comp.lang.fortran

• Thread Index

---

• Re: Automatically transform or expand do loop in a subroutine
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: Automatically transform or expand do loop in a subroutine
  • From: yaqi
• Re: Type specification and initialization expressions
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Type specification and initialization expressions
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: Type specification and initialization expressions
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Automatically transform or expand do loop in a subroutine
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Automatically transform or expand do loop in a subroutine
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Re: Automatically transform or expand do loop in a subroutine
  • From: Thomas Koenig
• Re: Automatically transform or expand do loop in a subroutine
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Automatically transform or expand do loop in a subroutine
  • From: Dr Ivan D. Reid
• Re: Automatically transform or expand do loop in a subroutine
  • From: yaqi
• Re: Automatically transform or expand do loop in a subroutine
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Re: computing Bernoulli numbers
  • From: Bart Vandewoestyne
• Re: Fortran 2003: abstract interfaces
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: The concept of a record
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: computing Bernoulli numbers
  • From: Michel Olagnon
• Re: computing Bernoulli numbers
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Re: computing Bernoulli numbers
  • From: Reinhold Bader
• Re: computing Bernoulli numbers
  • From: dpb
• Re: computing Bernoulli numbers
  • From: Bart Vandewoestyne
• Re: computing Bernoulli numbers
  • From: Michel Olagnon
• Re: Fortran 2003: abstract interfaces
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: computing Bernoulli numbers
  • From: Bart Vandewoestyne
• Re: Allocatable Arrays As Outputs
  • From: Infinity77
• Re: Automatically transform or expand do loop in a subroutine
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: Fortran 2003: abstract interfaces
  • From: Tobias Burnus
• Re: passing a variable number of args/vectors to a routine
  • From: dpb
• Re: computing Bernoulli numbers
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• Re: The concept of a record
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: Did anyone manage to get MATRAN compiled with g95?
  • From: Ed
• Re: How to quote the " character in a format statement?
  • From: Mirko . Vukovic
• Re: computing Bernoulli numbers
  • From: Michel Olagnon
• Re: computing Bernoulli numbers
  • From: Bart Vandewoestyne
• computing Bernoulli numbers
  • From: Bart Vandewoestyne
• Re: Automatically transform or expand do loop in a subroutine
  • From: Tim Prince
• Fortran 2003: abstract interfaces
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: The concept of a record
  • From: LC's No-Spam Newsreading account
• Type specification and initialization expressions
  • From: Tobias Burnus
• Re: Did anyone manage to get MATRAN compiled with g95?
  • From: paul . richard . thomas
• Re: Automatically transform or expand do loop in a subroutine
  • From: Louis Krupp
• Re: Automatically transform or expand do loop in a subroutine
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: Automatically transform or expand do loop in a subroutine
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Automatically transform or expand do loop in a subroutine
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Re: Automatically transform or expand do loop in a subroutine
  • From: highegg
• Re: Automatically transform or expand do loop in a subroutine
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: The concept of a record
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Automatically transform or expand do loop in a subroutine
  • From: yaqi
• Re: The concept of a record
  • From: qsc
• Re: Why is this structure misaligned?
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: The concept of a record
  • From: qsc
• Re: IVF + Xp (32bit) = 3Gb
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: IVF + Xp (32bit) = 3Gb
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Re: passing a variable number of args/vectors to a routine
  • From: Mirko . Vukovic
• Re: IVF + Xp (32bit) = 3Gb
  • From: Eugene A. Pallat
• Re: IVF + Xp (32bit) = 3Gb
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Allocatable Arrays As Outputs
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: How to quote the " character in a format statement?
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: passing a variable number of args/vectors to a routine
  • From: dpb
• Re: Code as documentation
  • From: Andrew Chen
• How to quote the " character in a format statement?
  • From: Mirko . Vukovic
• Re: passing a variable number of args/vectors to a routine
  • From: Mirko . Vukovic
• Re: Why is this structure misaligned?
  • From: none
• Re: The concept of a record
  • From: dpb
• Re: passing a variable number of args/vectors to a routine
  • From: dpb
• Re: Allocatable Arrays As Outputs
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Allocatable Arrays As Outputs
  • From: Richard Maine
• passing a variable number of args/vectors to a routine
  • From: Mirko . Vukovic
• Re: Exit code with Fortran 90
  • From: John Harper
• Did anyone manage to get MATRAN compiled with g95?
  • From: Ed
• Re: The concept of a record
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: The concept of a record
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: Allocatable Arrays As Outputs
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• OT Launched - pictures from Andoya, Norway - Andenes, Bleik, and the rocket range
  • From: Kevin G. Rhoads
• Re: IVF + Xp (32bit) = 3Gb
  • From: Kevin G. Rhoads
• Re: The concept of a record
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: The concept of a record
  • From: dpb
• Re: The concept of a record
  • From: qsc
• Re: Allocatable Arrays As Outputs
  • From: Craig Dedo
• Re: Code as documentation
  • From: Brian Hanson
• Re: The concept of a record
  • From: Klaus Wacker
• Re: The concept of a record
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: Allocatable Arrays As Outputs
  • From: bonzaboy
• The concept of a record
  • From: qsc
• Re: Allocatable Arrays As Outputs
  • From: Reinhold Bader
• Allocatable Arrays As Outputs
  • From: Infinity77
• Re: Exit code with Fortran 90
  • From: Walter Spector
• Re: Exit code with Fortran 90
  • From: Gary Scott
• Re: Exit code with Fortran 90
  • From: Joseph Huber
• Re: Exit code with Fortran 90
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Exit code with Fortran 90
  • From: Andrea Francia
• Re: installing fruit
  • From: Andrew Chen
• Re: What is wrong with this search for the character PV/PQ
  • From: guyanpersad
• Re: What is wrong with this search for the character PV/PQ
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: What is wrong with this search for the character PV/PQ
  • From: John Harper
• Re: Problem reading data from a file (encounter EOF after second last record)
  • From: dpb
• Re: Problem reading data from a file (encounter EOF after second last record)
  • From: Terence
• Re: Problem reading data from a file (encounter EOF after second last record)
  • From: nure123
• Re: IVF + Xp (32bit) = 3Gb
  • From: dpb
• Re: IVF + Xp (32bit) = 3Gb
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: IVF + Xp (32bit) = 3Gb
  • From: dpb
• Re: What is wrong with this search for the character PV/PQ
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: IVF + Xp (32bit) = 3Gb
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: Fortran 6.5 Download
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: IVF + Xp (32bit) = 3Gb
  • From: rih5342
• Re: What is wrong with this search for the character PV/PQ
  • From: sara_patty
• Fortran 6.5 Download
  • From: rp_perez
• Re: large number with interger
  • From: Tobias Burnus
• Re: What is wrong with this search for the character PV/PQ
  • From: Gerry Ford
• Re: large number with interger
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• Re: installing fruit
  • From: Gerry Ford
• Re: large number with interger
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• Re: Problem reading data from a file (encounter EOF after second last record)
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: locate a value in an array
  • From: Klemens
• Problem reading data from a file (encounter EOF after second last record)
  • From: nure123
• Re: Handling automation events in an Intel Visual Fortran Windows application
  • From: Gary Scott
• Handling automation events in an Intel Visual Fortran Windows application
  • From: jmcgowan
• Re: IVF + Xp (32bit) = 3Gb
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: IVF + Xp (32bit) = 3Gb
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: IVF + Xp (32bit) = 3Gb
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: IVF + Xp (32bit) = 3Gb
  • From: rih5342
• Re: installing fruit
  • From: Andrew Chen
• Re: IVF + Xp (32bit) = 3Gb
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: IVF + Xp (32bit) = 3Gb
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: IVF + Xp (32bit) = 3Gb
  • From: garylscott
• Re: IVF + Xp (32bit) = 3Gb
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: [OT] Re: binary of gcc and gfortran shapshot 20080125 for windows
  • From: Paul van Delst
• Re: [OT] Re: binary of gcc and gfortran shapshot 20080125 for windows
  • From: FX
• Re: [OT] Re: binary of gcc and gfortran shapshot 20080125 for windows
  • From: FX
• Re: binary of gcc and gfortran shapshot 20080125 for windows
  • From: Fly Away
• Re: [OT] Re: binary of gcc and gfortran shapshot 20080125 for windows
  • From: FX
• Re: IVF + Xp (32bit) = 3Gb
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: [OT] Re: binary of gcc and gfortran shapshot 20080125 for windows
  • From: user1
• Re: IVF + Xp (32bit) = 3Gb
  • From: rih5342
• Re: binary of gcc and gfortran shapshot 20080125 for windows
  • From: Paul van Delst
• Re: locate a value in an array
  • From: e p chandler
• Re: binary of gcc and gfortran shapshot 20080125 for windows
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Why is this structure misaligned?
