comp.lang.fortran
- Re: Module compile order
- Re: Garbage in dead zone
- Re: warning on running image !!!!!
- Re: Module compile order
- Re: Module compile order
- Module compile order
- Re: Fortran 90 Chess
- Re: Fortran 90 Chess
- Re: Is this legal?
- Re: NYT disses Fortran
- Re: Fortran 90 Chess
- Re: Garbage in dead zone
- Re: optional or interface
- Re: Binding name
- Re: CPAN equivalent for fortran?
- NYT disses Fortran
- Re: optional assumed-shape array
- Re: warning on running image !!!!!
- Re: .true. help
- optional or interface
- optional assumed-shape array
- Re: format with G descriptor
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: format with G descriptor
- Re: format with G descriptor
- Re: format with G descriptor
- Re: format with G descriptor
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- format with G descriptor
- Re: Is this legal?
- Re: Problem with file writing
- Re: Problem with file writing
- Re: Problem with file writing
- Problem with file writing
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- Re: .true. help
- Re: Arrays Intersection
- Re: Arrays Intersection
- Re: warning on running image !!!!!
- Re: Arrays Intersection
- Re: Arrays Intersection
- Re: Arrays Intersection
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Arrays Intersection
- Re: Arrays Intersection
- warning on running image !!!!!
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- Re: Arrays Intersection
- Re: Is this legal?
- Re: public/private and overloaded operator
- Re: Fortran 77 alphabet character $
- Re: newbie: that mapping CHARACTER*2 to INTEGER*2 question
- Arrays Intersection
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- Re: .true. help
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- Re: .true. help
- Re: .true. help
- Re: Interfacing between Fortran and C - a little utility
- Re: .true. help
- Re: Interfacing between Fortran and C - a little utility
- .true. help
- CPAN equivalent for fortran?
- Re: newbie: that mapping CHARACTER*2 to INTEGER*2 question
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- Re: Is this legal?
- Re: HPC Considered Harmful
- Re: Fortran 77 alphabet character $
- Re: Fortran 77 alphabet character $
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- Re: Fortran 77 alphabet character $
- Re: Fortran 77 alphabet character $
- Re: Fortran 77 alphabet character $
- Re: Fortran 77 alphabet character $
- Re: public/private and overloaded operator
- Re: Fortran 90 Chess
- public/private and overloaded operator
- From: mrestelli@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- Re: Slick or Slack
- Re: Slick or Slack
- Re: Fortran 77 alphabet character $
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- Re: Fortran 77 alphabet character $
- Re: Fortran 77 alphabet character $
- Re: Fortran 77 alphabet character $
- Re: Gfortran 4.4 binary (OpenMP and 64bit capability) for PPC Tiger
- Re: Is this legal?
- Re: Fortran 77 alphabet character $
- Re: Fortran 77 alphabet character $
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Fortran 77 alphabet character $
- Re: Fortran 77 alphabet character $
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- Re: Is this legal?
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- Is this legal?
- Re: Fortran 77 alphabet character $
- Fortran 77 alphabet character $
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- Re: 1.0d0 stored as integer?
- Re: problem with very small numbers - g95 versus gfortran
- Interfacing between Fortran and C - a little utility
- Re: problem with very small numbers - g95 versus gfortran
- Re: problem with very small numbers - g95 versus gfortran
- Re: Slick or Slack
- Re: problem with very small numbers - g95 versus gfortran
- Re: problem with very small numbers - g95 versus gfortran
- Re: problem with very small numbers - g95 versus gfortran
- Re: problem with very small numbers - g95 versus gfortran
- Re: Slick or Slack
- Re: problem with very small numbers - g95 versus gfortran
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- Re: Validation?
- Re: problem with very small numbers - g95 versus gfortran
- Re: problem with very small numbers - g95 versus gfortran
- Re: problem with very small numbers - g95 versus gfortran
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- Re: problem with very small numbers - g95 versus gfortran
- Re: Unsigned in CVF
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: 1.0d0 stored as integer?
