Re: http or tcp/ip
- From: Brooks Moses <bmoses-nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2007 20:06:06 -0700
Gary Scott wrote:
Curious, will all of the $DEC instructions go away with an F2k3 compiler (i.e. does BIND(C) + passby +... cover everything necessary?)
It seems to me that if there are system-specific things which don't, a good place for a F2k3 compiler to put them would be as extensions to the BIND() syntax -- e.g., something like BIND(C, CONVENTION="STDCALL"), or for that matter BIND(STDCALL), since the "C" of BIND(C) is effectively a name for a calling convention.
This does mean that the program is no longer standard-conforming, unlike the !DEC$ attributes which hide in comments on compilers that don't support them, but I'm not convinced that's a bad thing; in most cases the program is inherently system-specific anyway, and the directives are critical to its meaning, so it's likely better to get a clear compiler error that effectively says "this directive isn't supported".
- Brooks
--
The "bmoses-nospam" address is valid; no unmunging needed.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: http or tcp/ip
- From: Jan Vorbrüggen
- Re: http or tcp/ip
- From: PJH
- Re: http or tcp/ip
- References:
- http or tcp/ip
- From: allelopath
- Re: http or tcp/ip
- From: gary . l . scott
- Re: http or tcp/ip
- From: David Frank
- Re: http or tcp/ip
- From: Beliavsky
- Re: http or tcp/ip
- From: Steve Lionel
- Re: http or tcp/ip
- From: Gary Scott
- Re: http or tcp/ip
- From: Steve Lionel
- Re: http or tcp/ip
- From: Gary Scott
- Re: http or tcp/ip
- From: Gary Scott
- http or tcp/ip
- Prev by Date: Re: http or tcp/ip
- Next by Date: NAGWare Fortran 95 Syntax Checker Available online
- Previous by thread: Re: http or tcp/ip
- Next by thread: Re: http or tcp/ip
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|