  • From: none
• Re: Why is this structure misaligned?
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: binary of gcc and gfortran shapshot 20080125 for windows
  • From: none
• Re: [OT] Re: binary of gcc and gfortran shapshot 20080125 for windows
  • From: post
• Re: installing fruit
  • From: Paul van Delst
• Re: binary of gcc and gfortran shapshot 20080125 for windows
  • From: post
• Re: binary of gcc and gfortran shapshot 20080125 for windows
  • From: post
• Why is this structure misaligned?
  • From: none
• Re: locate a value in an array
  • From: Arjen Markus
• locate a value in an array
  • From: Klemens
• Re: installing fruit
  • From: Andrew Chen
• Re: binary of gcc and gfortran shapshot 20080125 for windows
  • From: none
• Re: FORTRAN Unit Test Framework (FRUIT) 2.1 released
  • From: Gary Scott
• [OT] Re: binary of gcc and gfortran shapshot 20080125 for windows
  • From: FX
• Re: FORTRAN Unit Test Framework (FRUIT) 2.1 released
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: Stack overflow problem but increasing stack size does not solve the problem
  • From: Louis Krupp
• Re: binary of gcc and gfortran shapshot 20080125 for windows
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: binary of gcc and gfortran shapshot 20080125 for windows
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: binary of gcc and gfortran shapshot 20080125 for windows
  • From: post
• Re: binary of gcc and gfortran shapshot 20080125 for windows
  • From: post
• Re: binary of gcc and gfortran shapshot 20080125 for windows
  • From: none
• Re: binary of gcc and gfortran shapshot 20080125 for windows
  • From: FX
• Re: fortran and unit testing
  • From: Pierre Asselin
• Re: Stack overflow problem but increasing stack size does not solve the problem
  • From: Terence
• Re: Error while reading in pointer Location
  • From: Gary Scott
• Re: Stack overflow problem but increasing stack size does not solve the problem
  • From: nure123
• Re: Error while reading in pointer Location
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Re: Error while reading in pointer Location
  • From: Gary Scott
• Re: Error while reading in pointer Location
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Error while reading in pointer Location
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Re: Stack overflow problem but increasing stack size does not solve the problem
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Re: Stack overflow problem but increasing stack size does not solve the problem
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: IVF + Xp (32bit) = 3Gb
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: IVF + Xp (32bit) = 3Gb
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: Error while reading in pointer Location
  • From: fj
• Re: Stack overflow problem but increasing stack size does not solve the problem
  • From: fj
• Re: Stack overflow problem but increasing stack size does not solve the problem
  • From: fj
• Re: Using Fortran to predict the stock market
  • From: David Frank
• Re: Error while reading in pointer Location
  • From: Louis Krupp
• Re: Stack overflow problem but increasing stack size does not solve the problem
  • From: Louis Krupp
• Re: Using Fortran to predict the stock market
  • From: David Frank
• Re: Stack overflow problem but increasing stack size does not solve the problem
  • From: nure123
• Re: Stack overflow problem but increasing stack size does not solve the problem
  • From: Ravindra Vidhate
• Error while reading in pointer Location
  • From: Ravindra Vidhate
• Stack overflow problem but increasing stack size does not solve the problem
  • From: nure123
• Re: IVF + Xp (32bit) = 3Gb
  • From: Gerry Ford
• Re: FORTRAN Unit Test Framework (FRUIT) 2.1 released
  • From: Gerry Ford
• Re: recursion, stack, fortran
  • From: Gerry Ford
• installing fruit
  • From: Gerry Ford
• Re: FORTRAN Unit Test Framework (FRUIT) 2.1 released
  • From: Andrew Chen
• Re: IVF + Xp (32bit) = 3Gb
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: IVF + Xp (32bit) = 3Gb
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: IVF + Xp (32bit) = 3Gb
  • From: webmaster
• Re: IVF + Xp (32bit) = 3Gb
  • From: rih5342
• Re: IVF + Xp (32bit) = 3Gb
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: How to write an output file into a specific directory in Linux?
  • From: Hani
• IVF + Xp (32bit) = 3Gb
  • From: rih5342
• Re: it links, but why does it return 0??
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: it links, but why does it return 0??
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: it links, but why does it return 0??
  • From: Isomorphismus
• Re: Allow * as a format string?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: it links, but why does it return 0??
  • From: LR
• it links, but why does it return 0??
  • From: Isomorphismus
• Re: large number with interger
  • From: mecej4
• Re: Allow * as a format string?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: large number with interger
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Allow * as a format string?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: convection-diffusion PDE solver packages
  • From: Kith
• large number with interger
  • From: Kith
• Re: Allow * as a format string?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Allow * as a format string?
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: Allow * as a format string?
  • From: garylscott
• Re: Allow * as a format string?
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: Allow * as a format string?
  • From: Beliavsky
• Re: Allow * as a format string?
  • From: David Jones
• Re: gfortran -std=f95 overzealous?
  • From: Daniel Franke
• Re: fortran and unit testing
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: fortran and unit testing
  • From: Bil Kleb
• Re: Allow * as a format string?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Allow * as a format string?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Allow * as a format string?
  • From: Beliavsky
• Re: Allow * as a format string?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: convection-diffusion PDE solver packages
  • From: Mirko . Vukovic
• Re: convection-diffusion PDE solver packages
  • From: Gib Bogle
• Re: Compatibility of MOD files
  • From: Craig Powers
• Re: How to write an output file into a specific directory in Linux?
  • From: fj
• Allow * as a format string?
  • From: Beliavsky
• Re: Compatibility of MOD files
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: Compatibility of MOD files
  • From: Fly Away
• Re: Code as documentation
  • From: Sebastian Hanigk
• Re: Code as documentation
  • From: Mirko . Vukovic
• Re: Code as documentation
  • From: Mirko . Vukovic
• convection-diffusion PDE solver packages
  • From: Mirko . Vukovic
• How to write an output file into a specific directory in Linux?
