optional or interface

Hi

Very often, I need to modify the procedure to fit more extensible
purpose. Then I choose to add more optional arguments in the current
procedure. I don't like to write another similar procedure and use
interface, since there will be lots of similar procedures and then
hard to manage them.
However, it will be harder and harder to write more generic procedures
when demands are more general.
I'd like to ask how you decide which one (or any other one) to be
used.

Thank you in advance.

Mike
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: optional or interface
    ... Arjen Markus wrote: ... I need to modify the procedure to fit more extensible ... purpose. ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)
  • Re: Re: they are ranging such as the suburb now, wont urge blades later
    ... modify them? ... Where did Zebediah top the review to the inclined ... fit might send some inappropriate pans. ... emphasizing in conjunction with cautious, minus wrong, depending on ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: Bug Tracking integration with MS Project Server
    ... It's fit for your purpose. ... > my task to one of my team members and I need to add/update a deliverable, ... > My experience with Bugzilla (and other Bug Tracking apps) is that this type ...
    (microsoft.public.project)
  • Re: Planning on buying Vista?
    ... In the UK we have a law about goods you buy being "fit for purpose". ... than 512MB of RAM, and it caused the OS to crash. ...
    (rec.photo.digital)
  • Re: Working while on income support
    ... As an aside, it's an interesting phrase, this "not fit for purpose", isn't it? ... At one time, you only encountered it in a technical/engineering or maybe a military sense, but since some here yesterday / gone yesterday politician started using it, it's really taken off as a trendyism. ...
    (uk.legal)