Re: gfortran, g95, and dual-core
- From: Charles Russell <NOSPAM@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 12:58:59 -0600
Charles Russell wrote:
For Monte
Carlo (actually, Metropolis algorithm) there is not much I can do other than to scale the problem as best as I can. Convergence to a static distribution is fastest with about 80% rejections, so I suppose I could get a fivefold gain by parallel evaluation before the rejection step.
Or maybe more, since that 80% number is for the case of sequential evaluation.
.
- References:
- gfortran, g95, and dual-core
- From: Charles Russell
- Re: gfortran, g95, and dual-core
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: gfortran, g95, and dual-core
- From: Charles Russell
- Re: gfortran, g95, and dual-core
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: gfortran, g95, and dual-core
- From: Charles Russell
- Re: gfortran, g95, and dual-core
- From: Janne Blomqvist
- Re: gfortran, g95, and dual-core
- From: Charles Russell
- gfortran, g95, and dual-core
- Prev by Date: Re: gfortran, g95, and dual-core
- Next by Date: Re: Windows array allocation problem
- Previous by thread: Re: gfortran, g95, and dual-core
- Next by thread: Re: gfortran, g95, and dual-core
- Index(es):