comp.lang.fortran

• Thread Index

---

• Re: Clear Screen
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: Lahey Fortran and Core 2 duo
  • From: Andrew Smith
• Re: Lahey Fortran and Core 2 duo
  • From: Fly Away
• Re: Lahey Fortran and Core 2 duo
  • From: Harvey Gratt
• Re: Lahey Fortran and Core 2 duo
  • From: Andrew Smith
• Re: Subroutine "arguments"??
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Lahey Fortran and Core 2 duo
  • From: Harvey Gratt
• Re: Subroutine "arguments"??
  • From: tholen
• Re: Lahey Fortran and Core 2 duo
  • From: Harvey Gratt
• Re: Subroutine "arguments"??
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Lahey Fortran and Core 2 duo
  • From: mecej4
• Re: Lahey Fortran and Core 2 duo
  • From: Harvey Gratt
• Subroutine "arguments"??
  • From: li . simula
• Re: Clear Screen
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: Clear Screen
  • From: Rosana Khan
• Re: forall and do loop
  • From: highegg
• Re: Clear Screen
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: Clear Screen
  • From: Richard Maine
• Clear Screen
  • From: Rosana Khan
• Re: Lahey Fortran and Core 2 duo
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Lahey Fortran and Core 2 duo
  • From: Tim Prince
• Lahey Fortran and Core 2 duo
  • From: Harvey Gratt
• Re: forall and do loop
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: forall and do loop
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: forall and do loop
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: forall and do loop
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: forall and do loop
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: forall and do loop
  • From: Richard Edgar
• Re: forall and do loop
  • From: Richard Edgar
• Re: forall and do loop
  • From: highegg
• Re: forall and do loop
  • From: Ian Bush
• Re: forall and do loop
  • From: Walter Spector
• Re: Simple Input File Parsing Question
  • From: Arno
• Re: forall and do loop
  • From: Ian Bush
• Re: Problem linking fortran code
  • From: highegg
• Re: forall and do loop
  • From: highegg
• Re: Problem linking fortran code
  • From: Fly Away
• Re: Problem linking fortran code
  • From: erik magnuson
• Re: Problem linking fortran code
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: forall and do loop
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: forall and do loop
  • From: Walter Spector
• Re: forall and do loop
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Re: Execution Timing
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: forall and do loop
  • From: highegg
• Re: Problem linking fortran code
  • From: erik magnuson
• Re: Converting code from single to double precision
  • From: Lynn
• Re: Help linking f77 libraries into gfortran
  • From: deltaseq0
• Execution Timing
  • From: Dr Ivan D. Reid
• Re: f77, f90, f95 or f2003?
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: forall and do loop
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Re: Converting code from single to double precision
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: Converting code from single to double precision
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: forall and do loop
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: forall and do loop
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: forall and do loop
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Re: forall and do loop
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Converting code from single to double precision
  • From: Colin Watters
• Re: Help linking f77 libraries into gfortran
  • From: FX
• Re: Help linking f77 libraries into gfortran
  • From: deltaseq0
• Re: Help linking f77 libraries into gfortran
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: forall and do loop
  • From: Janne Blomqvist
• Re: Help linking f77 libraries into gfortran
  • From: FX
• Help linking f77 libraries into gfortran
  • From: deltaseq0
• Re: forall and do loop
  • From: Richard Maine
• making default arguments easier to use
  • From: Beliavsky
• Re: forall and do loop
  • From: highegg
• Re: forall and do loop
  • From: Gary Scott
• Re: forall and do loop
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Re: How do add decoration to imported subroutines in Intel Compiler?
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: forall and do loop
  • From: highegg
• Re: forall and do loop
  • From: Richard Edgar
• Re: forall and do loop
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: forall and do loop
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: forall and do loop
  • From: highegg
• Re: forall and do loop
  • From: Tobias Burnus
• Re: forall and do loop
  • From: highegg
• Re: forall and do loop
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: forall and do loop
  • From: Richard Maine
• How do add decoration to imported subroutines in Intel Compiler?
  • From: ferrad
• Re: forall and do loop
  • From: aeroguy
• Re: simplest way to sort a bi-dimensional array? mat(a,b)...
  • From: Les
• Re: forall and do loop
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: forall and do loop
  • From: highegg
• Re: forall and do loop
  • From: aeroguy
• Re: forall and do loop
  • From: highegg
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: forall and do loop
  • From: aeroguy
• Re: forall and do loop
  • From: Sebastian Hanigk
• forall and do loop
  • From: aeroguy
• Re: Matrix multiplication using subarrays?
  • From: Peter
• Re: C/C++ speed optimization bible/resources/pointers needed!
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: Lynn McGuire
• Re: Matrix multiplication using subarrays?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: language rules question: using a (passed in) parameter to define a parameter
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: simplest way to sort a bi-dimensional array? mat(a,b)...
  • From: e p chandler
• Re: language rules question: using a (passed in) parameter to define a parameter
  • From: BenR
• Matrix multiplication using subarrays?
  • From: Peter
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: Walter Spector
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: Walter Spector
• Re: simplest way to sort a bi-dimensional array? mat(a,b)...
  • From: ginko
• Re: simplest way to sort a bi-dimensional array? mat(a,b)...
  • From: dpb
• Re: How to call a Java program from Fortran?
  • From: Mark Westwood
• Re: simplest way to sort a bi-dimensional array? mat(a,b)...
  • From: ginko
• Re: simplest way to sort a bi-dimensional array? mat(a,b)...
  • From: Les
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Re: Statement terminators
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: Walter Spector
• Re: simplest way to sort a bi-dimensional array? mat(a,b)...
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Syntax to link a library in an *.ini
  • From: Adlane Rebai
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: Lynn McGuire
• Re: simplest way to sort a bi-dimensional array? mat(a,b)...
  • From: ginko
• Re: Q: Can I allocate a variable length character string?
  • From: gary . l . scott
• Re: Why zero is represented by an extremely small value?
  • From: Paul van Delst
• Re: simplest way to sort a bi-dimensional array? mat(a,b)...
  • From: highegg
• Re: simplest way to sort a bi-dimensional array? mat(a,b)...
  • From: Gordon Sande
• How to call a Java program from Fortran?
  • From: www
• Re: simplest way to sort a bi-dimensional array? mat(a,b)...
  • From: jwm
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: Statement terminators
  • From: Jugoslav Dujic
• simplest way to sort a bi-dimensional array? mat(a,b)...
  • From: ginko
• Re: precompilation?
  • From: inkant . awasthi
• Re: Q: Can I allocate a variable length character string?
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: Q: Can I allocate a variable length character string?
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: Is there a way to remove these goto statement
  • From: aeroguy
• Re: Q: Can I allocate a variable length character string?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Problem linking fortran code
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: Q: Can I allocate a variable length character string?
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: Q: Can I allocate a variable length character string?
  • From: robert . corbett
• Q: Can I allocate a variable length character string?
  • From: James Tursa
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: Gary Scott
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Statement terminators
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: Terence
• Re: Why zero is represented by an extremely small value?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Why zero is represented by an extremely small value?
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: language rules question: using a (passed in) parameter to define a parameter
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Why zero is represented by an extremely small value?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: language rules question: using a (passed in) parameter to define a parameter
  • From: dpb
• language rules question: using a (passed in) parameter to define a parameter
  • From: BenR
• Re: Why zero is represented by an extremely small value?
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: Why zero is represented by an extremely small value?
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: Why zero is represented by an extremely small value?
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: mecej4
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: wclodius
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: Kevin G. Rhoads
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: Les
• Re: Problem linking fortran code
  • From: H.S.
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: Gordon Sande
• precompilation?
  • From: Girish Kulkarni
• Bright up your advertising with a slim light box !----11 mm LED light box in China!
  • From: jenny-edlite
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: Edward N Bromhead
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Problem linking fortran code
  • From: a-lbi
• Re: Simple Input File Parsing Question
  • From: Les
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: Q: Best reference for a F77 programmer learning F90?
  • From: James Tursa
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: tianyf@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Simple Input File Parsing Question
  • From: tianyf@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: John Harper
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: mecej4
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: John Harper
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: Terence
• Re: Why zero is represented by an extremely small value?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Problem linking fortran code
  • From: H.S.
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: Simple Input File Parsing Question
  • From: dpb
• Re: Simple Input File Parsing Question
  • From: Dr Ivan D. Reid
• Re: Why zero is represented by an extremely small value?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Why zero is represented by an extremely small value?
  • From: Louis Krupp
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Simple Input File Parsing Question
  • From: magesing
• Why zero is represented by an extremely small value?
