comp.lang.fortran

• Thread Index

---

• Re: Clear Screen
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: Lahey Fortran and Core 2 duo
  • From: Andrew Smith
• Re: Lahey Fortran and Core 2 duo
  • From: Fly Away
• Re: Lahey Fortran and Core 2 duo
  • From: Harvey Gratt
• Re: Lahey Fortran and Core 2 duo
  • From: Andrew Smith
• Re: Subroutine "arguments"??
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Lahey Fortran and Core 2 duo
  • From: Harvey Gratt
• Re: Subroutine "arguments"??
  • From: tholen
• Re: Lahey Fortran and Core 2 duo
  • From: Harvey Gratt
• Re: Subroutine "arguments"??
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Lahey Fortran and Core 2 duo
  • From: mecej4
• Re: Lahey Fortran and Core 2 duo
  • From: Harvey Gratt
• Subroutine "arguments"??
  • From: li . simula
• Re: Clear Screen
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: Clear Screen
  • From: Rosana Khan
• Re: forall and do loop
  • From: highegg
• Re: Clear Screen
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: Clear Screen
  • From: Richard Maine
• Clear Screen
  • From: Rosana Khan
• Re: Lahey Fortran and Core 2 duo
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Lahey Fortran and Core 2 duo
  • From: Tim Prince
• Lahey Fortran and Core 2 duo
  • From: Harvey Gratt
• Re: forall and do loop
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: forall and do loop
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: forall and do loop
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: forall and do loop
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: forall and do loop
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: forall and do loop
  • From: Richard Edgar
• Re: forall and do loop
  • From: Richard Edgar
• Re: forall and do loop
  • From: highegg
• Re: forall and do loop
  • From: Ian Bush
• Re: forall and do loop
  • From: Walter Spector
• Re: Simple Input File Parsing Question
  • From: Arno
• Re: forall and do loop
  • From: Ian Bush
• Re: Problem linking fortran code
  • From: highegg
• Re: forall and do loop
  • From: highegg
• Re: Problem linking fortran code
  • From: Fly Away
• Re: Problem linking fortran code
  • From: erik magnuson
• Re: Problem linking fortran code
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: forall and do loop
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: forall and do loop
  • From: Walter Spector
• Re: forall and do loop
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Re: Execution Timing
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: forall and do loop
  • From: highegg
• Re: Problem linking fortran code
  • From: erik magnuson
• Re: Converting code from single to double precision
  • From: Lynn
• Re: Help linking f77 libraries into gfortran
  • From: deltaseq0
• Execution Timing
  • From: Dr Ivan D. Reid
• Re: f77, f90, f95 or f2003?
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: forall and do loop
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Re: Converting code from single to double precision
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: Converting code from single to double precision
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: forall and do loop
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: forall and do loop
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: forall and do loop
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Re: forall and do loop
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Converting code from single to double precision
  • From: Colin Watters
• Re: Help linking f77 libraries into gfortran
  • From: FX
• Re: Help linking f77 libraries into gfortran
  • From: deltaseq0
• Re: Help linking f77 libraries into gfortran
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: forall and do loop
  • From: Janne Blomqvist
• Re: Help linking f77 libraries into gfortran
  • From: FX
• Help linking f77 libraries into gfortran
  • From: deltaseq0
• Re: forall and do loop
  • From: Richard Maine
• making default arguments easier to use
  • From: Beliavsky
• Re: forall and do loop
  • From: highegg
• Re: forall and do loop
  • From: Gary Scott
• Re: forall and do loop
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Re: How do add decoration to imported subroutines in Intel Compiler?
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: forall and do loop
  • From: highegg
• Re: forall and do loop
  • From: Richard Edgar
• Re: forall and do loop
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: forall and do loop
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: forall and do loop
  • From: highegg
• Re: forall and do loop
  • From: Tobias Burnus
• Re: forall and do loop
  • From: highegg
• Re: forall and do loop
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: forall and do loop
  • From: Richard Maine
• How do add decoration to imported subroutines in Intel Compiler?
  • From: ferrad
• Re: forall and do loop
  • From: aeroguy
• Re: simplest way to sort a bi-dimensional array? mat(a,b)...
  • From: Les
• Re: forall and do loop
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: forall and do loop
  • From: highegg
• Re: forall and do loop
  • From: aeroguy
• Re: forall and do loop
  • From: highegg
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: forall and do loop
  • From: aeroguy
• Re: forall and do loop
  • From: Sebastian Hanigk
• forall and do loop
  • From: aeroguy
• Re: Matrix multiplication using subarrays?
  • From: Peter
• Re: C/C++ speed optimization bible/resources/pointers needed!
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: Lynn McGuire
• Re: Matrix multiplication using subarrays?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: language rules question: using a (passed in) parameter to define a parameter
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: simplest way to sort a bi-dimensional array? mat(a,b)...
