Re: what is wrong with this code?can someone walk me through this?



"Steven G. Kargl" <kargl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:fsesmg$8a6$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In article
<2536c6bf-4017-43c3-aa00-5d9eb8dd305e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
madhu0319@xxxxxxxxx writes:
Heres a fortran code to solve
....
source code:

IMPLICIT NONE
REAL*8 DERIV_FX,
DERIV_FY,N,RP,RF,RHO,UF,alpha,K,R0,U
REAL*8
Nu,x,y,y0,THETA,DT,T0,UT0,PI,T,THETA0,Stokes
REAL*8
UR0,b,x1,VX,VY,R,UT_K,UR_K,THETA2,MP,R2,x_i
INTEGER t_max, time
REAL*8 n_t
EXTERNAL FX, FY, DERIV_FX, DERIV_FY
COMMON Nu, RP, RF, MP, UF, alpha, K,
PI, Stokes, x_i
CALL read_parameters (t_max, alpha,
RHO, RP, RF, UF)
PI = 3.1415
Nu = 0.0000181

The problems in this code are too numerous to expend
the effort until you actual post code that has a just
to compile with any compiler.
You probably want that sentence back for a tune-up.

I swear I've seen the same content and coding style before, so I don't think
that the supplicant is the author.

A question for OP: what does stokes represent? What are you doing for the
next eighteen days?
--

"I am waiting for them to prove that God is really American."

~~ Lawrence Ferlinghetti


.

Relevant Pages