Re: Windows array allocation problem
- From: Roy Lewallen <w7el@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 14:16:15 -0700
glen herrmannsfeldt wrote:
The price difference for 64 bit systems is small enough now that
I would say that anyone that close to 2GB should switch.
I can tell you've never spent much time at a cube farm! It is too bad that my corporate, government, and university customers can't just ask for and receive a new computer whenever they want one. But it doesn't work that way.
For a program you are distributing to others, it seems reasonable
for those users to switch if that last 300MB means that much.
The loss of 300 MB out of 2 GB is no great deal. The whole problem is that I don't have any way to know for sure it'll be 300 MB, and not 500 MB or a GB on some other system or machine. How much of a buffer do I need to leave?
Roy Lewallen
.
- References:
- Windows array allocation problem
- From: Roy Lewallen
- Re: Windows array allocation problem
- From: James Van Buskirk
- Re: Windows array allocation problem
- From: Steve Lionel
- Re: Windows array allocation problem
- From: Roy Lewallen
- Re: Windows array allocation problem
- From: Dan Nagle
- Re: Windows array allocation problem
- From: Roy Lewallen
- Re: Windows array allocation problem
- From: Dan Nagle
- Re: Windows array allocation problem
- From: Roy Lewallen
- Re: Windows array allocation problem
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Windows array allocation problem
- Prev by Date: Re: gfortran, g95, and dual-core
- Previous by thread: Re: Windows array allocation problem
- Next by thread: Re: Windows array allocation problem
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|