Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- From: Dan Nagle <dannagle@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 01:24:03 GMT
Hello,
On 2008-06-29 21:07:25 -0400, lindahl@xxxxxxx (Greg Lindahl) said:
But I'm pretty sure you're completely
missing the historical lesson to be learned, while you quibble away.
Suit yourself.
No, I'm making the simple point that
the more general kind mechanism, rather than the simpler
"*N" notation, has the _possibility_ of treating
future hardware. As you say, suit yourself.
And quibble about history as you will.
That is, future kinds will involve more than
a one-dimensional space (size) to be searched.
--
Cheers!
Dan Nagle
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- From: Greg Lindahl
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- References:
- Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- From: Clive Page
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- From: John Appleyard
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- From: Dan Nagle
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- From: Dan Nagle
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- From: Greg Lindahl
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- From: Dan Nagle
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- From: Greg Lindahl
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- From: Dan Nagle
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- From: Greg Lindahl
- Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- Prev by Date: Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- Next by Date: Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- Previous by thread: Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- Next by thread: Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- Index(es):