comp.lang.fortran

• Thread Index

---

• Re: mean function (intrinsic) in Fortran 95
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: mean function (intrinsic) in Fortran 95
  • From: Terence
• Re: What is this
  • From: FX
• Re: mean function (intrinsic) in Fortran 95
  • From: Craig Dedo
• Re: internal procedure as an actual argument
  • From: relaxmike
• Re: Good way to fill integer array with successive indices?
  • From: Toon Moene
• Re: What is this
  • From: Kurt Kallblad
• Re: mean function (intrinsic) in Fortran 95
  • From: James Giles
• Re: mean function (intrinsic) in Fortran 95
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Re: Goto inside a call statement?
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Goto inside a call statement?
  • From: James Giles
• Re: mean function (intrinsic) in Fortran 95
  • From: simonvandonk
• Re: mean function (intrinsic) in Fortran 95
  • From: Craig Dedo
• Re: mean function (intrinsic) in Fortran 95
  • From: simonvandonk
• Re: Fortran 2008 draft: EXECUTE_COMMAND_LINE
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: Goto inside a call statement?
  • From: Sebastian Hanigk
• Re: Fortran 2008 draft: EXECUTE_COMMAND_LINE
  • From: Harold Stevens
• Re: Fortran 2008 draft: EXECUTE_COMMAND_LINE
  • From: GaryScott
• Re: Fortran 2008 draft: EXECUTE_COMMAND_LINE
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: Goto inside a call statement?
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: mean function (intrinsic) in Fortran 95
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: Goto inside a call statement?
  • From: Sebastian Hanigk
• mean function (intrinsic) in Fortran 95
  • From: simonvandonk
• Re: Fortran 2008 draft: EXECUTE_COMMAND_LINE
  • From: FX
• Re: Fortran 2008 draft: EXECUTE_COMMAND_LINE
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: Goto inside a call statement?
  • From: SimonG
• Re: using dot_product from c++ II
  • From: Gerry Ford
• Fortran 2008 draft: EXECUTE_COMMAND_LINE
  • From: FX
• Re: Common block file
  • From: Catherine Rees Lay
• Re: passing a pointer to a function using iso_c_binding
  • From: Gerry Ford
• Re: preparing for the next open-source gfortran release
  • From: FX
• Re: using dot_product from c++ II
  • From: FX
• Re: passing a pointer to a function using iso_c_binding
  • From: FX
• Re: Goto inside a call statement?
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: Goto inside a call statement?
  • From: Sebastian Hanigk
• preparing for the next open-source gfortran release
  • From: Gerry Ford
• Re: Goto inside a call statement?
  • From: James Giles
• Re: passing a pointer to a function using iso_c_binding
  • From: Damian
• Re: using dot_product from c++ II
  • From: Gerry Ford
• Re: passing a pointer to a function using iso_c_binding
  • From: Gerry Ford
• Re: passing a pointer to a function using iso_c_binding
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: passing a pointer to a function using iso_c_binding
  • From: Damian
• Re: passing a pointer to a function using iso_c_binding
  • From: Craig Powers
• Re: question on precision
  • From: Ron Shepard
• Re: Depedency Generation for g77
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: Depedency Generation for g77
  • From: average
• Re: internal procedure as an actual argument
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: internal procedure as an actual argument
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: question on precision
  • From: Michel Olagnon
• Re: internal procedure as an actual argument
  • From: relaxmike
• Re: question on precision
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: passing a pointer to a function using iso_c_binding
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: passing a pointer to a function using iso_c_binding
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• passing a pointer to a function using iso_c_binding
  • From: Damian
• Re: Assistance Reading Binary Data
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Assistance Reading Binary Data
  • From: Ken Plotkin
• Re: Factorial function
  • From: RAMI Y.
• Re: Assistance Reading Binary Data
  • From: Gib Bogle
• Re: Factorial function
  • From: e p chandler
• Re: Assistance Reading Binary Data
  • From: e p chandler
• Re: Assistance Reading Binary Data
  • From: baf
• Re: Factorial function
  • From: Gerry Ford
• Re: Subroutine calling a function?
  • From: Gerry Ford
• Assistance Reading Binary Data
  • From: shazrahbar
• Re: Common block file
  • From: Shawn
• Re: Common block file
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Common block file
  • From: Colin Watters
• Re: Common block file
  • From: GaryScott
• Re: internal procedure as an actual argument
  • From: Mirko . Vukovic
• Common block file
  • From: Shawn
• Re: internal procedure as an actual argument
  • From: qsc
• Re: Depedency Generation for g77
  • From: Bart Vandewoestyne
• Re: Good way to fill integer array with successive indices?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Good way to fill integer array with successive indices?
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Re: Program organization
  • From: relaxmike
• Re: Depedency Generation for g77
  • From: qsc
• Re: internal procedure as an actual argument
  • From: relaxmike
• Re: passing arbitrarily large arrays of data
  • From: octaedro
• Re: Factorial function
  • From: e p chandler
• Re: Depedency Generation for g77
  • From: relaxmike
• Re: printing a pointer in fortran
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: Factorial function
  • From: Michel Olagnon
• Re: Factorial function
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• Re: question on precision
  • From: Arjen Markus
• question on precision
  • From: Bart Vandewoestyne
• Re: Subroutine calling a function?
  • From: user1
• Re: Depedency Generation for g77
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: Factorial function
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: Factorial function
  • From: RAMI Y.
• Factorial function
  • From: RAMI Y.
• Re: Depedency Generation for g77
  • From: Kay Diederichs
• Re: Way to autogenerate C/C++ Headers?
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Free MCSD Stuff to Download
  • From: MCSD
• Re: printing a pointer in fortran
  • From: Gerry Ford
• Re: Subroutine calling a function?
  • From: Gerry Ford
• Re: printing a pointer in fortran
  • From: Gerry Ford
• Re: passing arbitrarily large arrays of data
  • From: David Duffy
• Re: Good way to fill integer array with successive indices?
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Re: Good way to fill integer array with successive indices?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Good way to fill integer array with successive indices?
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Depedency Generation for g77
  • From: average
• Re: Goto inside a call statement?
  • From: Shawn
• Re: Good way to fill integer array with successive indices?
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Re: Goto inside a call statement?
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Re: Goto inside a call statement?
  • From: Shawn
• Re: Goto inside a call statement?
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Goto inside a call statement?
  • From: Shawn
• Re: printing a pointer in fortran
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: printing a pointer in fortran
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Will Co-Array Fortran be considered a valuable tool for next-generation programming?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: passing arbitrarily large arrays of data
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Re: passing arbitrarily large arrays of data
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• passing arbitrarily large arrays of data
  • From: octaedro
• Re: passing arbitrarily large arrays of data
  • From: dpb
• Re: printing a pointer in fortran
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: Strange Phenomenon of Cosine Function on Linux x86_64 env
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: Strange Phenomenon of Cosine Function on Linux x86_64 env
  • From: Pierre Asselin
• Re: Subroutine calling a function?
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Re: Good way to fill integer array with successive indices?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Subroutine calling a function?
  • From: user1
• Re: printing a pointer in fortran
  • From: Gerry Ford
• Re: Good way to fill integer array with successive indices?
  • From: Sebastian Hanigk
• Re: Way to autogenerate C/C++ Headers?
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: Subroutine calling a function?
  • From: Gerry Ford
• Re: Subroutine calling a function?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Subroutine calling a function?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Subroutine calling a function?