  • From: e p chandler
• Re: language rules question: using a (passed in) parameter to define a parameter
  • From: BenR
• Matrix multiplication using subarrays?
  • From: Peter
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: Walter Spector
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: Walter Spector
• Re: simplest way to sort a bi-dimensional array? mat(a,b)...
  • From: ginko
• Re: simplest way to sort a bi-dimensional array? mat(a,b)...
  • From: dpb
• Re: How to call a Java program from Fortran?
  • From: Mark Westwood
• Re: simplest way to sort a bi-dimensional array? mat(a,b)...
  • From: ginko
• Re: simplest way to sort a bi-dimensional array? mat(a,b)...
  • From: Les
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Re: Statement terminators
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: Walter Spector
• Re: simplest way to sort a bi-dimensional array? mat(a,b)...
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Syntax to link a library in an *.ini
  • From: Adlane Rebai
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: Lynn McGuire
• Re: simplest way to sort a bi-dimensional array? mat(a,b)...
  • From: ginko
• Re: Q: Can I allocate a variable length character string?
  • From: gary . l . scott
• Re: Why zero is represented by an extremely small value?
  • From: Paul van Delst
• Re: simplest way to sort a bi-dimensional array? mat(a,b)...
  • From: highegg
• Re: simplest way to sort a bi-dimensional array? mat(a,b)...
  • From: Gordon Sande
• How to call a Java program from Fortran?
  • From: www
• Re: simplest way to sort a bi-dimensional array? mat(a,b)...
  • From: jwm
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: Statement terminators
  • From: Jugoslav Dujic
• simplest way to sort a bi-dimensional array? mat(a,b)...
  • From: ginko
• Re: precompilation?
  • From: inkant . awasthi
• Re: Q: Can I allocate a variable length character string?
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: Q: Can I allocate a variable length character string?
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: Is there a way to remove these goto statement
  • From: aeroguy
• Re: Q: Can I allocate a variable length character string?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Problem linking fortran code
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: Q: Can I allocate a variable length character string?
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: Q: Can I allocate a variable length character string?
  • From: robert . corbett
• Q: Can I allocate a variable length character string?
  • From: James Tursa
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: Gary Scott
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Statement terminators
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: Terence
• Re: Why zero is represented by an extremely small value?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Why zero is represented by an extremely small value?
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: language rules question: using a (passed in) parameter to define a parameter
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Why zero is represented by an extremely small value?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: language rules question: using a (passed in) parameter to define a parameter
  • From: dpb
• language rules question: using a (passed in) parameter to define a parameter
  • From: BenR
• Re: Why zero is represented by an extremely small value?
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: Why zero is represented by an extremely small value?
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: Why zero is represented by an extremely small value?
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: mecej4
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: wclodius
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: Kevin G. Rhoads
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: Les
• Re: Problem linking fortran code
  • From: H.S.
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: Gordon Sande
• precompilation?
  • From: Girish Kulkarni
• Bright up your advertising with a slim light box !----11 mm LED light box in China!
  • From: jenny-edlite
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: Edward N Bromhead
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Problem linking fortran code
  • From: a-lbi
• Re: Simple Input File Parsing Question
  • From: Les
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: Q: Best reference for a F77 programmer learning F90?
  • From: James Tursa
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: tianyf@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Simple Input File Parsing Question
  • From: tianyf@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: John Harper
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: mecej4
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: John Harper
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: Terence
• Re: Why zero is represented by an extremely small value?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Problem linking fortran code
  • From: H.S.
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: Simple Input File Parsing Question
  • From: dpb
• Re: Simple Input File Parsing Question
  • From: Dr Ivan D. Reid
• Re: Why zero is represented by an extremely small value?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Why zero is represented by an extremely small value?
  • From: Louis Krupp
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Simple Input File Parsing Question
  • From: magesing
• Why zero is represented by an extremely small value?
  • From: www
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• Re: iso curve extraction
  • From: veda
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: mecej4
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Re: Problem linking fortran code
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: Need some HELP!! In a pre-version fortran codes
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: Need some HELP!! In a pre-version fortran codes
  • From: Les
• Re: f77, f90, f95 or f2003?
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: Need some HELP!! In a pre-version fortran codes
  • From: Jugoslav Dujic
• users of Fortran
  • From: Beliavsky
• Re: Problem linking fortran code
  • From: a-lbi
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Problem linking fortran code
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: Need some HELP!! In a pre-version fortran codes
  • From: PH.D.Condidater.Li.Ning
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: tianyf@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Need some HELP!! In a pre-version fortran codes
  • From: Les
• Re: Reading in data from several files
  • From: PH.D.Condidater.Li.Ning
• Re: Need some HELP!! In a pre-version fortran codes
  • From: nealleehit
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: tholen
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: Keith Refson
• Re: Statement terminators
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: Need some HELP!! In a pre-version fortran codes
  • From: Les
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: Need some HELP!! In a pre-version fortran codes
  • From: Louis Krupp
• Problem linking fortran code
  • From: a-lbi
• Re: Need some HELP!! In a pre-version fortran codes
  • From: nealleehit
• Re: Need some HELP!! In a pre-version fortran codes
  • From: nealleehit
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: tianyf@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Insert string at the first line of a file.
