Re: Parallelization on Dell Workstations
- From: Sebastian Hanigk <hanigk@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 22:19:07 +0000
Tim Prince <timothyprince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
There is a lot of argument about whether hybrid MPI with OpenMP or MPI
alone is ideal for such machines. The optimum, again, depends on
factors which you haven't divulged.
Implicit hybrid programming has been useful on Europe's currently
largest supercomputer, the Mare Nostrum, because the node interconnect
consists of only one Myrinet interface - which caused bandwidth problems
in our code if four MPI processes were to run on each node. The usage of
the multithreaded LAPACK-library with only one MPI-process per node was
in that case faster (which makes it quite obvious that sheer FLOPS count
is worthless without good interconnects).
Sebastian
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Parallelization on Dell Workstations
- From: Tim Prince
- Re: Parallelization on Dell Workstations
- References:
- Parallelization on Dell Workstations
- From: Ganesh
- Re: Parallelization on Dell Workstations
- From: Tim Prince
- Parallelization on Dell Workstations
- Prev by Date: Re: dynamic filename string
- Next by Date: Re: Allow interspersed named and positional arguments?
- Previous by thread: Re: Parallelization on Dell Workstations
- Next by thread: Re: Parallelization on Dell Workstations
- Index(es):