Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- From: dpb <none@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2008 08:01:20 -0500
James Giles wrote:
....
And I left out whole-array operations. Are they simple enough?
As I mentioned before, I probably left out a whole lot of important
stuff.
I'm not a language designer by any stretch but I can't imagine designing a simple, prototyping language w/o the feature. In my mind, other than free form source, the largest contribution of F90/95.
I'm also curious about the earlier proscription on ALLOCATABLE--unless you're intending transparent allocation/assignment a la Matlab for a prototyping, simple language. To me, the removal of fixed memory requirements is mandatory for simplicity in writing/prototyping (albeit w/ a lack of performance unless somewhat careful, but this is prototyping, right?)
That said, and while it's some interest, I'm curious why OP asked for that as a target since earlier emphasis seemed to be on large corporate clients.
--
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- From: James Giles
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- References:
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- From: analyst41
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- From: James Giles
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- From: James Giles
- Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- Prev by Date: writing in a file in parallel execution
- Next by Date: Re: optional or interface
- Previous by thread: Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- Next by thread: Re: one-liner for characater replacement
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|