  • From: www
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• Re: iso curve extraction
  • From: veda
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: mecej4
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Re: Problem linking fortran code
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: Need some HELP!! In a pre-version fortran codes
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: Need some HELP!! In a pre-version fortran codes
  • From: Les
• Re: f77, f90, f95 or f2003?
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: Need some HELP!! In a pre-version fortran codes
  • From: Jugoslav Dujic
• users of Fortran
  • From: Beliavsky
• Re: Problem linking fortran code
  • From: a-lbi
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Problem linking fortran code
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: Need some HELP!! In a pre-version fortran codes
  • From: PH.D.Condidater.Li.Ning
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: tianyf@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Need some HELP!! In a pre-version fortran codes
  • From: Les
• Re: Reading in data from several files
  • From: PH.D.Condidater.Li.Ning
• Re: Need some HELP!! In a pre-version fortran codes
  • From: nealleehit
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: tholen
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: Keith Refson
• Re: Statement terminators
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: Need some HELP!! In a pre-version fortran codes
  • From: Les
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: Need some HELP!! In a pre-version fortran codes
  • From: Louis Krupp
• Problem linking fortran code
  • From: a-lbi
• Re: Need some HELP!! In a pre-version fortran codes
  • From: nealleehit
• Re: Need some HELP!! In a pre-version fortran codes
  • From: nealleehit
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: tianyf@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Insert string at the first line of a file.
  • From: tianyf@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: Q: Best reference for a F77 programmer learning F90?
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Read error
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: Fly Away
• Re: f77, f90, f95 or f2003?
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: Terence
• Re: Need some HELP!! In a pre-version fortran codes
  • From: Terence
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: tianyf@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Need some HELP!! In a pre-version fortran codes
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Q: Best reference for a F77 programmer learning F90?
  • From: ryofurue
• Re: iso curve extraction
  • From: Mark Stucky
• Re: fortran compilers
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: Need some HELP!! In a pre-version fortran codes
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: Thomas Koenig
• Re: Reading in data from several files
  • From: Kevin G. Rhoads
• Re: Need some HELP!! In a pre-version fortran codes
  • From: fj
• Re: Q: Best reference for a F77 programmer learning F90?
  • From: Clive Page
• convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: Lynn McGuire
• Re: Insert string at the first line of a file.
  • From: jwm
• Re: Q: Best reference for a F77 programmer learning F90?
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Re: Reading in data from several files
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Reading in data from several files
  • From: smurray444
• Re: Fortran 77 - Is their something special about subroutines
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• Re: Fortran 77 - Is their something special about subroutines
  • From: dpb
• Fortran 77 - Is their something special about subroutines
  • From: coolchick
• Re: Need some HELP!! In a pre-version fortran codes
  • From: Tim Prince
• RE: Fortran 77 - Is their something special about subroutines
  • From: meek
• Re: Need some HELP!! In a pre-version fortran codes
  • From: nealleehit
• Re: Need some HELP!! In a pre-version fortran codes
  • From: nealleehit
• Re: Need some HELP!! In a pre-version fortran codes
  • From: nealleehit
• Re: Need some HELP!! In a pre-version fortran codes
  • From: nealleehit
• Re: Need some HELP!! In a pre-version fortran codes
  • From: nealleehit
• Re: Need some HELP!! In a pre-version fortran codes
  • From: fj
• Re: Unsigned Integers and Fortran
  • From: Colin Paul Gloster
• Re: Unsigned Integers and Fortran
  • From: Colin Paul Gloster
• Re: f77, f90, f95 or f2003?
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: iso curve extraction
  • From: fj
• Re: iso curve extraction
  • From: veda
• Re: Need some HELP!! In a pre-version fortran codes
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: f77, f90, f95 or f2003?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Need some HELP!! In a pre-version fortran codes
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: f77, f90, f95 or f2003?
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: Need some HELP!! In a pre-version fortran codes
  • From: Louis Krupp
• Re: Q: Best reference for a F77 programmer learning F90?
  • From: Beliavsky
• Re: f77, f90, f95 or f2003?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Need some HELP!! In a pre-version fortran codes
  • From: nealleehit
• Re: Q: Best reference for a F77 programmer learning F90?
  • From: John Harper
• Re: Statement terminators
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Statement terminators
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Statement terminators
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: iso curve extraction
  • From: fj
• Re: Upgrading XP machine to run gcc
  • From: deltaseq0
• Re: Form k = i + j and test for overflow.
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: tholen
• Re: Form k = i + j and test for overflow.
  • From: James Giles
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: James Giles
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: tholen
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: tholen
• Re: Scope question (gfortran odd-man out)
  • From: David Thompson
• Re: Unsigned Integers and Fortran
  • From: David Thompson
• Re: Form k = i + j and test for overflow.
  • From: David Thompson
• Re: Form k = i + j and test for overflow.
  • From: David Thompson
• Re: Upgrading XP machine to run gcc
  • From: Dr Ivan D. Reid
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: tholen
• Re: Insert string at the first line of a file.
  • From: Dr Ivan D. Reid
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: James Giles
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: Gary Scott
• Re: iso curve extraction
  • From: veda
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: James Giles
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: dpb
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: Gary Scott
• Re: Statement terminators
  • From: James Giles
• Re: iso curve extraction
  • From: fj
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Statement terminators
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: Gary Scott
• Re: Read error
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Insert string at the first line of a file.
  • From: Gary Scott
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Statement terminators
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Insert string at the first line of a file.
  • From: Louis Krupp
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Insert string at the first line of a file.
  • From: tianyf@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Read error
  • From: tianyf@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Read error
  • From: dpb
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: dpb
• Re: Statement terminators
  • From: Ben Hetland
• Re: f77, f90, f95 or f2003?
  • From: Dr Ivan D. Reid
• Read error
  • From: Tim Springer
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: tholen
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: James Giles
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: tholen
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: tholen
• Re: iso curve extraction
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: James Giles
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: Gary Scott
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: James Giles
• Re: iso curve extraction
  • From: veda
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: tholen
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: James Giles
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: James Giles
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: tholen
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: tholen
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: Gary Scott
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: James Giles
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: tholen
• Re: Best reference for a F77 programmer learning F90?
  • From: John Fredrickson
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: James Giles
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: Gary Scott
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: James Giles
• Re: f77, f90, f95 or f2003?
  • From: Gib Bogle
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: Gary Scott
• Re: iso curve extraction
  • From: veda
• Re: iso curve extraction
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: James Giles
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: James Giles
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: Gary Scott
• Re: Fortran Training - Cranfield University
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: iso curve extraction
  • From: fj
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: tholen
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Q: Best reference for a F77 programmer learning F90?
  • From: Bil Kleb
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: James Giles
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: tholen
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: tholen
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: James Giles
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Q: Best reference for a F77 programmer learning F90?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Q: Best reference for a F77 programmer learning F90?
  • From: Gary Scott
• Q: Best reference for a F77 programmer learning F90?
  • From: James Tursa
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: James Giles
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: tholen
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: tholen
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: tholen
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: tholen
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: tholen
• Re: Flavors of zero, flavors of infinity Re: On writing negative zero -
  • From: tholen
• FYI: Fortran Training - Cranfield University
  • From: Gary Scott
• Re: Statement terminators
  • From: Jugoslav Dujic
• Re: Upgrading XP machine to run gcc
  • From: deltaseq0
• Re: Upgrading XP machine to run gcc
  • From: deltaseq0
• Re: f77, f90, f95 or f2003?
  • From: Wade Ward
• iso curve extraction
  • From: veda
• Re: f77, f90, f95 or f2003?
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: Janne Blomqvist
• Re: Statement terminators
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: f77, f90, f95 or f2003?
  • From: Greg Lindahl
• Re: f77, f90, f95 or f2003?
  • From: Jan Gerrit Kootstra
• Re: f77, f90, f95 or f2003?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Statement terminators
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: Statement terminators
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Statement terminators
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Statement terminators
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Statement terminators
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: Upgrading XP machine to run gcc
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: Pierre Asselin
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: analyst41
• Re: Upgrading XP machine to run gcc
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: James Giles
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: Kevin G. Rhoads
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: James Giles
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: tholen
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: tholen
• Re: Flavors of zero, flavors of infinity Re: On writing negative zero - with
  • From: Kevin G. Rhoads
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: Kevin G. Rhoads
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: tholen
• Re: Statement terminators
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Statement terminators
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Statement terminators
  • From: James Giles
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: tholen
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: tholen
• Re: Statement terminators
  • From: James Giles
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Flavors of zero, flavors of infinity Re: On writing negative zero - with
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Statement terminators
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Flavors of zero, flavors of infinity Re: On writing negative zero - with
  • From: James Giles
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Statement terminators
  • From: ryofurue
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: James Giles
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: tholen
• Re: Flavors of zero, flavors of infinity Re: On writing negative zero - with
  • From: tholen
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: tholen
• Re: f77, f90, f95 or f2003?
