Re: data with metadata



"Gary Scott" <garylscott@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:NjXHj.5738$qT6.4654@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Gerry Ford wrote:

"Gary Scott" <garylscott@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:q2XHj.36585$J41.14342@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

*** Hendrickson wrote:

Gary Scott wrote:


Ken Plotkin wrote:


On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 04:57:24 -0700 (PDT), analyst41@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:



Would it be a good idea to define "fortran data sets" as part of the
language?


[snip]

No. Data format should not be part of a language.

Ken Plotkin


It would be of tremendous value tho if there was a standardized
database interface for Fortran.


Doesn't the C interoperability feature do this? Essentially any
set of library routines that can be described in terms of the C
features can be called from Fortran. I think most of the major
databases have a C interface.

Well, yes, but "yuk". At least if some vendor goes the rest of the way
and creates a ready-made module of declarations (and whatever else may be
needed to adapt to the "Fortran way". F90SQL only went part of the way,
retaining much of the horrid C'isms of the native API.

That's an unflattering description of what you have described as the
tools of your trade.

Not the tools of my trade, because I was unable to convince them to pay
for an unsupported package (F90SQL). No, the tools of the trade are VB
and .asp.
What were you refering to semi-recently as having been compiled in C?
--

"I am waiting for them to prove that God is really American."

~~ Lawrence Ferlinghetti


.