  • From: hermitian
• Re: Compatibility of MOD files
  • From: Paul van Delst
• Re: Is a temporary SCRATCH file formatted or unformatted?
  • From: Joseph Huber
• Re: Code as documentation
  • From: mecej4
• Re: Code as documentation
  • From: Gary Scott
• Re: Is a temporary SCRATCH file formatted or unformatted?
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: Compatibility of MOD files
  • From: mecej4
• Re: Code as documentation
  • From: mecej4
• Re: Code as documentation
  • From: David Flower
• Re: Code as documentation
  • From: Dieter Britz
• Re: fortran and unit testing
  • From: John
• Re: Is a temporary SCRATCH file formatted or unformatted?
  • From: Joseph Huber
• Re: Code as documentation
  • From: Sebastian Hanigk
• Re: Interfacing C routine with CVF routine called from VB
  • From: axtens
• Re: Interfacing C routine with CVF routine called from VB
  • From: axtens
• [newbie] Interfacing C routine with CVF routine called from VB
  • From: axtens
• Re: Code as documentation
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Is there a way to construct a generic "list" by Fortran 95?
  • From: Walter Spector
• Re: Code as documentation
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: Code as documentation
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Code as documentation
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Code as documentation
  • From: Louis Krupp
• Re: Code as documentation
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Code as documentation
  • From: Craig Dedo
• Re: Code as documentation
  • From: Louis Krupp
• Re: Is a temporary SCRATCH file formatted or unformatted?
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: Code as documentation
  • From: john . harper
• Re: Code as documentation
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Code as documentation
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: Code as documentation
  • From: garylscott
• Re: Code as documentation
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Is there a way to construct a generic "list" by Fortran 95?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Is there a way to construct a generic "list" by Fortran 95?
  • From: Sebastian Hanigk
• Re: Is a temporary SCRATCH file formatted or unformatted?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Code as documentation
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Is there a way to construct a generic "list" by Fortran 95?
  • From: garylscott
• Re: Corresponding g77 options for ifort options
  • From: Dr Ivan D. Reid
• Re: Is a temporary SCRATCH file formatted or unformatted?
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Is there a way to construct a generic "list" by Fortran 95?
  • From: Damian
• Re: Code as documentation
  • From: mecej4
• Re: Is a temporary SCRATCH file formatted or unformatted?
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Is there a way to construct a generic "list" by Fortran 95?
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Code as documentation
  • From: Beliavsky
• Re: Is there a way to construct a generic "list" by Fortran 95?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Corresponding g77 options for ifort options
  • From: jomarbueyes
• Re: Is a temporary SCRATCH file formatted or unformatted?
  • From: Joseph Huber
• Re: Is a temporary SCRATCH file formatted or unformatted?
  • From: Ron Shepard
• Re: Code as documentation
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: Is a temporary SCRATCH file formatted or unformatted?
  • From: Craig Dedo
• Re: Code as documentation
  • From: Paul van Delst
• Re: Code as documentation
  • From: Paul van Delst
• Re: Is there a way to construct a generic "list" by Fortran 95?
  • From: Gary Scott
• Re: Code as documentation
  • From: Ian Bush
• Corresponding g77 options for ifort options
  • From: Kevin VW
• Code as documentation
  • From: David Flower
• Re: Is a temporary SCRATCH file formatted or unformatted?
  • From: David Flower
• Re: Is there a way to construct a generic "list" by Fortran 95?
  • From: s8ngsu3
• Re: Is a temporary SCRATCH file formatted or unformatted?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Is there a way to construct a generic "list" by Fortran 95?
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Is a temporary SCRATCH file formatted or unformatted?
  • From: Louis Krupp
• Is a temporary SCRATCH file formatted or unformatted?
  • From: hermitian
• Re: REAL -> string -> REAL
  • From: Gib Bogle
• Re: Is there a way to construct a generic "list" by Fortran 95?
  • From: Simulate
• Re: Is there a way to construct a generic "list" by Fortran 95?
  • From: Damian
• Re: Is there a way to construct a generic "list" by Fortran 95?
  • From: Damian
• Re: REAL -> string -> REAL
  • From: James Giles
• Re: REAL -> string -> REAL
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: REAL -> string -> REAL
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Is there a way to construct a generic "list" by Fortran 95?
  • From: garylscott
• Re: REAL -> string -> REAL
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: REAL -> string -> REAL
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: TRANSFER on LOGICALs
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: REAL -> string -> REAL
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: REAL -> string -> REAL
  • From: FX
• Re: recursion, stack, fortran
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: mixed language programming - LNK2001
  • From: Sebastian Gallinat
• Re: TRANSFER on LOGICALs
  • From: James Giles
• Re: REAL -> string -> REAL
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: REAL -> string -> REAL
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: are character*4 and integer*4 the same thing, storage wise ?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: REAL -> string -> REAL
  • From: James Giles
• Re: TRANSFER on LOGICALs
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: REAL -> string -> REAL
  • From: FX
• Re: mixed language programming - LNK2001
  • From: Craig Powers
• Re: What is wrong with this search for the character PV/PQ
  • From: sara_patty
• mixed language programming - LNK2001
  • From: Isomorphismus
• Re: Is there a way to construct a generic "list" by Fortran 95?
  • From: James Giles
• Re: TRANSFER on LOGICALs
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: REAL -> string -> REAL
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: REAL -> string -> REAL
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Compatibility of MOD files
  • From: Paul van Delst
• Re: REAL -> string -> REAL
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Compatibility of MOD files
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: REAL -> string -> REAL
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Re: Is there a way to construct a generic "list" by Fortran 95?
  • From: Damian
• Re: REAL -> string -> REAL
  • From: FX
• Re: REAL -> string -> REAL
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: FORTRAN Unit Test Framework (FRUIT) 2.1 released
  • From: nobat
• Re: FORTRAN Unit Test Framework (FRUIT) 2.1 released
  • From: Paul van Delst
• Re: Compatibility of MOD files
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: FORTRAN Unit Test Framework (FRUIT) 2.1 released
  • From: Paul van Delst
• Re: REAL -> string -> REAL
  • From: FX
• REAL -> string -> REAL
  • From: Gus Gassmann
• Re: Compatibility of MOD files
  • From: FX
• Compatibility of MOD files
  • From: s8ngsu3
• Re: fortran and unit testing
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: fortran and unit testing
  • From: John
• Re: fortran and unit testing
  • From: John
• Re: TRANSFER on LOGICALs (was: Several questions about character C binding)
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Re: fortran and unit testing
  • From: Andrew Chen
• Re: TRANSFER on LOGICALs (was: Several questions about character C binding)
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Re: FORTRAN Unit Test Framework (FRUIT) 2.1 released
  • From: Fly Away
• Re: command input file for CLEAN77
  • From: David Thompson
• Re: finding unused code
  • From: David Thompson
• Re: FORTRAN Unit Test Framework (FRUIT) 2.1 released
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: Problem with MSP4 and CVF6.6C
  • From: Ken Plotkin
• Is there a way to construct a generic "list" by Fortran 95?