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- Re: 1.0d0 stored as integer?
- Re: Fortran 90 Chess
- 1.0d0 stored as integer?
- Re: Gfortran 4.4 binary (OpenMP and 64bit capability) for PPC Tiger
- Slick or Slack
- HPC Considered Harmful
- Gfortran 4.4 binary (OpenMP and 64bit capability) for PPC Tiger
- problem with very small numbers - g95 versus gfortran
- Re: How to do AINS() and ADEL()
- Re: Reinitialising random number generator
- Re: How to do AINS() and ADEL()
- Re: Fortran 90 Chess
- Re: How to do AINS() and ADEL()
- Re: HDF read example
- Re: How to do AINS() and ADEL()
- Foray Build Tool Project Started
- RE: HDF read example
- Re: How to do AINS() and ADEL()
- How to do AINS() and ADEL()
- Re: Validation?
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- Re: Fortran algorithms to look for a maximum over an array of real numbers
- Re: Unsigned in CVF
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- Re: Unsigned in CVF
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Validation?
- Re: Unsigned in CVF
- Re: Unsigned in CVF
- Re: HDF read example
- Re: HDF read example
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- Re: Error compiling example program with gfortran using lapack95 on win32
- HDF read example
- Error compiling example program with gfortran using lapack95 on win32
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- Re: Unsigned in CVF
- Re: Unsigned in CVF
- Unsigned in CVF
- Re: Fortran algorithms to look for a maximum over an array of real numbers
- Fortran algorithms to look for a maximum over an array of real numbers
- Re: RtlMoveMemory not being found to link in
- Re: RtlMoveMemory not being found to link in
- Re: RtlMoveMemory not being found to link in
- Re: RtlMoveMemory not being found to link in
- Re: RtlMoveMemory not being found to link in
- Re: RtlMoveMemory not being found to link in
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- Re: RtlMoveMemory not being found to link in
- Re: GNU gfortran on Mac OSX
- Re: GNU gfortran on Mac OSX
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- Re: GNU gfortran on Mac OSX
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- Re: GNU gfortran on Mac OSX
- Re: RtlMoveMemory not being found to link in
- Re: GNU gfortran on Mac OSX
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- Re: GNU gfortran on Mac OSX
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- GNU gfortran on Mac OSX
- Re: Garbage in dead zone
- Re: Fortran 90 Chess
- Re: Fortran 90 Chess
- Re: Fortran 90 Chess
- Re: RtlMoveMemory not being found to link in
- Re: RtlMoveMemory not being found to link in
- Re: RtlMoveMemory not being found to link in
- Re: Garbage in dead zone
- Re: RtlMoveMemory not being found to link in
- RtlMoveMemory not being found to link in
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- Re: Garbage in dead zone
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Garbage in dead zone
- Re: newbie: that mapping CHARACTER*2 to INTEGER*2 question
- newbie: that mapping CHARACTER*2 to INTEGER*2 question
- Garbage in dead zone
- Re: Fortran 90 Chess
- Re: Fortran 90 Chess
- Re: Fortran 2003 questions
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- Re: I think the standard will be on my side (BOZ)
- Re: Fortran 2003 questions
- Re: Fortran 2003 questions
- Re: Fortran 2003 questions
- Re: Fortran 90 Chess
- Re: I think the standard will be on my side (BOZ)
- Re: Fortran 2003 questions
- Fortran 2003 questions
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- Re: Binding name
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- Re: Binding name
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- Re: Binding name
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- Re: allocatable array component with intent(out)
- Re: Binding name
- Re: Array Filtering
- Re: Binding name
- Re: Binding name
- Re: Array Filtering
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Array Filtering
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: allocatable array component with intent(out)
- Re: Array Filtering
- Re: Array Filtering
- Re: transfer filename to subroutine
- Re: about recursion function.
- Re: Array Filtering
- Re: Array Filtering
- Re: Array Filtering
- Re: allocatable array component with intent(out)
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: about recursion function.
