Re: Need Help: compiling old Fortran program
- From: Förster vom Silberwald <chain_lube@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 03:23:16 -0700
On Jun 29, 10:08 am, nos...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Richard Maine) wrote:
It is quite possible to write Fortran code that does not depend on
specific compilers. Some of us here have done that for multiple decades.
The language does not have such dependence. Some users do. Some of us
here put quite a lot of work into trying to educate people about the
benefits of coding portably. In the end, it has very little to do with
languages, and a lot to do with users. Some languages do more than
others to facilitate or hinder portable coding, but that has never been
the real determining factor.
Maybe as an addenmdum: using the F90 compiler on our Sun workstations
I get through the compiling stage:
==
igam02ws% f90 ./R*.f -c
IF (R(J) .EQ. 0.D0) GO TO 30
^
"./RADINV.f", Line = 540, Column = 36: WARNING: Transfer of control
into the DO loop starting at line 542 is not safe.
f90comp: 1159 SOURCE LINES
f90comp: 0 ERRORS, 1 WARNINGS, 0 OTHER MESSAGES, 0 ANSI
==
Silly question: I always thought gnu compilers are more forgiveable.
As already written my first turn was under a g77 compiler on my
Macintosh.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Need Help: compiling old Fortran program
- From: Förster vom Silberwald
- Re: Need Help: compiling old Fortran program
- References:
- Need Help: compiling old Fortran program
- From: Förster vom Silberwald
- Re: Need Help: compiling old Fortran program
- From: Wade Ward
- Re: Need Help: compiling old Fortran program
- From: Förster vom Silberwald
- Re: Need Help: compiling old Fortran program
- From: Richard Maine
- Need Help: compiling old Fortran program
- Prev by Date: Re: type/rank mismatch error
- Next by Date: Re: Need Help: compiling old Fortran program
- Previous by thread: Re: Need Help: compiling old Fortran program
- Next by thread: Re: Need Help: compiling old Fortran program
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
