Re: Zero-size arrays
- From: Terence <tbwright@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 15:49:11 -0700 (PDT)
On Apr 5, 2:15 am, "James Van Buskirk" <not_va...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
....
The obvious problem is the size of the language. It got bigger from
f77 to f90, from f90 to f95, and from f95 to f03. The increase in
size from f90 to f95 is often underestimated by those who haven't
tried to make f95 compilers work on specification expressions.
Yup!
I stick with F77. It works. It does the job. I don't get to see or
hear of any bugs.
Like the early AT days, the first version of eevrything was GREAT;
then the acountants pushed the various companies to produce new
products for more money. So they 'improved' the first version, and
sucessively. You all see what happened.
All because memory got cheaper...
.
- References:
- Zero-size arrays
- From: relaxmike
- Re: Zero-size arrays
- From: Tobias Burnus
- Re: Zero-size arrays
- From: James Van Buskirk
- Zero-size arrays
- Prev by Date: Re: Any libraries for vector mask and vector population count?
- Next by Date: Re: Fortran 77 parser
- Previous by thread: Re: Zero-size arrays
- Next by thread: Re: Zero-size arrays
- Index(es):