Re: overloaded cant be distinguished by return values?
- From: Reinhold Bader <Bader@xxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 17:39:28 +0200
Richard Edgar wrote:
Being more general (please correct me if I'm wrong...), this is an
example of the rule in Fortran that the RHS of any expression is
evaluated before the LHS is considered.
If I've understood it correctly, it is simply a case of a function
result not being a dummy argument, although in some respects it may
behave similar to one with intent(out). In particular, the function
result object is short lived in that it ceases being defined once the
assignment to the LHS at call is performed.
Regards
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: overloaded cant be distinguished by return values?
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: overloaded cant be distinguished by return values?
- References:
- overloaded cant be distinguished by return values?
- From: Berthold Höllmann
- Re: overloaded cant be distinguished by return values?
- From: Michael Metcalf
- Re: overloaded cant be distinguished by return values?
- From: Richard Edgar
- overloaded cant be distinguished by return values?
- Prev by Date: Re: F77 & WIN XP
- Next by Date: Re: F77 & WIN XP
- Previous by thread: Re: overloaded cant be distinguished by return values?
- Next by thread: Re: overloaded cant be distinguished by return values?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|