  • From: tianyf@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: Q: Best reference for a F77 programmer learning F90?
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Read error
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: Fly Away
• Re: f77, f90, f95 or f2003?
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: Terence
• Re: Need some HELP!! In a pre-version fortran codes
  • From: Terence
• Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: tianyf@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Need some HELP!! In a pre-version fortran codes
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Q: Best reference for a F77 programmer learning F90?
  • From: ryofurue
• Re: iso curve extraction
  • From: Mark Stucky
• Re: fortran compilers
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: Need some HELP!! In a pre-version fortran codes
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: Thomas Koenig
• Re: Reading in data from several files
  • From: Kevin G. Rhoads
• Re: Need some HELP!! In a pre-version fortran codes
  • From: fj
• Re: Q: Best reference for a F77 programmer learning F90?
  • From: Clive Page
• convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
  • From: Lynn McGuire
• Re: Insert string at the first line of a file.
  • From: jwm
• Re: Q: Best reference for a F77 programmer learning F90?
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Re: Reading in data from several files
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Reading in data from several files
  • From: smurray444
• Re: Fortran 77 - Is their something special about subroutines
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• Re: Fortran 77 - Is their something special about subroutines
  • From: dpb
• Fortran 77 - Is their something special about subroutines
  • From: coolchick
• Re: Need some HELP!! In a pre-version fortran codes
  • From: Tim Prince
• RE: Fortran 77 - Is their something special about subroutines
  • From: meek
• Re: Need some HELP!! In a pre-version fortran codes
  • From: nealleehit
• Re: Need some HELP!! In a pre-version fortran codes
  • From: nealleehit
• Re: Need some HELP!! In a pre-version fortran codes
  • From: nealleehit
• Re: Need some HELP!! In a pre-version fortran codes
  • From: nealleehit
• Re: Need some HELP!! In a pre-version fortran codes
  • From: nealleehit
• Re: Need some HELP!! In a pre-version fortran codes
  • From: fj
• Re: Unsigned Integers and Fortran
  • From: Colin Paul Gloster
• Re: Unsigned Integers and Fortran
  • From: Colin Paul Gloster
• Re: f77, f90, f95 or f2003?
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: iso curve extraction
  • From: fj
• Re: iso curve extraction
  • From: veda
• Re: Need some HELP!! In a pre-version fortran codes
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: f77, f90, f95 or f2003?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Need some HELP!! In a pre-version fortran codes
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: f77, f90, f95 or f2003?
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: Need some HELP!! In a pre-version fortran codes
  • From: Louis Krupp
• Re: Q: Best reference for a F77 programmer learning F90?
  • From: Beliavsky
• Re: f77, f90, f95 or f2003?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Need some HELP!! In a pre-version fortran codes
  • From: nealleehit
• Re: Q: Best reference for a F77 programmer learning F90?
  • From: John Harper
• Re: Statement terminators
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Statement terminators
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Statement terminators
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: iso curve extraction
  • From: fj
• Re: Upgrading XP machine to run gcc
  • From: deltaseq0
• Re: Form k = i + j and test for overflow.
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: tholen
• Re: Form k = i + j and test for overflow.
  • From: James Giles
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: James Giles
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: tholen
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: tholen
• Re: Scope question (gfortran odd-man out)
  • From: David Thompson
• Re: Unsigned Integers and Fortran
  • From: David Thompson
• Re: Form k = i + j and test for overflow.
  • From: David Thompson
• Re: Form k = i + j and test for overflow.
  • From: David Thompson
• Re: Upgrading XP machine to run gcc
  • From: Dr Ivan D. Reid
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: tholen
• Re: Insert string at the first line of a file.
  • From: Dr Ivan D. Reid
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: James Giles
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: Gary Scott
• Re: iso curve extraction
  • From: veda
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: James Giles
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: dpb
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: Gary Scott
• Re: Statement terminators
  • From: James Giles
• Re: iso curve extraction
  • From: fj
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Statement terminators
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: Gary Scott
• Re: Read error
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Insert string at the first line of a file.
  • From: Gary Scott
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Statement terminators
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Insert string at the first line of a file.
  • From: Louis Krupp
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Insert string at the first line of a file.
  • From: tianyf@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Read error
  • From: tianyf@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Read error
  • From: dpb
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: dpb
• Re: Statement terminators
  • From: Ben Hetland
• Re: f77, f90, f95 or f2003?
