Re: What is wrong with this search for the character PV/PQ
- From: "Gerry Ford" <invalid@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 06:34:28 -0700
"sara_patty" <k_partha@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:dbe16626-34bf-44bc-8b0f-8f0c4c95e376@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Jan 20, 1:37 am, e p chandler <e...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:sorry, elliot, about the attribution
On Jan 19, 9:58 pm, "Regan Revised" <inva...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
_patty" <k_par...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:c2936acb-3054-4880-871f-44ab6f2ddef8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Jan 18, 11:38 am, e p chandler <e...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
talk about yourself
WTF? context???
399 - Unrecognised statement, did you forget to add /FIXED_FORMAT?
Compilation failed.
You are compiling fixed format source in which two lines extend beyond
column 72. However your file extension is not F.
/FIXED_FORMAT appears to be a Salford/Silverfrost option. IIRC this is
what you are using.
If you compile it for fixed format you have two lines which extend
beyond column 72.
If you compile it for free format you have old style comments.
So this source file is neither fixed nor free format.
[flame on]
I use G95 so I saved the source with an extension of .f -- and
overlooked the lines extending beyond column 72. Compiled, gnashed
teeth, lathered, rinsed, repeated until feeble brain registered "pilot
error".
I am just about ready to curse those who write in upper case or fixed
format or Fortran 77. I'm almost ready to renounce star notation as an
act of penitence. :-).
[flame off]
-- e
Strange, it works for me using f77 +E6 +E1 -K +es +U77 -g rd.f
Why on God's green earth are you using f77?
--
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: What is wrong with this search for the character PV/PQ
- From: sara_patty
- Re: What is wrong with this search for the character PV/PQ
- References:
- What is wrong with this search for the character PV/PQ
- From: sara_patty
- Re: What is wrong with this search for the character PV/PQ
- From: Reagan Revision
- Re: What is wrong with this search for the character PV/PQ
- From: sara_patty
- Re: What is wrong with this search for the character PV/PQ
- From: e p chandler
- Re: What is wrong with this search for the character PV/PQ
- From: sara_patty
- Re: What is wrong with this search for the character PV/PQ
- From: e p chandler
- Re: What is wrong with this search for the character PV/PQ
- From: sara_patty
- Re: What is wrong with this search for the character PV/PQ
- From: Regan Revised
- Re: What is wrong with this search for the character PV/PQ
- From: e p chandler
- Re: What is wrong with this search for the character PV/PQ
- From: sara_patty
- What is wrong with this search for the character PV/PQ
- Prev by Date: Re: large number with interger
- Next by Date: Re: large number with interger
- Previous by thread: Re: What is wrong with this search for the character PV/PQ
- Next by thread: Re: What is wrong with this search for the character PV/PQ
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|