
      • Re: Merits of fortran, Dan Nagle
      • Re: Merits of fortran, Michael Prager
  • Re: Merits of fortran, Charles Russell
  • Re: Merits of fortran, Louis Krupp
    • Re: Merits of fortran, Richard Harter
    • Re: Merits of fortran, glen herrmannsfeldt
  • Re: Merits of fortran