Re: Fortran bashing in the MATLAB newsgroup
- From: Brian Salter-Duke <b_duke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 06:08:41 GMT
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 05:03:26 +0000 (UTC), Steven G. Kargl <kargl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <4RX9k.15914$IK1.5601@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Brian Salter-Duke <b_duke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
This was true while g77 was the
norm for a free compiler on linux, but of course is less true for
gfortran.
Can you expand on this comment? If g77 compiles a piece of
(standard conforming?) code then gfortran should also compile
the code.
It is the other way round I think. g77 was a F77 compiler and this
forced a lot of scientific code writers to stick with F77. With gfortran
they do not have to, but most in quantum chemistry seem to be doing so.
That is what I was trying to say.
gfortran does very well with F77 programs like GAMESS(US). It gives faster
executables than g77 and most other compilers.
Brian.
--
Brian Salter-Duke Melbourne, Australia
My real address is b_duke(AT)bigpond(DOT)net(DOT)au
Use this for reply or followup
.
- References:
- Fortran bashing in the MATLAB newsgroup
- From: James Tursa
- Re: Fortran bashing in the MATLAB newsgroup
- From: Brian Salter-Duke
- Re: Fortran bashing in the MATLAB newsgroup
- From: Steven G. Kargl
- Fortran bashing in the MATLAB newsgroup
- Prev by Date: Re: Fortran bashing in the MATLAB newsgroup
- Next by Date: Re: Fortran bashing in the MATLAB newsgroup
- Previous by thread: Re: Fortran bashing in the MATLAB newsgroup
- Next by thread: Re: Fortran bashing in the MATLAB newsgroup
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|