comp.lang.fortran
- Least sq. polynom. approximation
- Re: Least sq. polynom. approximation
- Re: fortran95 error
- Re: Error LNK2019
- Re: Error LNK2019
- Re: fortran95 error
- Re: Error LNK2019
- Re: TRANSPOSE and MATMUL interaction
- Re: TRANSPOSE and MATMUL interaction
- Re: fortran95 error
- Re: Error LNK2019
- Re: fortran95 error
- Re: fortran95 error
- fortran95 error
- fortran95 error
- Re: Error LNK2019
- Re: Deletion of BITS Datatype from Fortran 2008
- Error LNK2019
- Re: collision detection in fortran
- Re: TRANSPOSE and MATMUL interaction
- Re: TRANSPOSE and MATMUL interaction
- Re: Deletion of BITS Datatype from Fortran 2008
- Re: TRANSPOSE and MATMUL interaction
- Re: fortran character set
- Re: fortran character set
- Re: Is there a way like this in Fortran?
- Re: Is there a way like this in Fortran?
- collision detection in fortran
- From: Marek Wojciechowski
- Re: fortran character set
- Re: TRANSPOSE and MATMUL interaction
- Re: fortran character set
- Re: fortran character set
- Re: TRANSPOSE and MATMUL interaction
- Re: TRANSPOSE and MATMUL interaction
- TRANSPOSE and MATMUL interaction
- Re: fortran character set
- Re: High Performance Fortran compiler?
- Re: High Performance Fortran compiler?
- High Performance Fortran compiler?
- Re: Is there a way like this in Fortran?
- Re: Deletion of BITS Datatype from Fortran 2008
- Re: fortran character set
- From: Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
- Re: fortran character set
- From: Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
- Re: Deletion of BITS Datatype from Fortran 2008
- Re: Deletion of BITS Datatype from Fortran 2008
- Re: Deletion of BITS Datatype from Fortran 2008
- Re: Deletion of BITS Datatype from Fortran 2008
- Re: fortran character set
- Re: fortran character set
- Re: fortran character set
- Re: Deletion of BITS Datatype from Fortran 2008
- Re: Deletion of BITS Datatype from Fortran 2008
- Re: Deletion of BITS Datatype from Fortran 2008
- Re: fortran character set
- Re: Deletion of BITS Datatype from Fortran 2008
- Re: association with zero-length array?
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Deletion of BITS Datatype from Fortran 2008
- Re: Deletion of BITS Datatype from Fortran 2008
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Deletion of BITS Datatype from Fortran 2008
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: association with zero-length array?
- Re: Deletion of BITS Datatype from Fortran 2008
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Is there a way like this in Fortran?
- Re: fortran character set
- Re: Use of Include Files
- Re: Deletion of BITS Datatype from Fortran 2008
- Re: Deletion of BITS Datatype from Fortran 2008
- Re: fortran character set
- Re: Is there a way like this in Fortran?
- Re: Deletion of BITS Datatype from Fortran 2008
- Re: Deletion of BITS Datatype from Fortran 2008
- Re: Deletion of BITS Datatype from Fortran 2008
- Re: Deletion of BITS Datatype from Fortran 2008
- Re: fortran character set
- Re: fortran character set
- Re: Is there a way like this in Fortran?
- Re: fortran character set
- Re: Deletion of BITS Datatype from Fortran 2008 (Was: Quick Summary of WG5/J3 London meeting)
- Re: fortran character set
- Re: Is there a way like this in Fortran?
- Re: fortran character set
- Deletion of BITS Datatype from Fortran 2008 (Was: Quick Summary of WG5/J3 London meeting)
- Re: fortran character set
- Re: Why Fortran?
- Re: Why zero is represented by an extremely small value?
- Re: fortran character set
- Re: fortran character set
- From: Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
- Re: generic interface question
- Re: directory listing
- Re: directory listing
- Re: directory listing
- Re: fortran character set
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: generic interface question
- Re: fortran character set
- Re: fortran character set
- Re: generic interface question
- Re: generic interface question
- Re: generic interface question
- Re: directory listing
- Re: fortran character set
- Re: generic interface question
- generic interface question
- Re: directory listing
- Re: Q for DISLIN people
- directory listing
- Re: Is there a way like this in Fortran?
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Is there a way like this in Fortran?
- Re: Is there a way like this in Fortran?
- Re: Is there a way like this in Fortran?
- Re: Intel 10 for MAC OSX ?
- Re: Intel 10 for MAC OSX ?
- Re: Is there a way like this in Fortran?
- Re: Is there a way like this in Fortran?
- Re: Intel 10 for MAC OSX ?
- Use of Include Files (Was: Why Fortran?)
- Re: Intel 10 for MAC OSX ?
- Re: Is there a way like this in Fortran?
- Re: One more TARGET quiz
- Re: Is there a way like this in Fortran?
- Re: fortran character set
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: fortran character set
- Re: fortran character set
- Re: One more TARGET quiz
- Re: Intel 10 for MAC OSX ?
- Re: Is there a way like this in Fortran?
- Re: fortran character set
- Re: fortran character set
- Re: Is there a way like this in Fortran?
- Re: Array import to Fortran
- Re: One more TARGET quiz
- Re: fortran character set
- Re: fortran character set
- Re: MS Fortran PowerStation 1.0a under Win XP
- Re: Intel 10 for MAC OSX ?
- Re: fortran character set
- Re: Intel 10 for MAC OSX ?
- Re: fortran character set
- Re: fortran character set
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Is there a way like this in Fortran?