  • From: Dr Ivan D. Reid
• Read error
  • From: Tim Springer
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: tholen
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: James Giles
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: tholen
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: tholen
• Re: iso curve extraction
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: James Giles
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: Gary Scott
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: James Giles
• Re: iso curve extraction
  • From: veda
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: tholen
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: James Giles
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: James Giles
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: tholen
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: tholen
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: Gary Scott
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: James Giles
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: tholen
• Re: Best reference for a F77 programmer learning F90?
  • From: John Fredrickson
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: James Giles
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: Gary Scott
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: James Giles
• Re: f77, f90, f95 or f2003?
  • From: Gib Bogle
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: Gary Scott
• Re: iso curve extraction
  • From: veda
• Re: iso curve extraction
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: James Giles
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: James Giles
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: Gary Scott
• Re: Fortran Training - Cranfield University
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: iso curve extraction
  • From: fj
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: tholen
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Q: Best reference for a F77 programmer learning F90?
  • From: Bil Kleb
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: James Giles
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: tholen
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: tholen
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: James Giles
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Q: Best reference for a F77 programmer learning F90?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Q: Best reference for a F77 programmer learning F90?
  • From: Gary Scott
• Q: Best reference for a F77 programmer learning F90?
  • From: James Tursa
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: James Giles
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: tholen
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: tholen
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: tholen
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: tholen
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: tholen
• Re: Flavors of zero, flavors of infinity Re: On writing negative zero -
  • From: tholen
• FYI: Fortran Training - Cranfield University
  • From: Gary Scott
• Re: Statement terminators
  • From: Jugoslav Dujic
• Re: Upgrading XP machine to run gcc
  • From: deltaseq0
• Re: Upgrading XP machine to run gcc
  • From: deltaseq0
• Re: f77, f90, f95 or f2003?
  • From: Wade Ward
• iso curve extraction
  • From: veda
• Re: f77, f90, f95 or f2003?
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: Janne Blomqvist
• Re: Statement terminators
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: f77, f90, f95 or f2003?
  • From: Greg Lindahl
• Re: f77, f90, f95 or f2003?
  • From: Jan Gerrit Kootstra
• Re: f77, f90, f95 or f2003?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Statement terminators
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: Statement terminators
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Statement terminators
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Statement terminators
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Statement terminators
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: Upgrading XP machine to run gcc
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: Pierre Asselin
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: analyst41
• Re: Upgrading XP machine to run gcc
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: James Giles
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: Kevin G. Rhoads
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: James Giles
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: tholen
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: tholen
• Re: Flavors of zero, flavors of infinity Re: On writing negative zero - with
  • From: Kevin G. Rhoads
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: Kevin G. Rhoads
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: tholen
• Re: Statement terminators
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Statement terminators
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Statement terminators
  • From: James Giles
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: tholen
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: tholen
• Re: Statement terminators
  • From: James Giles
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Flavors of zero, flavors of infinity Re: On writing negative zero - with
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Statement terminators
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Flavors of zero, flavors of infinity Re: On writing negative zero - with
  • From: James Giles
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Statement terminators
  • From: ryofurue
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: James Giles
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: tholen
• Re: Flavors of zero, flavors of infinity Re: On writing negative zero - with
  • From: tholen
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: tholen
• Re: f77, f90, f95 or f2003?
  • From: James Giles
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: tholen
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: tholen
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Insert string at the first line of a file.
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: f77, f90, f95 or f2003?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Upgrading XP machine to run gcc
  • From: deltaseq0
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: Kevin G. Rhoads
• Flavors of zero, flavors of infinity Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: Kevin G. Rhoads
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: Kevin G. Rhoads
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: Insert string at the first line of a file.
  • From: mcalhoun
• Re: f77, f90, f95 or f2003?
  • From: Kevin G. Rhoads
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: Pierre Asselin
• Re: g95 error
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: Insert string at the first line of a file.
  • From: imailz
• Re: Insert string at the first line of a file.
  • From: Beliavsky
• Re: Insert string at the first line of a file.
  • From: imailz
• Re: public/private attribute before actual declaration
  • From: fj
• Re: Insert string at the first line of a file.
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Insert string at the first line of a file.
  • From: imailz
• Re: f77, f90, f95 or f2003?
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: James Giles
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: James Giles
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: tholen
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: tholen
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: tholen
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: f77, f90, f95 or f2003?
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: f77, f90, f95 or f2003?
  • From: Douglas Wells
• Re: public/private attribute before actual declaration
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: James Giles
• Re: error in do while !!
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: f77, f90, f95 or f2003?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: Derived type in main
  • From: Ralf Schaa
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: f77, f90, f95 or f2003?
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: f77, f90, f95 or f2003?
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: error in do while !!
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: f77, f90, f95 or f2003?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: Gary Scott
• Re: error in do while !!
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: f77, f90, f95 or f2003?
  • From: Douglas Wells
• Re: g95 error
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: error in do while !!
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: g95 error
  • From: Gary Scott
• Re: g95 error
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: g95 error
  • From: David
• Re: g95 error
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• g95 error
  • From: David
• Re: f77, f90, f95 or f2003?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: f77, f90, f95 or f2003?