  • From: dpb
• Re: Subroutine calling a function?
  • From: greyham433
• Re: Good way to fill integer array with successive indices?
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Re: Way to autogenerate C/C++ Headers?
  • From: Gerry Ford
• Re: Good way to fill integer array with successive indices?
  • From: Gerry Ford
• Re: Way to autogenerate C/C++ Headers?
  • From: Steven Correll
• Re: Good way to fill integer array with successive indices?
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Re: Strange Phenomenon of Cosine Function on Linux x86_64 env
  • From: Gerry Ford
• Re: printing a pointer in fortran
  • From: Gerry Ford
• Re: Good way to fill integer array with successive indices?
  • From: Lorenzo `paulatz' Paulatto
• Re: Good way to fill integer array with successive indices?
  • From: Sebastian Hanigk
• Re: printing a pointer in fortran
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: printing a pointer in fortran
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: printing a pointer in fortran
  • From: Gerry Ford
• Re: Good way to fill integer array with successive indices?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Will Co-Array Fortran be considered a valuable tool for next-generation programming?
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Re: Strange Phenomenon of Cosine Function on Linux x86_64 env
  • From: FX
• Re: Good way to fill integer array with successive indices?
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Re: Is anyone using Intel Fortran under Mac OS X
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: Strange Phenomenon of Cosine Function on Linux x86_64 env
  • From: Greg Lindahl
• Re: Is anyone using Intel Fortran under Mac OS X
  • From: Greg Lindahl
• Re: Is anyone using Intel Fortran under Mac OS X
  • From: Paul van Delst
• Re: Is anyone using Intel Fortran under Mac OS X
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: internal procedure as an actual argument
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: Will Co-Array Fortran be considered a valuable tool for next-generation programming?
  • From: Ian Bush
• Re: Will Co-Array Fortran be considered a valuable tool for next-generation programming?
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: Will Co-Array Fortran be considered a valuable tool for next-generation programming?
  • From: Gary Scott
• Strange Phenomenon of Cosine Function on Linux x86_64 env
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: Way to autogenerate C/C++ Headers?
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: Will Co-Array Fortran be considered a valuable tool for next-generation programming?
  • From: Ian Bush
• Re: Way to autogenerate C/C++ Headers?
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: Will Co-Array Fortran be considered a valuable tool for next-generation programming?
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: Will Co-Array Fortran be considered a valuable tool for next-generation programming?
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: Way to autogenerate C/C++ Headers?
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: Subroutine calling a function?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Subroutine calling a function?
  • From: Richard L Walker
• Re: Subroutine calling a function?
  • From: baf
• Subroutine calling a function?
  • From: greyham433
• Re: internal procedure as an actual argument
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: internal procedure as an actual argument
  • From: qsc
• Re: internal procedure as an actual argument
  • From: e p chandler
• internal procedure as an actual argument
  • From: qsc
• Re: Good way to fill integer array with successive indices?
  • From: Lorenzo `paulatz' Paulatto
• Re: Issues with C and Fortran, loadlibrary() and getprocaddress()
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Re: Issues with C and Fortran, loadlibrary() and getprocaddress()
  • From: Gary Scott
• Issues with C and Fortran, loadlibrary() and getprocaddress()
  • From: DKLarson
• Re: Fortan2003 and C/C++ interoperability
  • From: utab
• Re: Fortan2003 and C/C++ interoperability
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: I've never seen this before in 30 years - what is this?
  • From: robin
• Fortan2003 and C/C++ interoperability
  • From: utab
• Re: using dot_product from c++ II
  • From: FX
• Re: printing a pointer in fortran
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: printing a pointer in fortran
  • From: Gerry Ford
• Re: printing a pointer in fortran
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• printing a pointer in fortran
  • From: Gerry Ford
• Re: Will Co-Array Fortran be considered a valuable tool for next-generation programming?
  • From: Simulate
• Re: Program organization
  • From: jiho
• Re: using dot_product from c++
  • From: Gerry Ford
• Re: [ANN] TCBuild: A New Build Tool for Fortran
  • From: Athanasios Migdalas
• Re: using dot_product from c++ II
  • From: Gerry Ford
• Re: Will Co-Array Fortran be considered a valuable tool for next-generation programming?
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: Will Co-Array Fortran be considered a valuable tool for next-generation programming?
  • From: post
• Re: Will Co-Array Fortran be considered a valuable tool for next-generation programming?
  • From: Janne Blomqvist
• Re: Floating-point precision
  • From: fj
• Re: What is this
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Will Co-Array Fortran be considered a valuable tool for next-generation programming?
  • From: Janne Blomqvist
• Re: Will Co-Array Fortran be considered a valuable tool for next-generation programming?
  • From: Ron Shepard
• Re: Is anyone using Intel Fortran under Mac OS X
  • From: Ron Shepard
• Re: Floating-point precision
  • From: baf
• Re: more compiler switches
  • From: Gerry Ford
• Re: Floating-point precision
  • From: Richard Maine
• Floating-point precision
  • From: John Harper
• Re: What is this
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: What is this
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: What is this
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Re: What is this
  • From: Terence
• Re: What is this
  • From: Terence
• Re: What is this
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: fortran and unit testing
  • From: pschmittML
• Re: Will Co-Array Fortran be considered a valuable tool for next-generation programming?
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: I've never seen this before in 30 years - what is this?
  • From: Colin Watters
• Re: What is this
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Re: I've never seen this before in 30 years - what is this?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Will Co-Array Fortran be considered a valuable tool for next-generation programming?
  • From: post
• Re: What is this
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: What is this
  • From: pixel
• Re: I've never seen this before in 30 years - what is this?
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Re: I've never seen this before in 30 years - what is this?
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: Is anyone using Intel Fortran under Mac OS X
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: I've never seen this before in 30 years - what is this?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Is anyone using Intel Fortran under Mac OS X
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Is anyone using Intel Fortran under Mac OS X
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: Will Co-Array Fortran be considered a valuable tool for next-generation programming?
  • From: GaryScott
• Re: Will Co-Array Fortran be considered a valuable tool for next-generation programming?
  • From: GaryScott
• Re: Will Co-Array Fortran be considered a valuable tool for next-generation programming?
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: Will Co-Array Fortran be considered a valuable tool for next-generation programming?
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: Will Co-Array Fortran be considered a valuable tool for next-generation programming?
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Re: file formatting (open, recl, etc.)
  • From: dpb
• Re: What is this
  • From: fj
• Re: Will Co-Array Fortran be considered a valuable tool for next-generation programming?
  • From: GaryScott
• Re: Will Co-Array Fortran be considered a valuable tool for next-generation programming?
  • From: Ron Shepard
• Re: What is this
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Is anyone using Intel Fortran under Mac OS X
  • From: Ron Shepard
• Re: Is anyone using Intel Fortran under Mac OS X
  • From: Dave Seaman
• Re: using dot_product from c++ II
  • From: Craig Powers
• Re: Is anyone using Intel Fortran under Mac OS X
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: Is anyone using Intel Fortran under Mac OS X
  • From: AnotherSquid
• Re: file formatting (open, recl, etc.)
  • From: Craig Dedo
• Re: Good way to fill integer array with successive indices?
  • From: Mirko . Vukovic
• Re: What is this
  • From: fj
• Re: What is this
  • From: J. F. Cornwall
• Re: Will Co-Array Fortran be considered a valuable tool for next-generation programming?
