Re: Are f.p. manipulation functions only used in initialization?
- From: "Anony" <invalid-email@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 12:34:46 GMT
"James Van Buskirk" <not_valid@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:eZudnecxz7swfY7VnZ2dnUVZ_remnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
So I presume your test was carried out on 32-bit Windows. As you
can see, same date build fails on 64-bit Windows. I recall that in
the earliest versions of gfortran for 64-bit Windows, all the single
precision intrinsics were missing. This may be a continuation of
that problem, but now for a subset of intrinsics rather than a
subset of KINDs. Steven Kargl's intuition about platform specificity
seems to have been accurate.
Yes. I was on 32-bit windows when I copied and pasted your program. Sorry,
not to see you are on win64.
It is nice to know there are people working on win64. Win64 seems not ready
yet. There are some problems, even affecting binutuls. RANLIB and AR also
have problem (It cannot be reproduced everytime.). There was one user who
complined "hang forever" without providing a code example (I never
eperienced the problem, and I have no idea).
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Are f.p. manipulation functions only used in initialization?
- From: James Van Buskirk
- Re: Are f.p. manipulation functions only used in initialization?
- From: Anony
- Re: Are f.p. manipulation functions only used in initialization?
- From: James Van Buskirk
- Are f.p. manipulation functions only used in initialization?
- Prev by Date: Re: Using external subroutines in OpenMP?
- Next by Date: Re: Are f.p. manipulation functions only used in initialization?
- Previous by thread: Re: Are f.p. manipulation functions only used in initialization?
- Next by thread: Re: Are f.p. manipulation functions only used in initialization?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|