Re: fortran character set
- From: dpb <none@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 10:50:05 -0500
Richard Maine wrote:
Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
<helbig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <1188271167.470173@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, harper@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
(John Harper) writes:
The problem is all the non-dollar currency symbols. Many Americans callBut isn't this just because the pound sign (£) and the number sign (#)
the hash mark or octothorp a pound sign, but it has nothing to do with
currency. ...
are often on the same key and depending on the environment either one or
the other might be printed? Alternatively, the ASCII code might be interpreted in a non-standard variant as the pound sign, so if I send
you £ and say it is pound, you might see # and call it the pound sign.
No, that is not why. Those usages predate computers. I didn't bother
trying to track it down, but I'm (moderately) sure that the octothorpe
was called a pound sign when I was a kid. Not that I quite predate
computers, but certainly "ordinary" people wouldn't have been much
influenced by such computer conventions then.
I agree and from previous correlating data it appears I'm "slightly" ahead of you, Richard... :)
But, I seem to recall there were typewriters before computer keyboards that also had the upper-shift "3" as the "£" instead of "#". Then, of course, along came the IBM Selectric and similar w/ the interchangeable ball. Of course, by then mainframe computers were around but pretty much predated any personal computers.
The use of "#" as lb-wt goes way back in the US. I don't have any clue as to where/when/how it was first popularized in that usage, but I have farm records of granddad's where wheat test weights from the '10s and '20s were written that way (longhand). I'm reasonably confident that wasn't anything new even then...
--
--
.
- References:
- fortran character set
- From: Wade Ward
- Re: fortran character set
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: fortran character set
- From: Terence
- Re: fortran character set
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: fortran character set
- From: John Harper
- Re: fortran character set
- From: Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
- Re: fortran character set
- From: Richard Maine
- fortran character set
- Prev by Date: Re: fortran character set
- Next by Date: Re: Deletion of BITS Datatype from Fortran 2008
- Previous by thread: Re: fortran character set
- Next by thread: Re: fortran character set
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|