  • From: Tim Stitt
• Re: Will Co-Array Fortran be considered a valuable tool for next-generation programming?
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Re: I've never seen this before in 30 years - what is this?
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Re: Will Co-Array Fortran be considered a valuable tool for next-generation programming?
  • From: Sebastian Hanigk
• Re: what about the option -time for g95?
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: Will Co-Array Fortran be considered a valuable tool for next-generation programming?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Will Co-Array Fortran be considered a valuable tool for next-generation programming?
  • From: Tim Stitt
• file formatting (open, recl, etc.)
  • From: itdevries
• Re: using dot_product from c++ II
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: using dot_product from c++ II
  • From: FX
• Re: Way to autogenerate C/C++ Headers?
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Re: what about the option -time for g95?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: what about the option -time for g95?
  • From: Arjen Markus
• To whom interested in CVF programming in Vista X86 or X64
  • From: PhysNova
• Re: Accessing Fortran 90 in c++, modules
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: I've never seen this before in 30 years - what is this?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Accessing Fortran 90 in c++, modules
  • From: Craig Dedo
• Re: I've never seen this before in 30 years - what is this?
  • From: Tom Gederberg
• Re: I've never seen this before in 30 years - what is this?
  • From: Gordon Sande
• I've never seen this before in 30 years - what is this?
  • From: Tom Gederberg
• What is this
  • From: Tom Gederberg
• Re: C code runs very slowly when called from g95 on i86-64
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: using dot_product from c++ II
  • From: Gerry Ford
• Re: Accessing Fortran 90 in c++, modules
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Accessing Fortran 90 in c++, modules
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: C code runs very slowly when called from g95 on i86-64
  • From: Gerry Ford
• Re: Accessing Fortran 90 in c++, modules
  • From: everphilski@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Accessing Fortran 90 in c++, modules
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Accessing Fortran 90 in c++, modules
  • From: everphilski@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Accessing Fortran 90 in c++, modules
  • From: everphilski@xxxxxxxxx
• C code runs very slowly when called from g95 on i86-64
  • From: legrape
• Re: Accessing Fortran 90 in c++, modules
  • From: fj
• Accessing Fortran 90 in c++, modules
  • From: everphilski@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Good way to fill integer array with successive indices?
  • From: Craig Powers
• Re: what about the option -time for g95?
  • From: Craig Powers
• Re: Good way to fill integer array with successive indices?
  • From: Jan Gerrit Kootstra
• Re: what about the option -time for g95?
  • From: qsc
• Re: what about the option -time for g95?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Good way to fill integer array with successive indices?
  • From: Mirko . Vukovic
• Re: Good way to fill integer array with successive indices?
  • From: Paul van Delst
• Re: Good way to fill integer array with successive indices?
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Good way to fill integer array with successive indices?
  • From: Mirko . Vukovic
• Re: what about the option -time for g95?
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: Way to autogenerate C/C++ Headers?
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: what about the option -time for g95?
  • From: qsc
• Re: what about the option -time for g95?
  • From: qsc
• Re: what about the option -time for g95?
  • From: qsc
• Re: what about the option -time for g95?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Program organization
  • From: Pierre Asselin
• Re: what about the option -time for g95?
  • From: qsc
• Re: what about the option -time for g95?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: what about the option -time for g95?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: what about the option -time for g95?
  • From: qsc
• what about the option -time for g95?
  • From: qsc
• Re: GFortran run time error codes. Where to find them?
  • From: Paul van Delst
• Re: Way to autogenerate C/C++ Headers?
  • From: fj
• Re: [ANN] TCBuild: A New Build Tool for Fortran
  • From: Paul van Delst
• Re: Program organization
  • From: jiho
• Re: Program organization
  • From: jiho
• Re: GFortran run time error codes. Where to find them?
  • From: FX
• Re: using dot_product from c++ II
  • From: FX
• Re: GFortran run time error codes. Where to find them?
  • From: Gerry Ford
• Re: GFortran run time error codes. Where to find them?
  • From: FX
• Re: OT Launched - pictures from Andoya, Norway - Andenes, Bleik, and the rocket range
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: Help requested troubleshooting code
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Help requested troubleshooting code
  • From: Gerry Ford
• Re: Is this a bug of Intel Fortran Compiler 10.1?
  • From: Gib Bogle
• Re: emacs support for Fortran 77
  • From: Glenn Morris
• Re: ALLOCATABLE arrays in TYPES with gfortran
  • From: Gerry Ford
• Re: GFortran run time error codes. Where to find them?
  • From: Gerry Ford
• Re: GFortran run time error codes. Where to find them?
  • From: Gerry Ford
• Re: using dot_product from c++ II
  • From: Gerry Ford
• Re: Help requested troubleshooting code
  • From: e p chandler
• Re: converter
  • From: luca . ammirabile
• Re: GFortran run time error codes. Where to find them?
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: [ANN] TCBuild: A New Build Tool for Fortran
  • From: FX
• Re: Fortran IV
  • From: Terence
• Re: GFortran run time error codes. Where to find them?
  • From: Paul van Delst
• Re: GFortran run time error codes. Where to find them?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: using dot_product from c++ II
  • From: Craig Powers
• [ANN] TCBuild: A New Build Tool for Fortran
  • From: Drew McCormack
• GFortran run time error codes. Where to find them?
  • From: Paul van Delst
• Re: Register variables in fortran ?
  • From: jamesgiles@xxxxxxx
• Re: Register variables in fortran ?
  • From: jamesgiles@xxxxxxx
• Re: Is this a bug of Intel Fortran Compiler 10.1?
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Re: Register variables in fortran ?
  • From: Gary Scott
• Re: Is this a bug of Intel Fortran Compiler 10.1?
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: Is this a bug of Intel Fortran Compiler 10.1?
  • From: hermitian
• Re: Register variables in fortran ?
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: Fortran IV
  • From: e p chandler
• Re: Way to autogenerate C/C++ Headers?
  • From: FX
• Re: Is this a bug of Intel Fortran Compiler 10.1?
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• Is this a bug of Intel Fortran Compiler 10.1?
  • From: hermitian
• Re: Way to autogenerate C/C++ Headers?
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: using dot_product from c++ II
  • From: utab
• Re: Way to autogenerate C/C++ Headers?
  • From: Helge Avlesen
• Re: more compiler switches
  • From: FX
• Re: Register variables in fortran ?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Register variables in fortran ?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Register variables in fortran ?
  • From: Ganesh
• Re: more compiler switches
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: Register variables in fortran ?
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Re: Register variables in fortran ?
  • From: Louis Krupp
• Re: Fortran IV
  • From: Louis Krupp
• Register variables in fortran ?
  • From: Ganesh
• Fortran IV
  • From: meister4G
• more compiler switches
  • From: Gerry Ford
• Re: Using pre-compiled program parts with FTN95
  • From: Gerry Ford
• Re: ALLOCATABLE arrays in TYPES with gfortran
  • From: rusi_pathan
• Re: ALLOCATABLE arrays in TYPES with gfortran
  • From: Damian
• Re: ALLOCATABLE arrays in TYPES with gfortran
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: ALLOCATABLE arrays in TYPES with gfortran
  • From: Rick
• Re: ALLOCATABLE arrays in TYPES with gfortran
  • From: Craig Powers
• Re: ALLOCATABLE arrays in TYPES with gfortran
  • From: Rick
• Re: ALLOCATABLE arrays in TYPES with gfortran
  • From: Rick
• Re: Reading a file with an unknown amount of data
  • From: robin
• Re: simulation using fortran
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: simulation using fortran
  • From: none
• Re: ALLOCATABLE arrays in TYPES with gfortran
  • From: rusi_pathan
• Re: ALLOCATABLE arrays in TYPES with gfortran
  • From: Craig Powers
• Re: ALLOCATABLE arrays in TYPES with gfortran
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• ALLOCATABLE arrays in TYPES with gfortran
  • From: Rick
• Re: simulation using fortran
  • From: Gary Scott
• Re: OT Launched - pictures from Andoya, Norway - Andenes, Bleik, and the rocket range
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: N1710 Moving the co-array feature into a TR in f2008!!!
