Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
- From: tholen@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 20 Jul 2007 08:03:10 GMT
jvorbrueggen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
I am unfamiliar with the concept of interval arithmetic.
In all seriousness: If you are using floating-point arithmetic at all, not
knowing interval arithmetic is a serious gap in education.
I disagree.
The English
Wikipedia only has a short section in a larger article on intervals, but
points you to the corresponding German article that even has a nice worked
example. As a motivation, it uses measurement error of physical properties,
but of course the intrinsic properties of floating-point numbers apply in just
the same way.
For that I use propagation of error techniques. Sounds like a different
path to the same end result, hence my disagreement above.
Doesn't sound like interval arithmetic is necessarily going to provide
what a physical scientist needs. Consider the following simplified
example. Suppose you want to know the distance from A to C, but what
you have are measurements of the distance from A to B, and from B to C.
Suppose the positions of A and C are extremely well known, but the
position of B is very poorly known. Your measurement of the distance
from A to B will have a large uncertainty associated with it. Ditto for
your measurement of the distance from B to C. Computationally, the
distance from A to C is simply the sum of the distances between A and B,
and between B and C. You might erroneously propagate the error using
dz**2 = dx**2 + dy**2
for the case
z = x + y
the error being due to the fact that x and y are anticorrelated. How is
interval arithmetic going to know that?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
- From: Kevin G. Rhoads
- Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
- From: Jan Vorbrüggen
- Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
- References:
- On writing negative zero - with or without sign
- From: Jerry DeLisle
- Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
- From: robert . corbett
- Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
- From: robert . corbett
- Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
- From: Terence
- Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
- From: Ron Shepard
- Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
- From: James Giles
- Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
- From: tholen
- Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
- From: James Giles
- Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
- From: tholen
- Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
- From: James Giles
- Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
- From: tholen
- Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
- From: Jan Vorbrüggen
- On writing negative zero - with or without sign
- Prev by Date: Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
- Next by Date: Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
- Previous by thread: Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
- Next by thread: Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|