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: fortran character set
- Re: Is there a way like this in Fortran?
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Is there a way like this in Fortran?
- Re: TARGET and INTENT(IN)
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: fortran character set
- fortran character set
- Re: Intel 10 for MAC OSX ?
- Re: TARGET and INTENT(IN)
- Re: TARGET and INTENT(IN)
- Re: TARGET and INTENT(IN)
- Re: One more TARGET quiz
- Re: One more TARGET quiz
- Re: One more TARGET quiz
- Re: One more TARGET quiz
- Re: Is there a way like this in Fortran?
- Re: Is there a way like this in Fortran?
- Re: TARGET and INTENT(IN)
- Re: Intel 10 for MAC OSX ?
- Re: One more TARGET quiz
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: One more TARGET quiz
- Re: One more TARGET quiz
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: One more TARGET quiz
- Re: One more TARGET quiz
- Re: One more TARGET quiz
- Re: How to run *.f95 in Compaq?
- Re: Q for DISLIN people
- One more TARGET quiz
- Re: Why Fortran?
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Is there a way like this in Fortran?
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Is there a way like this in Fortran?
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Is there a way like this in Fortran?
- Re: Is there a way like this in Fortran?
- Re: How to run *.f95 in Compaq?
- Re: Is there a way like this in Fortran?
- Re: How to run *.f95 in Compaq?
- Re: Q for DISLIN people
- How to run *.f95 in Compaq?
- Re: Q for DISLIN people
- Re: Q for DISLIN people
- Q for DISLIN people
- Re: Is there a way like this in Fortran?
- Re: Is there a way like this in Fortran?
- Re: Is there a way like this in Fortran?
- Re: Is there a way like this in Fortran?
- Re: Is there a way like this in Fortran?
- Re: Is there a way like this in Fortran?
- Re: Is there a way like this in Fortran?
- Re: Is there a way like this in Fortran?
- Re: Intel 10 for MAC OSX ?
- From: Engineering Calculations
- Re: Shootout Challenge
- Re: Shootout Challenge
- Re: Shootout Challenge
- Re: why sometimes contain a subroutine in a module?
- Re: format printing [Was: Why Fortran?]
- Re: Shootout Challenge
- Re: Shootout Challenge
- Re: TARGET and INTENT(IN)
- Re: BIND and ELEMENTAL
- Re: quick question about linking Fortran and C
- Re: Why Fortran?
- Re: Clear Screen
- Re: g95 error
- Re: Shootout Challenge
- Re: Shootout Challenge
- Re: Is there a way like this in Fortran?
- Re: Is there a way like this in Fortran?
- Re: why sometimes contain a subroutine in a module?
- Re: Intel 10 for MAC OSX ?
- Re: Intel 10 for MAC OSX ?
- why sometimes contain a subroutine in a module?
- Re: Intel 10 for MAC OSX ?
- Re: Intel 10 ?
- Re: Is there a way like this in Fortran?
- Re: why sometimes contain a subroutine in a module?
- Re: Is there a way like this in Fortran?
- Re: Is there a way like this in Fortran?
- Re: Is there a way like this in Fortran?
- Re: Intel 10 for MAC OSX ?
- Re: Is there a way like this in Fortran?
- Re: Is there a way like this in Fortran?
- Re: Is there a way like this in Fortran?
- Re: Is there a way like this in Fortran?
- Re: Is there a way like this in Fortran?
- Re: Is there a way like this in Fortran?
- Re: Is there a way like this in Fortran?
- Re: Is there a way like this in Fortran?
- Re: Is there a way like this in Fortran?
- Re: Is there a way like this in Fortran?
- Is there a way like this in Fortran?
- Re: Fortran 2003: IMPORT question
- Re: Fortran 2003: IMPORT question
- Re: Shootout Challenge
- Fortran 2003: IMPORT question
- Intel 10 for MAC OSX ?
- From: Engineering Calculations
- Re: Intel 10 ?
- From: Engineering Calculations
- Re: Shootout Challenge
- Re: TARGET and INTENT(IN)
- Re: TARGET and INTENT(IN)
- Re: gfortran bug or not?
- Re: Intel 10 ?
- Re: TARGET and INTENT(IN)
- RE: Shootout Challenge
- Re: gfortran bug or not?
- gfortran bug or not?
- Shootout Challenge
- Re: Intel 10 ?
- Re: Array import to Fortran
- Re: Array import to Fortran
- Re: Array import to Fortran
- Array import to Fortran
- Re: TARGET and INTENT(IN)
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: TARGET and INTENT(IN)
- Re: Are there pre-defined macro symbols available to determine what compiler is being used?
- Re: TARGET and INTENT(IN)
- Re: TARGET and INTENT(IN)
- Re: TARGET and INTENT(IN)
- Re: TARGET and INTENT(IN)
- Re: TARGET and INTENT(IN)
- Re: Q: Are there pre-defined macro symbols available to determine what compiler is being used?
- Q: Are there pre-defined macro symbols available to determine what compiler is being used?
- Re: Intel 10 ?
- Intel 10 ?