- Re: about recursion function.
- Re: Array Filtering
- Re: transfer filename to subroutine
- about recursion function.
- Re: file copy routine
- Re: allocatable array component with intent(out)
- Re: Copying data between pointers
- Re: maximum open files and unit numbers
- Re: allocatable array component with intent(out)
- Re: allocatable array component with intent(out)
- Re: Binding name
- Fix: allocatable array component with intent(out)
- Re: allocatable array component with intent(out)
- Re: Array Filtering
- Re: Array Filtering
- allocatable array component with intent(out)
- Re: Array Filtering
- Re: Array Filtering
- Re: Array Filtering
- Array Filtering
- Re: Binding name
- Re: transfer filename to subroutine
- Re: Binding name
- Re: Reinitialising random number generator
- Re: Requirements for FINAL procedures
- Re: Binding name
- Re: Reinitialising random number generator
- Re: Reinitialising random number generator
- Re: transfer filename to subroutine
- Re: transfer filename to subroutine
- Re: Reinitialising random number generator
- Re: maximum open files and unit numbers
- Re: Reinitialising random number generator
- Re: transfer filename to subroutine
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Copying data between pointers
- Re: transfer filename to subroutine
- transfer filename to subroutine
- Re: encoding="utf-8" and formatted direct access
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: encoding="utf-8" and formatted direct access
- Re: ISO 10646 support
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- Re: file copy routine
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: file copy routine
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: file copy routine
- Re: Copying data between pointers
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: file copy routine
- Re: Copying data between pointers
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- Requirements for FINAL procedures
- Re: Copying data between pointers
- Re: Copying data between pointers
- Re: Requirements for FINAL procedures
- Re: file copy routine
- Re: Question about passing arrays to subroutines
- Re: file copy routine
- Re: file copy routine
- Re: KIND optional argument in transformational intrinsics
- Re: Fortran 90 Chess
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- Re: Reinitialising random number generator
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- Re: Reinitialising random number generator
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- Re: Reinitialising random number generator
- Re: Question about passing arrays to subroutines
- Re: Copying data between pointers
- Re: Reinitialising random number generator
- Re: Reinitialising random number generator
- Re: Question about passing arrays to subroutines
- Question about passing arrays to subroutines
- Re: Fortran 90 Chess
- Re: file copy routine
- Re: file copy routine
- Re: Reinitialising random number generator
- Re: Reinitialising random number generator
- Re: Reinitialising random number generator
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- Re: newbie: mapping CHARACTER*2 to INTEGER*2
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Copying data between pointers
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Reinitialising random number generator
- Re: Reinitialising random number generator
- Re: Reinitialising random number generator
- Re: Fortran 90 Chess
- From: Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
- Reinitialising random number generator
- Re: Writing nul characters, f90 formatted output
- Re: file copy routine
- Re: file copy routine
- Re: Copying data between pointers
- Re: Copying data between pointers
- Re: newbie: mapping CHARACTER*2 to INTEGER*2
- From: paul . richard . thomas
- Re: file copy routine
- Re: file copy routine
- Re: Fortran 90 Chess
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- Re: newbie: mapping CHARACTER*2 to INTEGER*2
- Re: Copying data between pointers
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Copying data between pointers
- Fortran 90 Chess
- Copying data between pointers
- Re: public comments
- Re: public comments
- Re: Dynamic CHAR length?
- Re: public comments
- Re: Creating .so file to call from IDL
- Re: public comments
- Re: newbie: mapping CHARACTER*2 to INTEGER*2
- Re: Creating .so file to call from IDL
- Re: Writing nul characters, f90 formatted output
- Re: maximum open files and unit numbers
- Re: file copy routine
- Re: maximum open files and unit numbers
- Re: maximum open files and unit numbers
- Re: Writing nul characters, f90 formatted output
- Re: Using external subroutines in OpenMP: Update
- Re: Writing nul characters, f90 formatted output
- Re: Writing nul characters, f90 formatted output
- Writing nul characters, f90 formatted output
- Re: maximum open files and unit numbers
- Re: maximum open files and unit numbers
- maximum open files and unit numbers
- newbie: mapping CHARACTER*2 to INTEGER*2
- public comments
- Re: encoding="utf-8" and formatted direct access
- Re: encoding="utf-8" and formatted direct access
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- Re: Fortran 2003 : no OO constructor ?
