Re: TYPE declaration/statement in Fortran 77 code
- From: Steve Lionel <steve.lionel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 12:10:23 +0200
Arjen Markus wrote:
Replace TYPE by PRINT or WRITE(*,*).It seems strange to me (at least in this case) that I should replace
TYPE with 'PRINT *,' or 'WRITE(*,*)', as that would still prevent the
code from compiling (IMPLICIT NONE statement is included in the
routines).
I doubt this is the correct substitution. In the implementations I have seen where TYPE is an I/O statement, it is interchangeable with "PRINT" and still requires a format specifier. Given the code sample, I'd guess that this is some odd declaration syntax instead. Perhaps if we saw more of the code we'd have a better idea of what to suggest.
--
Steve Lionel
Developer Products Division
Intel Corporation
Nashua, NH
For email address, replace "invalid" with "com"
User communities for Intel Software Development Products
http://softwareforums.intel.com/
Intel Fortran Support
http://support.intel.com/support/performancetools/fortran
My Fortran blog
http://www.intel.com/software/drfortran
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: TYPE declaration/statement in Fortran 77 code
- From: wim
- Re: TYPE declaration/statement in Fortran 77 code
- From: Klaus Wacker
- Re: TYPE declaration/statement in Fortran 77 code
- References:
- TYPE declaration/statement in Fortran 77 code
- From: wim
- Re: TYPE declaration/statement in Fortran 77 code
- From: mecej4
- Re: TYPE declaration/statement in Fortran 77 code
- From: wim
- Re: TYPE declaration/statement in Fortran 77 code
- From: Arjen Markus
- TYPE declaration/statement in Fortran 77 code
- Prev by Date: Re: TYPE declaration/statement in Fortran 77 code
- Next by Date: Re: The linf project (2)
- Previous by thread: Re: TYPE declaration/statement in Fortran 77 code
- Next by thread: Re: TYPE declaration/statement in Fortran 77 code
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