- From: Engineering Calculations
- Re: TARGET and INTENT(IN)
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: TARGET and INTENT(IN)
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: TARGET and INTENT(IN)
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: TARGET and INTENT(IN)
- Re: TARGET and INTENT(IN)
- Re: TARGET and INTENT(IN)
- Re: TARGET and INTENT(IN)
- Re: TARGET and INTENT(IN)
- Re: TARGET and INTENT(IN)
- Re: TARGET and INTENT(IN)
- Re: TARGET and INTENT(IN)
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: TARGET and INTENT(IN)
- Re: TARGET and INTENT(IN)
- Re: Some problem with ivf10+vs2005
- Re: TARGET and INTENT(IN)
- Re: TARGET and INTENT(IN)
- Re: TARGET and INTENT(IN)
- Re: TARGET and INTENT(IN)
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: TARGET and INTENT(IN)
- Re: TARGET and INTENT(IN)
- Re: Some problem with ivf10+vs2005
- Re: TARGET and INTENT(IN)
- Re: TARGET and INTENT(IN)
- Some problem with ivf10+vs2005
- Re: What would it take to have no undefined behavior in Fortran ?
- Re: Is this a compiler bug?
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: TARGET and INTENT(IN)
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: TARGET and INTENT(IN)
- Re: TARGET and INTENT(IN)
- Re: TARGET and INTENT(IN)
- Re: TARGET and INTENT(IN)
- Re: TARGET and INTENT(IN)
- Re: TARGET and INTENT(IN)
- Re: gfortran: what does the standard say?
- Re: gfortran: what does the standard say?
- Re: TARGET and INTENT(IN)
- Re: gfortran: what does the standard say?
- gfortran: what does the standard say?
- Re: TARGET and INTENT(IN)
- Re: TARGET and INTENT(IN)
- Re: TARGET and INTENT(IN)
- Re: TARGET and INTENT(IN)
- Re: TARGET and INTENT(IN)
- Re: TARGET and INTENT(IN)
- Re: TARGET and INTENT(IN)
- Re: TARGET and INTENT(IN)
- Re: TARGET and INTENT(IN)
- Re: TARGET and INTENT(IN)
- Re: TARGET and INTENT(IN)
- TARGET and INTENT(IN)
- Re: IVF 10 Bug: Wrong branch returned by SQRT for COMPLEX*16 argument
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Is this a compiler bug?
- Re: How read the data in one line in this case?
- Re: IVF 10 Bug: Wrong branch returned by SQRT for COMPLEX*16 argument
- Re: Q: Association rules ?
- Re: IVF 10 Bug: Wrong branch returned by SQRT for COMPLEX*16 argument
- Re: IVF 10 Bug: Wrong branch returned by SQRT for COMPLEX*16 argument
- Re: How read the data in one line in this case?
- Re: IVF 10 Bug: Wrong branch returned by SQRT for COMPLEX*16 argument
- Re: IVF 10 Bug: Wrong branch returned by SQRT for COMPLEX*16 argument
- Re: IVF 10 Bug: Wrong branch returned by SQRT for COMPLEX*16 argument
- Re: IVF 10 Bug: Wrong branch returned by SQRT for COMPLEX*16 argument
- Re: IVF 10 Bug: Wrong branch returned by SQRT for COMPLEX*16 argument
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: How read the data in one line in this case?
- Re: IVF 10 Bug: Wrong branch returned by SQRT for COMPLEX*16 argument
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: IVF 10 Bug: Wrong branch returned by SQRT for COMPLEX*16 argument
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: MS Fortran PowerStation 1.0a under Win XP
- Re: IVF 10 Bug: Wrong branch returned by SQRT for COMPLEX*16 argument
- Re: IVF 10 Bug: Wrong branch returned by SQRT for COMPLEX*16 argument
- Re: IVF 10 Bug: Wrong branch returned by SQRT for COMPLEX*16 argument
- Re: How read the data in one line in this case?
- Re: IVF 10 Bug: Wrong branch returned by SQRT for COMPLEX*16 argument
- Re: IVF 10 Bug: Wrong branch returned by SQRT for COMPLEX*16 argument
- Re: IVF 10 Bug: Wrong branch returned by SQRT for COMPLEX*16 argument
- Re: IVF 10 Bug: Wrong branch returned by SQRT for COMPLEX*16 argument
- Re: IVF 10 Bug: Wrong branch returned by SQRT for COMPLEX*16 argument
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: IVF 10 Bug: Wrong branch returned by SQRT for COMPLEX*16 argument
- Re: IVF 10 Bug: Wrong branch returned by SQRT for COMPLEX*16 argument
- Re: IVF 10 Bug: Wrong branch returned by SQRT for COMPLEX*16 argument
- Re: IVF 10 Bug: Wrong branch returned by SQRT for COMPLEX*16 argument
- Re: How read the data in one line in this case?
- Re: IVF 10 Bug: Wrong branch returned by SQRT for COMPLEX*16 argument
- Re: IVF 10 Bug: Wrong branch returned by SQRT for COMPLEX*16 argument
- IVF 10 Bug: Wrong branch returned by SQRT for COMPLEX*16 argument
- How read the data in one line in this case?
- Re: MS Fortran PowerStation 1.0a under Win XP
- MS Fortran PowerStation 1.0a under Win XP
- Re: Red-Black-Trees and Fortran 2003 Features
- Re: Red-Black-Trees and Fortran 2003 Features
- Re: An odd halt in my program
- Re: An odd halt in my program
- Re: Red-Black-Trees and Fortran 2003 Features
- Re: Can gfortran has the function of define the precision of whole program?
- Re: Is this a compiler bug?
- Re: Can gfortran has the function of define the precision of whole program?
- Re: Can gfortran has the function of define the precision of whole program?
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Can gfortran has the function of define the precision of whole program?
- Re: Q: Association rules ?
- Can gfortran has the function of define the precision of whole program?
- Re: Is this a compiler bug?
- Re: Q: Association rules ?
