Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- From: Dan Nagle <dannagle@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 00:41:41 GMT
Hello,
On 2008-06-27 20:07:56 -0400, lindahl@xxxxxxx (Greg Lindahl) said:
programmers asked for what ended up being 36 bit variables when 32
would have worked most of the time.
Pray please explain how the kind system
allows the requirement of bit-sizes.
--
Cheers!
Dan Nagle
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- From: William Clodius
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- From: Greg Lindahl
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- References:
- Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- From: Clive Page
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- From: John Appleyard
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- From: Dan Nagle
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- From: Dan Nagle
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- From: Greg Lindahl
- Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- Prev by Date: Re: Overflow errror--what could cause this?
- Next by Date: Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- Previous by thread: Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- Next by thread: Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- Index(es):
