Re: Fortran 77 alphabet character $

From: user1 <user@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 08:18:32 -0400

Moot point though since thte code violates the Standard in
many places by passing DP arrays to every type under the sun (even Integer*2). G95 correctly rejects these illegal
but often prevelent parameter/argument mappings.

Are caller and callee in same source file ? Perhaps you could break it up - each subprogram in a separate file, compile separately. Fsplit may help.

.

References:
- Fortran 77 alphabet character $
  - From: Herman D . Knoble
- Re: Fortran 77 alphabet character $
  - From: mecej4
- Re: Fortran 77 alphabet character $
  - From: Herman D . Knoble

Prev by Date: Re: newbie: that mapping CHARACTER*2 to INTEGER*2 question
Next by Date: Re: public/private and overloaded operator
Previous by thread: Re: Fortran 77 alphabet character $
Next by thread: Re: Fortran 77 alphabet character $
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: ISampleGrabber
... > by any chance post the code that you took out of qedit.h and put in a ... > separate file?? ... > I seem to be either missing something or I have just got it wrong.. ... source file that uses qedit.h and the rest of my source files use the D3D ...
(microsoft.public.win32.programmer.directx.video)
Re: ISampleGrabber
... >> I seem to be having a problem getting the NullRenderer to compile, ... >> separate file?? ... > source file that uses qedit.h and the rest of my source files use the D3D ...
(microsoft.public.win32.programmer.directx.video)
Re: reason for having separate package.lisp?
... I wonder why package.lisp in asdf systems is a separate file? ... I'd like to have defpackage form inside ... the source file sometimes. ... you may have packages big enough that you want to implement ...
(comp.lang.lisp)