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: integer overflow
  • From: Greg Lindahl
• Re: Getting information about Fortran95 structures
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Getting information about Fortran95 structures
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Is anyone using Intel Fortran under Mac OS X
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: Using pre-compiled program parts with FTN95
  • From: Mathemagician
• Is anyone using Intel Fortran under Mac OS X
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• Re: OT Launched - pictures from Andoya, Norway - Andenes, Bleik, and the rocket range
  • From: Kevin G. Rhoads
• emacs support for Fortran 77
  • From: deltaquattro
• Getting information about Fortran95 structures
  • From: McKinldj
• N1710 Moving the co-array feature into a TR in f2008!!!
  • From: Simulate
• Re: simulation using fortran
  • From: Gerry Ford
• Re: simulation using fortran
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: simulation using fortran
  • From: Richard Maine
• simulation using fortran
  • From: RAMI Y.
• Re: using dot_product from c++ II
  • From: Gerry Ford
• Re: Program organization
  • From: Ken Plotkin
• Re: integer overflow
  • From: Ken Plotkin
• Re: gfortran and g95 give surprisingly different performance on the FORALL construct.
  • From: Daniel Platt
• Re: integer overflow
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: integer overflow
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: Reading a file with an unknown amount of data
  • From: robin
• Re: integer overflow
  • From: robin
• Re: Bus error ?
  • From: robin
• Re: integer overflow
  • From: robin
• Re: integer overflow
  • From: robin
• Re: Reading a file with an unknown amount of data
  • From: robin
• Re: integer overflow
  • From: robin
• Re: integer overflow
  • From: robin
• Re: Program organization
  • From: David Frank
• Re: [ANN] binary of variant of gfortran release 4.2.3 for windows
  • From: FX
• Re: [ANN] binary of variant of gfortran release 4.2.3 for windows
  • From: Greg Lindahl
• Re: integer overflow
  • From: Greg Lindahl
• Re: integer overflow
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: 32 vs. 64 machines and unformatted files
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: OT Launched - pictures from Andoya, Norway - Andenes, Bleik, and the rocket range
  • From: Wade Ward
• using dot_product from c++ II
  • From: Gerry Ford
• Re: Can Fortran be used with DirectX to make games for Windows?
  • From: Gerry Ford
• Re: Help requested troubleshooting code
  • From: Zachary Davis
• Re: Help requested troubleshooting code
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Help requested troubleshooting code
  • From: Zachary Davis
• Re: Help requested troubleshooting code
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Help requested troubleshooting code
  • From: Tim Springer
• Re: Questions about open-source fortran distributions
  • From: Gerry Ford
• Re: Help requested troubleshooting code
  • From: Zachary Davis
• Re: Help requested troubleshooting code
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Help requested troubleshooting code
  • From: pixel
• Re: Help requested troubleshooting code
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: Help requested troubleshooting code
  • From: Zachary Davis
• Re: Help requested troubleshooting code
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: Help requested troubleshooting code
  • From: alexzenk
• Re: Help requested troubleshooting code
  • From: Zachary Davis
• Re: Help requested troubleshooting code
  • From: dominiq
• Re: Help requested troubleshooting code
  • From: fj
• Re: integer overflow
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Help requested troubleshooting code
  • From: Zachary Davis
• Re: Program organization
  • From: Craig Dedo
• Re: [ANN] binary of variant of gfortran release 4.2.3 for windows
  • From: FX
• Re: integer overflow
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: 32 vs. 64 machines and unformatted files
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: Program organization
  • From: Tom Micevski
• Re: Program organization
  • From: jiho
• Re: 32 vs. 64 machines and unformatted files
  • From: Thomas Koenig
• Re: [ANN] binary of variant of gfortran release 4.2.3 for windows
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: integer overflow
  • From: Greg Lindahl
• Re: Can Fortran be used with DirectX to make games for Windows?
  • From: GaryScott
• Re: Can Fortran be used with DirectX to make games for Windows?
  • From: Gib Bogle
• Re: Can Fortran be used with DirectX to make games for Windows?
  • From: Gib Bogle
• Re: Can Fortran be used with DirectX to make games for Windows?
  • From: Gib Bogle
• Re: Can Fortran be used with DirectX to make games for Windows?
  • From: GaryScott
• Re: Can Fortran be used with DirectX to make games for Windows?
  • From: uhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
• Re: Can Fortran be used with DirectX to make games for Windows?
  • From: GaryScott
• Re: Program organization
  • From: Craig Powers
• Re: Can Fortran be used with DirectX to make games for Windows?
  • From: uhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
• Re: Can Fortran be used with DirectX to make games for Windows?
  • From: ajmf77
• Re: Can Fortran be used with DirectX to make games for Windows?
  • From: uhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
• When elephants go berserk
  • From: uhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
• Re: Can Fortran be used with DirectX to make games for Windows?
  • From: ajmf77
• Re: Program organization
  • From: Sebastian Hanigk
• Re: Program organization
  • From: jiho
• Re: Program organization
  • From: Beliavsky
• Program organization
  • From: jiho
• Re: OT Launched - pictures from Andoya, Norway - Andenes, Bleik, and the rocket range
  • From: Kevin G. Rhoads
• Re: [ANN] binary of variant of gfortran release 4.2.3 for windows
  • From: FX
• Re: Can Fortran be used with DirectX to make games for Windows?
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: Can Fortran be used with DirectX to make games for Windows?
  • From: GaryScott
• Re: Can Fortran be used with DirectX to make games for Windows?
  • From: ajmf77
• Re: Can Fortran be used with DirectX to make games for Windows?
  • From: Paul van Delst
• Re: Can Fortran be used with DirectX to make games for Windows?
  • From: GaryScott
• "Gunman Slays 6 at N. Illinois University "
  • From: uhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
• Re: Can Fortran be used with DirectX to make games for Windows?
  • From: uhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
• Re: Can Fortran be used with DirectX to make games for Windows?
  • From: uhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
• Re: Questions about open-source fortran distributions
  • From: FX
• Re: Moderately OT: Scientific File Design
  • From: Les
• Re: Using pre-compiled program parts with FTN95
  • From: Catherine Rees Lay
• Re: Moderately OT: Scientific File Design
  • From: Catherine Rees Lay
• Re: Can Fortran be used with DirectX to make games for Windows?
  • From: Gib Bogle
• *** / Sell Gucci Moon Bag btbebay.com
  • From: sdf
• Re: integer overflow
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: using dot_product from c++
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: Can Fortran be used with DirectX to make games for Windows?
  • From: Louis Krupp
• Re: MCSD Resource
  • From: Gerry Ford
• Re: Way to autogenerate C/C++ Headers?
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: Can Fortran be used with DirectX to make games for Windows?