  • From: James Giles
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: tholen
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: tholen
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Insert string at the first line of a file.
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: f77, f90, f95 or f2003?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Upgrading XP machine to run gcc
  • From: deltaseq0
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: Kevin G. Rhoads
• Flavors of zero, flavors of infinity Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: Kevin G. Rhoads
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: Kevin G. Rhoads
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: Insert string at the first line of a file.
  • From: mcalhoun
• Re: f77, f90, f95 or f2003?
  • From: Kevin G. Rhoads
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: Pierre Asselin
• Re: g95 error
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: Insert string at the first line of a file.
  • From: imailz
• Re: Insert string at the first line of a file.
  • From: Beliavsky
• Re: Insert string at the first line of a file.
  • From: imailz
• Re: public/private attribute before actual declaration
  • From: fj
• Re: Insert string at the first line of a file.
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Insert string at the first line of a file.
  • From: imailz
• Re: f77, f90, f95 or f2003?
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: James Giles
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: James Giles
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: tholen
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: tholen
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: tholen
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: f77, f90, f95 or f2003?
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: f77, f90, f95 or f2003?
  • From: Douglas Wells
• Re: public/private attribute before actual declaration
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: James Giles
• Re: error in do while !!
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: f77, f90, f95 or f2003?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: Derived type in main
  • From: Ralf Schaa
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: f77, f90, f95 or f2003?
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: f77, f90, f95 or f2003?
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: error in do while !!
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: f77, f90, f95 or f2003?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: Gary Scott
• Re: error in do while !!
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: f77, f90, f95 or f2003?
  • From: Douglas Wells
• Re: g95 error
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: error in do while !!
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: g95 error
  • From: Gary Scott
• Re: g95 error
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: g95 error
  • From: David
• Re: g95 error
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• g95 error
  • From: David
• Re: f77, f90, f95 or f2003?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: f77, f90, f95 or f2003?
  • From: Terence
• Re: f77, f90, f95 or f2003?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: Terence
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: James Giles
• copyright= C linear dependence testing C no dependence - vectorizable C integer ntimes,ld,n,i,nl real
  • From: rych67
• Re: f77, f90, f95 or f2003?
  • From: Gib Bogle
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: fortran compilers
  • From: Kevin G. Rhoads
• Re: A basic question about linked list
  • From: veda
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: tholen
• Re: f77, f90, f95 or f2003?
  • From: Beliavsky
• Re: f77, f90, f95 or f2003?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: f77, f90, f95 or f2003?
  • From: Ian Gay
• Re: ifort functions for test NaN and Inf
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: segmentation fault
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: segmentation fault
  • From: kalu
• Re: error with " do while "
  • From: e p chandler
• Re: ifort functions for test NaN and Inf
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: ifort functions for test NaN and Inf
  • From: highegg
• Re: ifort functions for test NaN and Inf
  • From: highegg
• Re: Derived type in main
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: A question about OOP in Fortran?
  • From: Paul Colin Gloster
• Re: error in do while !!
  • From: Robert Corbett
• Re: error in do while !!
  • From: Gib Bogle
• Re: f77, f90, f95 or f2003?
  • From: Gib Bogle
• Re: fortran compilers
  • From: merl the perl
• Re: fortran compilers
  • From: merl the perl
• Re: error in do while !!
  • From: Les
• Re: error in do while !!
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: fortran // concat /> fortranconcat
  • From: Richard Maine
• error in do while !!
  • From: nakisa
• Re: fortran // concat /> fortranconcat
  • From: John Paine
• Re: question about function !!!
  • From: nakisa
• Re: Sun Studio 12 available for download
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: A basic question about linked list
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: A question about OOP in Fortran?
  • From: James Giles
• Re: random_seed
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• A basic question about linked list
  • From: veda
• random_seed
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: random_seed
  • From: Thomas Koenig
• Re: ifort functions for test NaN and Inf
  • From: James Giles
• Re: error with " do while "
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Sun Studio 12, what do you think?
  • From: Reinhold Bader
• Re: f77, f90, f95 or f2003?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Fortran 2003 -- when?
  • From: Colin Paul Gloster
• Re: Fortran 2003 -- when?
  • From: Colin Paul Gloster
• Re: F Compiler has function to analysis Module?
  • From: Colin Paul Gloster
• public/private attribute before actual declaration
  • From: Bálint Aradi
• Re: error with " do while "
  • From: Ron Shepard
• Re: ifort functions for test NaN and Inf
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• Re: f77, f90, f95 or f2003?
  • From: Colin Paul Gloster
• Re: error with " do while "
  • From: dpb
• Re: error with " do while "
  • From: dpb
• Re: error with " do while "
  • From: Ian Bush
• Re: ifort functions for test NaN and Inf
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• Re: error with " do while "
  • From: Les
• Re: Does F2003 has the similar fuction like "template" in C++??
  • From: Colin Paul Gloster
• Re: error with " do while "
  • From: Ian Bush
• Re: unresolved external symbol while calling setvbuf3f
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• error with " do while "
  • From: nakisa
• Re: question about function !!!
  • From: nakisa
• Re: ifort functions for test NaN and Inf
  • From: Tim Prince
• unresolved external symbol while calling setvbuf3f
  • From: abhivg
• Re: ifort functions for test NaN and Inf
  • From: Ian Bush
• ifort functions for test NaN and Inf
  • From: ddb78s@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: A question about OOP in Fortran?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: fortran // concat /> fortranconcat
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: A question about OOP in Fortran?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: fortran // concat /> fortranconcat
  • From: David Jones
• Re: A question about OOP in Fortran?
  • From: James Giles
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: Robert Corbett
• Re: fortran // concat /> fortranconcat
  • From: Richard Maine
• fortran // concat /> fortranconcat
  • From: aeroguy
• Re: Derived type in main
  • From: dpb
• Re: Derived type in main
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Derived type in main
  • From: Ralf Schaa
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: Terence
• Re: A question about OOP in Fortran?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: A question about OOP in Fortran?
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Sun Studio 12 available for download
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: A question about OOP in Fortran?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: A question about OOP in Fortran?
  • From: James Giles
• Re: A question about OOP in Fortran?
  • From: James Giles
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: James Giles
• Re: segmentation fault
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: segmentation fault
  • From: Kevin G. Rhoads
• Re: A question about OOP in Fortran?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: segmentation fault
  • From: dpb
• Re: A question about OOP in Fortran?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Fortran 90 modules suck for portability- why use them?
  • From: Kevin G. Rhoads
• Re: fortran compilers
  • From: Kevin G. Rhoads
• Re: A question about OOP in Fortran?
  • From: Colin Paul Gloster
• Re: C++ Bounds Checking
  • From: Colin Paul Gloster
• Re: C++ Bounds Checking
  • From: Colin Paul Gloster
• Re: C++ Bounds Checking
  • From: Colin Paul Gloster
• Re: segmentation fault
  • From: Les
• segmentation fault
  • From: kalu
• Re: A question about OOP in Fortran?
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: A question about OOP in Fortran?
  • From: Colin Paul Gloster
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: tholen
• Re: Total n00b gets compiler error with FORMAT statement...
  • From: Wim Cossement
• Re: matmul trouble
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: Sun Studio 12 available for download
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: Sun Studio 12 available for download
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: James Giles
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: Sun Studio 12 available for download
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: John Harper
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Reading an image array.
  • From: William Asher
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: tholen
• Re: fortran compilers
  • From: Dr Ivan D. Reid
• Re: question about function !!!
  • From: dpb
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: James Giles
• Re: question about function !!!
  • From: e p chandler
• Re: question about function !!!
  • From: Jan Gerrit Kootstra
• Re: question about function !!!
  • From: nakisa
• Re: Total n00b gets compiler error with FORMAT statement...
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Total n00b gets compiler error with FORMAT statement...
  • From: dpb
• Re: Total n00b gets compiler error with FORMAT statement...
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Total n00b gets compiler error with FORMAT statement...
  • From: Wim Cossement
• Re: Fortran 90 modules suck for portability- why use them?
  • From: Greg Lindahl
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: Ron Shepard
• Re: Upgrading XP machine to run gcc
  • From: FX
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: dpb
• Re: Can Fortran compiler detect memory leaks??
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• Re: Dynamic vector allocation
  • From: m_pr
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: Dynamic vector allocation
  • From: highegg
• Re: Dynamic vector allocation
  • From: robert . corbett
• Dynamic vector allocation
  • From: m_pr
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Sun Studio 12, what do you think?