- Re: Double-checking a Program
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Interpreting read statement in FORTRAN IV code
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Double-checking a Program
- Re: Double-checking a Program
- www.faressoft.all-up.com
- Re: Interpreting read statement in FORTRAN IV code
- Re: Interpreting read statement in FORTRAN IV code
- Re: Problems with unformatted reads with FORTRAN 77 and Fortran 95
- Re: How to pas an overloaded subroutine as an argument to another subroutine
- Re: Quick Summary of WG5/J3 London meeting
- Re: Problems with unformatted reads with FORTRAN 77 and Fortran 95
- Re: An odd halt in my program
- Re: Problems with unformatted reads with FORTRAN 77 and Fortran 95
- Re: Red-Black-Trees and Fortran 2003 Features
- Re: Problems with unformatted reads with FORTRAN 77 and Fortran 95
- Re: Red-Black-Trees and Fortran 2003 Features
- Problems with unformatted reads with FORTRAN 77 and Fortran 95
- Re: Red-Black-Trees and Fortran 2003 Features
- Re: LEN of subroutine variables
- Red-Black-Trees and Fortran 2003 Features
- Re: association with zero-length array?
- Re: Q: Association rules ?
- LEN of subroutine variables
- From: mrestelli@xxxxxxxxx
- Is this a compiler bug?
- How to pas an overloaded subroutine as an argument to another subroutine
- Re: Interpreting read statement in FORTRAN IV code
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- RE: Double-checking a Program
- Re: Interpreting read statement in FORTRAN IV code
- Re: Double-checking a Program
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Interpreting read statement in FORTRAN IV code
- Re: Incorrect values calling F from C
- Double-checking a Program
- Re: Q: Association rules ?
- Re: Interpreting read statement in FORTRAN IV code
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Interpreting read statement in FORTRAN IV code
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: An odd halt in my program
- Re: Interpreting read statement in FORTRAN IV code
- Re: quick question about linking Fortran and C
- Re: Incorrect values calling F from C
- Re: Interpreting read statement in FORTRAN IV code
- Re: Interpreting read statement in FORTRAN IV code
- Incorrect values calling F from C
- Re: Interpreting read statement in FORTRAN IV code
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Interpreting read statement in FORTRAN IV code
- Re: Interpreting read statement in FORTRAN IV code
- Re: Interpreting read statement in FORTRAN IV code
- Re: Interpreting read statement in FORTRAN IV code
- Interpreting read statement in FORTRAN IV code
- Re: Fortran 2003 question regarding public entries of private types
- Fortran 2003 question regarding public entries of private types
- Re: MI5 Persecution: Fitted up 26/4/96 (813)
- Re: An odd halt in my program
- Re: An odd halt in my program
- Re: dynamic allocation of new objects
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: BIND and ELEMENTAL
- Re: dynamic allocation of new objects
- Re: dynamic allocation of new objects
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: dynamic allocation of new objects
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: dynamic allocation of new objects
- Re: dynamic allocation of new objects
- Re: dynamic allocation of new objects
- dynamic allocation of new objects
- Re: coming to 64bit fortran 2
- Re: coming to 64bit fortran 2
- Re: BIND and ELEMENTAL
- Re: coming to 64bit fortran 2
- Q: Association rules ?
- coming to 64bit fortran 2
- Re: quick question about linking Fortran and C
- Re: BIND and ELEMENTAL
- Re: Errors in Fortran standards
- Re: association with zero-length array?
- BIND and ELEMENTAL
- Re: An odd halt in my program
- Re: An odd halt in my program
- Re: quick question about linking Fortran and C
- Re: An odd halt in my program
- Re: Quick Summary of WG5/J3 London meeting
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- An odd halt in my program
- Re: quick question about linking Fortran and C
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: quick question about linking Fortran and C
- Re: quick question about linking Fortran and C
- Re: quick question about linking Fortran and C
- Re: quick question about linking Fortran and C
- Re: quick question about linking Fortran and C
- Re: quick question about linking Fortran and C
- Re: quick question about linking Fortran and C
- Re: quick question about linking Fortran and C
- Re: quick question about linking Fortran and C
- Re: quick question about linking Fortran and C
- quick question about linking Fortran and C
- Re: Fun with allocatables. Is this legal code?
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Quick Summary of WG5/J3 London meeting
- Re: Fun with allocatables. Is this legal code?
- Re: association with zero-length array?
- Re: association with zero-length array?
- Re: avoiding out of bounds errors
- Re: dummy allocatable question
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: testing for floating point equality
- Re: association with zero-length array?
- Re: testing for floating point equality
- Errors in Fortran standards
- Re: Quick Summary of WG5/J3 London meeting
- Re: dummy allocatable question
- Re: association with zero-length array?
- Re: Fun with allocatables. Is this legal code?
- avoiding out of bounds errors
- dummy allocatable question
- Re: Quick Summary of WG5/J3 London meeting
- Re: Quick Summary of WG5/J3 London meeting
- Re: Fun with allocatables. Is this legal code?
- Fun with allocatables. Is this legal code?
- Re: Quick Summary of WG5/J3 London meeting
- Re: Quick Summary of WG5/J3 London meeting
- Re: Quick Summary of WG5/J3 London meeting
- Re: FORTRAN IV program illustrating assigned GO TO on web site
- Re: Quick Summary of WG5/J3 London meeting
- Re: Windows to Linux Fortran code
- Re: Windows to Linux Fortran code
- Re: association with zero-length array?
- Re: association with zero-length array?