  • From: Gerry Ford
• Re: Questions about open-source fortran distributions
  • From: Gerry Ford
• Re: Can Fortran be used with DirectX to make games for Windows?
  • From: Gib Bogle
• Re: Questions about open-source fortran distributions
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: Difference between Intel Visual Fortran and Compaq VF
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: Variable Format Expressions (VFEs) (Was: Difference between Intel Visual Fortran and Compaq VF)
  • From: Gerry Ford
• Re: using dot_product from c++
  • From: Gerry Ford
• Re: using dot_product from c++
  • From: Gerry Ford
• Re: Questions about open-source fortran distributions
  • From: Gerry Ford
• Re: Moderately OT: Scientific File Design
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Moderately OT: Scientific File Design
  • From: J. F. Cornwall
• Re: Difference between Intel Visual Fortran and Compaq VF
  • From: Gib Bogle
• Re: Can Fortran be used with DirectX to make games for Windows?
  • From: uhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
• Re: integer overflow
  • From: Ian
• Re: Can Fortran be used with DirectX to make games for Windows?
  • From: uhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
• Re: Can Fortran be used with DirectX to make games for Windows?
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: Can Fortran be used with DirectX to make games for Windows?
  • From: Beliavsky
• Re: Can Fortran be used with DirectX to make games for Windows?
  • From: uhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
• Re: Can Fortran be used with DirectX to make games for Windows?
  • From: uhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
• Re: Can Fortran be used with DirectX to make games for Windows?
  • From: GaryScott
• Re: Variable Format Expressions (VFEs) (Was: Difference between Intel Visual Fortran and Compaq VF)
  • From: GaryScott
• Re: integer overflow
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: Questions about open-source fortran distributions
  • From: Craig Powers
• Re: Variable Format Expressions (VFEs) (Was: Difference between Intel Visual Fortran and Compaq VF)
  • From: jamesgiles@xxxxxxx
• Re: Can Fortran be used with DirectX to make games for Windows?
  • From: Craig Powers
• Re: Variable Format Expressions (VFEs) (Was: Difference between Intel Visual Fortran and Compaq VF)
  • From: jamesgiles@xxxxxxx
• Re: integer overflow
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Can Fortran be used with DirectX to make games for Windows?
  • From: uhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
• Re: Variable Format Expressions (VFEs) (Was: Difference between Intel Visual Fortran and Compaq VF)
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: using dot_product from c++
  • From: Craig Powers
• Re: Variable Format Expressions (VFEs) (Was: Difference between Intel Visual Fortran and Compaq VF)
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Way to autogenerate C/C++ Headers?
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Re: using dot_product from c++
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Re: integer overflow
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• Re: Variable Format Expressions (VFEs)
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Using pre-compiled program parts with FTN95
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• Re: Using pre-compiled program parts with FTN95
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Variable Format Expressions (VFEs) (Was: Difference between Intel Visual Fortran and Compaq VF)
  • From: Craig Dedo
• Re: integer overflow
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Using pre-compiled program parts with FTN95
  • From: Mathemagician
• Re: Moderately OT: Scientific File Design
  • From: Clive Page
• Re: using dot_product from c++
  • From: FX
• Re: Difference between Intel Visual Fortran and Compaq VF
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: using dot_product from c++
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: Type declarations are for n00bs?
  • From: Paul van Delst
• Re: Difference between Intel Visual Fortran and Compaq VF
  • From: Gary Scott
• Re: Type declarations are for n00bs?
  • From: Beliavsky
• Re: using dot_product from c++
  • From: utab
• Re: using dot_product from c++
  • From: utab
• Re: Difference between Intel Visual Fortran and Compaq VF
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Re: Difference between Intel Visual Fortran and Compaq VF
  • From: jwm
• Re: using dot_product from c++
  • From: FX
• Re: using dot_product from c++
  • From: utab
• Re: Type declarations are for n00bs?
  • From: Bil Kleb
• Re: integer overflow
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Moderately OT: Scientific File Design
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: Moderately OT: Scientific File Design
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: integer overflow
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: Way to autogenerate C/C++ Headers?
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: Questions about open-source fortran distributions
  • From: FX
• Re: Difference between Intel Visual Fortran and Compaq VF
  • From: Gib Bogle
• Re: Moderately OT: Scientific File Design
  • From: Craig Dedo
• Re: Moderately OT: Scientific File Design
  • From: Gary Scott
• Re: Moderately OT: Scientific File Design
  • From: J. F. Cornwall
• Re: Difference between Intel Visual Fortran and Compaq VF
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: Difference between Intel Visual Fortran and Compaq VF
  • From: Gary Scott
• Difference between Intel Visual Fortran and Compaq VF
  • From: yaqi
• Re: using dot_product from c++
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: using dot_product from c++
  • From: FX
• Re: Questions about open-source fortran distributions
  • From: FX
• Re: Questions about open-source fortran distributions
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: using dot_product from c++
  • From: Gerry Ford
• Re: Questions about open-source fortran distributions
  • From: Gerry Ford
• Re: Moderately OT: Scientific File Design
  • From: Mark Stucky
• Re: Moderately OT: Scientific File Design
  • From: Dr Ivan D. Reid
• Re: Moderately OT: Scientific File Design
  • From: Craig Dedo
• Re: using dot_product from c++
  • From: utab
• Re: Moderately OT: Scientific File Design
  • From: Craig Powers
• Re: Questions about open-source fortran distributions
  • From: Craig Powers
• Re: Type declarations are for n00bs?
  • From: Craig Powers
• Re: gfortran and g95 give surprisingly different performance on the FORALL construct.
  • From: Craig Powers
• Re: using dot_product from c++
  • From: Craig Powers
• Re: using dot_product from c++
  • From: Craig Powers
• Re: Moderately OT: Scientific File Design
  • From: GaryScott
• Re: Moderately OT: Scientific File Design
  • From: Patrick Nolan
• Re: Moderately OT: Scientific File Design
  • From: Mark Westwood
• Re: Moderately OT: Scientific File Design
  • From: Clive Page
• Re: Moderately OT: Scientific File Design
  • From: John Appleyard
• Re: using dot_product from c++
  • From: Ken . Fairfield
• Re: Moderately OT: Scientific File Design
  • From: Clive Page
• Re: Found ! [was Re: beginner question about exit values]
  • From: Ian Bush
• Found ! [was Re: beginner question about exit values]
  • From: Bernard Barbier
• Re: beginner question about exit values
  • From: Craig Dedo
• Re: need suggestions on Fortran editor in Linux
  • From: ajmf77
• integer overflow
  • From: alexzenk
• Re: Moderately OT: Scientific File Design
  • From: Craig Dedo
• Re: Moderately OT: Scientific File Design
  • From: Daniel Snouck
• Re: 32 vs. 64 machines and unformatted files
  • From: Steve Lionel
• integer overflow
  • From: alexzenk
• Re: beginner question about exit values
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: Moderately OT: Scientific File Design
  • From: Gordon Sande
• beginner question about exit values
  • From: Bernard Barbier
• Re: 32 vs. 64 machines and unformatted files
  • From: Gary Scott
• Moderately OT: Scientific File Design
  • From: Mark Westwood
• Re: Questions about open-source fortran distributions
  • From: Daniel Franke
• Re: Type declarations are for n00bs?