  • From: Simulate
• Re: recursion, stack, fortran
  • From: John Harper
• Re: gfortran -std=f95 overzealous?
  • From: Al Greynolds
• Re: gfortran -std=f95 overzealous?
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: TRANSFER on LOGICALs (was: Several questions about character C binding)
  • From: James Giles
• Re: gfortran -std=f95 overzealous?
  • From: Craig Dedo
• Re: TRANSFER on LOGICALs (was: Several questions about character C binding)
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• gfortran -std=f95 overzealous?
  • From: Al Greynolds
• TRANSFER on LOGICALs (was: Several questions about character C binding)
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Problem with MSP4 and CVF6.6C
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: Problem with MSP4 and CVF6.6C
  • From: garylscott
• Re: Problem with MSP4 and CVF6.6C
  • From: Craig Powers
• Re: Problem with MSP4 and CVF6.6C
  • From: Steve Lionel
• FITS Library Package upgrade
  • From: Donald Gudehus
• Re: Several questions about character C binding
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Re: Several questions about character C binding
  • From: Pierre Asselin
• Re: are character*4 and integer*4 the same thing, storage wise ?
  • From: pixel
• Re: Building BLAS/LAPACK libraries with gfortran (mingw) on Windows
  • From: Merlin . Piedragon
• Re: code to find average values
  • From: Tim Prince
• code to find average values
  • From: rajkrai
• Re: Several questions about character C binding
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: are character*4 and integer*4 the same thing, storage wise ?
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: Several questions about character C binding
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Re: are character*4 and integer*4 the same thing, storage wise ?
  • From: Lynn McGuire
• Re: Several questions about character C binding
  • From: Walter Spector
• Re: Problem with MPI programming
  • From: Dave Seaman
• Re: Several questions about character C binding
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Re: Several questions about character C binding
  • From: Walter Spector
• Re: Problem with MSP4 and CVF6.6C
  • From: e p chandler
• Re: What is wrong with this search for the character PV/PQ
  • From: e p chandler
• Re: are character*4 and integer*4 the same thing, storage wise ?
  • From: Ron Shepard
• Re: are character*4 and integer*4 the same thing, storage wise ?
  • From: Ken Plotkin
• Re: Several questions about character C binding
  • From: Regan Revised
• Problem with MPI programming
  • From: milind . chokshi
• Re: Several questions about character C binding
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Re: are character*4 and integer*4 the same thing, storage wise ?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: are character*4 and integer*4 the same thing, storage wise ?
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: are character*4 and integer*4 the same thing, storage wise ?
  • From: Regan Revised
• Re: What is wrong with this search for the character PV/PQ
  • From: Regan Revised
• Re: Several questions about character C binding
  • From: Steven Correll
• Re: Several questions about character C binding
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Re: recursion, stack, fortran
  • From: Regan Revised
• Re: are character*4 and integer*4 the same thing, storage wise ?
  • From: user1
• Re: are character*4 and integer*4 the same thing, storage wise ?
  • From: Walter Spector
• Re: are character*4 and integer*4 the same thing, storage wise ?
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Building BLAS/LAPACK libraries with gfortran (mingw) on Windows
  • From: Merlin . Piedragon
• Re: are character*4 and integer*4 the same thing, storage wise ?
  • From: user1
• Re: are character*4 and integer*4 the same thing, storage wise ?
  • From: James Giles
• Re: recursion, stack, fortran
  • From: Regan Revised
• Re: are character*4 and integer*4 the same thing, storage wise ?
  • From: user1
• Re: Several questions about character C binding
  • From: Walter Spector
• Re: are character*4 and integer*4 the same thing, storage wise ?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: are character*4 and integer*4 the same thing, storage wise ?
  • From: user1
• Re: are character*4 and integer*4 the same thing, storage wise ?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: are character*4 and integer*4 the same thing, storage wise ?
  • From: user1
• Re: finding average, pls help me
  • From: Richard L Walker
• Re: are character*4 and integer*4 the same thing, storage wise ?
  • From: James Giles
• Re: are character*4 and integer*4 the same thing, storage wise ?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: are character*4 and integer*4 the same thing, storage wise ?
  • From: Ken Plotkin
• Re: are character*4 and integer*4 the same thing, storage wise ?
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: Building BLAS/LAPACK libraries with gfortran (mingw) on Windows
  • From: Merlin . Piedragon
• Re: FORTRAN Unit Test Framework (FRUIT) 2.1 released
  • From: Bil Kleb
• Re: are character*4 and integer*4 the same thing, storage wise ?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Problem with MSP4 and CVF6.6C
  • From: David Frank
• Re: are character*4 and integer*4 the same thing, storage wise ?
  • From: dpb
• Re: are character*4 and integer*4 the same thing, storage wise ?
  • From: Sjouke Burry
• Re: Problem with MSP4 and CVF6.6C
  • From: Gary Scott
• are character*4 and integer*4 the same thing, storage wise ?
  • From: Lynn McGuire
• Re: GCC / gfortran 4.3.0 approaches the regression-only freeze periode
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Problem with MSP4 and CVF6.6C
  • From: Richard Maine
• GCC / gfortran 4.3.0 approaches the regression-only freeze periode
  • From: Tobias Burnus
• Re: Building BLAS/LAPACK libraries with gfortran (mingw) on Windows
  • From: FX
• Re: FORTRAN Unit Test Framework (FRUIT) 2.1 released
  • From: Bil Kleb
• Re: FORTRAN Unit Test Framework (FRUIT) 2.1 released
  • From: Pierre Asselin
• Re: Several questions about character C binding
  • From: Gary Scott
• Re: Several questions about character C binding
  • From: Gary Scott
• Re: Problem with MSP4 and CVF6.6C
  • From: Luka Djigas
• Re: Several questions about character C binding
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: finding average, pls help me
  • From: Gib Bogle
• Re: finding average, pls help me
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: finding average, pls help me
  • From: Terence
• Re: finding average, pls help me
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Several questions about character C binding
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Several questions about character C binding
  • From: Gary Scott
• Re: Several questions about character C binding
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: recursion, stack, fortran
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Several questions about character C binding
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: finding average, pls help me
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Building BLAS/LAPACK libraries with gfortran (mingw) on Windows
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: finding average, pls help me
  • From: Gib Bogle
• Re: Building BLAS/LAPACK libraries with gfortran (mingw) on Windows
  • From: Merlin . Piedragon
• Re: Several questions about character C binding
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Re: Building BLAS/LAPACK libraries with gfortran (mingw) on Windows
  • From: Merlin . Piedragon
• Re: Several questions about character C binding
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Re: What is wrong with this search for the character PV/PQ
  • From: Gib Bogle
• Re: finding average, pls help me
  • From: Terence
• Re: finding average, pls help me
  • From: Gib Bogle
• Re: FORTRAN Unit Test Framework (FRUIT) 2.1 released
  • From: Andrew Chen
• Re: FORTRAN Unit Test Framework (FRUIT) 2.1 released
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: FORTRAN Unit Test Framework (FRUIT) 2.1 released
  • From: Paul van Delst
• Re: finding average, pls help me
  • From: e p chandler
• Re: FORTRAN Unit Test Framework (FRUIT) 2.1 released
  • From: Beliavsky
• Re: Problem with MSP4 and CVF6.6C
  • From: Craig Powers
• Re: finding average, pls help me
