Re: forall and do loop
- From: Richard Edgar <rge21@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 10:32:39 -0400
Tim Prince wrote:
I suppose you could use it as a purely Fortran syntax check for some of
the prerequisites for OpenMP parallel, before switching to OMP PARALLEL DO.
If you can write it as FORALL, then OMP WORKSHARE would probably be a
better fit.
Richard
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: forall and do loop
- From: Tim Prince
- Re: forall and do loop
- References:
- forall and do loop
- From: aeroguy
- Re: forall and do loop
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: forall and do loop
- From: aeroguy
- Re: forall and do loop
- From: *** Hendrickson
- Re: forall and do loop
- From: highegg
- Re: forall and do loop
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: forall and do loop
- From: Wade Ward
- Re: forall and do loop
- From: Tim Prince
- forall and do loop
- Prev by Date: Re: forall and do loop
- Next by Date: Re: forall and do loop
- Previous by thread: Re: forall and do loop
- Next by thread: Re: forall and do loop
- Index(es):