- Re: Fortran 2003 : no OO constructor ?
- Re: encoding="utf-8" and formatted direct access
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Variable size component in derived type
- RE: newbie: mapping CHARACTER*2 to INTEGER*2
- Re: Variable size component in derived type
- Re: ISO 10646 support
- Re: encoding="utf-8" and formatted direct access
- Re: encoding="utf-8" and formatted direct access
- Re: Variable size component in derived type
- Re: I need help about IF command
- Re: encoding="utf-8" and formatted direct access
- Re: encoding="utf-8" and formatted direct access
- Re: Dynamic CHAR length?
- Re: Using external subroutines in OpenMP: Update
- Re: encoding="utf-8" and formatted direct access
- Re: Variable size component in derived type
- Re: encoding="utf-8" and formatted direct access
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- Re: Variable size component in derived type
- Re: encoding="utf-8" and formatted direct access
- Re: Variable size component in derived type
- Re: Binding name
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- Re: Variable size component in derived type
- Re: Variable size component in derived type
- Re: Binding name
- Re: Fortran 2003 : no OO constructor ?
- Re: file copy routine
- Re: encoding="utf-8" and formatted direct access
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Binding name
- Re: encoding="utf-8" and formatted direct access
- Re: Dynamic CHAR length?
- Re: encoding="utf-8" and formatted direct access
- Re: encoding="utf-8" and formatted direct access
- Re: encoding="utf-8" and formatted direct access
- Re: Fortran 2003 : no OO constructor ?
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: encoding="utf-8" and formatted direct access
- Re: encoding="utf-8" and formatted direct access
- Re: Dynamic CHAR length?
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- Re: Variable size component in derived type
- Re: Binding name
- Re: Fortran 2003 : no OO constructor ?
- Re: Dynamic CHAR length?
- Using external subroutines in OpenMP: Update
- Re: Binding name
- Re: Binding name
- Re: I need help about IF command
- Re: I need help about IF command
- Re: Binding name
- Re: I need help about IF command
- Re: file copy routine
- Fortran 2003 : no OO constructor ?
- Re: encoding="utf-8" and formatted direct access
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: g95 writes 0.232699336-309 instead of 0.000000000E+00
- Re: I need help about IF command
- Re: g95 writes 0.232699336-309 instead of 0.000000000E+00
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: file copy routine
- Re: I need help about IF command
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: file copy routine
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- Re: Binding name
- Re: Binding name
- Re: Binding name
- Re: Binding name
- Re: Binding name
- Re: Dynamic CHAR length?
- Binding name
- Re: Variable size component in derived type
- Re: I need help about IF command
- Re: Variable size component in derived type
- I need help about IF command
- Re: Variable size component in derived type
- Re: Variable size component in derived type
- Re: Variable size component in derived type
- Re: secnds
- Variable size component in derived type
- Re: secnds
- secnds
- Re: encoding="utf-8" and formatted direct access
- Re: file copy routine
- Re: Ifort long compilation time
- Re: Dynamic CHAR length?
- Re: Dynamic CHAR length?
- Re: Ifort long compilation time
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: encoding="utf-8" and formatted direct access
- Re: DPROD issues
- Re: encoding="utf-8" and formatted direct access
- Re: encoding="utf-8" and formatted direct access
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Ifort long compilation time
- Re: encoding="utf-8" and formatted direct access
- Re: encoding="utf-8" and formatted direct access
- Re: KIND optional argument in transformational intrinsics
- Re: encoding="utf-8" and formatted direct access
- Re: encoding="utf-8" and formatted direct access
- Re: file copy routine
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- encoding="utf-8" and formatted direct access
- Re: file copy routine
- Re: Dynamic CHAR length?
