Re: Are f.p. manipulation functions only used in initialization?
- From: "FX" <coudert@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 22:12:09 +0000 (UTC)
It's an OS issue. Look at -fdump-tree-original.
That's what I intend to do as soon as I get some time. There are two
things I suspect can happen, one of them is a GCC/gfortran issue (ie the
builtins themselves being wrongly defined, for example long vs. long
long) or an OS library issue. Wait and see!
--
FX
.
- References:
- Are f.p. manipulation functions only used in initialization?
- From: James Van Buskirk
- Re: Are f.p. manipulation functions only used in initialization?
- From: FX
- Re: Are f.p. manipulation functions only used in initialization?
- From: Steven G. Kargl
- Are f.p. manipulation functions only used in initialization?
- Prev by Date: Re: Are f.p. manipulation functions only used in initialization?
- Next by Date: Re: Using external subroutines in OpenMP?
- Previous by thread: Re: Are f.p. manipulation functions only used in initialization?
- Next by thread: Re: Are f.p. manipulation functions only used in initialization?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|