- Re: Scientific Programming, vol. 15, no 1., 2007
- Re: Quick Summary of WG5/J3 London meeting
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Attributes, paramerters, etc. (was: Quick Summary of WG5/J3 London meeting)
- Re: Attributes, paramerters, etc. (was: Quick Summary of WG5/J3 London meeting)
- Re: Quick Summary of WG5/J3 London meeting
- Re: Quick Summary of WG5/J3 London meeting
- Attributes, paramerters, etc. (was: Quick Summary of WG5/J3 London meeting)
- Re: Quick Summary of WG5/J3 London meeting
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Quick Summary of WG5/J3 London meeting
- Re: Quick Summary of WG5/J3 London meeting
- From: Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
- Re: Fortran I/O
- Re: association with zero-length array?
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Scientific Programming, vol. 15, no 1., 2007
- Re: Scientific Programming, vol. 15, no 1., 2007
- Re: Quick Summary of WG5/J3 London meeting
- Re: Quick Summary of WG5/J3 London meeting
- Re: association with zero-length array?
- Re: Scientific Programming, vol. 15, no 1., 2007
- Re: association with zero-length array?
- Re: Quick Summary of WG5/J3 London meeting
- Re: Quick Summary of WG5/J3 London meeting
- Re: semantics of a goto inside a do loop
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: association with zero-length array?
- Re: Quick Summary of WG5/J3 London meeting
- Re: association with zero-length array?
- Re: association with zero-length array?
- Re: association with zero-length array?
- Re: association with zero-length array?
- Re: association with zero-length array?
- Re: Quick Summary of WG5/J3 London meeting
- association with zero-length array?
- Re: Fortran I/O
- Re: Fortran I/O
- Re: format statements and arrays
- Re: Fortran I/O
- Re: intel ct multiprocessor compiler
- Re: intel ct multiprocessor compiler
- Re: Fortran I/O
- From: Jan Gerrit Kootstra
- Re: format statements and arrays
- Re: format statements and arrays
- Re: format statements and arrays
- Fortran I/O
- Re: I/O Access
- Re: format statements and arrays
- Re: format statements and arrays
- Re: format statements and arrays
- I/O Access
- Re: a Fortran precision question
- Re: Character assignment question in Function
- Re: a Fortran precision question
- Re: Quick Summary of WG5/J3 London meeting
- format statements and arrays
- Re: Quick Summary of WG5/J3 London meeting
- Re: Quick Summary of WG5/J3 London meeting
- Re: semantics of a goto inside a do loop
- Re: Quick Summary of WG5/J3 London meeting
- RE: semantics of a goto inside a do loop
- Re: semantics of a goto inside a do loop
- semantics of a goto inside a do loop
- Re: Fortran 2003 interoperability with C tutorial?
- Re: intel ct multiprocessor compiler
- Re: Quick Summary of WG5/J3 London meeting
- Re: Quick Summary of WG5/J3 London meeting
- Re: Quick Summary of WG5/J3 London meeting
- Re: Quick Summary of WG5/J3 London meeting
- Re: Windows to Linux Fortran code
- Re: Windows to Linux Fortran code
- Re: Windows to Linux Fortran code
- RE: semantics of a goto inside a do loop
- Re: Windows to Linux Fortran code
- Re: Windows to Linux Fortran code
- Re: Quick Summary of WG5/J3 London meeting
- Re: intel ct multiprocessor compiler
- Re: Windows to Linux Fortran code
- Re: Windows to Linux Fortran code
- Re: Windows to Linux Fortran code
- Re: Windows to Linux Fortran code
- Re: intel ct multiprocessor compiler
- Re: Windows to Linux Fortran code
- Windows to Linux Fortran code
- Re: Quick Summary of WG5/J3 London meeting
- Re: Quick Summary of WG5/J3 London meeting
- Re: Character assignment question in Function
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: compiler independent random_seed() (newbie)
- Re: Character assignment question in Function
- Re: Updated Compiler Comparisons
- Re: Character assignment question in Function
- Re: Quick Summary of WG5/J3 London meeting
- Re: Character assignment question in Function
- Re: Quick Summary of WG5/J3 London meeting
- Character assignment question in Function
- Updated Compiler Comparisons
- Re: intel ct multiprocessor compiler
- Re: intel ct multiprocessor compiler
- Re: Can IBM's xl fortran linux version work in Cygwin?
- Re: Can IBM's xl fortran linux version work in Cygwin?
- Re: Can IBM's xl fortran linux version work in Cygwin?
- Can IBM's xl fortran linux version work in Cygwin?
- Re: How to dump the value of all variables when an exception was raised, and reload them to repeat the error.
- Re: How to dump the value of all variables when an exception was raised, and reload them to repeat the error.
- Re: How to dump the value of all variables when an exception was raised, and reload them to repeat the error.
- Re: Quick Summary of WG5/J3 London meeting
- Re: Quick Summary of WG5/J3 London meeting
- Re: Intel software forum links broken
- Re: Quick Summary of WG5/J3 London meeting
- Intel software forum links broken
- Re: Quick Summary of WG5/J3 London meeting
- Re: testing for floating point equality
- Re: Quick Summary of WG5/J3 London meeting
- Re: Quick Summary of WG5/J3 London meeting
- Re: testing for floating point equality
- Re: Quick Summary of WG5/J3 London meeting
- Re: Looking for integrator that supports evaluating integrand at multiple points in batch mode?
- Re: Looking for integrator that supports evaluating integrand at multiple points in batch mode?
