Re: gfortran, g95, and dual-core
- From: Tim Prince <timothyprince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 15:10:59 -0700
Charles Russell wrote:
Tim Prince wrote:Cygwin isn't tolerant of an unlimited number of make threads (make -j)
In my experience Cygwin
make -j 2, if not overdone, brings most of the relative speed increase
seen on linux.
Are you speaking of a dual-core machine? Is that where the 2 comes from?
What does "overdone" mean?
or even twice as many threads as pseudo-processors. 2 or 3 work fine on
a single core HT, for those of us whose 32-bit Windows boxes are long in
the tooth.
.
- References:
- gfortran, g95, and dual-core
- From: Charles Russell
- Re: gfortran, g95, and dual-core
- From: Tim Prince
- Re: gfortran, g95, and dual-core
- From: Charles Russell
- Re: gfortran, g95, and dual-core
- From: Tim Prince
- Re: gfortran, g95, and dual-core
- From: Charles Russell
- gfortran, g95, and dual-core
- Prev by Date: Re: run a program with more than 2**32 bite
- Next by Date: Re: Windows array allocation problem
- Previous by thread: Re: gfortran, g95, and dual-core
- Next by thread: Re: gfortran, g95, and dual-core
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|