  • From: Terence
• Re: f77, f90, f95 or f2003?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: Terence
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: James Giles
• copyright= C linear dependence testing C no dependence - vectorizable C integer ntimes,ld,n,i,nl real
  • From: rych67
• Re: f77, f90, f95 or f2003?
  • From: Gib Bogle
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: fortran compilers
  • From: Kevin G. Rhoads
• Re: A basic question about linked list
  • From: veda
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: tholen
• Re: f77, f90, f95 or f2003?
  • From: Beliavsky
• Re: f77, f90, f95 or f2003?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: f77, f90, f95 or f2003?
  • From: Ian Gay
• Re: ifort functions for test NaN and Inf
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: segmentation fault
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: segmentation fault
  • From: kalu
• Re: error with " do while "
  • From: e p chandler
• Re: ifort functions for test NaN and Inf
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: ifort functions for test NaN and Inf
  • From: highegg
• Re: ifort functions for test NaN and Inf
  • From: highegg
• Re: Derived type in main
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: A question about OOP in Fortran?
  • From: Paul Colin Gloster
• Re: error in do while !!
  • From: Robert Corbett
• Re: error in do while !!
  • From: Gib Bogle
• Re: f77, f90, f95 or f2003?
  • From: Gib Bogle
• Re: fortran compilers
  • From: merl the perl
• Re: fortran compilers
  • From: merl the perl
• Re: error in do while !!
  • From: Les
• Re: error in do while !!
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: fortran // concat /> fortranconcat
  • From: Richard Maine
• error in do while !!
  • From: nakisa
• Re: fortran // concat /> fortranconcat
  • From: John Paine
• Re: question about function !!!
  • From: nakisa
• Re: Sun Studio 12 available for download
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: A basic question about linked list
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: A question about OOP in Fortran?
  • From: James Giles
• Re: random_seed
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• A basic question about linked list
  • From: veda
• random_seed
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: random_seed
  • From: Thomas Koenig
• Re: ifort functions for test NaN and Inf
  • From: James Giles
• Re: error with " do while "
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Sun Studio 12, what do you think?
  • From: Reinhold Bader
• Re: f77, f90, f95 or f2003?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Fortran 2003 -- when?
  • From: Colin Paul Gloster
• Re: Fortran 2003 -- when?
  • From: Colin Paul Gloster
• Re: F Compiler has function to analysis Module?
  • From: Colin Paul Gloster
• public/private attribute before actual declaration
  • From: Bálint Aradi
• Re: error with " do while "
  • From: Ron Shepard
• Re: ifort functions for test NaN and Inf
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• Re: f77, f90, f95 or f2003?
  • From: Colin Paul Gloster
• Re: error with " do while "
  • From: dpb
• Re: error with " do while "
  • From: dpb
• Re: error with " do while "
  • From: Ian Bush
• Re: ifort functions for test NaN and Inf
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• Re: error with " do while "
  • From: Les
• Re: Does F2003 has the similar fuction like "template" in C++??
  • From: Colin Paul Gloster
• Re: error with " do while "
  • From: Ian Bush
• Re: unresolved external symbol while calling setvbuf3f
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• error with " do while "
  • From: nakisa
• Re: question about function !!!
  • From: nakisa
• Re: ifort functions for test NaN and Inf
  • From: Tim Prince
• unresolved external symbol while calling setvbuf3f
  • From: abhivg
• Re: ifort functions for test NaN and Inf
  • From: Ian Bush
• ifort functions for test NaN and Inf
  • From: ddb78s@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: A question about OOP in Fortran?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: fortran // concat /> fortranconcat
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: A question about OOP in Fortran?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: fortran // concat /> fortranconcat
  • From: David Jones
• Re: A question about OOP in Fortran?
  • From: James Giles
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: Robert Corbett
• Re: fortran // concat /> fortranconcat
  • From: Richard Maine
• fortran // concat /> fortranconcat
  • From: aeroguy
• Re: Derived type in main
  • From: dpb
• Re: Derived type in main
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Derived type in main
  • From: Ralf Schaa
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: Terence
• Re: A question about OOP in Fortran?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: A question about OOP in Fortran?
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Sun Studio 12 available for download
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: A question about OOP in Fortran?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: A question about OOP in Fortran?
  • From: James Giles
• Re: A question about OOP in Fortran?
  • From: James Giles
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: James Giles
• Re: segmentation fault
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: segmentation fault
  • From: Kevin G. Rhoads
• Re: A question about OOP in Fortran?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: segmentation fault
  • From: dpb
• Re: A question about OOP in Fortran?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Fortran 90 modules suck for portability- why use them?
  • From: Kevin G. Rhoads
• Re: fortran compilers
  • From: Kevin G. Rhoads
• Re: A question about OOP in Fortran?
