Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
- From: "Wade Ward" <zaxfuuq@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 10:30:33 -0700
<tholen@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:46a5def2$0$8048$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
jvorbrueggen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
I was always amazed at the mosaic that are computations in astronomy. It'sAnd with regard to the other replies: Yes, I know about g-2, and some
other
examples for high-accuracy measurements. The astronomical one is actually
quite interesting: Various compound values, in particular GM for various
heavenly bodies, are known very well, as they can (and need be) measured
to
high precision for navigation. G, on the other hand, as one of the
fundamental
constants, is only known to 10^-3 or so, and likewise the related values
for
the masses of the bodies.
CODATA gives G to a lot better than 10^-3. But GM is still known a lot
better.
hard to get a second opinion from the other side of space. Dr. Ptak always
said that getting measurements to within an order of magnitude was very
good.
--
Wade Ward
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
- References:
- On writing negative zero - with or without sign
- From: Jerry DeLisle
- Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
- From: robert . corbett
- Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
- From: robert . corbett
- Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
- From: Terence
- Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
- From: Ron Shepard
- Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
- From: James Giles
- Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
- From: tholen
- Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
- From: James Giles
- Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
- From: tholen
- Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
- From: James Giles
- Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
- From: tholen
- Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
- From: Jan Vorbrüggen
- Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
- From: tholen
- Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
- From: Jan Vorbrüggen
- Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
- From: tholen
- Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
- From: Jan Vorbrüggen
- Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
- From: James Giles
- Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
- From: Jan Vorbrüggen
- Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
- From: tholen
- On writing negative zero - with or without sign
- Prev by Date: Re: convert f77 code from mixed case to lower case
- Next by Date: Why zero is represented by an extremely small value?
- Previous by thread: Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
- Next by thread: Re: On writing negative zero - with or without sign
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading