Re: Windows array allocation problem
- From: Roy Lewallen <w7el@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 16:37:00 -0700
Dan Nagle wrote:
Hello,
Roy Lewallen wrote:
And, at the moment, I'm not able to even get within 350 MB of the 2 GB boundary. And I don't know why.
IIRC, Windows marks 250 MB at one end, and 100 MB at the other,
as unusable, in order to catch stray C pointers.
If that's true, then it's the answer to my question and the solution to my problem. If I know for sure how much will be unavailable, I can set the maximum allocation accordingly.
Unfortunately, I can't find any reference to this on the web. I've found that the top and bottom 64 kB are reserved, but no mention of larger amounts. Can you point me to a reference where this is explained or discussed?
Thanks,
Roy Lewallen
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Windows array allocation problem
- From: Walter Spector
- Re: Windows array allocation problem
- From: Dan Nagle
- Re: Windows array allocation problem
- References:
- Windows array allocation problem
- From: Roy Lewallen
- Re: Windows array allocation problem
- From: James Van Buskirk
- Re: Windows array allocation problem
- From: Steve Lionel
- Re: Windows array allocation problem
- From: Roy Lewallen
- Re: Windows array allocation problem
- From: Dan Nagle
- Windows array allocation problem
- Prev by Date: Re: Windows array allocation problem
- Next by Date: Re: Windows array allocation problem
- Previous by thread: Re: Windows array allocation problem
- Next by thread: Re: Windows array allocation problem
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|