  • From: Catherine Rees Lay
• Re: Is it possible to invoke a Unix command within Fortran 90 source
  • From: Catherine Rees Lay
• Re: using dot_product from c++
  • From: utab
• Re: Terence, google, Minsk
  • From: Gerry Ford
• Re: 32 vs. 64 machines and unformatted files
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: run-time error M6104 : Math
  • From: RAMI Y.
• Re: using dot_product from c++
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Re: Questions about open-source fortran distributions
  • From: Gerry Ford
• Re: using dot_product from c++
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: Questions about open-source fortran distributions
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Questions about open-source fortran distributions
  • From: Gerry Ford
• Re: gfortran and g95 give surprisingly different performance on the FORALL construct.
  • From: hermitian
• Re: using dot_product from c++
  • From: Gerry Ford
• Re: Is it possible to invoke a Unix command within Fortran 90 source
  • From: tholen
• Re: using dot_product from c++
  • From: Ken . Fairfield
• Re: Type declarations are for n00bs?
  • From: Pierre Asselin
• Re: using dot_product from c++
  • From: James Giles
• Re: using dot_product from c++
  • From: Craig Powers
• Re: ISO_C_BINDING and generic interfaces
  • From: fj
• Re: run-time error M6104 : Math
  • From: Ken . Fairfield
• Re: using dot_product from c++
  • From: Ken . Fairfield
• Re: gfortran and g95 give surprisingly different performance on the FORALL construct.
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: gfortran and g95 give surprisingly different performance on the FORALL construct.
  • From: Craig Powers
• Re: using dot_product from c++
  • From: utab
• Re: using dot_product from c++
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: using dot_product from c++
  • From: utab
• Re: using dot_product from c++
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: 32 vs. 64 machines and unformatted files
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: using dot_product from c++
  • From: utab
• using dot_product from c++
  • From: utab
• Re: 32 vs. 64 machines and unformatted files
  • From: Paula
• Re: 32 vs. 64 machines and unformatted files
  • From: Steve Lionel
• 32 vs. 64 machines and unformatted files
  • From: Paula
• Re: ISO_C_BINDING and generic interfaces
  • From: Steven Correll
• Re: Exit code with Fortran 90
  • From: Gary Scott
• Re: need suggestions on Fortran editor in Linux
  • From: ajmf77
• Type declarations are for n00bs?
  • From: Bil Kleb
• Re: need suggestions on Fortran editor in Linux
  • From: relaxmike
• Re: run-time error M6104 : Math
  • From: Ken Plotkin
• Re: run-time error M6104 : Math
  • From: Luka Djigas
• Re: gfortran and g95 give surprisingly different performance on the FORALL construct.
  • From: James Giles
• gfortran and g95 give surprisingly different performance on the FORALL construct.
  • From: hermitian
• Re: Exit code with Fortran 90
  • From: Craig Dedo
• run-time error M6104 : Math
  • From: RAMI Y.
• Re: Exit code with Fortran 90
  • From: Gary Scott
• Re: need suggestions on Fortran editor in Linux
  • From: Craig Powers
• Re: Exit code with Fortran 90
  • From: Craig Dedo
• Re: fortran and unit testing
  • From: Tom
• Re: need suggestions on Fortran editor in Linux
  • From: twlaub
• Re: Exit code with Fortran 90
  • From: Andrea Francia
• Re: Exit code with Fortran 90
  • From: Gary Scott
• Re: ISO_C_BINDING and generic interfaces
  • From: fj
• Re: Exit code with Fortran 90
  • From: Andrea Francia
• Re: ISO_C_BINDING and generic interfaces
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: ISO_C_BINDING and generic interfaces
  • From: fj
• Re: ISO_C_BINDING and generic interfaces
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: ISO_C_BINDING and generic interfaces
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: ISO_C_BINDING and generic interfaces
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: ISO_C_BINDING and generic interfaces
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Write after nonadvancing read
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: need suggestions on Fortran editor in Linux
  • From: Sebastian Hanigk
• Re: Way to autogenerate C/C++ Headers?
  • From: Arjen Markus
• ISO_C_BINDING and generic interfaces
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: need suggestions on Fortran editor in Linux
  • From: hes selex
• Re: need suggestions on Fortran editor in Linux
  • From: Jan Gerrit Kootstra
• Re: Bus error ?
  • From: Thomas Koenig
• Re: need suggestions on Fortran editor in Linux
  • From: Sebastian Hanigk
• Re: Bus error ?
  • From: Luciel
• Re: Bus error ?
  • From: Luciel
• Re: need suggestions on Fortran editor in Linux
  • From: Ian
• Re: need suggestions on Fortran editor in Linux
  • From: Kamaraju S Kusumanchi
• Re: What is Standards Conformance? (Was: Is it possible to invoke a Unix command within Fortran 90 source)
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Hi
  • From: uhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
• Re: Bus error ?
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Re: Bus error ?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Bus error ?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Bus error ?
  • From: Luciel
• Re: Bus error ?
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Bus error ?
  • From: Luciel
• Re: need suggestions on Fortran editor in Linux
  • From: Gary Scott
• Re: Did anyone manage to get MATRAN compiled with g95?
  • From: Ken Fairfield
• Re: need suggestions on Fortran editor in Linux
  • From: david.baxendale@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: What is Standards Conformance? (Was: Is it possible to invoke a Unix command within Fortran 90 source)
  • From: Gary Scott
• Re: Write after nonadvancing read
  • From: Terence
• Re: Write after nonadvancing read
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: What is Standards Conformance? (Was: Is it possible to invoke a Unix command within Fortran 90 source)
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Replace one single line in a ascii data file
  • From: Clive Page
• Re: Write after nonadvancing read
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: Write after nonadvancing read
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Write after nonadvancing read
  • From: David Frank
• Write after nonadvancing read
  • From: Thomas Koenig
• Re: System call from FORTRAN
  • From: Richard L Walker
• Re: What is Standards Conformance? (Was: Is it possible to invoke a Unix command within Fortran 90 source)
  • From: Gerry Ford
• Re: What is Standards Conformance? (Was: Is it possible to invoke a Unix command within Fortran 90 source)
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: Matrix exponentiation in FORTRAN
  • From: paul . richard . thomas
• Re: need suggestions on Fortran editor in Linux
  • From: Gerry Ford
• Re: need suggestions on Fortran editor in Linux
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• need suggestions on Fortran editor in Linux
  • From: jun wen
• Re: Did anyone manage to get MATRAN compiled with g95?
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: OT Launched - pictures from Andoya, Norway - Andenes, Bleik, and the rocket range
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: computing Bernoulli numbers
  • From: robin
• Re: What is Standards Conformance? (Was: Is it possible to invoke a Unix command within Fortran 90 source)
  • From: Douglas Wells
• Re: compiler switch -c
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: Is it possible to invoke a Unix command within Fortran 90 source
  • From: Douglas Wells
• Re: [ANN] binary of variant of gfortran release 4.2.3 for windows
  • From: FX
• Re: reading what you write
  • From: Gene Wagenbreth
• Re: Matrix exponentiation in FORTRAN
  • From: Gerry Ford
• Re: compiler switch -c
  • From: Gerry Ford
• Re: reading what you write
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: reading what you write
  • From: James Giles
• Re: binary of variant of gfortran release 4.2.3 for windows
  • From: Gerry Ford
• Re: Is it possible to invoke a Unix command within Fortran 90 source
  • From: fj
• Re: compiler switch -c
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: Terence, google, Minsk
  • From: Gerry Ford
• Re: reading what you write
  • From: Gene Wagenbreth
• Re: compiler switch -c
  • From: Gerry Ford
• reading what you write
  • From: Gene Wagenbreth
• Re: Is it possible to invoke a Unix command within Fortran 90 source
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Is it possible to invoke a Unix command within Fortran 90 source
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Is it possible to invoke a Unix command within Fortran 90 source
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Way to autogenerate C/C++ Headers?