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: finding average, pls help me
  • From: Richard Maine
• finding average, pls help me
  • From: rajkrai
• Re: Need help on calling c functions from fortran programs
  • From: fj
• Re: What is wrong with this search for the character PV/PQ
  • From: dpb
• Re: What is wrong with this search for the character PV/PQ
  • From: dpb
• Re: recursion, stack, fortran
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: What is wrong with this search for the character PV/PQ
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: What is wrong with this search for the character PV/PQ
  • From: sara_patty
• Re: FORTRAN Unit Test Framework (FRUIT) 2.1 released
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: What is wrong with this search for the character PV/PQ
  • From: e p chandler
• Re: What is wrong with this search for the character PV/PQ
  • From: sara_patty
• Re: recursion, stack, fortran
  • From: David Flower
• Re: What is wrong with this search for the character PV/PQ
  • From: e p chandler
• Re: Building BLAS/LAPACK libraries with gfortran (mingw) on Windows
  • From: Damian
• fUnit (was Re: [ANN] FORTRAN Unit Test Framework (FRUIT) 2.1 released)
  • From: Bil Kleb
• Re: Building BLAS/LAPACK libraries with gfortran (mingw) on Windows
  • From: Paul van Delst
• Re: What is wrong with this search for the character PV/PQ
  • From: Michel Olagnon
• Re: What is wrong with this search for the character PV/PQ
  • From: sara_patty
• Re: Need help on calling c functions from fortran programs
  • From: ZelluX
• Re: Need help on calling c functions from fortran programs
  • From: fj
• Re: recursion, stack, fortran
  • From: Regan Revised
• Re: a question about C binding
  • From: fj
• Re: recursion, stack, fortran
  • From: David Flower
• Re: Problem with MSP4 and CVF6.6C
  • From: Jugoslav Dujic
• Need help on calling c functions from fortran programs
  • From: ZelluX
• Re: recursion, stack, fortran
  • From: Reagan Revision
• Re: FORTRAN Unit Test Framework (FRUIT) 2.1 released
  • From: Andrew Chen
• Re: What is wrong with this search for the character PV/PQ
  • From: Reagan Revision
• Problem with MSP4 and CVF6.6C
  • From: Luka Djigas
• Re: [ANN] FORTRAN Unit Test Framework (FRUIT) 2.1 released
  • From: Reagan Revision
• Re: Building BLAS/LAPACK libraries with gfortran (mingw) on Windows
  • From: FX
• Re: What is wrong with this search for the character PV/PQ
  • From: e p chandler
• Re: Building BLAS/LAPACK libraries with gfortran (mingw) on Windows
  • From: Merlin . Piedragon
• Re: What is wrong with this search for the character PV/PQ
  • From: dpb
• Re: Function pointers in current fortran compilers
  • From: jwm
• Re: FORTRAN Unit Test Framework (FRUIT) 2.1 released
  • From: Andrew Chen
• Re: What is wrong with this search for the character PV/PQ
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• What is wrong with this search for the character PV/PQ
  • From: sara_patty
• Re: Function pointers in current fortran compilers
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: Function pointers in current fortran compilers
  • From: jwm
• Re: [ANN] FORTRAN Unit Test Framework (FRUIT) 2.1 released
  • From: Bil Kleb
• [ANN] FORTRAN Unit Test Framework (FRUIT) 2.1 released
  • From: Andrew Chen
• Re: Several questions about character C binding
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: Function pointers in current fortran compilers
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: Several questions about character C binding
  • From: Steven Correll
• Re: Function pointers in current fortran compilers
  • From: relaxmike
• Re: Building BLAS/LAPACK libraries with gfortran (mingw) on Windows
  • From: FX
• Building BLAS/LAPACK libraries with gfortran (mingw) on Windows
  • From: Merlin . Piedragon
• Re: Terence, google, Minsk
  • From: Terence
• Re: Several questions about character C binding
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Re: Several questions about character C binding
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: Several questions about character C binding
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Re: Several questions about character C binding
  • From: Tobias Burnus
• Re: A question about "kind"?
  • From: Gib Bogle
• Re: Several questions about character C binding
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Re: Several questions about character C binding
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Re: Function pointers in current fortran compilers
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: Is there a "static" in Fortran like in C++?
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Is there a "static" in Fortran like in C++?
  • From: Craig Dedo
• Re: Is there a "static" in Fortran like in C++?
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Is there a "static" in Fortran like in C++?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Function pointers in current fortran compilers
  • From: relaxmike
• Re: Is there a "static" in Fortran like in C++?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Is there a "static" in Fortran like in C++?
  • From: David Flower
• Re: Function pointers in current fortran compilers
  • From: relaxmike
• Re: Function pointers in current fortran compilers
  • From: Simulate
• Re: Is there a "static" in Fortran like in C++?
  • From: Simulate
• Function pointers in current fortran compilers
  • From: relaxmike
• Re: Is there a "static" in Fortran like in C++?
  • From: Craig Dedo
• Re: A question about "kind"?
  • From: Steven Correll
• Re: Is there a "static" in Fortran like in C++?
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: Is there a "static" in Fortran like in C++?
  • From: Reinhold Bader
• Re: Is there a "static" in Fortran like in C++?
  • From: Simulate
• Is there a "static" in Fortran like in C++?
  • From: Simulate
• Re: Several questions about character C binding
  • From: Craig Dedo
• Re: Terence, google, Minsk
  • From: Reagan Revision
• Re: A question about "kind"?
  • From: Catherine Rees Lay
• Re: Combo Boxes
  • From: Catherine Rees Lay
• Re: Several questions about character C binding
  • From: Tobias Burnus
• Re: Several questions about character C binding
  • From: fj
• Re: A question about "kind"?
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Several questions about character C binding
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Re: A question about "kind"?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: A question about "kind"?
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Re: A question about "kind"?
  • From: John Harper
• Re: A question about "kind"?
  • From: James Giles
• Re: A question about "kind"?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: OT: Notepad2 highlighting file
  • From: JussiJ
• Re: A question about "kind"?
  • From: John Harper
• Re: checkerboard pattern
  • From: John Harper
• Re: finding unused code
  • From: Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
• Re: Several questions about character C binding
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: A question about "kind"?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: A question about "kind"?
  • From: James Giles
• Re: SetPriorityClass
  • From: Craig Powers
• Re: Several questions about character C binding
  • From: Tobias Burnus
• Re: A question about "kind"?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: recursion, stack, fortran
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Several questions about character C binding
  • From: fj
• Re: allocating arrays, trouble
  • From: Victor Eijkhout
• a question about C binding
  • From: fj
• Re: A question about "kind"?
  • From: Gib Bogle
• Re: A question about "kind"?
  • From: Craig Dedo
• Re: A question about "kind"?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: recursion, stack, fortran
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: A question about "kind"?
  • From: Craig Dedo
• Re: A question about "kind"?
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Re: Has anyone used f90sql-lite with g95?
  • From: Ed
• Re: A question about "kind"?
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Re: A question about "kind"?
  • From: Paul van Delst
• A question about "kind"?
  • From: Simulate
• Re: SetPriorityClass
  • From: garylscott
• Re: SetPriorityClass
  • From: garylscott
• Re: SetPriorityClass
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: Has anyone used f90sql-lite with g95?
