Re: allocating arrays, trouble
- From: Arjen Markus <arjen.markus@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 03:20:35 -0800 (PST)
On 26 nov, 11:38, "Förster vom Silberwald" <chain_l...@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On Nov 26, 10:26 am, "Wade Ward" <w...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
real*8, dimension(buff1,buff2) :: ger2
Why the non-portable declaration? Would it work with silverfoerster 95?
Why is it non-portable? What do you mean by silverfoerster 95?
Thanks
"real*8" is a (popular) extension to the FORTRAN 77 standard
for:
double precision
(The "8" refers to the fact that on many machine double
precision reals are implemented with 8 bytes. But that
is not guaranteed.)
Current F90/95/... practice is this:
real(kind=kind(1.0d00))
(or any of a variety of means to determine the kind of
double precision reals).
Regards,
Arjen
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: allocating arrays, trouble
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: allocating arrays, trouble
- From: Gordon Sande
- Re: allocating arrays, trouble
- From: Förster vom Silberwald
- Re: allocating arrays, trouble
- From: Wade Ward
- Re: allocating arrays, trouble
- References:
- allocating arrays, trouble
- From: Förster vom Silberwald
- Re: allocating arrays, trouble
- From: Förster vom Silberwald
- Re: allocating arrays, trouble
- From: Wade Ward
- Re: allocating arrays, trouble
- From: Förster vom Silberwald
- allocating arrays, trouble
- Prev by Date: Re: allocating arrays, trouble
- Next by Date: Re: allocating arrays, trouble
- Previous by thread: Re: allocating arrays, trouble
- Next by thread: Re: allocating arrays, trouble
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|