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: Sun Studio 12, what do you think?
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: Fortran 90 modules suck for portability- why use them?
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: Fortran 90 modules suck for portability- why use them?
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: Terence
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: Fortran 90 modules suck for portability- why use them?
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Fortran 90 modules suck for portability- why use them?
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: Fortran 90 modules suck for portability- why use them?
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: Fortran 90 modules suck for portability- why use them?
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: Fortran 90 modules suck for portability- why use them?
  • From: John Harper
• Re: Fortran 90 modules suck for portability- why use them?
  • From: Greg Lindahl
• Re: Fortran 90 modules suck for portability- why use them?
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: Upgrading XP machine to run gcc
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: Upgrading XP machine to run gcc
  • From: deltaseq0
• Re: calling c from fortran 90
  • From: dpb
• Re: calling c from fortran 90
  • From: mecej4
• Re: Upgrading XP machine to run gcc
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: Upgrading XP machine to run gcc
  • From: FX
• Re: Upgrading XP machine to run gcc
  • From: FX
• Re: Fortran 90 modules suck for portability- why use them?
  • From: Greg Lindahl
• Re: question about function !!!
  • From: tholen
• question about function !!!
  • From: nakisa
• Re: Fortran 90 modules suck for portability- why use them?
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: Upgrading XP machine to run gcc
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: Fortran 90 modules suck for portability- why use them?
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: Reading an image array.
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Upgrading XP machine to run gcc
  • From: deltaseq0
• Re: Fortran 90 modules suck for portability- why use them?
  • From: Gary Scott
• Re: Fortran 90 modules suck for portability- why use them?
  • From: Greg Lindahl
• Re: Fortran 90 modules suck for portability- why use them?
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: Fortran 90 modules suck for portability- why use them?
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: Fortran 90 modules suck for portability- why use them?
  • From: Gary Scott
• Re: Fortran 90 modules suck for portability- why use them?
  • From: Greg Lindahl
• Re: Fortran 90 modules suck for portability- why use them?
  • From: Greg Lindahl
• Re: Fortran 90 modules suck for portability- why use them?
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: Sun Studio 12 available for download
  • From: gsal
• Re: Fortran 90 modules suck for portability- why use them?
  • From: Gary Scott
• Re: Fortran 90 modules suck for portability- why use them?
  • From: Thomas Koenig
• Re: Fortran 90 modules suck for portability- why use them?
  • From: Bil Kleb
• Re: Is Fortran faster than C?
  • From: Janne Blomqvist
• Re: Reading an image array.
  • From: merl the perl
• Re: Reading an image array.
  • From: Terence
• Re: Fortran 90 modules suck for portability- why use them?
  • From: Greg Lindahl
• حصريا فيلم كركر آخر افلام محمد سعد جودة رائعة وصوت اروع فقط على ديدي ديفيدي
  • From: مزيونه
• Re: Sun Studio 12 available for download
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: Fortran 90 modules suck for portability- why use them?
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: Sun Studio 12 available for download
  • From: merl the perl
• Re: Can Fortran compiler detect memory leaks??
  • From: merl the perl
• Re: Reading an image array.
  • From: merl the perl
• Re: Reading an image array.
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Reading an image array.
  • From: dpb
• Can Fortran compiler detect memory leaks??
  • From: li . simula
• Re: Reading an image array.
  • From: merl the perl
• Re: Reading an image array.
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Reading an image array.
  • From: Terence
• Re: Fortran 90 modules suck for portability- why use them?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Fortran 90 modules suck for portability- why use them?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Fortran 90 modules suck for portability- why use them?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Is Fortran faster than C?
  • From: merl the perl
• Re: Fortran 90 modules suck for portability- why use them?
  • From: max
• Re: Fortran 90 modules suck for portability- why use them?
  • From: Paul van Delst
• Re: Fortran 90 modules suck for portability- why use them?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Fortran 90 modules suck for portability- why use them?
  • From: Reinhold Bader
• Re: Fortran 90 modules suck for portability- why use them?
  • From: Greg Lindahl
• Re: Fortran 90 modules suck for portability- why use them?
  • From: Reinhold Bader
• Fortran 90 modules suck for portability- why use them?
  • From: henrikholst80
• Re: Reading an image array.
  • From: dsurveyor
• Re: NAN and INF again ...
  • From: Jan Gerrit Kootstra
• Re: NAN and INF again ...
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• Re: A question about "Read" by key word?
  • From: Gib Bogle
• Re: A question about "Read" by key word?
  • From: e p chandler
• A question about "Read" by key word?
  • From: li . simula
• Re: flattening a matrix...
  • From: Les
• Re: Is Fortran faster than C?
  • From: Janne Blomqvist
• Re: flattening a matrix...
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: Jerry DeLisle
• Re: NAN and INF again ...
  • From: Ralf Schaa
• Re: What sort of literal is this?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• fortran at the uni
  • From: merl the perl
• Re: NAN and INF again ...
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Is Fortran faster than C?
  • From: merl the perl
• Re: NAN and INF again ...
  • From: Ralf Schaa
• Re: NAN and INF again ...
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: NAN and INF again ...
  • From: Tim Prince
• NAN and INF again ...
  • From: Ralf Schaa
• Re: flattening a matrix...
  • From: Terence
• Re: getting intel fortran to work from cygwin command line?
  • From: Mark Stucky
• Re: flattening a matrix...
  • From: mecej4
• Re: flattening a matrix...
  • From: highegg
• Re: flattening a matrix...
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: flattening a matrix...
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Re: calling c from fortran 90
  • From: Sebastian Hanigk
• Re: flattening a matrix...
  • From: Ron Shepard
• Re: flattening a matrix...
  • From: Ian Bush
• Re: calling c from fortran 90
  • From: dpb
• Re: calling c from fortran 90
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: calling c from fortran 90
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: calling c from fortran 90
  • From: dpb
• Re: calling c from fortran 90
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: calling c from fortran 90
  • From: dpb
• Re: flattening a matrix...
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: flattening a matrix...
  • From: Ian Bush
• previos message contd
  • From: joyeetadeb85
• calling c from fortran 90
  • From: joyeetadeb85
• Re: flattening a matrix...
  • From: highegg
• Re: boot sector
  • From: merl the perl
• Re: What sort of literal is this?
  • From: merl the perl
• Re: fortran compilers
  • From: Ian Gay
• Re: Form k = i + j and test for overflow.
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Form k = i + j and test for overflow.
  • From: Brooks Moses
• Re: Form k = i + j and test for overflow.
  • From: James Giles
• Re: fortran compilers
  • From: Terence
• Re: boot sector
  • From: Terence
• Re: boot sector
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: boot sector
  • From: merl the perl
• Re: fortran compilers
  • From: merl the perl
• Re: fortran compilers
  • From: John Harper
• Re: Form k = i + j and test for overflow.
  • From: Brooks Moses
• Re: Using Multiple Source Files with Plato3 in C
  • From: Mark Stevens
• Re: What sort of literal is this?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: What sort of literal is this?
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: What sort of literal is this?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: What sort of literal is this?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Sun Studio 12, what do you think?
  • From: merl the perl
• Re: What sort of literal is this?
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: reverse engineering a sig
  • From: Chip Coldwell
• Re: What sort of literal is this?
  • From: Walter Spector
• Re: What sort of literal is this?
  • From: Walter Spector
• Re: fortran compilers
  • From: Gary Scott
• Re: What sort of literal is this?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Sun Studio 12, what do you think?
  • From: Reinhold Bader
• Re: boot sector
  • From: e p chandler
• Re: What sort of literal is this?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: boot sector
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: What sort of literal is this?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: boot sector
  • From: merl the perl
• Re: fortran compilers
  • From: merl the perl
• Re: What sort of literal is this?
  • From: Walter Spector
• Re: fortran compilers
  • From: Jan Gerrit Kootstra
• Re: A problem about Fortran pointers
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: What sort of literal is this?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: What sort of literal is this?
  • From: Walter Spector
• Re: boot sector
  • From: Richard Maine
• boot sector
  • From: merl the perl
• fortran compilers
  • From: merl the perl
• Re: douady's rabbit
  • From: Terence
• Re: Reading an image array.
  • From: Terence
• Re: What sort of literal is this?
  • From: Colin Watters
• Re: Reading an image array.
  • From: J. F. Cornwall
• Re: What sort of literal is this?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• douady's rabbit
  • From: Lopes
• Re: What sort of literal is this?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: What sort of literal is this?
  • From: James Giles
• Re: What sort of literal is this?
  • From: Colin Watters
• Re: if construct
  • From: James Giles
• Re: if construct
  • From: Ken Fairfield
• Re: Reading an image array.
