Re: Windows array allocation problem

From: Dan Nagle <dannagle@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 21:24:24 GMT

Hello,

Roy Lewallen wrote:

And, at the moment, I'm not able to even get within 350 MB of the 2 GB boundary. And I don't know why.

IIRC, Windows marks 250 MB at one end, and 100 MB at the other,
as unusable, in order to catch stray C pointers.

--

Dan Nagle
Purple Sage Computing Solutions, Inc.
.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Windows array allocation problem
  - From: Roy Lewallen

References:
- Windows array allocation problem
  - From: Roy Lewallen
- Re: Windows array allocation problem
  - From: James Van Buskirk
- Re: Windows array allocation problem
  - From: Steve Lionel
- Re: Windows array allocation problem
  - From: Roy Lewallen

Prev by Date: Re: gfortran, g95, and dual-core
Next by Date: Re: rest energy and dp
Previous by thread: Re: Windows array allocation problem
Next by thread: Re: Windows array allocation problem
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: INTENT(WORKSPACE) as a new Fortran feature?
... Dan Nagle ... Purple Sage Computing Solutions, Inc. ... >I think a compiler's flow and liveness analysis should nowadays be pretty ...
(comp.lang.fortran)
Re: intel ct multiprocessor compiler
... Dan Nagle ... Purple Sage Computing Solutions, Inc. ... Btw I am using Intel FC 10.0.x ...
(comp.lang.fortran)
Re: compare two dynamic string
... to be authoritatively posted for a newby who's asking simple questions. ... Dan Nagle ... Purple Sage Computing Solutions, Inc. ...
(comp.lang.fortran)
Re: Release 1.1 (beta) of my AES implementation
... Dan Nagle ... Purple Sage Computing Solutions, Inc. ... >it's safe to say that any F77 implementation you will find today ...
(sci.crypt)
Re: Variable length/precision formats?
... the dominating language of today? ... Dan Nagle ... Purple Sage Computing Solutions, Inc. ...
(comp.lang.fortran)