- Re: Quick Summary of WG5/J3 London meeting
- Quick Summary of WG5/J3 London meeting
- Re: Triangular Arrays
- Re: Triangular Arrays
- Re: Any Substitute for READONLY in F77?
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: IBM Visual Fortran - Visual Environment
- Re: Triangular Arrays
- Re: Q: Checking the size of a non-allocated array?
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: testing for floating point equality
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Triangular Arrays
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Looking for integrator that supports evaluating integrand at multiple points in batch mode?
- Re: Triangular Arrays
- Re: IBM Visual Fortran - Visual Environment
- Re: IBM Visual Fortran - Visual Environment
- Re: IBM Visual Fortran - Visual Environment
- Re: Looking for integrator that supports evaluating integrand at multiple points in batch mode?
- Re: IBM Visual Fortran - Visual Environment
- Re: Long Live Fortran
- Re: IBM Visual Fortran - Visual Environment
- Re: How to dump the value of all variables when an exception was raised, and reload them to repeat the error.
- Re: IBM Visual Fortran - Visual Environment
- Re: IBM Visual Fortran - Visual Environment
- Re: Triangular Arrays
- Re: IBM Visual Fortran - Visual Environment
- Re: Triangular Arrays
- Re: IBM Visual Fortran - Visual Environment
- Re: IBM Visual Fortran - Visual Environment
- Re: IBM Visual Fortran - Visual Environment
- Re: IBM Visual Fortran - Visual Environment
- Re: IBM Visual Fortran - Visual Environment
- Re: How to dump the value of all variables when an exception was raised, and reload them to repeat the error.
- Re: Triangular Arrays
- Re: Triangular Arrays
- Re: Triangular Arrays
- Re: IBM Visual Fortran - Visual Environment
- Re: IBM Visual Fortran - Visual Environment
- Re: Triangular Arrays
- IBM Visual Fortran - Visual Environment
- Re: Triangular Arrays
- Re: Triangular Arrays
- Re: Triangular Arrays
- Triangular Arrays
- Long Live Fortran
- Re: problem with iargc() and lnblnk() in cvf
- Re: intersection of two sets
- problem with iargc() and lnblnk() in cvf
- Linux "idb" performance problem
- Re: compiler independent random_seed() (newbie)
- Re: compiler independent random_seed() (newbie)
- Re: compiler independent random_seed() (newbie)
- Re: compiler independent random_seed() (newbie)
- Re: compiler independent random_seed() (newbie)
- Re: Q: Checking the size of a non-allocated array?
- Re: access violation
- compiler independent random_seed() (newbie)
- Re: Q: Checking the size of a non-allocated array?
- Re: access violation
- Re: Q: Checking the size of a non-allocated array?
- Re: access violation
- Re: READONLY attribute?
- Re: READONLY attribute?
- Re: access violation
- Re: access violation
- From: Jan Gerrit Kootstra
- access violation
- Re: READONLY attribute?
- READONLY attribute?
- Re: Q: Checking the size of a non-allocated array?
- Re: Q: Checking the size of a non-allocated array?
- Re: Q: Checking the size of a non-allocated array?
- Q: Checking the size of a non-allocated array?
- Re: testing for floating point equality
- Re: testing for floating point equality
- Re: testing for floating point equality
- Re: Reverse order of data in a particular dimension
- Re: intersection of two sets
- Re: intersection of two sets
- Re: intersection of two sets
- Re: intersection of two sets
- Re: Does working arrary must be presented as arguments in Function or Subroutine
- Re: How to dump the value of all variables when an exception was raised, and reload them to repeat the error.
- Re: Reverse order of data in a particular dimension
- Reverse order of data in a particular dimension
- Re: Does working arrary must be presented as arguments in Function or Subroutine
- Re: intersection of two sets
- Re: How to dump the value of all variables when an exception was raised, and reload them to repeat the error.
- How to dump the value of all variables when an exception was raised, and reload them to repeat the error.
- Re: testing for floating point equality
- Does working arrary must be presented as arguments in Function or Subroutine
- Re: intersection of two sets
- testing for floating point equality
- Re: intersection of two sets
- Re: Invalid Operator in complex assignment
- Re: Execution Timing
- Re: a Fortran precision question
- Re: intersection of two sets
- Lahey's ML_EXTERNAL and linking a C-Library
- Re: a Fortran precision question
- Re: a Fortran precision question
- Re: a Fortran precision question
- Re: a Fortran precision question
- a Fortran precision question
- Re: intersection of two sets
- Re: intersection of two sets
- Re: intersection of two sets
- Re: intersection of two sets
- Re: intersection of two sets
- intersection of two sets
- Re: Linking errors: __ctype_b and errno. Any ideas?
- Re: Linking errors: __ctype_b and errno. Any ideas?
- Re: Linking errors: __ctype_b and errno. Any ideas?
- Re: Should I Start With Fortran77 of Fortran90/95?
- Re: Linking errors: __ctype_b and errno. Any ideas?
- RE: How to read TIFF file using Fortran?
- Re: Should I Start With Fortran77 of Fortran90/95?
- patches available for Sun Studio 12
- Re: FORTRAN in Commodore 64
- How to read TIFF file using Fortran?
- Re: Linking errors: __ctype_b and errno. Any ideas?
- Re: [F03 C-interoperability] Correct way to do C_PTR (char *) to CHARACTER vector conversion
- [F03 C-interoperability] Correct way to do C_PTR (char *) to CHARACTER vector conversion
- Fortran 2003 interoperability with C tutorial?
- Re: Linking errors: __ctype_b and errno. Any ideas?