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: Reading an image array.
  • From: J. F. Cornwall
• Re: Reading an image array.
  • From: J. F. Cornwall
• Re: Reading an image array.
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Reading an image array.
  • From: dsurveyor
• Re: character*80 versus character*1 (80)
  • From: robin
• Re: What sort of literal is this?
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Re: What sort of literal is this?
  • From: dpb
• Re: requesting/forcing inlining of a contained function
  • From: Jeffery . A . White
• Re: Why not an EXIT statement for an if ... endif construct ?
  • From: Arno
• Re: named constants vs. literal constants
  • From: Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
• Re: if construct
  • From: Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
• Re: if construct
  • From: Gib Bogle
• Re: pls suggest me a simple but good compiler for F77
  • From: Gib Bogle
• Re: pls suggest me a simple but good compiler for F77
  • From: David Flower
• Re: What sort of literal is this?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: getting intel fortran to work from cygwin command line?
  • From: Pierre Asselin
• Re: character*80 versus character*1 (80)
  • From: John Harper
• Re: What sort of literal is this?
  • From: dpb
• Re: What sort of literal is this?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: What sort of literal is this?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: What sort of literal is this?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: matmul trouble
  • From: merl the perl
• Re: What sort of literal is this?
  • From: Terence
• Re: 'Advance=' by internal read
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: What sort of literal is this?
  • From: James Giles
• Re: What sort of literal is this?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: 'Advance=' by internal read
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Using fortran code with VBA
  • From: Craig Powers
• What sort of literal is this?
  • From: jaguar0616
• Re: if construct
  • From: Ken Fairfield
• Re: matmul trouble
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: how to avoid auto new line?
  • From: Bill C
• 'Advance=' by internal read
  • From: Michael
• Re: matmul trouble
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: matmul trouble
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: how to avoid auto new line?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: if construct
  • From: gsal
• Re: how to avoid auto new line?
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: matmul trouble
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: C++ Bounds Checking
  • From: Craig Powers
• Re: C++ Bounds Checking
  • From: Craig Powers
• Re: how to avoid auto new line?
  • From: ginko
• Re: matmul trouble
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: if construct
  • From: Ken Fairfield
• Re: matmul trouble
  • From: dpb
• Re: pls suggest me a simple but good compiler for F77
  • From: dpb
• Re: pls suggest me a simple but good compiler for F77
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: pls suggest me a simple but good compiler for F77
  • From: ginko
• Re: pls suggest me a simple but good compiler for F77
  • From: Beliavsky
• Re: pls suggest me a simple but good compiler for F77
  • From: ginko
• Re: pls suggest me a simple but good compiler for F77
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: pls suggest me a simple but good compiler for F77
  • From: jomarbueyes
• Re: pls suggest me a simple but good compiler for F77
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: how to avoid auto new line?
  • From: Bill C
• pls suggest me a simple but good compiler for F77
  • From: ginko
• Re: communicating the name of a function to deep within the call tree
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Re: how to avoid auto new line?
  • From: ginko
• Re: matmul trouble
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: matmul trouble
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: matmul trouble
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: communicating the name of a function to deep within the call tree
  • From: Paul van Delst
• Re: named constants vs. literal constants
  • From: Walter Spector
• Re: getting intel fortran to work from cygwin command line?
  • From: Ed
• Re: getting intel fortran to work from cygwin command line?
  • From: Ed
• Re: how to convert this line of Matlab code into Fortran?
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• Re: named constants vs. literal constants
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: how to avoid auto new line?
  • From: Gary Scott
• Re: Why not an EXIT statement for an if ... endif construct ?
  • From: Beliavsky
• Re: Why not an EXIT statement for an if ... endif construct ?
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: if construct
  • From: Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
• Why not an EXIT statement for an if ... endif construct ?
  • From: analyst41
• if construct
  • From: Leon
• Re: matmul trouble
  • From: Dan Nagle
• named constants vs. literal constants
  • From: Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
• Re: matmul trouble
  • From: Tom Micevski
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: James Giles
• Re: matmul trouble
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: RAN(IRANZ,IRBNZ)
  • From: clear
• Re: matmul trouble
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: matmul trouble
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: Janne Blomqvist
• Re: matmul trouble
  • From: Louis Krupp
• Re: character*80 versus character*1 (80)
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: how to avoid auto new line?
  • From: Thierry B.
• Re: matmul trouble
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: matmul trouble
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: matmul trouble
  • From: Louis Krupp
• Re: matmul trouble
  • From: Greg Lindahl
• Re: matmul trouble
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: matmul trouble
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: matmul trouble
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: matmul trouble
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: matmul trouble
  • From: dpb
• Re: matmul trouble
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: matmul trouble
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: character*80 versus character*1 (80)
  • From: Douglas Wells
• Re: How old is the average Fortran programmer?
  • From: Terence
• Re: communicating the name of a function to deep within the call tree
  • From: James Giles
• Re: communicating the name of a function to deep within the call tree
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: how to avoid auto new line?
  • From: Gary Scott
• Re: matmul trouble
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: How old is the average Fortran programmer?
  • From: John Harper
• Re: how to avoid auto new line?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: character*80 versus character*1 (80)
  • From: John Harper
• Re: matmul trouble
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: how to avoid auto new line?
  • From: spacecriter \(Bill C\)
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: how to avoid auto new line?
  • From: dpb
• Re: how to avoid auto new line?
  • From: spacecriter \(Bill C\)
• Re: matmul trouble
  • From: dpb
• Re: how to avoid auto new line?
  • From: ginko
• Re: matmul trouble
  • From: George Schroeder
• Re: How old is the average Fortran programmer?
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: how to avoid auto new line?
  • From: ginko
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: James Giles
• Re: how to avoid auto new line?
  • From: ginko
• Re: How old is the average Fortran programmer?
  • From: Wade Ward
• matmul trouble
  • From: Wade Ward
• On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: Jerry DeLisle
• Re: how to avoid auto new line?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: communicating the name of a function to deep within the call tree
  • From: James Giles
• Re: how to avoid auto new line?
  • From: Gary Scott
• Re: how to avoid auto new line?
  • From: ginko
• Re: communicating the name of a function to deep within the call tree
  • From: Walter Spector
• Re: Is Fortran faster than C?
  • From: Gary Scott
• Re: communicating the name of a function to deep within the call tree
  • From: Ron Shepard
• Re: communicating the name of a function to deep within the call tree
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Will Intel Visual Fortran 10.1 do automatic vectorization for me?
  • From: Ron Shepard
• Re: communicating the name of a function to deep within the call tree
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: communicating the name of a function to deep within the call tree
  • From: Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
• Re: communicating the name of a function to deep within the call tree
  • From: Ken Fairfield
• Re: Will Intel Visual Fortran 10.1 do automatic vectorization for me?
  • From: jwm
• Will Intel Visual Fortran 10.1 do automatic vectorization for me?
  • From: Linus Utopia
• Re: Is Fortran faster than C?
  • From: dpb
• Re: Is there a way to remove these goto statement
  • From: Gib Bogle
• Re: communicating the name of a function to deep within the call tree
  • From: Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
• Re: communicating the name of a function to deep within the call tree
  • From: Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
• Re: communicating the name of a function to deep within the call tree
  • From: Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
• Re: communicating the name of a function to deep within the call tree
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: communicating the name of a function to deep within the call tree
  • From: James Giles
• Re: communicating the name of a function to deep within the call tree
  • From: Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
• Re: communicating the name of a function to deep within the call tree
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Re: communicating the name of a function to deep within the call tree
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: communicating the name of a function to deep within the call tree
  • From: Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
• Re: Is Fortran faster than C?
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: communicating the name of a function to deep within the call tree
  • From: James Giles
• Re: communicating the name of a function to deep within the call tree
  • From: Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
• Re: How old is the average Fortran programmer?
  • From: aevaughn
• Re: how to avoid auto new line?
  • From: Gib Bogle
• Re: getting intel fortran to work from cygwin command line?
  • From: Pierre Asselin
• Re: C++ Bounds Checking
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: How old is the average Fortran programmer?
  • From: Terence
• Re: communicating the name of a function to deep within the call tree
  • From: James Giles
• Re: communicating the name of a function to deep within the call tree
  • From: Gary Scott
• Re: communicating the name of a function to deep within the call tree
  • From: Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
• Re: C++ Bounds Checking
  • From: Walter Spector
• Re: communicating the name of a function to deep within the call tree
  • From: Colin Watters
• Re: Is Fortran faster than C?
  • From: dpb
• Re: C++ Bounds Checking
  • From: James Giles
• Re: C++ Bounds Checking
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: is this syntax legal (transfer()) ?
