forall and do loop

From: aeroguy <sukhbinder.singh@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 05:14:10 -0000

REAL :: DS(100),UTA(100),STA(100),ONE
ONE = 1.0000

! First case
DO I=1,NE
UTA(I)=DS(I)
STA(I)=ONE
END DO

! second case
FORALL(I=1:NE) UTA(I)=DS(I)
STA=ONE

In this two follwoing code which will be more efficient? Efficent in
execution time and in parallel processing?

regards

.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: forall and do loop
  - From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: forall and do loop
  - From: Sebastian Hanigk

Prev by Date: Re: Matrix multiplication using subarrays?
Next by Date: Re: forall and do loop
Previous by thread: Re: C/C++ speed optimization bible/resources/pointers needed!
Next by thread: Re: forall and do loop
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread