Re: TYPE declaration/statement in Fortran 77 code
- From: Terence <tbwright@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 15:52:17 -0700 (PDT)
On Jun 16, 4:22 am, glen herrmannsfeldt <g...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I presume it was so the compiler could figure out which
were functions and which were arrays.
How many times have you seen someone forget to put in the DIMENSION
statement and found the compiler thought it was a function?
I think that was the underlying idea; hence the one extra character
allowed in the main program, because the subprograms had to use an
added trailing F...
When you learn a new related rule which replaced an older one, the old
rule is slowly erased in the brain...
A survival feature?
.
- References:
- TYPE declaration/statement in Fortran 77 code
- From: wim
- Re: TYPE declaration/statement in Fortran 77 code
- From: mecej4
- Re: TYPE declaration/statement in Fortran 77 code
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: TYPE declaration/statement in Fortran 77 code
- From: Terence
- Re: TYPE declaration/statement in Fortran 77 code
- From: dpb
- Re: TYPE declaration/statement in Fortran 77 code
- From: Terence
- Re: TYPE declaration/statement in Fortran 77 code
- From: James Giles
- Re: TYPE declaration/statement in Fortran 77 code
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: TYPE declaration/statement in Fortran 77 code
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: TYPE declaration/statement in Fortran 77 code
- From: Gary Scott
- Re: TYPE declaration/statement in Fortran 77 code
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: TYPE declaration/statement in Fortran 77 code
- From: Gary Scott
- Re: TYPE declaration/statement in Fortran 77 code
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- TYPE declaration/statement in Fortran 77 code
- Prev by Date: Re: TYPE declaration/statement in Fortran 77 code
- Next by Date: Re: TYPE declaration/statement in Fortran 77 code
- Previous by thread: Re: TYPE declaration/statement in Fortran 77 code
- Next by thread: Re: TYPE declaration/statement in Fortran 77 code
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|