- Re: Dynamic CHAR length?
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- Dynamic CHAR length?
- Re: g95 writes 0.232699336-309 instead of 0.000000000E+00
- Re: Yay!
- Re: Parsing gfortran error messages in emacs
- Re: g95 writes 0.232699336-309 instead of 0.000000000E+00
- Re: file copy routine
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- Re: g95 writes 0.232699336-309 instead of 0.000000000E+00
- Re: file copy routine
- Re: file copy routine
- Re: file copy routine
- opening files in psuite on NEC SX8
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- Re: g95 writes 0.232699336-309 instead of 0.000000000E+00
- Parsing gfortran error messages in emacs
- Re: g95 writes 0.232699336-309 instead of 0.000000000E+00
- Re: using gdb on windows
- line numbers was : one-liner for characater replacement (was: one-liner for characater replacement)
- Re: Yay!
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- Re: gfortran ---problem with random umber
- Re: Yay!
- Re: Ifort long compilation time
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- Re: gfortran ---problem with random umber
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- Re: Ifort long compilation time
- one-liner for characater replacement
- Re: KIND optional argument in transformational intrinsics
- Re: Ifort long compilation time
- Re: Ifort long compilation time
- Re: Yay!
- Re: DPROD issues
- Re: Ifort long compilation time
- Re: Yay!
- Re: KIND optional argument in transformational intrinsics
- Re: fl32 vs df in cvf6.6
- Creating .so file to call from IDL
- DPROD issues
- Re: CMPLX, REAL, and INT -- almost done
- Re: gfortran ---problem with random umber
- Yay!
- Re: CMPLX, REAL, and INT -- almost done
- Re: using gdb on windows
- Re: KIND optional argument in transformational intrinsics
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: gfortran ---problem with random umber
- Re: file copy routine
- Re: fl32 vs df in cvf6.6
- Re: file copy routine
- Re: Ifort long compilation time
- Re: Ifort long compilation time
- Re: fl32 vs df in cvf6.6
- Re: KIND optional argument in transformational intrinsics
- Re: file copy routine
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: file copy routine
- Ifort long compilation time
- From: braams@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: file copy routine
- Re: file copy routine
- Re: file copy routine
- Re: using gdb on windows
- Re: file copy routine
- Re: fl32 vs df in cvf6.6
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: fl32 vs df in cvf6.6
- Re: fl32 vs df in cvf6.6
- Re: file copy routine
- Re: Bad start on complex tests
- Re: file copy routine
- Re: using gdb on windows
- Re: file copy routine
- Re: Keyword arguments in intrinsics
- Re: Keyword arguments in intrinsics
- Re: Keyword arguments in intrinsics
- Re: file copy routine
- file copy routine
- Re: CMPLX, REAL, and INT -- almost done
- Re: CMPLX, REAL, and INT -- almost done
- Re: CMPLX, REAL, and INT -- almost done
- Re: weird g77 and gfortran
- Re: KIND optional argument in transformational intrinsics
- Re: KIND optional argument in transformational intrinsics
- Re: KIND optional argument in transformational intrinsics
- Re: gfortran ---problem with random umber
- Re: g95 writes 0.232699336-309 instead of 0.000000000E+00
- Re: g95 writes 0.232699336-309 instead of 0.000000000E+00
- Re: g95 writes 0.232699336-309 instead of 0.000000000E+00
- Re: gfortran ---problem with random umber
- Re: gfortran ---problem with random umber
- Re: KIND optional argument in transformational intrinsics
- Re: KIND optional argument in transformational intrinsics
- Re: KIND optional argument in transformational intrinsics
- Re: KIND optional argument in transformational intrinsics
- Re: KIND optional argument in transformational intrinsics
- Re: Bad start on complex tests
- Re: Bad start on complex tests
- Re: KIND optional argument in transformational intrinsics
- Re: Bad start on complex tests
- Re: Bad start on complex tests
- Re: Bad start on complex tests
- Re: Bad start on complex tests
- Re: Bad start on complex tests
- Re: gfortran ---problem with random umber
- Re: Bad start on complex tests
- Re: Bad start on complex tests
