Re: gfortran, g95, and dual-core
- From: Tim Prince <timothyprince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 12:49:25 -0700
Charles Russell wrote:
The gnu make info file in my Cygwin distribution says that option -j isgnu make on Windows is not known for speed. In my experience Cygwin
ineffective with MS-DOS. Does it do anything under Cygwin? What factor
is a "big jump?"
make -j 2, if not overdone, brings most of the relative speed increase
seen on linux. I didn't to suggest make -j without supplying a numeric
limit.
Increasingly high power consumption, other than in desktop graphics
Not sure what you have in mind when you say "anything."
Now it is the desktop's turn, but my
4.5-year-old desktop has a clock speed of 2.4 GHz, and even the top
range Intel chips are hardly any faster now. Instead, they have gone to
dual-core. Perhaps the market is all in laptops, so that high-speed
high-power chips are out of fashion.
boards, has gone out of fashion. My 5 year old P4 desktop board is
3.05Ghz, yet a 1.5 year old Core 2 board, stuck into another old P4 box,
out-performs it by about a factor of 4, including the gain from changing
from HT to dual core and from 32- to 64-bit OS.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: gfortran, g95, and dual-core
- From: Charles Russell
- Re: gfortran, g95, and dual-core
- References:
- gfortran, g95, and dual-core
- From: Charles Russell
- Re: gfortran, g95, and dual-core
- From: Tim Prince
- Re: gfortran, g95, and dual-core
- From: Charles Russell
- gfortran, g95, and dual-core
- Prev by Date: Re: gfortran, g95, and dual-core
- Next by Date: Re: gfortran, g95, and dual-core
- Previous by thread: Re: gfortran, g95, and dual-core
- Next by thread: Re: gfortran, g95, and dual-core
- Index(es):