  • From: pehache-tolai
• Re: communicating the name of a function to deep within the call tree
  • From: James Giles
• Re: SAVE - Continued.....
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: C++ Bounds Checking
  • From: James Giles
• Re: C++ Bounds Checking
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: requesting/forcing inlining of a contained function
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: requesting/forcing inlining of a contained function
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• requesting/forcing inlining of a contained function
  • From: micha
• communicating the name of a function to deep within the call tree
  • From: Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
• Re: Compilation problem with gfortran
  • From: Tobias Burnus
• Re: getting intel fortran to work from cygwin command line?
  • From: Tim Prince
• getting intel fortran to work from cygwin command line?
  • From: Ed
• Re: how to avoid auto new line?
  • From: ginko
• Re: SAVE - Continued.....
  • From: Tim Springer
• Re: Compilation problem with gfortran
  • From: Janne Blomqvist
• Re: C++ Bounds Checking
  • From: James Giles
• Re: C++ Bounds Checking
  • From: blmblm
• Re: C++ Bounds Checking
  • From: James Giles
• Re: C++ Bounds Checking
  • From: blmblm
• Re: how to avoid auto new line?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: OT Re: Fortran to VB.net
  • From: dpb
• Re: C++ Bounds Checking
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: Is there a way to remove these goto statement
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: OT Re: Fortran to VB.net
  • From: Mark B Stucky
• Re: C++ Bounds Checking
  • From: Greg Lindahl
• Re: "Call system" and threads
  • From: Victor Eijkhout
• Re: how to avoid auto new line?
  • From: Gib Bogle
• Re: FORTRAN BINARY FILE COMPATIBILITY W/ MATLAB
  • From: Mark B Stucky
• Re: Is Fortran faster than C?
  • From: Gib Bogle
• Re: Fortran to VB.net
  • From: Craig Powers
• Re: OT Re: Fortran to VB.net
  • From: dpb
• OT Re: Fortran to VB.net
  • From: Mark B Stucky
• Re: C++ Bounds Checking
  • From: Gary Scott
• Re: C++ Bounds Checking
  • From: Craig Powers
• Re: Fortran to VB.net
  • From: dpb
• Re: C++ Bounds Checking
  • From: Craig Powers
• Re: Fortran to VB.net
  • From: dpb
• Re: C++ Bounds Checking
  • From: Craig Powers
• Re: Need Help: compiling old Fortran program
  • From: Craig Powers
• Re: Compilation problem with gfortran
  • From: Kamaraju S Kusumanchi
• Re: reverse engineering a sig
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Compilation problem with gfortran
  • From: baf
• Re: Fortran to VB.net
  • From: Craig Powers
• Re: Fortran to VB.net
  • From: Craig Powers
• Re: Is there a way to remove these goto statement
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Is there a way to remove these goto statement
  • From: Louis Krupp
• Re: Compilation problem with gfortran
  • From: Richard Maine
• reverse engineering a sig
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: How old is the average Fortran programmer?
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: Fortran to VB.net
  • From: Craig Powers
• Re: Is there a way to remove these goto statement
  • From: e p chandler
• Re: Fortran to VB.net
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Is there a way to remove these goto statement
  • From: none
• Re: Is Fortran faster than C?
  • From: Pascal Bourguignon
• Re: Fortran to VB.net
  • From: dpb
• Re: How to get intel fortran 9.0 working on VS2005?
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: Fortran to VB.net
  • From: Shawn
• Re: How to debug Fortran DLL called from VBA
  • From: Craig Powers
• Re: Arguments limits in DLL from VBA?
  • From: Craig Powers
• How to get intel fortran 9.0 working on VS2005?
  • From: Zadig
• Compilation problem with gfortran
  • From: Richard Edgar
• Re: character*80 versus character*1 (80)
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Fortran to VB.net
  • From: dpb
• Re: RAN(IRANZ,IRBNZ)
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: RAN(IRANZ,IRBNZ)
  • From: trembl27
• Re: RAN(IRANZ,IRBNZ)
  • From: trembl27
• Re: g77: transfer of array size
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• RAN(IRANZ,IRBNZ)
  • From: clear
• Re: g77: transfer of array size
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: FORTRAN BINARY FILE COMPATIBILITY W/ MATLAB
  • From: David Golden
• Re: Fortran to VB.net
  • From: Shawn
• Re: FORTRAN BINARY FILE COMPATIBILITY W/ MATLAB
  • From: Paul van Delst
• Re: g77: transfer of array size
  • From: Jugoslav Dujic
• Re: how to avoid auto new line?
  • From: Ron Shepard
• Arguments limits in DLL from VBA?
  • From: trembl27
• Re: g77: transfer of array size
  • From: Ingo Thies
• Re: FORTRAN BINARY FILE COMPATIBILITY W/ MATLAB
  • From: kis
• Re: g77: transfer of array size
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: g77: transfer of array size
  • From: Tim Prince
• g77: transfer of array size
  • From: Ingo Thies
• Re: how to avoid auto new line?
  • From: Arjen Markus
• how to avoid auto new line?
  • From: ginko
• Re: How old is the average Fortran programmer?
  • From: Charles Richmond
• Re: How old is the average Fortran programmer?
  • From: Charles Richmond
• Re: How old is the average Fortran programmer?
  • From: Charles Richmond
• Re: Is there a way to remove these goto statement
  • From: dpb
• Re: Is there a way to remove these goto statement
  • From: aeroguy
• Re: Is there a way to remove these goto statement
  • From: aeroguy
• Re: Is there a way to remove these goto statement
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Is there a way to remove these goto statement
  • From: aeroguy
• Re: Scope question (gfortran odd-man out)
  • From: paul . richard . thomas
• Re: how to resolve the problem?
  • From: Les
• Re: how to resolve the problem?
  • From: tholen
• Re: Callbacks - Delphi and CVF
  • From: Jugoslav Dujic
• Re: is this syntax legal (transfer()) ?
  • From: FX
• Re: character*80 versus character*1 (80)
  • From: Terence
• Re: FORTRAN BINARY FILE COMPATIBILITY W/ MATLAB
  • From: Ian Bush
• Re: how to resolve the problem?
  • From: Terence
• Re: is this syntax legal (transfer()) ?
  • From: pehache-tolai
• Re: how to resolve the problem?
  • From: aeroguy
• Re: how to resolve the problem?
  • From: Wade Ward
• how to resolve the problem?
  • From: XYQ
• FORTRAN BINARY FILE COMPATIBILITY W/ MATLAB
  • From: kis
• Re: Fortran to VB.net
  • From: dpb
• Re: graphical user interface
  • From: Mark B Stucky
• Re: Scope question (gfortran odd-man out)
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: Scope question (gfortran odd-man out)
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: Scope question (gfortran odd-man out)
  • From: dpb
• Re: character*80 versus character*1 (80)
  • From: dpb
• Re: Scope question (gfortran odd-man out)
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: How to debug Fortran DLL called from VBA
  • From: e p chandler
• Re: character*80 versus character*1 (80)
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Passing arrays as input/output to fortran DLL in VBA (Excel)
  • From: e p chandler
• Re: character*80 versus character*1 (80)
  • From: Lynn McGuire
• Re: variant data type
  • From: Lynn McGuire
• Re: variant data type
  • From: Lynn McGuire
• Re: is this syntax legal (transfer()) ?
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• How to debug Fortran DLL called from VBA
  • From: trembl27
• Re: Fortran to VB.net
  • From: dpb
• Re: Passing arrays as input/output to fortran DLL in VBA (Excel)
  • From: trembl27
• Re: is this syntax legal (transfer()) ?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Fortran to VB.net
  • From: dpb
• Re: Passing arrays as input/output to fortran DLL in VBA (Excel)
  • From: e p chandler
• Re: Fortran to VB.net
  • From: Shawn
• is this syntax legal (transfer()) ?
  • From: pehache-tolai
• Passing arrays as input/output to fortran DLL in VBA (Excel)
  • From: trembl27
• Re: Is Fortran faster than C?
  • From: Paul van Delst
• Re: Callbacks - Delphi and CVF
  • From: Gary Scott
• Re: Fortran to VB.net
  • From: Shawn
• Re: character*80 versus character*1 (80)
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Re: Callbacks - Delphi and CVF
  • From: Jugoslav Dujic
• Re: f77, f90, f95 or f2003?
  • From: Terence
• Re: f77, f90, f95 or f2003?
  • From: Bart Vandewoestyne
• Callbacks - Delphi and CVF
  • From: Farzad . Sadr
• Re: variant data type
  • From: Jugoslav Dujic
• Re: variant data type
  • From: Daniel Franke
• Re: f77, f90, f95 or f2003?
  • From: David Flower
• Re: Is this standard conforming?
