Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 12:48:40 -0800
Dan Nagle wrote:
(snip)
So how will *N notation select among different radixes,
even limiting the choice to what's available in hardware?
It won't, but neither does "DOUBLE PRECISION".
I read his post mostly as a request for "REAL*8" as
a synonym for "DOUBLE PRECISION", (not counting the
first sentence).
Also, not to remove the KIND mechanism but only legitimize
the practice used in much old code and some quickly written
new code. (For a simple test, the declaration might be
more than half the program!)
-- glen
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- From: Clive Page
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- From: Dan Nagle
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- References:
- Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- From: Clive Page
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- From: John Appleyard
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- From: Dan Nagle
- Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- Prev by Date: Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- Next by Date: Overflow errror--what could cause this?
- Previous by thread: Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- Next by thread: Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|