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: recursion, stack, fortran
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: SetPriorityClass
  • From: tholen
• Re: Terence, google, Minsk
  • From: Terence
• Re: Has anyone used f90sql-lite with g95?
  • From: Jugoslav Dujic
• Re: checkerboard pattern
  • From: Reagan Revision
• Re: creating binary direct access file
  • From: Gary Scott
• Re: fortran and unit testing
  • From: Bil Kleb
• Re: recursion, stack, fortran
  • From: Reagan Revision
• Re: Fortran and VB
  • From: pixel
• Re: creating binary direct access file
  • From: Terence
• Re: Has anyone used f90sql-lite with g95?
  • From: Ed
• Re: creating binary direct access file
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: creating binary direct access file
  • From: Louis Krupp
• Re: fortran and unit testing
  • From: Terence
• Re: problem with Forum display
  • From: Terence
• Re: creating binary direct access file
  • From: Terence
• Re: Has anyone used f90sql-lite with g95?
  • From: John Appleyard
• Re: Has anyone used f90sql-lite with g95?
  • From: John Appleyard
• Re: creating binary direct access file
  • From: Louis Krupp
• Re: Has anyone used f90sql-lite with g95?
  • From: Ed
• Re: problem with Forum display
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: problem with Forum display
  • From: John Harper
• Re: creating binary direct access file
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Has anyone used f90sql-lite with g95?
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: creating binary direct access file
  • From: gislita
• Has anyone used f90sql-lite with g95?
  • From: Ed
• Re: conditional compile for gFortran (GCC?): newbie question
  • From: Steven Correll
• Re: conditional compile for gFortran (GCC?): newbie question
  • From: Steven Correll
• Re: problem with Forum display
  • From: Steven Correll
• Re: conditional compile for gFortran (GCC?): newbie question
  • From: Paul van Delst
• Re: fortran and unit testing
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: FORTRAN on Commodore 64
  • From: Paul van Delst
• Re: conditional compile for gFortran (GCC?): newbie question
  • From: John S
• Re: fortran and unit testing
  • From: Paul van Delst
• RE: creating binary direct access file
  • From: meek
• Re: problem with Forum display
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: creating binary direct access file
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: creating binary direct access file
  • From: gislita
• Re: checkerboard pattern
  • From: James Giles
• Re: checkerboard pattern
  • From: Jan Gerrit Kootstra
• Re: checkerboard pattern
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Compiler Support for the Fortran 2003 Standard
  • From: Gary Scott
• Re: Compiler Support for the Fortran 2003 Standard
  • From: FX
• Re: problem with Forum display
  • From: e p chandler
• Re: checkerboard pattern
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Re: problem with Forum display
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: problem with Forum display
  • From: Gary Scott
• Re: Compiler Support for the Fortran 2003 Standard
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Compiler Support for the Fortran 2003 Standard
  • From: Ken Plotkin
• Re: checkerboard pattern
  • From: John Harper
• Re: problem with Forum display
  • From: dpb
• Re: problem with Forum display
  • From: dpb
• Re: problem with Forum display
  • From: Terence
• Re: problem with Forum display
  • From: Terence
• Re: problem with Forum display
  • From: Terence
• Re: problem with Forum display
  • From: Terence
• Re: Compiler Support for the Fortran 2003 Standard
  • From: Damian
• Re: OT: news readers [was: Re: problem with Forum display]
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: checkerboard pattern
  • From: Gib Bogle
• Re: Compiler Support for the Fortran 2003 Standard
  • From: Gary Scott
• OT: news readers [was: Re: problem with Forum display]
  • From: Sebastian Hanigk
• Re: problem with Forum display
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Compiler Support for the Fortran 2003 Standard
  • From: li . simula
• Re: recursion, stack, fortran
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: fortran and unit testing
  • From: Arjen Markus
• recursion, stack, fortran
  • From: Reagan Revision
• Re: checkerboard pattern
  • From: utab
• Re: checkerboard pattern
  • From: utab
• Re: checkerboard pattern
  • From: Gerry Ford
• Re: checkerboard pattern
  • From: e p chandler
• Re: checkerboard pattern
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• checkerboard pattern
  • From: utab
• Re: SetPriorityClass
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: problem with Forum display
  • From: e p chandler
• Re: binary of gcc and gfortran of snapshot 2008-0111 for windows is available for download
  • From: FX
• Re: binary of gcc and gfortran of snapshot 2008-0111 for windows is available for download
  • From: FX
• Re: conditional compile for gFortran (GCC?): newbie question
  • From: Craig Dedo
• Re: problem with Forum display
  • From: Walter Spector
• Re: problem with Forum display
  • From: e p chandler
• Re: problem with Forum display
  • From: dpb
• Re: problem with Forum display
  • From: Terence
• SetPriorityClass
  • From: tholen
• Re: problem with Forum display
  • From: Gary Scott
• Re: OT: Notepad2 highlighting file
  • From: dpb
• Re: problem with Forum display
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Re: problem with Forum display
  • From: Terence
• Re: Fortran and VB
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: creating binary direct access file
  • From: e p chandler
• creating binary direct access file
  • From: gislita
• Re: Fortran and VB
  • From: Gary Scott
• Re: conditional compile for gFortran (GCC?): newbie question
  • From: Ron Shepard
• Re: problem with Forum display
  • From: Walter Spector
• Re: Fortran and VB
  • From: e p chandler
• Re: Fortran and VB
  • From: Jugoslav Dujic
• Re: Fantastic astronomical pictures
  • From: Jan Gerrit Kootstra
• Re: Fortran I/O performance versus file size
  • From: Thomas Koenig
• Re: Fantastic astronomical pictures
  • From: David Frank
• Re: Fortran and VB
  • From: Mark Stevens
• Re: Fantastic astronomical pictures
  • From: Jan Gerrit Kootstra
• Re: Fantastic astronomical pictures
  • From: David Frank
• Re: problem with Forum display
  • From: Reagan Revision
• Fortran and VB
  • From: veda
• problem with Forum display
  • From: Terence
• Re: conditional compile for gFortran (GCC?): newbie question
  • From: Fly Away
• Re: fortran and unit testing
  • From: John
• Re: FORTRAN on Commodore 64
  • From: x01001x
• Re: FORTRAN on Commodore 64
  • From: x01001x
• Re: conditional compile for gFortran (GCC?): newbie question
  • From: Craig Dedo
• Re: conditional compile for gFortran (GCC?): newbie question
  • From: steven . bosscher
• Re: Fantastic astronomical pictures
  • From: C. G. Montgomery
• Re: conditional compile for gFortran (GCC?): newbie question
  • From: Gary Scott
• Re: Problem in declaration
  • From: Gib Bogle
• Re: conditional compile for gFortran (GCC?): newbie question
  • From: FX
• Re: finding unused code
  • From: Bil Kleb
• conditional compile for gFortran (GCC?): newbie question
  • From: John S
• Re: fortran and unit testing
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Re: fortran and unit testing
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: finding unused code
  • From: Bil Kleb
• Re: Combo Boxes
  • From: Gary Scott
• Re: Problem in declaration
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: fortran and unit testing
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: finding unused code
  • From: Hajo Klingshirn
• Re: Fortran I/O performance versus file size
  • From: mpbro
• Re: fortran and unit testing
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: Problem in declaration
  • From: Jugoslav Dujic
• Combo Boxes
  • From: pjsgr100
• Re: Problem in declaration
  • From: Sjouke Burry
• Re: finding unused code
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: finding unused code
  • From: Colin Watters
• Re: Problem in declaration
  • From: nure123
• Re: Fantastic astronomical pictures
  • From: Reagan Revision
• Re: Fortran I/O performance versus file size
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: finding unused code
  • From: Bil Kleb
• Re: finding unused code
  • From: Bil Kleb
• Re: Problem in declaration
  • From: Sjouke Burry
• Re: finding unused code
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: Problem in declaration
  • From: John Harper
• Re: Fortran I/O performance versus file size
  • From: Pierre Asselin
• Re: Problem in declaration
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: finding unused code
  • From: dpb
• Re: Problem in declaration
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: finding unused code
  • From: baf
• Re: finding unused code
  • From: Bil Kleb
• Problem in declaration
  • From: nure123
• Re: Fantastic astronomical pictures
  • From: Terence
• Re: finding unused code
  • From: Terence
• Re: Fantastic astronomical pictures
  • From: Richard L Walker
• Re: finding unused code
  • From: Louis Krupp
• Re: finding unused code
  • From: dpb
• Re: finding unused code
  • From: Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
• Re: finding unused code
  • From: Bil Kleb
• Re: finding unused code
  • From: Paul van Delst
• Re: finding unused code
  • From: Bil Kleb
• Re: subroutine
  • From: garylscott
• Re: finding unused code
  • From: deltaseq0
• Re: finding unused code
  • From: Tim Springer
• Re: finding unused code
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: Fortran I/O performance versus file size
  • From: tholen
• Re: subroutine
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: finding unused code
  • From: Bil Kleb
• Re: subroutine
  • From: Paul van Delst
• Re: subroutine
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: finding unused code
  • From: Joost
• finding unused code
  • From: Bil Kleb
• Re: subroutine
  • From: Paul van Delst
• Re: Fortran I/O performance versus file size
  • From: mpbro
• Re: subroutine
  • From: Thierry B.