  • From: paul . richard . thomas
• Re: not visible in debug mode
  • From: aeroguy
• Re: Scope question (gfortran odd-man out)
  • From: paul . richard . thomas
• Re: "Call system" and threads
  • From: james.annan@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Auto-Deallocation of local pointer?
  • From: Brooks Moses
• Re: Auto-Deallocation of local pointer?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Auto-Deallocation of local pointer?
  • From: gaurav
• Re: "Call system" and threads
  • From: Thierry B.
• Re: not visible in debug mode
  • From: robin
• Re: character*80 versus character*1 (80)
  • From: robin
• Re: intrinsics performance
  • From: robin
• Re: graphical user interface
  • From: Jim Klein
• Re: variant data type
  • From: Ken Fairfield
• Re: How to export a subroutine in a DLL that is used from within?
  • From: triera
• Re: character*80 versus character*1 (80)
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Scope question (gfortran odd-man out)
  • From: James Giles
• Re: variant data type
  • From: dpb
• variant data type
  • From: Lynn
• Re: Scope question (gfortran odd-man out)
  • From: John Harper
• Re: character*80 versus character*1 (80)
  • From: dpb
• character*80 versus character*1 (80)
  • From: Lynn
• Re: data mining
  • From: dpb
• Re: data mining
  • From: Gary Scott
• Re: data mining
  • From: analyst41
• Re: graphical user interface
  • From: Gary Scott
• Re: array bounds in assignments
  • From: robin
• Re: How to export a subroutine in a DLL that is used from within?
  • From: dpb
• Re: "Call system" and threads
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Is this standard conforming?
  • From: Salvatore
• How to export a subroutine in a DLL that is used from within?
  • From: trembl27
• Re: f77, f90, f95 or f2003?
  • From: Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
• Re: f77, f90, f95 or f2003?
  • From: Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
• Re: f77, f90, f95 or f2003?
  • From: David Simpson
• Re: not visible in debug mode
  • From: Jugoslav Dujic
• f77, f90, f95 or f2003?
  • From: V. D.
• Re: Problem with Lahey-Fortran 7.1
  • From: trembl27
• not visible in debug mode
  • From: aeroguy
• Re: Scope question (gfortran odd-man out)
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: "Call system" and threads
  • From: james.annan@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: data mining
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: Scope question (gfortran odd-man out)
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Form k = i + j and test for overflow.
  • From: robin
• Re: Form k = i + j and test for overflow.
  • From: robin
• Re: Scope question (gfortran odd-man out)
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: "Call system" and threads
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: Scope question (gfortran odd-man out)
  • From: James Giles
• Re: "Call system" and threads
  • From: james.annan@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: graphical user interface
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: graphical user interface
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: "Call system" and threads
  • From: Thierry B.
• Re: Overload Write
  • From: Terence
• Re: data mining
  • From: Terence
• Re: Scope question (gfortran odd-man out)
  • From: James Giles
• Re: data mining
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Scope question (gfortran odd-man out)
  • From: John Harper
• Re: Overload Write
  • From: Terence
• Re: data mining
  • From: Terence
• Re: data mining
  • From: Terence
• Re: graphical user interface
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: Fortran to VB.net
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: Need Help: compiling old Fortran program
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: Scope question (gfortran odd-man out)
  • From: James Giles
• Re: data mining
  • From: merl the perl
• Re: Need Help: compiling old Fortran program
  • From: John Harper
• Re: Scope question (gfortran odd-man out)
  • From: John Harper
• Re: graphical user interface
  • From: gary . l . scott
• Re: Scope question (gfortran odd-man out)
  • From: John Harper
• Re: Fortran to VB.net
  • From: dpb
• Re: graphical user interface
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: Fortran to VB.net
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: Fortran to VB.net
  • From: dpb
• Re: Fortran to VB.net
  • From: dpb
• Re: Problem with Lahey-Fortran 7.1
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: Need Help: compiling old Fortran program
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Problem with Lahey-Fortran 7.1
  • From: jon
• Re: Overload Write
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: C++ Bounds Checking
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Fortran to VB.net
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Fortran to VB.net
  • From: dpb
• Re: Fortran to VB.net
  • From: Shawn
• Re: Fortran to VB.net
  • From: Shawn
• Re: Fortran to VB.net
  • From: Shawn
• Re: C++ Bounds Checking
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Fortran to VB.net
  • From: Shawn
• Re: C++ Bounds Checking
  • From: dpb
• Re: Fortran to VB.net
  • From: dpb
• Re: C++ Bounds Checking
  • From: Ken Fairfield
• Re: Fortran to VB.net
  • From: dpb
• Re: Fortran to VB.net
  • From: dpb
• Re: Fortran to VB.net
  • From: Shawn
• Re: Fortran to VB.net
  • From: dpb
• Re: Fortran to VB.net
  • From: dpb
• Re: Fortran to VB.net
  • From: dpb
• Re: C++ Bounds Checking
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: Fortran to VB.net
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: Fortran to VB.net
  • From: dpb
• Re: C++ Bounds Checking
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Re: Fortran to VB.net
  • From: Shawn
• Problem with Lahey-Fortran 7.1
  • From: trembl27
• Re: fixed or variable character length
  • From: dpb
• Re: Overload Write
  • From: Beliavsky
• Re: graphical user interface
  • From: gary . l . scott
• Re: Overload Write
  • From: Beliavsky
• Re: Fortran to VB.net
  • From: Shawn
• Re: fixed or variable character length
  • From: hsdesai1
• Overload Write
  • From: dbranting
• Re: fixed or variable character length
  • From: mposh372
• Re: C++ Bounds Checking
  • From: dpb
• Re: fixed or variable character length
  • From: dpb
• fixed or variable character length
  • From: hsdesai1
• Re: C++ Bounds Checking
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Fortran to VB.net
  • From: dpb
• Re: C++ Bounds Checking
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Fortran to VB.net
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Fortran to VB.net
  • From: Shawn
• Re: Form k = i + j and test for overflow.
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: graphical user interface
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: C++ Bounds Checking
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: C++ Bounds Checking
  • From: Richard Edgar
• Re: Fortran to VB.net
  • From: J. F. Cornwall
• Re: Fortran to VB.net
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: C++ Bounds Checking
  • From: Greg Lindahl
• Re: C++ Bounds Checking
  • From: Richard Edgar
• Re: C++ Bounds Checking
  • From: dpb
• Re: data mining
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: C++ Bounds Checking
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: Form k = i + j and test for overflow.
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Fortran to VB.net
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Fortran to VB.net
  • From: Shawn
• Re: Fortran to VB.net
  • From: dpb
• Re: Fortran to VB.net
  • From: Shawn
• Re: Fortran to VB.net
  • From: Ron Shepard
• Re: Fortran to VB.net
  • From: Shawn
• Re: Fortran to VB.net
  • From: dpb
• Re: C++ Bounds Checking
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Re: Fortran to VB.net
  • From: J. F. Cornwall
• Re: Derived type overspecialisation. Was: Re: A question about OOP in Fortran?
  • From: gary . l . scott
• Re: Form k = i + j and test for overflow.
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Form k = i + j and test for overflow.
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Fortran to VB.net
  • From: dpb
• Re: Fortran to VB.net
  • From: Shawn
• Re: Fortran to VB.net
  • From: Shawn
• Re: Form k = i + j and test for overflow.
  • From: robin
• Re: Form k = i + j and test for overflow.
  • From: robin
• Re: Form k = i + j and test for overflow.
  • From: robin
• Re: gdb and fortran arrays
  • From: Daniel Franke
• Re: intrinsics performance
  • From: Ian Bush
• Re: survey: Fortran on VMS
  • From: Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
• Re: graphical user interface
  • From: Arjen Markus
• graphical user interface
  • From: V. D.
• Re: Need Help: compiling old Fortran program
  • From: Terence
• Re: data mining
  • From: Terence
• Re: Need Help: compiling old Fortran program
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: Fortran to VB.net
  • From: dpb
• Re: Speed of code compiled with IVF 10.0 ?