- Re: accessing a C dll from Fortran
- Re: Should I Start With Fortran77 of Fortran90/95?
- Re: Should I Start With Fortran77 of Fortran90/95?
- Re: Should I Start With Fortran77 of Fortran90/95?
- From: Kamaraju S Kusumanchi
- Re: migrating STRUCTURE and RECORD to g77 or gfortran
- accessing a C dll from Fortran
- Should I Start With Fortran77 of Fortran90/95?
- Re: Why So Great for Numbers? / Best Compiler
- Re: Why Fortran?
- Re: Why Fortran?
- Re: Why Fortran?
- Re: DATA jhlf,jhlg/'f','g'/
- Re: Why Fortran?
- Re: Why Fortran?
- Re: migrating STRUCTURE and RECORD to g77 or gfortran
- Great to see a FORTRAN group!!
- Re: migrating STRUCTURE and RECORD to g77 or gfortran
- Re: Why So Great for Numbers? / Best Compiler
- Re: C/C++ speed optimization bible/resources/pointers needed!
- migrating STRUCTURE and RECORD to g77 or gfortran
- Re: Why Fortran?
- Re: Replicating results
- Re: DATA jhlf,jhlg/'f','g'/
- DATA jhlf,jhlg/'f','g'/
- Re: Why Fortran?
- Re: Why Fortran?
- Re: Replicating results
- Re: Why So Great for Numbers? / Best Compiler
- Re: Linking errors: __ctype_b and errno. Any ideas?
- Re: Why Fortran?
- Re: Why So Great for Numbers? / Best Compiler
- Re: coming to 64bit gfortran
- Re: bug or mistake?
- Re: Why Fortran?
- Re: Replicating results
- Re: Why Fortran?
- Re: Replicating results
- Re: Replicating results
- Re: Debug option in F77
- From: Kamaraju S Kusumanchi
- Debug option in F77
- Re: FORTRAN in Commodore 64
- Re: Why So Great for Numbers? / Best Compiler
- Re: Replicating results
- Re: Why So Great for Numbers? / Best Compiler
- Re: Why Fortran?
- Re: Replicating results
- Re: Why So Great for Numbers? / Best Compiler
- Re: FORTRAN in Commodore 64
- Re: Why So Great for Numbers? / Best Compiler
- Re: Invalid Operator in complex assignment
- Re: Why Fortran?
- Re: Why So Great for Numbers? / Best Compiler
- Re: Why So Great for Numbers? / Best Compiler
- Re: Why Fortran?
- Re: Replicating results
- Re: Why Fortran?
- Re: Why Fortran?
- Re: Invalid Operator in complex assignment
- Invalid Operator in complex assignment
- Re: Why So Great for Numbers? / Best Compiler
- Re: Why So Great for Numbers? / Best Compiler
- Re: Replicating results
- Re: Why Fortran?
- Re: Replicating results
- Re: bug or mistake?
- Re: Why Fortran?
- Re: Why Fortran?
- Re: Why Fortran?
- Re: Replicating results
- Re: Replicating results
- Re: Replicating results
- Re: bug or mistake?
- Re: Array section
- Re: bug or mistake?
- Re: Any Substitute for READONLY in F77?
- Re: Array section
- Re: Replicating results
- Re: bug or mistake?
- Re: bug or mistake?
- Re: Array section
- Re: Any Substitute for READONLY in F77?
- Re: Why So Great for Numbers? / Best Compiler
- Re: FORTRAN in Commodore 64
- Re: bug or mistake?
- FORTRAN in Commodore 64
- Re: Why Fortran?
- Re: Replicating results
- Re: Replicating results
- Re: Replicating results
- Re: Replicating results
- Re: Replicating results
- Re: Replicating results
- Re: Why So Great for Numbers? / Best Compiler
- Re: Replicating results
- Re: bug or mistake?
- Re: Why So Great for Numbers? / Best Compiler
- Re: Why So Great for Numbers? / Best Compiler
- Replicating results
- Re: bug or mistake?
- Re: bug or mistake?
- Re: Why So Great for Numbers? / Best Compiler
- Re: bug or mistake?
- Re: bug or mistake?
- Re: bug or mistake?
- bug or mistake?
- Re: Why So Great for Numbers? / Best Compiler
- Re: Why So Great for Numbers? / Best Compiler
- Re: Why Fortran?
- Re: Why Fortran?
- Re: Why So Great for Numbers? / Best Compiler
- Re: Why Fortran?
- Re: Why So Great for Numbers? / Best Compiler
- Re: Array section
- Re: Why Fortran?
- Linking errors: __ctype_b and errno. Any ideas?
- Array section
- Re: Why So Great for Numbers? / Best Compiler
- Why So Great for Numbers? / Best Compiler
- Re: Why Fortran?
- Re: IO_OPEN
- Re: Why Fortran?
- Re: IO_OPEN
- Re: intel ct multiprocessor compiler
- Re: IO_OPEN
- Re: Why Fortran?
- Re: coming to 64bit gfortran
- Re: Q: Intel 9.1 does intermediate single calculations in double. How do I turn this off?
- Re: intel ct multiprocessor compiler
- Re: coming to 64bit gfortran
- Re: Q: Intel 9.1 does intermediate single calculations in double. How do I turn this off?
- Re: Q: Intel 9.1 does intermediate single calculations in double. How do I turn this off?
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- coming to 64bit gfortran
- Re: IO_OPEN
- Q: Intel 9.1 does intermediate single calculations in double. How do I turn this off?