  • From: Colin Paul Gloster
• Re: C++ Bounds Checking
  • From: Colin Paul Gloster
• Re: C++ Bounds Checking
  • From: Colin Paul Gloster
• Re: C++ Bounds Checking
  • From: Colin Paul Gloster
• Re: segmentation fault
  • From: Les
• segmentation fault
  • From: kalu
• Re: A question about OOP in Fortran?
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: A question about OOP in Fortran?
  • From: Colin Paul Gloster
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: tholen
• Re: Total n00b gets compiler error with FORMAT statement...
  • From: Wim Cossement
• Re: matmul trouble
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: Sun Studio 12 available for download
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: Sun Studio 12 available for download
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: James Giles
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: Sun Studio 12 available for download
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: John Harper
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Reading an image array.
  • From: William Asher
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: tholen
• Re: fortran compilers
  • From: Dr Ivan D. Reid
• Re: question about function !!!
  • From: dpb
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: James Giles
• Re: question about function !!!
  • From: e p chandler
• Re: question about function !!!
  • From: Jan Gerrit Kootstra
• Re: question about function !!!
  • From: nakisa
• Re: Total n00b gets compiler error with FORMAT statement...
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Total n00b gets compiler error with FORMAT statement...
  • From: dpb
• Re: Total n00b gets compiler error with FORMAT statement...
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Total n00b gets compiler error with FORMAT statement...
  • From: Wim Cossement
• Re: Fortran 90 modules suck for portability- why use them?
  • From: Greg Lindahl
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: Ron Shepard
• Re: Upgrading XP machine to run gcc
  • From: FX
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: dpb
• Re: Can Fortran compiler detect memory leaks??
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• Re: Dynamic vector allocation
  • From: m_pr
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: Dynamic vector allocation
  • From: highegg
• Re: Dynamic vector allocation
  • From: robert . corbett
• Dynamic vector allocation
  • From: m_pr
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Sun Studio 12, what do you think?
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: Sun Studio 12, what do you think?
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: Fortran 90 modules suck for portability- why use them?
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: Fortran 90 modules suck for portability- why use them?
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: Terence
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: Fortran 90 modules suck for portability- why use them?
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Fortran 90 modules suck for portability- why use them?
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: Fortran 90 modules suck for portability- why use them?
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: Fortran 90 modules suck for portability- why use them?
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: Fortran 90 modules suck for portability- why use them?
  • From: John Harper
• Re: Fortran 90 modules suck for portability- why use them?
  • From: Greg Lindahl
• Re: Fortran 90 modules suck for portability- why use them?
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: Upgrading XP machine to run gcc
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: Upgrading XP machine to run gcc
  • From: deltaseq0
• Re: calling c from fortran 90
  • From: dpb
• Re: calling c from fortran 90
  • From: mecej4
• Re: Upgrading XP machine to run gcc
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: Upgrading XP machine to run gcc
  • From: FX
• Re: Upgrading XP machine to run gcc
  • From: FX
• Re: Fortran 90 modules suck for portability- why use them?
  • From: Greg Lindahl
• Re: question about function !!!
  • From: tholen
• question about function !!!
  • From: nakisa
• Re: Fortran 90 modules suck for portability- why use them?
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: Upgrading XP machine to run gcc
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: Fortran 90 modules suck for portability- why use them?
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: Reading an image array.
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Upgrading XP machine to run gcc
  • From: deltaseq0
• Re: Fortran 90 modules suck for portability- why use them?
  • From: Gary Scott
• Re: Fortran 90 modules suck for portability- why use them?
  • From: Greg Lindahl
• Re: Fortran 90 modules suck for portability- why use them?
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: Fortran 90 modules suck for portability- why use them?
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: Fortran 90 modules suck for portability- why use them?
  • From: Gary Scott
• Re: Fortran 90 modules suck for portability- why use them?
  • From: Greg Lindahl
• Re: Fortran 90 modules suck for portability- why use them?
  • From: Greg Lindahl
• Re: Fortran 90 modules suck for portability- why use them?
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: Sun Studio 12 available for download
  • From: gsal
• Re: Fortran 90 modules suck for portability- why use them?
  • From: Gary Scott
• Re: Fortran 90 modules suck for portability- why use them?
  • From: Thomas Koenig
• Re: Fortran 90 modules suck for portability- why use them?
  • From: Bil Kleb
• Re: Is Fortran faster than C?
  • From: Janne Blomqvist
• Re: Reading an image array.
  • From: merl the perl
• Re: Reading an image array.
  • From: Terence
• Re: Fortran 90 modules suck for portability- why use them?
  • From: Greg Lindahl
• حصريا فيلم كركر آخر افلام محمد سعد جودة رائعة وصوت اروع فقط على ديدي ديفيدي
  • From: مزيونه
• Re: Sun Studio 12 available for download
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: Fortran 90 modules suck for portability- why use them?