  • From: Richard Hoffpauir
• Re: Scope question (gfortran odd-man out)
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Scope question (gfortran odd-man out)
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Need Help: compiling old Fortran program
  • From: Ken Fairfield
• Re: Scope question (gfortran odd-man out)
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Fortran to VB.net
  • From: dpb
• Re: Need Help: compiling old Fortran program
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Scope question (gfortran odd-man out)
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Need Help: compiling old Fortran program
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: Scope question (gfortran odd-man out)
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: Scope question (gfortran odd-man out)
  • From: awgreynolds
• Re: Scope question (gfortran odd-man out)
  • From: awgreynolds
• Re: Scope question (gfortran odd-man out)
  • From: Paul van Delst
• Re: Need Help: compiling old Fortran program
  • From: Sjouke Burry
• Re: Scope question (gfortran odd-man out)
  • From: Paul van Delst
• Re: Scope question (gfortran odd-man out)
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: Scope question (gfortran odd-man out)
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Scope question (gfortran odd-man out)
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Scope question (gfortran odd-man out)
  • From: awgreynolds
• Re: Scope question (gfortran odd-man out)
  • From: awgreynolds
• Re: Scope question (gfortran odd-man out)
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Scope question (gfortran odd-man out)
  • From: Paul van Delst
• Re: Please help me understand my code
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Re: Scope question (gfortran odd-man out)
  • From: awgreynolds
• Re: Need Help: compiling old Fortran program
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: Scope question (gfortran odd-man out)
  • From: awgreynolds
• Re: Scope question (gfortran odd-man out)
  • From: awgreynolds
• Re: Fortran to VB.net
  • From: dpb
• Re: Scope question (gfortran odd-man out)
  • From: awgreynolds
• Re: Scope question (gfortran odd-man out)
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: Scope question (gfortran odd-man out)
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Fortran to VB.net
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: Need Help: compiling old Fortran program
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: data mining
  • From: Wade Ward
• Scope question (gfortran odd-man out)
  • From: awgreynolds
• Re: Need Help: compiling old Fortran program
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: Need Help: compiling old Fortran program
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: Please help me understand my code
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Please help me understand my code
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: Fortran to VB.net
  • From: Shawn
• Re: Form k = i + j and test for overflow.
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: Fortran to VB.net
  • From: dpb
• Re: Form k = i + j and test for overflow.
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Re: Derived type overspecialisation. Was: Re: A question about OOP in Fortran?
  • From: Beliavsky
• Re: -byteswapio
  • From: Paul van Delst
• Re: Derived type overspecialisation. Was: Re: A question about OOP in Fortran?
  • From: Paul van Delst
• Re: A problem about Fortran pointers
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Re: gdb and fortran arrays
  • From: Kamaraju S Kusumanchi
• Re: -byteswapio
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: survey: Fortran on VMS
  • From: Ken Fairfield
• Re: Derived type overspecialisation. Was: Re: A question about OOP in Fortran?
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: Fortran to VB.net
  • From: dpb
• gdb and fortran arrays
  • From: mjm2114
• Fortran to VB.net
  • From: Shawn
• Re: -byteswapio
  • From: tholen
• Re: Intel Compiler v10.0 Linking Error
  • From: Jugoslav Dujic
• Intel Compiler v10.0 Linking Error
  • From: michael
• Re: SAVE
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Re: Form k = i + j and test for overflow.
  • From: robin
• Re: Form k = i + j and test for overflow.
  • From: robin
• Re: Form k = i + j and test for overflow.
  • From: robin
• Re: intrinsics performance
  • From: Tim Prince
• Derived type overspecialisation. Was: Re: A question about OOP in Fortran?
  • From: Paul van Delst
• Re: survey: Fortran on VMS
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: intrinsics performance
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: survey: Fortran on VMS
  • From: dpb
• Re: intrinsics performance
  • From: dpb
• Re: intrinsics performance
  • From: Reis
• Re: Need Help: compiling old Fortran program
  • From: Jugoslav Dujic
• Re: survey: Fortran on VMS
  • From: Gary Scott
• Re: survey: Fortran on VMS
  • From: Gary Scott
• Re: Need Help: compiling old Fortran program
  • From: Terence
• Re: A problem about Fortran pointers
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: data mining
  • From: analyst41
• Re: survey: Fortran on VMS
  • From: Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
• Re: survey: Fortran on VMS
  • From: Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
• Re: intrinsics performance
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Please help me understand my code
  • From: Jugoslav Dujic
• Re: intrinsics performance
  • From: Arjen Markus
• intrinsics performance
  • From: Reis
• Re: A problem about Fortran pointers
  • From: Jugoslav Dujic
• Re: A question about OOP in Fortran?
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: A problem about Fortran pointers
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: A problem about Fortran pointers
  • From: James Giles
• Re: A problem about Fortran pointers
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Re: Need Help: compiling old Fortran program
  • From: John Harper
• Re: A question about OOP in Fortran?
  • From: Gary Scott
• Re: Need Help: compiling old Fortran program
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Need Help: compiling old Fortran program
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Need Help: compiling old Fortran program
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: data mining
  • From: Beliavsky
• Re: A question about OOP in Fortran?
  • From: gsal
• Re: Need Help: compiling old Fortran program
  • From: J. F. Cornwall
• Re: Need Help: compiling old Fortran program
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: reading an external text file
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: fortran compilation
  • From: Hani Ibrahim
• Re: Conversion of Fortran File unit to C File stream
  • From: Walter Spector
• Re: Need Help: compiling old Fortran program
  • From: John Harper
• Re: Deallocating memory created using pointers
  • From: Hani Ibrahim
• Re: Need Help: compiling old Fortran program
  • From: Terence
• Re: survey: Fortran on VMS
  • From: Terence
• Re: data mining
  • From: Terence
• Re: A problem about Fortran pointers
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Conversion of Fortran File unit to C File stream
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: How do use Pointer to reduce "type" size in the operation?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: fortran compilation
  • From: Peter
• Re: fortran compilation
  • From: Kamaraju S Kusumanchi
• Re: A problem about Fortran pointers
  • From: James Giles
• Re: data mining
  • From: Beliavsky
• Re: A problem about Fortran pointers
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: SAVE
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: fortran compilation
  • From: dpb
• Re: data mining
  • From: dpb
• Re: A problem about Fortran pointers
  • From: James Giles
• Re: fortran compilation
  • From: thinktank
• Re: survey: Fortran on VMS
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: fortran compilation
  • From: thinktank
• Re: fortran compilation
  • From: dpb
• Re: reading an external text file
  • From: dpb
• Re: fortran compilation
  • From: thinktank
• Re: Form k = i + j and test for overflow.
  • From: James Giles
• Re: fortran compilation
  • From: dpb
• Re: reading an external text file
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: Need Help: compiling old Fortran program
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: fortran compilation
  • From: Kamaraju S Kusumanchi
• Re: A problem about Fortran pointers
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Need Help: compiling old Fortran program
  • From: Wade Ward
• fortran compilation
  • From: thinktank
• Re: data mining
  • From: analyst41
• Re: survey: Fortran on VMS
  • From: Gary Scott
• Re: Need Help: compiling old Fortran program
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: survey: Fortran on VMS
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: data mining
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: Please help me understand my code
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: Need Help: compiling old Fortran program
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: survey: Fortran on VMS
  • From: Gary Scott
• Re: survey: Fortran on VMS
  • From: Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
• Re: A problem about Fortran pointers
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: A problem about Fortran pointers
  • From: yaqi
• Re: Speed of code compiled with IVF 10.0 ?
  • From: Jim Klein
• Re: survey: Fortran on VMS
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: survey: Fortran on VMS
  • From: mecej4
• survey: Fortran on VMS
  • From: Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
• Re: [g77/x86_64 arch] linking C functions...
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: Need Help: compiling old Fortran program
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: [g77/x86_64 arch] linking C functions...
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Speed of code compiled with IVF 10.0 ?
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: Please help me understand my code
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Form k = i + j and test for overflow.
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Please help me understand my code
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Form k = i + j and test for overflow.
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• data mining
  • From: analyst41
• Re: A problem about Fortran pointers
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: Fortran 2003 -- when?
  • From: Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
• Re: Fortran 2003 -- when?
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: Fortran 2003 -- when?
  • From: Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
• Re: Consistent floating-point computations and performance
  • From: Greg Lindahl
• Speed of code compiled with IVF 10.0 ?
  • From: Jim Klein
• Re: A problem about Fortran pointers
  • From: Gib Bogle
• Re: indentation - unbalanced parentheses
  • From: David Thompson
• Re: [g77/x86_64 arch] linking C functions...
  • From: David Thompson
• Re: Conversion of Fortran File unit to C File stream
  • From: David Thompson
• Re: Need Help: compiling old Fortran program
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: A question about OOP in Fortran?
  • From: Jon Harrop
• Re: Need Help: compiling old Fortran program
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: Unsigned Integers and Fortran
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: Unsigned Integers and Fortran
  • From: Terence
• Re: Need Help: compiling old Fortran program
  • From: Terence
• Re: Accessing Private Module Data using pointers?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Deallocating memory created using pointers
  • From: Richard Maine
• Accessing Private Module Data using pointers?
  • From: Dan
• Deallocating memory created using pointers
  • From: Dan
• RE: IF statements
  • From: meek