• Re: subroutine
  • From: dpb
• Re: subroutine
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: fortran and unit testing
  • From: Maik Beckmann
• Re: subroutine
  • From: dpb
• Re: Fortran I/O performance versus file size
  • From: John S
• subroutine
  • From: tele2
• Re: Fortran I/O performance versus file size
  • From: mpbro
• Re: Fortran I/O performance versus file size
  • From: John S
• Re: Fortran I/O performance versus file size
  • From: mpbro
• mpiSimulatoar available - example of overloading
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• Re: Fantastic astronomical pictures
  • From: Les
• Re: Fantastic astronomical pictures
  • From: David Frank
• Re: Fantastic astronomical pictures
  • From: Dr Ivan D. Reid
• Fantastic astronomical pictures
  • From: David Frank
• Re: not able to use gnuplotfortran ....
  • From: Henrik Holst
• Toolpack/1 Release 2.5 for UNIX
  • From: Jinsong.Zhao@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: fortran and unit testing
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: Initialization of character array in derived type
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Fortran I/O performance versus file size
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: fortran and unit testing
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: fortran and unit testing
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: Fortran I/O performance versus file size
  • From: mpbro
• Re: Fortran I/O performance versus file size
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: control the write not to next line
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Initialization of character array in derived type
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: plotting from within Fortran?
  • From: Henrik Holst
• Re: Initialization of character array in derived type
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Fortran I/O performance versus file size
  • From: mpbro
• Re: Notepad2 highlighting file
  • From: Craig Dedo
• Re: fortran and unit testing
  • From: Bil Kleb
• Re: gfortran 2007 annual report
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: Notepad2 highlighting file
  • From: Gary Scott
• Re: Notepad2 highlighting file
  • From: Luka Djigas
• Re: gfortran 2007 annual report
  • From: FX
• Re: gfortran 2007 annual report
  • From: kostelich . asu
• Re: Notepad2 highlighting file
  • From: Craig Dedo
• Re: OT: Notepad2 highlighting file
  • From: Luka Djigas
• Re: OT: Notepad2 highlighting file
  • From: Luka Djigas
• Re: floating decimal
  • From: robin
• Re: fortran and unit testing
  • From: Paul van Delst
• Re: fortran and unit testing
  • From: Sebastian Hanigk
• Re: Reading a file with an unknown amount of data
  • From: James Giles
• Re: fortran and unit testing
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: fortran and unit testing
  • From: Maik Beckmann
• Re: fortran and unit testing
  • From: Sebastian Hanigk
• Re: Reading a file with an unknown amount of data
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Re: FORTRAN on Commodore 64
  • From: e p chandler
• Re: Reading a file with an unknown amount of data
  • From: dpb
• Re: Reading a file with an unknown amount of data
  • From: dpb
• Re: OT: Notepad2 highlighting file
  • From: dpb
• Re: FORTRAN on Commodore 64
  • From: Paul van Delst
• Re: Reading a file with an unknown amount of data
  • From: Paul van Delst
• Re: fortran and unit testing
  • From: Bil Kleb
• Re: Reading a file with an unknown amount of data
  • From: David Frank
• Re: fortran and unit testing
  • From: John
• Re: fortran and unit testing
  • From: John
• Re: fortran and unit testing
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: fortran and unit testing
  • From: John
• Re: Reading a file with an unknown amount of data
  • From: deltaquattro
• Re: gfortran 2007 annual report
  • From: FX
• Re: Reading a file with an unknown amount of data
  • From: deltaquattro
• not able to use gnuplotfortran ....
  • From: mc0710@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: OT: Notepad2 highlighting file
  • From: deltaquattro
• FORTRAN on Commodore 64
  • From: x01001x
• Re: Win32 API and gfortran
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Re: gfortran 2007 annual report
  • From: Reagan Revision
• Re: Win32 API and gfortran
  • From: Richard L Walker
• Re: gfortran 2007 annual report
  • From: baf
• OT: Notepad2 highlighting file
  • From: Luka Djigas
• Re: control the write not to next line
  • From: leed
• Re: gfortran 2007 annual report
  • From: pigeon
• Re: gfortran 2007 annual report
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Initialization of character array in derived type
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: gfortran 2007 annual report
  • From: pigeon
• Re: gfortran 2007 annual report
  • From: Craig Powers
• Re: Initialization of character array in derived type
  • From: aborel
• Re: Initialization of character array in derived type
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: gfortran 2007 annual report
  • From: Toon Moene
• Re: gfortran 2007 annual report
  • From: wind
• Re: Reading a file with an unknown amount of data
  • From: James Giles
• Re: gfortran 2007 annual report
  • From: FX
• Re: gfortran 2007 annual report
  • From: ejkost
• Re: Reading a file with an unknown amount of data
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Re: Initialization of character array in derived type
  • From: aborel
• Re: fortran and unit testing
  • From: Bil Kleb
• Re: fortran and unit testing
  • From: Bil Kleb
• Re: fortran and unit testing
  • From: Paul van Delst
• Re: fortran and unit testing
  • From: Bil Kleb
• Re: Reading a file with an unknown amount of data
  • From: Paul van Delst
• Re: Reading a file with an unknown amount of data
  • From: dpb
• Reading a file with an unknown amount of data
  • From: deltaquattro
• Re: fortran and unit testing
  • From: Paul van Delst
• Re: fortran and unit testing
  • From: Bil Kleb
• Re: fortran and unit testing
  • From: Sebastian Hanigk
• Re: Initialization of character array in derived type
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• fortran and unit testing
  • From: John
• Re: control the write not to next line
  • From: Clive Page
• Re: plotting from within Fortran?
