Re: Windows array allocation problem
- From: Roy Lewallen <w7el@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 13:19:29 -0700
Steve Lionel wrote:
On Sep 29, 10:20 am, "James Van Buskirk" <not_va...@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Windows does this just to torture you. If you can switch to x64, the
problems may abate temporarily:
Do keep in mind that Windows still has a 2 GB limit for static code
and data. This means that you cannot simply declare a large array in
common or as a local array on an x64 system. Dynamic allocation is the
only way to exceed the 2 GB boundary.
And, at the moment, I'm not able to even get within 350 MB of the 2 GB boundary. And I don't know why.
Roy Lewallen
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Windows array allocation problem
- From: Dan Nagle
- Re: Windows array allocation problem
- References:
- Windows array allocation problem
- From: Roy Lewallen
- Re: Windows array allocation problem
- From: James Van Buskirk
- Re: Windows array allocation problem
- From: Steve Lionel
- Windows array allocation problem
- Prev by Date: Re: Windows array allocation problem
- Next by Date: Re: Windows array allocation problem
- Previous by thread: Re: Windows array allocation problem
- Next by thread: Re: Windows array allocation problem
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|