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• What is Standards Conformance? (Was: Is it possible to invoke a Unix command within Fortran 90 source)
  • From: Craig Dedo
• Re: Is it possible to invoke a Unix command within Fortran 90 source
  • From: Douglas Wells
• Re: Way to autogenerate C/C++ Headers?
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: Way to autogenerate C/C++ Headers?
  • From: Gary Scott
• Re: Way to autogenerate C/C++ Headers?
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: Way to autogenerate C/C++ Headers?
  • From: Gary Scott
• Re: Way to autogenerate C/C++ Headers?
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: Way to autogenerate C/C++ Headers?
  • From: fj
• Re: Way to autogenerate C/C++ Headers?
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: Is it possible to invoke a Unix command within Fortran 90 source
  • From: Catherine Rees Lay
• Re: Is it possible to invoke a Unix command within Fortran 90 source
  • From: fj
• Re: Way to autogenerate C/C++ Headers?
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: Way to autogenerate C/C++ Headers?
  • From: fj
• Re: Is it possible to invoke a Unix command within Fortran 90 source
  • From: tholen
• Re: Is it possible to invoke a Unix command within Fortran 90 source
  • From: FX
• Re: Is it possible to invoke a Unix command within Fortran 90 source
  • From: tholen
• Re: Way to autogenerate C/C++ Headers?
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: Is it possible to invoke a Unix command within Fortran 90 source
  • From: Douglas Wells
• Re: Is it possible to invoke a Unix command within Fortran 90 source
  • From: tholen
• Re: Is it possible to invoke a Unix command within Fortran 90 source
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: FORTRAN/VBA-EXCEL COMMON BLOCKS
  • From: Craig Powers
• Re: Replace one single line in a ascii data file
  • From: Thomas Koenig
• Re: FORTRAN/VBA-EXCEL COMMON BLOCKS
  • From: bjdesa
• Re: FORTRAN Unit Test Framework (FRUIT) 2.1 released
  • From: paul . richard . thomas
• Re: FORTRAN/VBA-EXCEL COMMON BLOCKS
  • From: Craig Powers
• Re: binary of variant of gfortran release 4.2.3 for windows
  • From: Ed
• Re: Matrix exponentiation in FORTRAN
  • From: none
• Re: Is it possible to invoke a Unix command within Fortran 90 source
  • From: tholen
• Re: Yapakit - a fortran editor
  • From: Michel Olagnon
• FORTRAN/VBA-EXCEL COMMON BLOCKS
  • From: bjdesa
• Re: Yapakit - a fortran editor
  • From: Michael Prager
• Re: Matrix exponentiation in FORTRAN
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Help with USE 'variable' visibility
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Is it possible to invoke a Unix command within Fortran 90 source code?
  • From: garylscott
• Re: Is it possible to invoke a Unix command within Fortran 90 source code?
  • From: Craig Dedo
• Re: Matrix exponentiation in FORTRAN
  • From: Ian Bush
• Matrix exponentiation in FORTRAN
  • From: Maayan
• Re: Is it possible to invoke a Unix command within Fortran 90 source code?
  • From: Les
• Re: Help with USE 'variable' visibility
  • From: Luis Cabellos
• Re: Is it possible to invoke a Unix command within Fortran 90 source code?
  • From: relaxmike
• Re: Help with USE 'variable' visibility
  • From: Luis Cabellos
• Re: Is it possible to invoke a Unix command within Fortran 90 source code?
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Is it possible to invoke a Unix command within Fortran 90 source code?
  • From: hermitian
• Re: Terence, google, Minsk
  • From: Terence
• Re: compiler switch -c
  • From: paul . richard . thomas
• Re: compiler switch -c
  • From: paul . richard . thomas
• Re: compiler switch -c
  • From: Gerry Ford
• Re: compiler switch -c
  • From: FX
• Re: passing fortran arrays
  • From: Gerry Ford
• Re: compiler switch -c
  • From: Gerry Ford
• Re: Way to autogenerate C/C++ Headers?
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: Yapakit - a fortran editor
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: Exit code with Fortran 90
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: compiler switch -c
  • From: Gerry Ford
• Re: Exit code with Fortran 90
  • From: MDArunkumar
• Re: [ANN] binary of variant of gfortran release 4.2.3 for windows
  • From: Gerry Ford
• Re: Yapakit - a fortran editor
  • From: rusi_pathan
• Re: compiler switch -c
  • From: e p chandler
• Re: Terence, google, Minsk
  • From: Dr Ivan D. Reid
• Re: Replace one single line in a ascii data file
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: compiler switch -c
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: compiler switch -c
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• compiler switch -c
  • From: Gerry Ford
• Re: Replace one single line in a ascii data file
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Yapakit - a fortran editor
  • From: yapakit . fortran
• Re: What's the meaning of "a model set of integers (reals)" in Fortran?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Replace one single line in a ascii data file
  • From: Thomas Koenig
• Re: Help with USE 'variable' visibility
  • From: dpb
• Re: Help with USE 'variable' visibility
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Help with USE 'variable' visibility
  • From: Luis Cabellos
• Re: Way to autogenerate C/C++ Headers?
  • From: nsdevelop12
• Re: Allocatable Arrays As Outputs
  • From: Judge
• Re: Way to autogenerate C/C++ Headers?
  • From: Damian
• Re: Way to autogenerate C/C++ Headers?
  • From: nsdevelop12
• Re: plz to help me to convert this fortran code to C
  • From: e p chandler
• Re: Replace one single line in a ascii data file
  • From: Gary Scott
• Re: redirect g77 under DOS 6.22- need output file
  • From: ophsfar
• Re: Is there a way to construct a generic "list" by Fortran 95?
  • From: Janne Blomqvist
• Re: Way to autogenerate C/C++ Headers?
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: Replace one single line in a ascii data file
  • From: relaxmike
• Re: TRANSFER on LOGICALs
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: Way to autogenerate C/C++ Headers?
  • From: fj
• Re: Way to autogenerate C/C++ Headers?
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: plz to help me to convert this fortran code to C
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: plz to help me to convert this fortran code to C
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: Terence, google, Minsk
  • From: Gerry Ford
• Re: Terence, google, Minsk
  • From: Terence
• Re: plz to help me to convert this fortran code to C
  • From: deltaseq0
• Re: Way to autogenerate C/C++ Headers?
  • From: nsdevelop12
• Re: plz to help me to convert this fortran code to C
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: plz to help me to convert this fortran code to C
  • From: Richard Maine
• Way to autogenerate C/C++ Headers?