- Re: Bad start on complex tests
- Re: gfortran ---problem with random umber
- Re: gfortran ---problem with random umber
- Re: g95 writes 0.232699336-309 instead of 0.000000000E+00
- Re: gfortran ---problem with random umber
- Re: g95 writes 0.232699336-309 instead of 0.000000000E+00
- Re: Bad start on complex tests
- Re: g95 writes 0.232699336-309 instead of 0.000000000E+00
- Re: g95 writes 0.232699336-309 instead of 0.000000000E+00
- Re: Bad start on complex tests
- Re: g95 writes 0.232699336-309 instead of 0.000000000E+00
- Re: gfortran ---problem with random umber
- Re: compiler problem
- Re: Bad start on complex tests
- Re: Bad start on complex tests
- Re: Bad start on complex tests
- Re: g95 writes 0.232699336-309 instead of 0.000000000E+00
- Re: g95 writes 0.232699336-309 instead of 0.000000000E+00
- Re: g95 writes 0.232699336-309 instead of 0.000000000E+00
- g95 writes 0.232699336-309 instead of 0.000000000E+00
- Re: ISO_C_BINDING and BLAS/LAPACK
- Re: using gdb on windows
- Bad start on complex tests
- Re: gfortran ---problem with random umber
- Re: KIND optional argument in transformational intrinsics
- Re: gfortran ---problem with random umber
- Re: gfortran ---problem with random umber
- Re: weird g77 and gfortran
- KIND optional argument in transformational intrinsics
- Keyword arguments in intrinsics
- Re: Pointers question
- Re: fl32 vs df in cvf6.6
- Re: fl32 vs df in cvf6.6
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: gfortran ---problem with random umber
- Re: compiler problem
- Re: gfortran ---problem with random umber
- Re: gfortran ---problem with random umber
- Re: gfortran ---problem with random umber
- gfortran ---problem with random umber
- Re: compiler problem
- Re: fl32 vs df in cvf6.6
- using gdb on windows
- Re: fl32 vs df in cvf6.6
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: fl32 vs df in cvf6.6
- Re: fl32 vs df in cvf6.6
- Re: Pointers question
- Re: Pointers question
- [fixed] Opening too much time files cause a segmentation fault
- Re: CMPLX, REAL, and INT -- almost done
- Re: fl32 vs df in cvf6.6
- Re: CMPLX, REAL, and INT -- almost done
- Re: fl32 vs df in cvf6.6
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Pointers question
- Re: Pointers question
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: fl32 vs df in cvf6.6
- Re: Sorting arrays
- Re: GFortran - OpenMP problem with Windows XP memory
- Re: weird g77 and gfortran
- Re: fl32 vs df in cvf6.6
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: fl32 vs df in cvf6.6
- Re: fl32 vs df in cvf6.6
- Re: fl32 vs df in cvf6.6
- From: formulae translator
- Re: GFortran - OpenMP problem with Windows XP memory
- Re: fl32 vs df in cvf6.6
- From: formulae translator
- Re: fl32 vs df in cvf6.6
- Re: fl32 vs df in cvf6.6
- Re: fl32 vs df in cvf6.6
- Re: fl32 vs df in cvf6.6
- IBM XLFortran 8.1 on MacOSX 10.5 (Leopard)
- fl32 vs df in cvf6.6
- From: formulae translator
- fl32 vs df
- From: formulae translator
- fl32 vs df
- From: formulae translator
- Pointers question
- Re: advance=no problem
- Re: Array sections and F90/95 Standard
- Re: Recursive function (with allocatable inside)
- Re: Sorting arrays
- Re: Derived types and allocatable
- Re: advance=no problem
- Re: advance=no problem
- Re: Sorting arrays
- Re: CMPLX, REAL, and INT -- almost done
- Re: Sorting arrays
- Re: CMPLX, REAL, and INT -- almost done
- Re: How to determine whether or not there exists a directory
- Re: Sorting arrays
- Re: How to determine whether or not there exists a directory
- Re: Sorting arrays
- Re: advance=no problem
- Re: Sorting arrays
- Re: advance=no problem
- Re: advance=no problem
- CMPLX, REAL, and INT -- almost done
- Re: [ifort] Opening too much time files cause a segmentation fault
- Re: [ifort] Opening too much time files cause a segmentation fault
- Re: Recursive function (with allocatable inside)
- Re: Sorting arrays
- Re: GFortran - OpenMP problem with Windows XP memory
- Re: GFortran - OpenMP problem with Windows XP memory
- [ifort] Opening too much time files cause a segmentation fault
- Re: Derived types and allocatable
- Re: Derived types and allocatable
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: advance=no problem
