Re: fortran character set
- From: Paul van Delst <Paul.vanDelst@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 09:59:21 -0400
Dan Nagle wrote:
Hello,
Paul van Delst wrote:Dan Nagle wrote:
<snip>
Today we have ASCII to standardize our confusion. :-)
Sounds like what we need is an ISCII.
ISO 646 ?
A standard with (by my count) 23 current variants.
It's time like this I ponder on how real-life and computers are almost mutually exclusive. Or maybe bureaucracy is a key component of the human condition (i.e. we're maximisers rather than satisficers :o)
cheers,
paulv
.
- References:
- fortran character set
- From: Wade Ward
- Re: fortran character set
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: fortran character set
- From: Terence
- Re: fortran character set
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: fortran character set
- From: John Harper
- Re: fortran character set
- From: Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
- Re: fortran character set
- From: Dan Nagle
- Re: fortran character set
- From: Paul van Delst
- Re: fortran character set
- From: Dan Nagle
- fortran character set
- Prev by Date: Re: Is there a way like this in Fortran?
- Next by Date: Re: Deletion of BITS Datatype from Fortran 2008 (Was: Quick Summary of WG5/J3 London meeting)
- Previous by thread: Re: fortran character set
- Next by thread: Re: fortran character set
- Index(es):