  • From: nsdevelop12
• Re: plz to help me to convert this fortran code to C
  • From: dpb
• Re: plz to help me to convert this fortran code to C
  • From: prosenjitkonar@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: redirect g77 under DOS 6.22- need output file
  • From: dpb
• Re: redirect g77 under DOS 6.22- need output file
  • From: e p chandler
• Re: Replace one single line in a ascii data file
  • From: Les
• Re: Replace one single line in a ascii data file
  • From: dpb
• Re: Replace one single line in a ascii data file
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Replace one single line in a ascii data file
  • From: dpb
• Re: plz to help me to convert this fortran code to C
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Re: Terence, google, Minsk
  • From: Dr Ivan D. Reid
• Re: redirect g77 under DOS 6.22- need output file
  • From: dpb
• Re: plz to help me to convert this fortran code to C
  • From: Tim Prince
• Replace one single line in a ascii data file
  • From: relaxmike
• Re: plz to help me to convert this fortran code to C
  • From: Thomas M. Hermann
• Re: redirect g77 under DOS 6.22- need output file
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: plz to help me to convert this fortran code to C
  • From: Tim Prince
• redirect g77 under DOS 6.22- need output file
  • From: valentrd@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: converter
  • From: Luka Djigas
• Re: converter
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• Re: converter
  • From: prosenjitkonar@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: converter
  • From: prosenjitkonar@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: converter
  • From: Arjen Markus
• converter
  • From: prosenjitkonar@xxxxxxxxx
• plz to help me to convert this fortran code to C
  • From: prosenjitkonar
• Re: VOLATILE and EQUIVALENCE
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• sunset in eastern australia
  • From: Gerry Ford
• Re: Terence, google, Minsk
  • From: Terence
• Re: [ANN] binary of variant of gfortran release 4.2.3 for windows
  • From: Gerry Ford
• Re: Terence, google, Minsk
  • From: Gerry Ford
• Re: [ANN] binary of variant of gfortran release 4.2.3 for windows
  • From: FX
• Re: VOLATILE and EQUIVALENCE
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: VOLATILE and EQUIVALENCE
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: [ANN] binary of variant of gfortran release 4.2.3 for windows
  • From: Gerry Ford
• VOLATILE and EQUIVALENCE
  • From: FX
• Re: BIND(C) for dummy argument procedure
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Re: [ANN] binary of variant of gfortran release 4.2.3 for windows
  • From: FX
• Re: BIND(C) for dummy argument procedure
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: BIND(C) for dummy argument procedure
  • From: FX
• BIND(C) for dummy argument procedure
  • From: fj
• Re: TRANSFER on LOGICALs
  • From: James Giles
• Re: TRANSFER on LOGICALs
  • From: James Giles
• Re: TRANSFER on LOGICALs
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Re: TRANSFER on LOGICALs
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: passing fortran arrays
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: [ANN] binary of variant of gfortran release 4.2.3 for windows
  • From: post
• Re: [ANN] binary of variant of gfortran release 4.2.3 for windows
  • From: post
• Re: [ANN] binary of variant of gfortran release 4.2.3 for windows
  • From: post
• Re: passing fortran arrays
  • From: Damian
• Re: passing fortran arrays
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: passing fortran arrays
  • From: Damian
• Re: [ANN] binary of variant of gfortran release 4.2.3 for windows
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: G format question
  • From: Jerry DeLisle
• Re: [ANN] binary of variant of gfortran release 4.2.3 for windows
  • From: none
• Re: [ANN] binary of variant of gfortran release 4.2.3 for windows
  • From: FX
• [ANN] binary of variant of gfortran release 4.2.3 for windows
  • From: post
• Re: G format question
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: G format question
  • From: Jerry DeLisle
• Re: computing Bernoulli numbers
  • From: Gerry Ford
• Re: G format question
  • From: Gerry Ford
• Re: G format question
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: passing fortran arrays
  • From: Gerry Ford
• RE: passing fortran arrays
  • From: meek
• Re: passing fortran arrays
  • From: Gerry Ford
• G format question
  • From: Jerry DeLisle
• Re: passing fortran arrays
  • From: Gary Scott
• Re: passing fortran arrays
  • From: Gerry Ford
• Re: passing fortran arrays
  • From: fj
• Re: how do gfortran and ifort deal with C head files?
  • From: rusi_pathan
• Re: passing fortran arrays
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: Wrong code, I could not find the error
  • From: e p chandler
• passing fortran arrays
  • From: Isomorphismus
• Re: how do gfortran and ifort deal with C head files?
  • From: e p chandler
• Re: how do gfortran and ifort deal with C head files?
  • From: s1166
• Re: how do gfortran and ifort deal with C head files?
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Fortran user models Intra-Day Stock Market
  • From: David Frank
• Re: how do gfortran and ifort deal with C head files?
  • From: s1166
• Re: how do gfortran and ifort deal with C head files?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: how do gfortran and ifort deal with C head files?
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: how do gfortran and ifort deal with C head files?
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• how do gfortran and ifort deal with C head files?
  • From: s1166
• Re: What's the meaning of "a model set of integers (reals)" in Fortran?
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: Wrong code, I could not find the error
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: installing fruit
  • From: Gerry Ford
• Re: Wrong code, I could not find the error
  • From: utab
• Re: Wrong code, I could not find the error
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Re: Wrong code, I could not find the error
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Re: Wrong code, I could not find the error
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Wrong code, I could not find the error
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: Wrong code, I could not find the error
  • From: Gib Bogle
• Re: Which direction is Fortran going?
  • From: rusi_pathan
• Re: Wrong code, I could not find the error
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Wrong code, I could not find the error
  • From: Ron Shepard
• Re: Wrong code, I could not find the error
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Wrong code, I could not find the error
  • From: e p chandler
• Re: Type specification and initialization expressions
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Wrong code, I could not find the error
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Wrong code, I could not find the error
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Wrong code, I could not find the error
  • From: Sebastian Gallinat
• Re: Which direction is Fortran going?
  • From: qsc
• Wrong code, I could not find the error
  • From: utab
• Re: Fortran 2003: abstract interfaces
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: passing a variable number of args/vectors to a routine
  • From: dpb
• Re: IVF + Xp (32bit) = 3Gb
  • From: rih5342
• Re: What's the meaning of "a model set of integers (reals)" in Fortran?
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: Type specification and initialization expressions
  • From: Tobias Burnus
• Re: Which direction is Fortran going?
  • From: highegg
• Re: Which direction is Fortran going?
  • From: Luka Djigas
• Re: What's the meaning of "a model set of integers (reals)" in Fortran?
  • From: andy2O
• Re: Fortran 2003: abstract interfaces
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: What's the meaning of "a model set of integers (reals)" in Fortran?
  • From: hermitian
• Re: Terence, google, Minsk
  • From: Wade Ward
• Re: What's the meaning of "a model set of integers (reals)" in Fortran?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• What's the meaning of "a model set of integers (reals)" in Fortran?
  • From: hermitian
• Re: Automatically transform or expand do loop in a subroutine
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Automatically transform or expand do loop in a subroutine
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Automatically transform or expand do loop in a subroutine
  • From: James Giles
• Which direction is Fortran going?
  • From: Frank
• Re: installing fruit
  • From: Andrew Chen
• Re: passing a variable number of args/vectors to a routine
  • From: Mirko . Vukovic
• Re: Automatically transform or expand do loop in a subroutine
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: computing Bernoulli numbers
  • From: Gerry Ford
• Re: installing fruit
  • From: Gerry Ford
• Re: Automatically transform or expand do loop in a subroutine
  • From: FX
• Re: Automatically transform or expand do loop in a subroutine
  • From: Richard Maine

• Security
• UNIX
• Linux
• Coding
• Usenet

• Archive
• About
• Privacy
• Search
• Imprint

coding.derkeiler.com  > Archive  > Fortran  > comp.lang.fortran  > 2008-02