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Derived types and allocatable
- Re: Derived types and allocatable
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Sorting arrays
- Re: Derived types and allocatable
- Re: Derived types and allocatable
- Re: advance=no problem
- Re: advance=no problem
- Re: advance=no problem
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: I think the standard will be on my side (BOZ)
- Re: advance=no problem
- Re: How to determine whether or not there exists a directory
- Re: How to determine whether or not there exists a directory
- Re: I think the standard will be on my side (BOZ)
- Re: Derived types and allocatable
- Re: I think the standard will be on my side (BOZ)
- Re: Array sections and F90/95 Standard
- Re: Recursive function (with allocatable inside)
- Re: How to determine whether or not there exists a directory
- Re: Recursive function (with allocatable inside)
- Re: advance=no problem
- Re: advance=no problem
- Re: Recursive function (with allocatable inside)
- Re: advance=no problem
- Re: How to determine whether or not there exists a directory
- Re: advance=no problem
- Re: advance=no problem
- Re: Array sections and F90/95 Standard
- Re: Recursive function (with allocatable inside)
- Re: Array sections and F90/95 Standard
- Re: Array sections and F90/95 Standard
- Sorting arrays
- Re: Array sections and F90/95 Standard
- Re: weird g77 and gfortran
- Re: Recursive function (with allocatable inside)
- Array sections and F90/95 Standard
- Re: Recursive function (with allocatable inside)
- Re: Recursive function (with allocatable inside)
- Re: How to distinguish between numerical data and alphanumeric title
- Recursive function (with allocatable inside)
- Re: Derived types and allocatable
- Re: How to determine whether or not there exists a directory
- Re: How to determine whether or not there exists a directory
- Re: advance=no problem
- Re: advance=no problem
- Re: advance=no problem
- Re: How to distinguish between numerical data and alphanumeric title
- Re: Bitwise logical functions in gfortran
- Re: advance=no problem
- Re: advance=no problem
- Re: advance=no problem
- Re: How to determine whether or not there exists a directory
- Re: advance=no problem
- Re: How to determine whether or not there exists a directory
- Re: advance=no problem
- Re: I think the standard will be on my side (BOZ)
- Re: advance=no problem
- Re: GFortran - OpenMP problem with Windows XP memory
- Re: How to distinguish between numerical data and alphanumeric title
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: How to determine whether or not there exists a directory
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Bitwise logical functions in gfortran
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Bitwise logical functions in gfortran
- Re: advance=no problem
- Re: GFortran - OpenMP problem with Windows XP memory
- Re: I think the standard will be on my side (BOZ)
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: GFortran - OpenMP problem with Windows XP memory
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: GFortran - OpenMP problem with Windows XP memory
- Re: Bitwise logical functions in gfortran
- Re: How to determine whether or not there exists a directory
- Re: ISO 10646 support
- Re: Bitwise logical functions in gfortran
- Re: How to determine whether or not there exists a directory
- Re: How to distinguish between numerical data and alphanumeric title
- Bitwise logical functions in gfortran
- Re: advance=no problem
- Re: advance=no problem
- Re: GFortran - OpenMP problem with Windows XP memory
- Re: GFortran - OpenMP problem with Windows XP memory
- Re: I think the standard will be on my side (BOZ)
- Re: How to distinguish between numerical data and alphanumeric title
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: How to distinguish between numerical data and alphanumeric title
- Re: I think the standard will be on my side (BOZ)
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: GFortran - OpenMP problem with Windows XP memory
- Re: I think the standard will be on my side (BOZ)
- Re: GFortran - OpenMP problem with Windows XP memory
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: GFortran - OpenMP problem with Windows XP memory