  • From: Clive Page
• control the write not to next line
  • From: leed
• Re: plotting from within Fortran?
  • From: Helmut Michels
• Re: plotting from within Fortran?
  • From: Helmut Michels
• Re: command input file for CLEAN77
  • From: e p chandler
• Re: plotting from within Fortran?
  • From: david.baxendale@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: command input file for CLEAN77
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: command input file for CLEAN77
  • From: Jinsong.Zhao@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: command input file for CLEAN77
  • From: e p chandler
• Re: command input file for CLEAN77
  • From: e p chandler
• Re: command input file for CLEAN77
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: command input file for CLEAN77
  • From: Sv. Broholm
• Re: Initialization of character array in derived type
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Initialization of character array in derived type
  • From: David Frank
• Re: plotting from within Fortran?
  • From: Terence
• Re: Initialization of character array in derived type
  • From: Paul van Delst
• Re: plotting from within Fortran?
  • From: baf
• Initialization of character array in derived type
  • From: aborel
• Re: plotting from within Fortran?
  • From: John Harper
• Re: plotting from within Fortran?
  • From: Charles Russell
• Re: plotting from within Fortran?
  • From: Luka Djigas
• Re: plotting from within Fortran?
  • From: Charles Russell
• Re: plotting from within Fortran?
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: plotting from within Fortran?
  • From: baf
• Re: plotting from within Fortran?
  • From: Louis Krupp
• Re: plotting from within Fortran?
  • From: Bart Vandewoestyne
• Re: plotting from within Fortran?
  • From: highegg
• Re: plotting from within Fortran?
  • From: Paul van Delst
• Re: Win32 API and gfortran
  • From: wind
• command input file for CLEAN77
  • From: Jinsong.Zhao@xxxxxxxxx
• plotting from within Fortran?
  • From: Bart Vandewoestyne
• Re: Win32 API and gfortran
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Re: Win32 API and gfortran
  • From: Gary Scott
• Re: Win32 API and gfortran
  • From: Richard L Walker
• Re: floating decimal
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: floating decimal
  • From: robin
• Re: floating decimal
  • From: robin
• Re: gfortran 2007 annual report
  • From: Toon Moene
• Re: gfortran 2007 annual report
  • From: wind
• Re: Animating Graphics
  • From: Terence
• Re: Animating Graphics
  • From: Gary Scott
• Re: Animating Graphics
  • From: Gib Bogle
• Re: keyword capitalization -- current practice
  • From: Reagan Revision
• Re: the mi5 persecution dude
  • From: Reagan Revision
• Re: Gamma function
  • From: Reagan Revision
• Re: gfortran and matlab symbol problem
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: elegant solution for counting runs
  • From: analyst41
• Re: floating decimal
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: floating decimal
  • From: robin
• Re: floating decimal
  • From: robin
• Re: floating decimal
  • From: robin
• Re: floating decimal
  • From: robin
• Re: floating decimal
  • From: robin
• Re: Animating Graphics
  • From: garylscott
• Re: gfortran 2007 annual report
  • From: FX
• Re: gfortran 2007 annual report
  • From: FX
• Re: gfortran 2007 annual report
  • From: FX
• Re: Animating Graphics
  • From: aeroguy
• Re: gfortran 2007 annual report
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Re: the mi5 persecution dude
  • From: Reagan Revision
• Re: F08 support of floating decimal?
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Re: keyword capitalization -- current practice
  • From: Paul van Delst
• re: Gamma function
  • From: robin
• Re: F08 support of floating decimal?
  • From: robin
• Re: F08 support of floating decimal?
  • From: robin
• Re: keyword capitalization -- current practice
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: keyword capitalization -- current practice
  • From: Paul van Delst
• Re: keyword capitalization -- current practice
  • From: paul . richard . thomas
• Re: Animating Graphics
  • From: David Frank
• Re: Animating Graphics
  • From: Terence
• Re: gfortran 2007 annual report
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Re: keyword capitalization -- current practice
  • From: Dr Ivan D. Reid
• Re: gfortran 2007 annual report
  • From: wind
• Re: keyword capitalization -- current practice
  • From: Craig Powers
• Re: gfortran 2007 annual report
  • From: linuxl4
• Animating Graphics
  • From: Ian Dean
• Re: gfortran 2007 annual report
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Re: gfortran 2007 annual report
  • From: wind
• Re: Does F2003 included "submodule" and will F2008 include "Parameterized Modules"??
  • From: jamesgiles@xxxxxxx
• Re: gfortran 2007 annual report
  • From: baf
• Re: gfortran 2007 annual report
  • From: wind
• Re: keyword capitalization -- current practice
  • From: Dr Ivan D. Reid
• Re: ifort and NAG array size limitations
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: keyword capitalization -- current practice
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: Using Fortran to predict the stock market
  • From: Beliavsky
• Re: ifort and NAG array size limitations
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: Fortran article in Physics World
  • From: Toon Moene
• Re: Using Fortran to predict the stock market
  • From: dpb
• Re: gfortran and matlab symbol problem
  • From: Ben
• Re: gfortran 2007 annual report
  • From: linuxl4
• Re: a modest proposal
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: keyword capitalization -- current practice
  • From: Ron Shepard
• Re: Does F2003 included "submodule" and will F2008 include "Parameterized Modules"??
  • From: li . simula
• Re: gfortran 2007 annual report
  • From: Paul van Delst
• Re: F08 support of floating decimal?
  • From: robin
• Re: Does F2003 included "submodule" and will F2008 include "Parameterized Modules"??
  • From: Craig Dedo
• Re: gfortran 2007 annual report
  • From: Thomas Koenig
• Re: gfortran 2007 annual report
  • From: paul . richard . thomas
• Re: keyword capitalization -- current practice
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: keyword capitalization -- current practice
  • From: Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
• Re: Does F2003 included "submodule" and will F2008 include "Parameterized Modules"??
  • From: li . simula
• Re: Using Fortran to predict the stock market
  • From: Gerry Ford
• Re: gfortran 2007 annual report
  • From: linuxl4
• gfortran 2007 annual report
  • From: paul . richard . thomas
• Using Fortran to predict the stock market
  • From: David Frank
• Does F2003 included "submodule" and will F2008 include "Parameterized Modules"??
  • From: li . simula
• the mi5 persecution dude
  • From: Gerry Ford
• Re: elegant solution for counting runs
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: elegant solution for counting runs
  • From: David Frank
• Re: elegant solution for counting runs
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Re: keyword capitalization -- current practice
  • From: Ron Shepard
• Re: keyword capitalization -- current practice
  • From: Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
• Re: a modest proposal
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Re: a modest proposal
  • From: Walter Spector

• Security
• UNIX
• Linux
• Coding
• Usenet

• Archive
• About
• Privacy
• Search
• Imprint

coding.derkeiler.com  > Archive  > Fortran  > comp.lang.fortran  > 2008-01