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: Sun Studio 12 available for download
  • From: merl the perl
• Re: Can Fortran compiler detect memory leaks??
  • From: merl the perl
• Re: Reading an image array.
  • From: merl the perl
• Re: Reading an image array.
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Reading an image array.
  • From: dpb
• Can Fortran compiler detect memory leaks??
  • From: li . simula
• Re: Reading an image array.
  • From: merl the perl
• Re: Reading an image array.
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Reading an image array.
  • From: Terence
• Re: Fortran 90 modules suck for portability- why use them?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Fortran 90 modules suck for portability- why use them?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Fortran 90 modules suck for portability- why use them?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Is Fortran faster than C?
  • From: merl the perl
• Re: Fortran 90 modules suck for portability- why use them?
  • From: max
• Re: Fortran 90 modules suck for portability- why use them?
  • From: Paul van Delst
• Re: Fortran 90 modules suck for portability- why use them?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Fortran 90 modules suck for portability- why use them?
  • From: Reinhold Bader
• Re: Fortran 90 modules suck for portability- why use them?
  • From: Greg Lindahl
• Re: Fortran 90 modules suck for portability- why use them?
  • From: Reinhold Bader
• Fortran 90 modules suck for portability- why use them?
  • From: henrikholst80
• Re: Reading an image array.
  • From: dsurveyor
• Re: NAN and INF again ...
  • From: Jan Gerrit Kootstra
• Re: NAN and INF again ...
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• Re: A question about "Read" by key word?
  • From: Gib Bogle
• Re: A question about "Read" by key word?
  • From: e p chandler
• A question about "Read" by key word?
  • From: li . simula
• Re: flattening a matrix...
  • From: Les
• Re: Is Fortran faster than C?
  • From: Janne Blomqvist
• Re: flattening a matrix...
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
  • From: Jerry DeLisle
• Re: NAN and INF again ...
  • From: Ralf Schaa
• Re: What sort of literal is this?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• fortran at the uni
  • From: merl the perl
• Re: NAN and INF again ...
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Is Fortran faster than C?
  • From: merl the perl
• Re: NAN and INF again ...
  • From: Ralf Schaa
• Re: NAN and INF again ...
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: NAN and INF again ...
  • From: Tim Prince
• NAN and INF again ...
  • From: Ralf Schaa
• Re: flattening a matrix...
  • From: Terence
• Re: getting intel fortran to work from cygwin command line?
  • From: Mark Stucky
• Re: flattening a matrix...
  • From: mecej4
• Re: flattening a matrix...
  • From: highegg
• Re: flattening a matrix...
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: flattening a matrix...
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Re: calling c from fortran 90
  • From: Sebastian Hanigk
• Re: flattening a matrix...
  • From: Ron Shepard
• Re: flattening a matrix...
  • From: Ian Bush
• Re: calling c from fortran 90
  • From: dpb
• Re: calling c from fortran 90
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: calling c from fortran 90
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: calling c from fortran 90
  • From: dpb
• Re: calling c from fortran 90
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: calling c from fortran 90
  • From: dpb
• Re: flattening a matrix...
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: flattening a matrix...
  • From: Ian Bush
• previos message contd
  • From: joyeetadeb85
• calling c from fortran 90
  • From: joyeetadeb85
• Re: flattening a matrix...
  • From: highegg
• Re: boot sector
  • From: merl the perl
• Re: What sort of literal is this?
  • From: merl the perl
• Re: fortran compilers
  • From: Ian Gay
• Re: Form k = i + j and test for overflow.
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Form k = i + j and test for overflow.
  • From: Brooks Moses
• Re: Form k = i + j and test for overflow.
  • From: James Giles
• Re: fortran compilers
  • From: Terence
• Re: boot sector
  • From: Terence
• Re: boot sector
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: boot sector
  • From: merl the perl
• Re: fortran compilers
  • From: merl the perl
• Re: fortran compilers
  • From: John Harper
• Re: Form k = i + j and test for overflow.
  • From: Brooks Moses
• Re: Using Multiple Source Files with Plato3 in C
  • From: Mark Stevens
• Re: What sort of literal is this?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: What sort of literal is this?
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: What sort of literal is this?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: What sort of literal is this?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Sun Studio 12, what do you think?
  • From: merl the perl
• Re: What sort of literal is this?
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: reverse engineering a sig
  • From: Chip Coldwell
• Re: What sort of literal is this?
  • From: Walter Spector
• Re: What sort of literal is this?
  • From: Walter Spector
• Re: fortran compilers
  • From: Gary Scott
• Re: What sort of literal is this?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Sun Studio 12, what do you think?
  • From: Reinhold Bader
• Re: boot sector
  • From: e p chandler
• Re: What sort of literal is this?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: boot sector
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: What sort of literal is this?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: boot sector
  • From: merl the perl
• Re: fortran compilers
  • From: merl the perl
• Re: What sort of literal is this?