- intel ct multiprocessor compiler
- Re: Any Substitute for READONLY in F77?
- Re: native support of complex-valued computations in Fortran?
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: A question about OOP in Fortran?
- Re: Why scalar /= dimension(1)) ? for intent(inout) dummy arg
- Re: Why scalar /= dimension(1)) ? for intent(inout) dummy arg
- Re: Any Substitute for READONLY in F77?
- Re: Most efficient way of vectorize the following code in Fortran?
- Re: Any Substitute for READONLY in F77?
- Re: Looking for good 1D function minimizer?
- Re: Most efficient way of vectorize the following code in Fortran?
- Re: Most efficient way of vectorize the following code in Fortran?
- Re: Most efficient way of vectorize the following code in Fortran?
- Re: Any Substitute for READONLY in F77?
- Re: Any Substitute for READONLY in F77?
- Re: Any Substitute for READONLY in F77?
- Re: Any Substitute for READONLY in F77?
- Re: Any Substitute for READONLY in F77?
- Any Substitute for READONLY in F77?
- Re: Why Fortran?
- Re: Why Fortran?
- Re: Why Fortran?
- Re: Why scalar /= dimension(1)) ? for intent(inout) dummy arg
- Re: Why Fortran?
- Re: Why Fortran?
- Re: Why Fortran?
- Re: Why Fortran?
- From: Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
- Re: Why Fortran?
- Re: Why Fortran?
- From: Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
- Why Fortran?
- Re: Why scalar /= dimension(1)) ? for intent(inout) dummy arg
- Re: Why scalar /= dimension(1)) ? for intent(inout) dummy arg
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: IO_OPEN
- Re: Why scalar /= dimension(1)) ? for intent(inout) dummy arg
- Re: IO_OPEN
- Re: Why scalar /= dimension(1)) ? for intent(inout) dummy arg
- Re: Why scalar /= dimension(1)) ? for intent(inout) dummy arg
- Re: Why scalar /= dimension(1)) ? for intent(inout) dummy arg
- Re: WATCOM Fortran 77- FSPAWN vs FSYSTEM - difference=?
- Re: Why scalar /= dimension(1)) ? for intent(inout) dummy arg
- Re: Why scalar /= dimension(1)) ? for intent(inout) dummy arg
- Re: Problem linking fortran code
- Re: Why scalar /= dimension(1)) ? for intent(inout) dummy arg
- Why scalar /= dimension(1)) ? for intent(inout) dummy arg
- Re: language rules question: using a (passed in) parameter to define a parameter
- Re: Fortran 77 and C#
- Re: Most efficient way of vectorize the following code in Fortran?
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: IO_OPEN
- Re: IO_OPEN
- Re: Most efficient way of vectorize the following code in Fortran?
- Re: IO_OPEN
- PathScale Compiler Team Joins SiCortex
- Re: array bounds exceeded error
- Re: array bounds exceeded error
- Re: array bounds exceeded error
- Re: array bounds exceeded error
- Re: Most efficient way of vectorize the following code in Fortran?
- Re: Most efficient way of vectorize the following code in Fortran?
- Re: array bounds exceeded error
- Re: Most efficient way of vectorize the following code in Fortran?
- Re: Most efficient way of vectorize the following code in Fortran?
- Re: Most efficient way of vectorize the following code in Fortran?
- Re: IO_OPEN
- Re: array bounds exceeded error
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: openmp: Is there a way for a thread to terminate all other parallel threads?
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: array bounds exceeded error
- Re: array bounds exceeded error
- Re: array bounds exceeded error
- Re: array bounds exceeded error
- Re: array bounds exceeded error
- array bounds exceeded error
- Re: openmp: Is there a way for a thread to terminate all other parallel threads?
- openmp: Is there a way for a thread to terminate all other parallel threads?
- Re: Most efficient way of vectorize the following code in Fortran?
- Re: Most efficient way of vectorize the following code in Fortran?
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Fortran 77 and C#
- Re: Most efficient way of vectorize the following code in Fortran?
- Most efficient way of vectorize the following code in Fortran?
- Re: A Fortran Novice asking for help...
- Re: IO_OPEN
- Re: IO_OPEN
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: WATCOM Fortran 77- FSPAWN vs FSYSTEM - difference=?
- Re: IO_OPEN
- From: George N. White III
- Re: IO_OPEN
- Re: IO_OPEN
- Re: language rules question: using a (passed in) parameter to define a parameter
- Re: WATCOM Fortran 77- FSPAWN vs FSYSTEM - difference=?
- [ANN] Absoft ships 32-bit and 64-bit IMSL Fortran libraries for MacOS/Intel
- Re: Left justfy output strings to different width A fields
- Left justfy output strings to different width A fields
- Re: IO_OPEN
- Re: A Fortran Novice asking for help...
- IO_OPEN
- using Matlab engine in Fortan
- Fortran 77 and C#
- Re: A Fortran Novice asking for help...
- WATCOM Fortran 77- FSPAWN vs FSYSTEM - difference=?
- Re: A Fortran Novice asking for help...
- Re: Missing exponent "E"
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Execution Timing
- Re: Execution Timing
- A Fortran Novice asking for help...
- Re: Execution Timing
- Re: Subroutine "arguments"??
- Re: Subroutine "arguments"??
- Re: Missing exponent "E"
- Missing exponent "E"
- Re: Problem linking fortran code
- Re: Lahey Fortran and Core 2 duo
- Re: Lahey Fortran and Core 2 duo
- Re: Lahey Fortran and Core 2 duo
- Re: Execution Timing
