Re: fortran character set
- From: helbig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply)
- Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 11:42:26 +0000 (UTC)
In article <1188271167.470173@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, harper@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
(John Harper) writes:
The problem is all the non-dollar currency symbols. Many Americans call
the hash mark or octothorp a pound sign, but it has nothing to do with
currency. If one is is referring to currency, a real pound sign is a
script upper case L with a horizontal line across its middle, in
countries that use or formerly used the pound, e.g. UK, Ireland,
Australia, NZ.
But isn't this just because the pound sign (£) and the number sign (#)
are often on the same key and depending on the environment either one or
the other might be printed? Alternatively, the ASCII code might be
interpreted in a non-standard variant as the pound sign, so if I send
you £ and say it is pound, you might see # and call it the pound sign.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: fortran character set
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: fortran character set
- From: Dan Nagle
- Re: fortran character set
- References:
- fortran character set
- From: Wade Ward
- Re: fortran character set
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: fortran character set
- From: Terence
- Re: fortran character set
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: fortran character set
- From: John Harper
- fortran character set
- Prev by Date: Re: generic interface question
- Next by Date: Re: fortran character set
- Previous by thread: Re: fortran character set
- Next by thread: Re: fortran character set
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|