Re: public/private and overloaded operator
- From: Steve Lionel <Steve.Lionel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 08:23:23 -0400
On Thu, 29 May 2008 15:28:40 -0700, nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Richard Maine)
wrote:
You might want to look at the
particular compiler options for controlling the version of the standard
that messages are produced for; some compilers have multiple options
there.
Unfortunately this won't help with ifort. I'll make sure that this is brought
to the attention of the appropriate folk.
--
Steve Lionel
Developer Products Division
Intel Corporation
Nashua, NH
For email address, replace "invalid" with "com"
User communities for Intel Software Development Products
http://softwareforums.intel.com/
Intel Fortran Support
http://support.intel.com/support/performancetools/fortran
My Fortran blog
http://www.intel.com/software/drfortran
.
- References:
- public/private and overloaded operator
- From: mrestelli@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: public/private and overloaded operator
- From: Richard Maine
- public/private and overloaded operator
- Prev by Date: Re: Fortran 77 alphabet character $
- Next by Date: Re: Is this legal?
- Previous by thread: Re: public/private and overloaded operator
- Next by thread: CPAN equivalent for fortran?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
