Re: Parallelization on Dell Workstations
- From: Sebastian Hanigk <hanigk@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 09:40:35 +0000
Tim Prince <timothyprince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
If the processes on a single node send messages among themselves on
shared memory, and don't involve more messages to other nodes than in a
hybrid model, there is nothing to be gained in savings on
communication.
Of course. The problem was among other things that most of the
communication was not intra-node traffic.
We face similar issues in attempting to get good performance with 8-core
nodes, when performance per core is not as high as in 4-core nodes,
additional message traffic among nodes will limit cluster performance at
a smaller number of nodes.
Contention of the CPU-memory link, I presume?
Sebastian
.
- References:
- Parallelization on Dell Workstations
- From: Ganesh
- Re: Parallelization on Dell Workstations
- From: Tim Prince
- Re: Parallelization on Dell Workstations
- From: Sebastian Hanigk
- Re: Parallelization on Dell Workstations
- From: Tim Prince
- Parallelization on Dell Workstations
- Prev by Date: Re: Read DOS or Unix files with the same fortran code
- Next by Date: Re: Parallelization on Dell Workstations
- Previous by thread: Re: Parallelization on Dell Workstations
- Next by thread: Allow interspersed named and positional arguments?
- Index(es):