Re: TRANSPOSE and MATMUL interaction
- From: Peter <sherwood@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 12:02:19 -0700
On Aug 31, 7:01 am, Jan Vorbrüggen <jvorbrueg...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Not that it has relevance to the code _as_written_, but it would have if, for
instance, fjac was ALLOCATABLE
fjac is allocatable, in a subroutine that calls this one.
The code below makes it clear that INTENT is at least IN, so this should be
either IN only or INOUT.
No, I removed all the code that calculates fjac. It is not IN (i e, we
don't use any values in that array at entry time).
.
- References:
- TRANSPOSE and MATMUL interaction
- From: Peter
- Re: TRANSPOSE and MATMUL interaction
- From: Jan Vorbrüggen
- TRANSPOSE and MATMUL interaction
- Prev by Date: Re: fortran95 error
- Next by Date: Re: TRANSPOSE and MATMUL interaction
- Previous by thread: Re: TRANSPOSE and MATMUL interaction
- Next by thread: Re: TRANSPOSE and MATMUL interaction
- Index(es):