  • From: Walter Spector
• Re: fortran compilers
  • From: Jan Gerrit Kootstra
• Re: A problem about Fortran pointers
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: What sort of literal is this?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: What sort of literal is this?
  • From: Walter Spector
• Re: boot sector
  • From: Richard Maine
• boot sector
  • From: merl the perl
• fortran compilers
  • From: merl the perl
• Re: douady's rabbit
  • From: Terence
• Re: Reading an image array.
  • From: Terence
• Re: What sort of literal is this?
  • From: Colin Watters
• Re: Reading an image array.
  • From: J. F. Cornwall
• Re: What sort of literal is this?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• douady's rabbit
  • From: Lopes
• Re: What sort of literal is this?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: What sort of literal is this?
  • From: James Giles
• Re: What sort of literal is this?
  • From: Colin Watters
• Re: if construct
  • From: James Giles
• Re: if construct
  • From: Ken Fairfield
• Re: Reading an image array.
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: Reading an image array.
  • From: J. F. Cornwall
• Re: Reading an image array.
  • From: J. F. Cornwall
• Re: Reading an image array.
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Reading an image array.
  • From: dsurveyor
• Re: character*80 versus character*1 (80)
  • From: robin
• Re: What sort of literal is this?
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Re: What sort of literal is this?
  • From: dpb
• Re: requesting/forcing inlining of a contained function
  • From: Jeffery . A . White
• Re: Why not an EXIT statement for an if ... endif construct ?
  • From: Arno
• Re: named constants vs. literal constants
  • From: Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
• Re: if construct
  • From: Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
• Re: if construct
  • From: Gib Bogle
• Re: pls suggest me a simple but good compiler for F77
  • From: Gib Bogle
• Re: pls suggest me a simple but good compiler for F77
  • From: David Flower
• Re: What sort of literal is this?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: getting intel fortran to work from cygwin command line?
  • From: Pierre Asselin
• Re: character*80 versus character*1 (80)
  • From: John Harper
• Re: What sort of literal is this?
  • From: dpb
• Re: What sort of literal is this?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: What sort of literal is this?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: What sort of literal is this?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: matmul trouble
  • From: merl the perl
• Re: What sort of literal is this?
  • From: Terence
• Re: 'Advance=' by internal read
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: What sort of literal is this?
  • From: James Giles
• Re: What sort of literal is this?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: 'Advance=' by internal read
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Using fortran code with VBA
  • From: Craig Powers
• What sort of literal is this?
  • From: jaguar0616
• Re: if construct
  • From: Ken Fairfield
• Re: matmul trouble
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: how to avoid auto new line?
  • From: Bill C
• 'Advance=' by internal read
  • From: Michael
• Re: matmul trouble
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: matmul trouble
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: how to avoid auto new line?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: if construct
  • From: gsal
• Re: how to avoid auto new line?
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: matmul trouble
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: C++ Bounds Checking
  • From: Craig Powers
• Re: C++ Bounds Checking
  • From: Craig Powers
• Re: how to avoid auto new line?
  • From: ginko
• Re: matmul trouble
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: if construct
  • From: Ken Fairfield
• Re: matmul trouble
  • From: dpb
• Re: pls suggest me a simple but good compiler for F77
  • From: dpb
• Re: pls suggest me a simple but good compiler for F77
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: pls suggest me a simple but good compiler for F77
  • From: ginko
• Re: pls suggest me a simple but good compiler for F77
  • From: Beliavsky
• Re: pls suggest me a simple but good compiler for F77
  • From: ginko
• Re: pls suggest me a simple but good compiler for F77
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: pls suggest me a simple but good compiler for F77
  • From: jomarbueyes
• Re: pls suggest me a simple but good compiler for F77
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: how to avoid auto new line?
  • From: Bill C
• pls suggest me a simple but good compiler for F77
  • From: ginko
• Re: communicating the name of a function to deep within the call tree
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Re: how to avoid auto new line?
  • From: ginko
• Re: matmul trouble
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: matmul trouble
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: matmul trouble
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: communicating the name of a function to deep within the call tree
  • From: Paul van Delst
• Re: named constants vs. literal constants
  • From: Walter Spector
• Re: getting intel fortran to work from cygwin command line?
  • From: Ed
• Re: getting intel fortran to work from cygwin command line?
  • From: Ed
• Re: how to convert this line of Matlab code into Fortran?
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• Re: named constants vs. literal constants
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: how to avoid auto new line?
  • From: Gary Scott
• Re: Why not an EXIT statement for an if ... endif construct ?
  • From: Beliavsky
• Re: Why not an EXIT statement for an if ... endif construct ?
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: if construct
  • From: Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
• Why not an EXIT statement for an if ... endif construct ?
  • From: analyst41
• if construct
  • From: Leon
• Re: matmul trouble
  • From: Dan Nagle
• named constants vs. literal constants
  • From: Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply