Re: Will Co-Array Fortran be considered a valuable tool for next-generation programming?
- From: GaryScott <garylscott@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 10:54:28 -0800 (PST)
On Feb 22, 12:45 pm, Dan Nagle <danna...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 2008-02-22 12:13:48 -0500, GaryScott <garylsc...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> said:
The more interesting question for me is why coarrays before we even
have the most basic multi-threading, process control/priorization,
etc. features in the language.
http://users.erols.com/dnagle/pub/pthread.f03
should get you started.
(Please don't complain about the file name suffix.
It's just there to warn you not to try this
with an f95 compiler!)
--
Cheers!
Dan Nagle
Yup, I'm very familiar with your nice repository of stuff. I peruse
it for ideas often.
.
- References:
- Will Co-Array Fortran be considered a valuable tool for next-generation programming?
- From: Tim Stitt
- Re: Will Co-Array Fortran be considered a valuable tool for next-generation programming?
- From: GaryScott
- Re: Will Co-Array Fortran be considered a valuable tool for next-generation programming?
- From: Dan Nagle
- Will Co-Array Fortran be considered a valuable tool for next-generation programming?
- Prev by Date: Re: Will Co-Array Fortran be considered a valuable tool for next-generation programming?
- Next by Date: Re: Is anyone using Intel Fortran under Mac OS X
- Previous by thread: Re: Will Co-Array Fortran be considered a valuable tool for next-generation programming?
- Next by thread: Re: Will Co-Array Fortran be considered a valuable tool for next-generation programming?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|