- GFortran - OpenMP problem with Windows XP memory
- Re: I think the standard will be on my side (BOZ)
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: How to distinguish between numerical data and alphanumeric title
- Re: weird g77 and gfortran
- Re: I think the standard will be on my side (BOZ)
- Re: weird g77 and gfortran
- Re: How to distinguish between numerical data and alphanumeric title
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: MPI code error raises a question
- Re: advance=no problem
- Re: advance=no problem
- Re: weird g77 and gfortran
- Re: How to determine whether or not there exists a directory
- Re: How to determine whether or not there exists a directory
- Re: advance=no problem
- Re: weird g77 and gfortran
- Re: How to distinguish between numerical data and alphanumeric title
- Re: How to distinguish between numerical data and alphanumeric title
- Re: How to determine whether or not there exists a directory
- Re: weird g77 and gfortran
- Re: How to distinguish between numerical data and alphanumeric title
- Re: weird g77 and gfortran
- Re: How to distinguish between numerical data and alphanumeric title
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: I think the standard will be on my side (BOZ)
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: How to distinguish between numerical data and alphanumeric title
- Re: How to determine whether or not there exists a directory
- How to determine whether or not there exists a directory
- Re: How to distinguish between numerical data and alphanumeric title
- How to distinguish between numerical data and alphanumeric title
- Re: advance=no problem
- Re: MPI code error raises a question
- Re: I think the standard will be on my side (BOZ)
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: advance=no problem
- Re: advance=no problem
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: advance=no problem
- Re: compiler problem
- Re: compiler problem
- Re: advance=no problem
- Re: compiler problem
- Re: compiler problem
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: advance=no problem
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: advance=no problem
- Re: advance=no problem
- Re: advance=no problem
- Re: compiler problem
- Re: advance=no problem
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: advance=no problem
- Re: compiler problem
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Identifier name length in g77
- Re: compiler problem
- Re: compiler problem
- Re: derived type as argument
- Re: Subroutine header
- Re: Identifier name length in g77
- Re: advance=no problem
- Re: advance=no problem
- advance=no problem
- Re: Identifier name length in g77
- Identifier name length in g77
- Re: CMPLX and constant folding
- Re: Subroutine header
- Re: CMPLX and constant folding
- Re: derived type as argument
- Re: CMPLX and constant folding
- Re: I think the standard will be on my side (BOZ)
- Re: I think the standard will be on my side (BOZ)
- Subroutine header
- Re: Perverse G77 syntax extension
- ISO_C_BINDING and BLAS/LAPACK
- Re: derived type as argument
- ISO 10646 support
- Re: derived type as argument
- Re: ranlux
- From: Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
- derived type as argument
- Re: CMPLX and constant folding
- Re: I think the standard will be on my side (BOZ)
- Re: I think the standard will be on my side (BOZ)
- Re: I think the standard will be on my side (BOZ)
- Re: I think the standard will be on my side (BOZ)
- Re: I think the standard will be on my side (BOZ)
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: I think the standard will be on my side (BOZ)
- Re: I think the standard will be on my side (BOZ)
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: I think the standard will be on my side (BOZ)
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: I think the standard will be on my side (BOZ)
- Re: I think the standard will be on my side (BOZ)
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: I think the standard will be on my side (BOZ)
- Re: compiler problem
- Re: I think the standard will be on my side (BOZ)
- Re: I think the standard w