Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
- From: tholen@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 20 Jul 2007 18:18:19 GMT
Kevin G. Rhoads writes:
You might erroneously propagate the error using
dz**2 = dx**2 + dy**2
for the case
z = x + y
the error being due to the fact that x and y are anticorrelated. How is
interval arithmetic going to know that?
Actually that is the UNcorrelated case,
Incorrect. Uncorrelated means that the correlation coefficient is zero,
and changes in x are completely independent of changes in y. Anticorrelated
means that the correlation coefficient is -1, and that's the case for the
example I gave, because if you increase x by delta, you decrease y by delta.
for ANTIcorrelated you would use
dz = |dx - dy|
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
- From: Kevin G. Rhoads
- Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
- References:
- On writing negative zero - with or without sign
- From: Jerry DeLisle
- Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
- From: robert . corbett
- Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
- From: robert . corbett
- Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
- From: Terence
- Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
- From: Ron Shepard
- Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
- From: James Giles
- Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
- From: tholen
- Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
- From: James Giles
- Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
- From: tholen
- Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
- From: James Giles
- Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
- From: tholen
- Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
- From: Jan Vorbrüggen
- Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
- From: tholen
- Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
- From: Kevin G. Rhoads
- On writing negative zero - with or without sign
- Prev by Date: Re: f77, f90, f95 or f2003?
- Next by Date: Re: Flavors of zero, flavors of infinity Re: On writing negative zero - with
- Previous by thread: Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
- Next by thread: Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|